-
Comparative studies of the sensitivities of sparse and full geometries of Total-Body PET scanners built from crystals and plastic scintillators
Authors:
Meysam Dadgar,
Szymon Parzych,
Jakub Baran,
Neha Chug,
Catalina Curceanu,
Eryk Czerwiński,
Kamil Dulski,
Kavya Elyan,
Aleksander Gajos,
Beatrix Hiesmayr,
Łukasz Kapłon,
Konrad Klimaszewski,
Paweł Konieczka,
Grzegorz Korcyl,
Tomasz Kozik,
Wojciech Krzemień,
Deepak Kumar,
Szymon Niedźwiecki,
Domonik Panek,
Eleną Perez del Rio,
Lech Raczyński,
Sushil Sharma,
Shivani,
Roman Shopa,
Magdalena Skurzok
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Background: Total-Body imaging offers high sensitivity, single-bed position, and low dose, but high construction costs limit worldwide utilization. This study compares existing and develo** tomographs using plastic scintillators via simulations to propose a cost-efficient Total-Body PET scanner.
Methods: Simulations of eight uEXPLORER tomographs with different scintillator materials, axial fie…
▽ More
Background: Total-Body imaging offers high sensitivity, single-bed position, and low dose, but high construction costs limit worldwide utilization. This study compares existing and develo** tomographs using plastic scintillators via simulations to propose a cost-efficient Total-Body PET scanner.
Methods: Simulations of eight uEXPLORER tomographs with different scintillator materials, axial field-of-view, and detector configuration, and eight J-PET scanners with various field-of-view, plastic scintillator cross-sections, and layers were performed. Biograph Vision was also simulated. Two types of simulations were conducted with a central source and a water-filled phantom.
Results: BGO crystal-based scanners showed the best sensitivity (350 cps/kBq at the center). Sparse geometry or LYSO crystals reduced sensitivity. J-PET design showed similar sensitivity to sparse LYSO detectors, with full body coverage and additional gain for brain imaging.
Conclusion: The J-PET tomography system using plastic scintillators could be a cost-efficient alternative for Total-Body PET scanners, overcoming high construction costs while maintaining sensitivity
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Feasibility of the J-PET to monitor range of therapeutic proton beams
Authors:
Jakub Baran,
Damian Borys,
Karol Brzeziński,
Jan Gajewski,
Michał Silarski,
Neha Chug,
Aurélien Coussat,
Eryk Czerwiński,
Meysam Dadgar,
Kamil Dulski,
Kavya V. Eliyan,
Aleksander Gajos Krzysztof Kacprzak,
Łukasz Kapłon,
Konrad Klimaszewski,
Paweł Konieczka,
Renata Kopeć,
Grzegorz Korcyl,
Tomasz Kozik,
Wojciech Krzemień,
Deepak Kumar,
Antony J. Lomax,
Keegan McNamara,
Szymon Niedźwiecki,
Paweł Olko,
Dominik Panek
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Objective: The aim of this work is to investigate the feasibility of the Jagiellonian Positron Emission Tomography (J-PET) scanner for intra-treatment proton beam range monitoring. Approach: The Monte Carlo simulation studies with GATE and PET image reconstruction with CASToR were performed in order to compare six J-PET scanner geometries (three dual-heads and three cylindrical). We simulated prot…
▽ More
Objective: The aim of this work is to investigate the feasibility of the Jagiellonian Positron Emission Tomography (J-PET) scanner for intra-treatment proton beam range monitoring. Approach: The Monte Carlo simulation studies with GATE and PET image reconstruction with CASToR were performed in order to compare six J-PET scanner geometries (three dual-heads and three cylindrical). We simulated proton irradiation of a PMMA phantom with a Single Pencil Beam (SPB) and Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) of various ranges. The sensitivity and precision of each scanner were calculated, and considering the setup's cost-effectiveness, we indicated potentially optimal geometries for the J-PET scanner prototype dedicated to the proton beam range assessment. Main results: The investigations indicate that the double-layer cylindrical and triple-layer double-head configurations are the most promising for clinical application. We found that the scanner sensitivity is of the order of 10$^{-5}$ coincidences per primary proton, while the precision of the range assessment for both SPB and SOBP irradiation plans was found below 1 mm. Among the scanners with the same number of detector modules, the best results are found for the triple-layer dual-head geometry. Significance: We performed simulation studies demonstrating that the feasibility of the J-PET detector for PET-based proton beam therapy range monitoring is possible with reasonable sensitivity and precision enabling its pre-clinical tests in the clinical proton therapy environment. Considering the sensitivity, precision and cost-effectiveness, the double-layer cylindrical and triple-layer dual-head J-PET geometry configurations seem promising for the future clinical application. Experimental tests are needed to confirm these findings.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
TOF MLEM Adaptation for the Total-Body J-PET with a Realistic Analytical System Response Matrix
Authors:
R. Y. Shopa,
J. Baran,
K. Klimaszewski,
W. Krzemień,
L. Raczyński,
W. Wiślicki,
K. Brzeziński,
N. Chug,
A. Coussat,
C. Curceanu,
E. Czerwiński,
M. Dadgar,
K. Dulski,
J. Gajewski,
A. Gajos,
B. C. Hiesmayr,
E. Kavya Valsan,
G. Korcyl,
T. Kozik,
D. Kumar,
Ł. Kapłon,
G. Moskal,
S. Niedźwiecki,
D. Panek,
S. Parzych
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report a study of the original image reconstruction algorithm based on the time-of-flight maximum likelihood expectation maximisation (TOF MLEM), developed for the total-body (TB) Jagiellonian PET (J-PET) scanners. The method is applicable to generic cylindrical or modular multi-layer layouts and is extendable to multi-photon imaging. The system response matrix (SRM) is represented as a set of…
▽ More
We report a study of the original image reconstruction algorithm based on the time-of-flight maximum likelihood expectation maximisation (TOF MLEM), developed for the total-body (TB) Jagiellonian PET (J-PET) scanners. The method is applicable to generic cylindrical or modular multi-layer layouts and is extendable to multi-photon imaging. The system response matrix (SRM) is represented as a set of analytical functions, uniquely defined for each pair of plastic scintillator strips used for the detection. A realistic resolution model (RM) in detector space is derived from fitting the Monte Carlo simulated emissions and detections of annihilation photons on oblique transverse planes. Additional kernels embedded in SRM account for TOF, parallax effect and axial smearing. The algorithm was tested on datasets, simulated in GATE for the NEMA IEC and static XCAT phantoms inside a 24-module 2-layer TB J-PET. Compared to the reference TOF MLEM with none or a shift-invariant RM, an improvement was observed, as evaluated by the analysis of image quality, difference images and ground truth metrics. We also reconstructed the data with additive contributions, pre-filtered geometrically and with non-TOF scatter correction applied. Despite some deterioration, the obtained results still capitalise on the realistic RM with better edge preservation and superior ground truth metrics. The envisioned prospects of the TOF MLEM with analytical SRM include its application in multi-photon imaging and further upgrade to account for the non-collinearity, positron range and other factors.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2023; v1 submitted 6 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Realistic Total-Body J-PET Geometry Optimization -- Monte Carlo Study
Authors:
Jakub Baran,
Wojciech Krzemien,
Lech Raczyński,
Mateusz Bała,
Aurelien Coussat,
Szymon Parzych,
Neha Chug,
Eryk Czerwiński,
Catalina Oana Curceanu,
Meysam Dadgar,
Kamil Dulski,
Kavya Eliyan,
Jan Gajewski,
Aleksander Gajos,
Beatrix Hiesmayr,
Krzysztof Kacprzak,
Łukasz Kapłon,
Konrad Klimaszewski,
Grzegorz Korcyl,
Tomasz Kozik,
Deepak Kumar,
Szymon Niedźwiecki,
Dominik Panek,
Elena Perez del Rio,
Antoni Ruciński
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Total-Body PET is one of the most promising medical diagnostics modalities. The high sensitivity provided by Total-Body technology can be advantageous for novel tomography methods like positronium imaging. Several efforts are ongoing to lower the price of the TB-PET systems. Among the alternatives, the Jagiellonian PET (J-PET) technology, based on plastic scintillator strips, offers a low-cost alt…
▽ More
Total-Body PET is one of the most promising medical diagnostics modalities. The high sensitivity provided by Total-Body technology can be advantageous for novel tomography methods like positronium imaging. Several efforts are ongoing to lower the price of the TB-PET systems. Among the alternatives, the Jagiellonian PET (J-PET) technology, based on plastic scintillator strips, offers a low-cost alternative. The work aimed to compare five Total-Body J-PET geometries as a possible next generation J-PET scanner design. We present comparative studies of performance characteristics of the cost-effective Total-Body PET scanners using J-PET technology. We investigated in silico five Total-Body scanner geometries. Monte Carlo simulations of the XCAT phantom, the 2-meter sensitivity line source and positronium sensitivity phantoms were performed. We compared the sensitivity profiles for 2-gamma and 3-gamma tomography, relative cost of the setups and performed quantitative analysis of the reconstructed images. The analysis of the reconstructed XCAT images reveals the superiority of the seven-ring scanners over the three-ring setups. However, the three-ring scanners would be approximately 2-3 times cheaper. The peak sensitivity values for two-gamma vary from 20 to 34 cps/kBq. The sensitivity curves for the positronium tomography have a similar shape to the two-gamma sensitivity profiles. The peak values are lower compared to the two-gamma cases, from about 20-28 times, with a maximum of 1.66 cps/kBq. The results show the feasibility of multi-organ imaging of all the systems to be considered for the next generation of TB J-PET designs. The relative cost for all the scanners is about 10-4 times lower compared to the cost of the uExplorer. These properties coupled together with J-PET cost-effectiveness, make the J-PET technology an attractive solution for broad application in clinics.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2024; v1 submitted 5 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
