Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Mrenna, S

Variance Reduction via Simultaneous Importance Sampling and Control Variates Techniques Using Vegas

Authors: Prasanth Shyamsundar, Jacob L. Scott, Stephen Mrenna, Konstantin T. Matchev, Kyoungchul Kong

Abstract: Monte Carlo (MC) integration is an important calculational technique in the physical sciences. Practical considerations require that the calculations are performed as accurately as possible for a given set of computational resources. To improve the accuracy of MC integration, a number of useful variance reduction algorithms have been developed, including importance sampling and control variates. I… ▽ More Monte Carlo (MC) integration is an important calculational technique in the physical sciences. Practical considerations require that the calculations are performed as accurately as possible for a given set of computational resources. To improve the accuracy of MC integration, a number of useful variance reduction algorithms have been developed, including importance sampling and control variates. In this work, we demonstrate how these two methods can be applied simultaneously, thus combining their benefits. We provide a python wrapper, named CoVVVR, which implements our approach in the Vegas program. The improvements are quantified with several benchmark examples from the literature. △ Less

Submitted 24 January, 2024; v1 submitted 19 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: 20 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables

HL-LHC Computing Review Stage-2, Common Software Projects: Event Generators

Authors: The HSF Physics Event Generator WG, :, Efe Yazgan, Josh McFayden, Andrea Valassi, Simone Amoroso, Enrico Bothmann, Andy Buckley, John Campbell, Gurpreet Singh Chahal, Taylor Childers, Gloria Corti, Rikkert Frederix, Stefano Frixione, Francesco Giuli, Alexander Grohsjean, Stefan Hoeche, Phil Ilten, Frank Krauss, Michal Kreps, David Lange, Leif Lonnblad, Zach Marshall, Olivier Mattelaer, Stephen Mrenna , et al. (14 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This paper has been prepared by the HEP Software Foundation (HSF) Physics Event Generator Working Group (WG), as an input to the second phase of the LHCC review of High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) computing, which is due to take place in November 2021. It complements previous documents prepared by the WG in the context of the first phase of the LHCC review in 2020, including in particular the WG paper… ▽ More This paper has been prepared by the HEP Software Foundation (HSF) Physics Event Generator Working Group (WG), as an input to the second phase of the LHCC review of High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) computing, which is due to take place in November 2021. It complements previous documents prepared by the WG in the context of the first phase of the LHCC review in 2020, including in particular the WG paper on the specific challenges in Monte Carlo event generator software for HL-LHC, which has since been updated and published, and which we are also submitting to the November 2021 review as an integral part of our contribution. △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: 34 pages; editors Efe Yazgan, Josh McFayden and Andrea Valassi

BROOD: Bilevel and Robust Optimization and Outlier Detection for Efficient Tuning of High-Energy Physics Event Generators

Authors: Wen**g Wang, Mohan Krishnamoorthy, Juliane Muller, Stephen Mrenna, Holger Schulz, Xiangyang Ju, Sven Leyffer, Zachary Marshall

Abstract: The parameters in Monte Carlo (MC) event generators are tuned on experimental measurements by evaluating the goodness of fit between the data and the MC predictions. The relative importance of each measurement is adjusted manually in an often time-consuming, iterative process to meet different experimental needs. In this work, we introduce several optimization formulations and algorithms with new… ▽ More The parameters in Monte Carlo (MC) event generators are tuned on experimental measurements by evaluating the goodness of fit between the data and the MC predictions. The relative importance of each measurement is adjusted manually in an often time-consuming, iterative process to meet different experimental needs. In this work, we introduce several optimization formulations and algorithms with new decision criteria for streamlining and automating this process. These algorithms are designed for two formulations: bilevel optimization and robust optimization. Both formulations are applied to the datasets used in the ATLAS A14 tune and to the dedicated hadronization datasets generated by the sherpa generator, respectively. The corresponding tuned generator parameters are compared using three metrics. We compare the quality of our automatic tunes to the published ATLAS A14 tune. Moreover, we analyze the impact of a pre-processing step that excludes data that cannot be described by the physics models used in the MC event generators. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2021; v1 submitted 9 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: 87 pages, Submission to SciPost

Apprentice for Event Generator Tuning

Authors: Mohan Krishnamoorthy, Holger Schulz, Xiangyang Ju, Wen**g Wang, Sven Leyffer, Zachary Marshall, Stephen Mrenna, Juliane Muller, James B. Kowalkowski

Abstract: Apprentice is a tool developed for event generator tuning. It contains a range of conceptual improvements and extensions over the tuning tool Professor. Its core functionality remains the construction of a multivariate analytic surrogate model to computationally expensive Monte-Carlo event generator predictions. The surrogate model is used for numerical optimization in chi-square minimization and… ▽ More Apprentice is a tool developed for event generator tuning. It contains a range of conceptual improvements and extensions over the tuning tool Professor. Its core functionality remains the construction of a multivariate analytic surrogate model to computationally expensive Monte-Carlo event generator predictions. The surrogate model is used for numerical optimization in chi-square minimization and likelihood evaluation. Apprentice also introduces algorithms to automate the selection of observable weights to minimize the effect of mis-modeling in the event generators. We illustrate our improvements for the task of MC-generator tuning and limit setting. △ Less

Submitted 9 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: 9 pages, 2 figures, submitted to the 25th International Conference on Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics

HL-LHC Computing Review: Common Tools and Community Software

Authors: HEP Software Foundation, :, Thea Aarrestad, Simone Amoroso, Markus Julian Atkinson, Joshua Bendavid, Tommaso Boccali, Andrea Bocci, Andy Buckley, Matteo Cacciari, Paolo Calafiura, Philippe Canal, Federico Carminati, Taylor Childers, Vitaliano Ciulli, Gloria Corti, Davide Costanzo, Justin Gage Dezoort, Caterina Doglioni, Javier Mauricio Duarte, Agnieszka Dziurda, Peter Elmer, Markus Elsing, V. Daniel Elvira, Giulio Eulisse , et al. (85 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Common and community software packages, such as ROOT, Geant4 and event generators have been a key part of the LHC's success so far and continued development and optimisation will be critical in the future. The challenges are driven by an ambitious physics programme, notably the LHC accelerator upgrade to high-luminosity, HL-LHC, and the corresponding detector upgrades of ATLAS and CMS. In this doc… ▽ More Common and community software packages, such as ROOT, Geant4 and event generators have been a key part of the LHC's success so far and continued development and optimisation will be critical in the future. The challenges are driven by an ambitious physics programme, notably the LHC accelerator upgrade to high-luminosity, HL-LHC, and the corresponding detector upgrades of ATLAS and CMS. In this document we address the issues for software that is used in multiple experiments (usually even more widely than ATLAS and CMS) and maintained by teams of developers who are either not linked to a particular experiment or who contribute to common software within the context of their experiment activity. We also give space to general considerations for future software and projects that tackle upcoming challenges, no matter who writes it, which is an area where community convergence on best practice is extremely useful. △ Less

Submitted 31 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Comments: 40 pages contribution to Snowmass 2021

Report number: HSF-DOC-2020-01

Challenges in Monte Carlo event generator software for High-Luminosity LHC

Authors: The HSF Physics Event Generator WG, :, Andrea Valassi, Efe Yazgan, Josh McFayden, Simone Amoroso, Joshua Bendavid, Andy Buckley, Matteo Cacciari, Taylor Childers, Vitaliano Ciulli, Rikkert Frederix, Stefano Frixione, Francesco Giuli, Alexander Grohsjean, Christian Gütschow, Stefan Höche, Walter Hopkins, Philip Ilten, Dmitri Konstantinov, Frank Krauss, Qiang Li, Leif Lönnblad, Fabio Maltoni, Michelangelo Mangano , et al. (16 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We review the main software and computing challenges for the Monte Carlo physics event generators used by the LHC experiments, in view of the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) physics programme. This paper has been prepared by the HEP Software Foundation (HSF) Physics Event Generator Working Group as an input to the LHCC review of HL-LHC computing, which has started in May 2020. We review the main software and computing challenges for the Monte Carlo physics event generators used by the LHC experiments, in view of the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) physics programme. This paper has been prepared by the HEP Software Foundation (HSF) Physics Event Generator Working Group as an input to the LHCC review of HL-LHC computing, which has started in May 2020. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2021; v1 submitted 28 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: 20 pages; editors Andrea Valassi, Efe Yazgan and Josh McFayden; addressed additional comments by journal reviewers

Report number: CERN-LPCC-2020-002; FERMILAB-PUB-20-183-SCD-T; MCNET-20-15

Journal ref: Comput Softw Big Sci 5, 12 (2021)

Multivariate Rational Approximation

Authors: Anthony P. Austin, Mohan Krishnamoorthy, Sven Leyffer, Stephen Mrenna, Juliane Muller, Holger Schulz

Abstract: We present two approaches for computing rational approximations to multivariate functions, motivated by their effectiveness as surrogate models for high-energy physics (HEP) applications. Our first approach builds on the Stieltjes process to efficiently and robustly compute the coefficients of the rational approximation. Our second approach is based on an optimization formulation that allows us to… ▽ More We present two approaches for computing rational approximations to multivariate functions, motivated by their effectiveness as surrogate models for high-energy physics (HEP) applications. Our first approach builds on the Stieltjes process to efficiently and robustly compute the coefficients of the rational approximation. Our second approach is based on an optimization formulation that allows us to include structural constraints on the rational approximation, resulting in a semi-infinite optimization problem that we solve using an outer approximation approach. We present results for synthetic and real-life HEP data, and we compare the approximation quality of our approaches with that of traditional polynomial approximations. △ Less

Submitted 2 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

MSC Class: 2010 MSC: 41A20; 41A63; 65D15

Response to NITRD, NCO, NSF Request for Information on "Update to the 2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan"

Authors: J. Amundson, J. Annis, C. Avestruz, D. Bowring, J. Caldeira, G. Cerati, C. Chang, S. Dodelson, D. Elvira, A. Farahi, K. Genser, L. Gray, O. Gutsche, P. Harris, J. Kinney, J. B. Kowalkowski, R. Kutschke, S. Mrenna, B. Nord, A. Para, K. Pedro, G. N. Perdue, A. Scheinker, P. Spentzouris, J. St. John , et al. (5 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We present a response to the 2018 Request for Information (RFI) from the NITRD, NCO, NSF regarding the "Update to the 2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan." Through this document, we provide a response to the question of whether and how the National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan (NAIRDSP) should be updated from the perspect… ▽ More We present a response to the 2018 Request for Information (RFI) from the NITRD, NCO, NSF regarding the "Update to the 2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan." Through this document, we provide a response to the question of whether and how the National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan (NAIRDSP) should be updated from the perspective of Fermilab, America's premier national laboratory for High Energy Physics (HEP). We believe the NAIRDSP should be extended in light of the rapid pace of development and innovation in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) since 2016, and present our recommendations below. AI has profoundly impacted many areas of human life, promising to dramatically reshape society --- e.g., economy, education, science --- in the coming years. We are still early in this process. It is critical to invest now in this technology to ensure it is safe and deployed ethically. Science and society both have a strong need for accuracy, efficiency, transparency, and accountability in algorithms, making investments in scientific AI particularly valuable. Thus far the US has been a leader in AI technologies, and we believe as a national Laboratory it is crucial to help maintain and extend this leadership. Moreover, investments in AI will be important for maintaining US leadership in the physical sciences. △ Less

Submitted 4 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Report number: FERMILAB-FN-1092-SCD

Bard: Interpreting New Frontier Energy Collider Physics

Authors: Bruce Knuteson, Stephen Mrenna

Abstract: No systematic procedure currently exists for inferring the underlying physics from discrepancies observed in high energy collider data. We present Bard, an algorithm designed to facilitate the process of model construction at the energy frontier. Top-down scans of model parameter space are discarded in favor of bottom-up diagrammatic explanations of particular discrepancies, an explanation space… ▽ More No systematic procedure currently exists for inferring the underlying physics from discrepancies observed in high energy collider data. We present Bard, an algorithm designed to facilitate the process of model construction at the energy frontier. Top-down scans of model parameter space are discarded in favor of bottom-up diagrammatic explanations of particular discrepancies, an explanation space that can be exhaustively searched and conveniently tested with existing analysis tools. △ Less

Submitted 11 February, 2006; originally announced February 2006.

Comments: 3 pages, 2 figures