The CHEPA model: assessing the impact of HEPA filter units in classrooms using a fast-running coupled indoor air quality and dynamic thermal model
Authors:
Henry C. Burridge,
Sen Liu,
Sara Mohamed,
Samuel G. A. Wood,
Cath J. Noakes
Abstract:
The quality of the classroom environment, including ventilation, air quality and thermal conditions, has an important impact on children's health and academic achievements. The use of portable HEPA filter air cleaners is widely suggested as a strategy to mitigate exposure to particulate matter and airborne viruses. However, there is a need to quantify the relative benefits of such devices includin…
▽ More
The quality of the classroom environment, including ventilation, air quality and thermal conditions, has an important impact on children's health and academic achievements. The use of portable HEPA filter air cleaners is widely suggested as a strategy to mitigate exposure to particulate matter and airborne viruses. However, there is a need to quantify the relative benefits of such devices including the impacts on energy use. We present a simple coupled dynamic thermal and air quality model and apply it to naturally ventilated classrooms, representative of modern and Victorian era construction. We consider the addition of HEPA filters with, and without, reduced opening of windows, and explore concentrations of carbon dioxide (\co), \PM, airborne viral RNA, classroom temperature and energy use. Results indicate the addition of HEPA filters was predicted to reduce \PM~ by 40--60\% and viral RNA by 30--50\% depending on the classroom design and window opening behaviour. The energy cost of running HEPA filters is likely to be only 1\%--2\% of the classroom heating costs. In scenarios when HEPA filters were on and window opening was reduced (to account for the additional clean air delivery rate of the filters), the heating cost was predicted to be reduced by as much as -13\%, and these maximum reductions grew to -46\% in wintertime simulations. In these scenarios the HEPA filters result in a notable reduction in \PM~and viral RNA, but the \co\ concentration is significantly higher. The model provides a mechanism for exploring the relative impact of ventilation and air cleaning strategies on both exposures and energy costs, enabling an understanding of where trade-offs lie.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2024; v1 submitted 16 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
Predictive and retrospective modelling of airborne infection risk using monitored carbon dioxide
Authors:
Henry C. Burridge,
Shiwei Fan,
Roderic L. Jones,
Catherine J. Noakes,
P. F. Linden
Abstract:
The risk of long range, herein `airborne', infection needs to be better understood and is especially urgent during the current COVID-19 pandemic. We present a method to determine the relative risk of airborne transmission that can be readily deployed with either modelled or monitored CO$_2$ data and occupancy levels within an indoor space. For spaces regularly, or consistently, occupied by the sam…
▽ More
The risk of long range, herein `airborne', infection needs to be better understood and is especially urgent during the current COVID-19 pandemic. We present a method to determine the relative risk of airborne transmission that can be readily deployed with either modelled or monitored CO$_2$ data and occupancy levels within an indoor space. For spaces regularly, or consistently, occupied by the same group of people, e.g. an open-plan office or a school classroom, we establish protocols to assess the absolute risk of airborne infection of this regular attendance at work or school. We present a methodology to easily calculate the expected number of secondary infections arising from a regular attendee becoming infectious and remaining pre/asymptomatic within these spaces. We demonstrate our model by calculating risks for both a modelled open-plan office and by using monitored data recorded within a small naturally ventilated office. In addition, by inferring ventilation rates from monitored CO$_2$ we show that estimates of airborne infection can be accurately reconstructed; thereby offering scope for more informed retrospective modelling should outbreaks occur in spaces where CO$_2$ is monitored. Our modelling suggests that regular attendance at an office for work is unlikely to significantly contribute to the pandemic but only if relatively quiet desk-based work is carried out in the presence of adequate ventilation (i.e. at least 10\,l/s/p following UK guidance), appropriate hygiene controls, distancing measures, and that all commuting presents minimal infection risk. Crucially, modelling even moderate changes to the conditions within the office, or basing estimates for the infectivity of the SARS-CoV-2 variant B1.1.7 current data, typically results in the prediction that for a single infector within the office the airborne route alone gives rises to more than one secondary infection.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2021; v1 submitted 7 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
