Small Platforms, High Return: The Need to Enhance Investment in Small Satellites for Focused Science, Career Development, and Improved Equity
Authors:
James Paul Mason,
Robert G. Begbie,
Maitland Bowen,
Amir Caspi,
Phillip C. Chamberlin,
Amal Chandran,
Ian Cohen,
Edward E. DeLuca,
Alfred G. de Wijn,
Karin Dissauer,
Francis Eparvier,
Rachael Filwett,
Sarah Gibson,
Chris R. Gilly,
Vicki Herde,
George Ho,
George Hospodarsky,
Allison Jaynes,
Andrew R. Jones,
Justin C. Kasper,
Rick Kohnert,
Zoe Lee,
E. I. Mason,
Aimee Merkel,
Rafael Mesquita
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In the next decade, there is an opportunity for very high return on investment of relatively small budgets by elevating the priority of smallsat funding in heliophysics. We've learned in the past decade that these missions perform exceptionally well by traditional metrics, e.g., papers/year/\$M (Spence et al. 2022 -- arXiv:2206.02968). It is also well established that there is a "leaky pipeline" r…
▽ More
In the next decade, there is an opportunity for very high return on investment of relatively small budgets by elevating the priority of smallsat funding in heliophysics. We've learned in the past decade that these missions perform exceptionally well by traditional metrics, e.g., papers/year/\$M (Spence et al. 2022 -- arXiv:2206.02968). It is also well established that there is a "leaky pipeline" resulting in too little diversity in leadership positions (see the National Academies Report at https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/increasing-diversity-in-the-leadership-of-competed-space-missions). Prioritizing smallsat funding would significantly increase the number of opportunities for new leaders to learn -- a crucial patch for the pipeline and an essential phase of career development. At present, however, there are far more proposers than the available funding can support, leading to selection ratios that can be as low as 6% -- in the bottom 0.5th percentile of selection ratios across the history of ROSES. Prioritizing SmallSat funding and substantially increasing that selection ratio are the fundamental recommendations being made by this white paper.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
Re-calibration of the Sunspot Number: Status Report
Authors:
F. Clette,
L. Lefèvre,
T. Chatzistergos,
H. Hayakawa,
V. M. Carrasco,
R. Arlt,
E. W. Cliver,
T. Dudok de Wit,
T. Friedli,
N. Karachik,
G. Kopp,
M. Lockwood,
S. Mathieu,
A. Muñoz-Jaramillo,
M. Owens,
D. Pesnell,
A. Pevtsov,
L. Svalgaard,
I. G. Usoskin,
L. van Driel-Gesztelyi,
J. M. Vaquero
Abstract:
We report progress on the ongoing recalibration of the Wolf sunspot number (SN) and Group sunspot number (GN) following the release of version 2.0 of SN in 2015. This report constitutes both an update of the efforts reported in the 2016 Topical Issue of Solar Physics and a summary of work by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI) International Team formed in 2017 to develop optimal SN an…
▽ More
We report progress on the ongoing recalibration of the Wolf sunspot number (SN) and Group sunspot number (GN) following the release of version 2.0 of SN in 2015. This report constitutes both an update of the efforts reported in the 2016 Topical Issue of Solar Physics and a summary of work by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI) International Team formed in 2017 to develop optimal SN and GN re-construction methods while continuing to expand the historical sunspot number database. Significant progress has been made on the database side while more work is needed to bring the various proposed SN and (primarily) GN reconstruction methods closer to maturity, after which the new reconstructions (or combinations thereof) can be compared with (a) ``benchmark'' expectations for any normalization scheme (e.g., a general increase in observer normalization factors going back in time), and (b) independent proxy data series such as F10.7 and the daily range of variations of Earth's undisturbed magnetic field. New versions of the underlying databases for SN and GN will shortly become available for years through 2022 and we anticipate the release of next versions of these two time series in 2024.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
