-
Planetary Exploration Horizon 2061 Report Chapter 5: Enabling technologies for planetary exploration
Authors:
Manuel Grande,
Linli Guo,
Michel Blanc,
Advenit Makaya,
Sami Asmar,
David Atkinson,
Anne Bourdon,
Pascal Chabert,
Steve Chien,
John Day,
Alberto G. Fairen,
Anthony Freeman,
Antonio Genova,
Alain Herique,
Wlodek Kofman,
Joseph Lazio,
Olivier Mousis,
Gian Gabriele Ori,
Victor Parro,
Robert Preston,
Jose A Rodriguez-Manfredi,
Veerle Sterken,
Keith Stephenson,
Joshua Vander Hook,
Hunter Waite
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The main objective of this chapter is to present an overview of the different areas of key technologies that will be needed to fly the technically most challenging of the representative missions identified in chapter 4 (the Pillar 2 Horizon 2061 report). It starts with a description of the future scientific instruments which will address the key questions of Horizon 2061 described in chapter 3 (th…
▽ More
The main objective of this chapter is to present an overview of the different areas of key technologies that will be needed to fly the technically most challenging of the representative missions identified in chapter 4 (the Pillar 2 Horizon 2061 report). It starts with a description of the future scientific instruments which will address the key questions of Horizon 2061 described in chapter 3 (the Pillar 1 Horizon 2061 report) and the new technologies that the next generations of space instruments will require (section 2). From there, the chapter follows the line of logical development and implementation of a planetary mission: section 3 describes some of the novel mission architectures that will be needed and how they will articulate interplanetary spacecraft and science platforms; section 4 summarizes the system-level technologies needed: power, propulsion, navigation, communication, advanced autonomy on board planetary spacecraft; section 5 describes the diversity of specialized science platforms that will be needed to survive, operate and return scientific data from the extreme environments that future missions will target; section 6 describes the new technology developments that will be needed for long-duration missions and semi-permanent settlements; finally, section 7 attempts to anticipate on the disruptive technologies that should emerge and progressively prevail in the decades to come to meet the long-term needs of future planetary missions.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Planetary Exploration Horizon 2061 Report, Chapter 3: From science questions to Solar System exploration
Authors:
Véronique Dehant,
Michel Blanc,
Steve Mackwell,
Krista M. Soderlund,
Pierre Beck,
Emma Bunce,
Sébastien Charnoz,
Bernard Foing,
Valerio Filice,
Leigh N. Fletcher,
François Forget,
Léa Griton,
Heidi Hammel,
Dennis Höning,
Takeshi Imamura,
Caitriona Jackman,
Yohai Kaspi,
Oleg Korablev,
Jérémy Leconte,
Emmanuel Lellouch,
Bernard Marty,
Nicolas Mangold,
Patrick Michel,
Alessandro Morbidelli,
Olivier Mousis
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This chapter of the Planetary Exploration Horizon 2061 Report reviews the way the six key questions about planetary systems, from their origins to the way they work and their habitability, identified in chapter 1, can be addressed by means of solar system exploration, and how one can find partial answers to these six questions by flying to the different provinces to the solar system: terrestrial p…
▽ More
This chapter of the Planetary Exploration Horizon 2061 Report reviews the way the six key questions about planetary systems, from their origins to the way they work and their habitability, identified in chapter 1, can be addressed by means of solar system exploration, and how one can find partial answers to these six questions by flying to the different provinces to the solar system: terrestrial planets, giant planets, small bodies, and up to its interface with the local interstellar medium. It derives from this analysis a synthetic description of the most important space observations to be performed at the different solar system objects by future planetary exploration missions. These observation requirements illustrate the diversity of measurement techniques to be used as well as the diversity of destinations where these observations must be made. They constitute the base for the identification of the future planetary missions we need to fly by 2061, which are described in chapter 4. Q1- How well do we understand the diversity of planetary systems objects? Q2- How well do we understand the diversity of planetary system architectures? Q3- What are the origins and formation scenarios for planetary systems? Q4- How do planetary systems work? Q5- Do planetary systems host potential habitats? Q6- Where and how to search for life?
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Exogenic origin for the volatiles sampled by the Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite impact
Authors:
Kathleen E Mandt,
Olivier Mousis,
Dana Hurley,
Alexis Bouquet,
Kurt Retherford,
Lizeth Magana,
Adrienn Luspay-Kuti
Abstract:
Returning humans to the Moon presents an unprecedented opportunity to determine the origin of volatiles stored in the permanently shaded regions (PSRs), which trace the history of lunar volcanic activity, solar wind surface chemistry, and volatile delivery to the Earth and Moon through impacts of comets, asteroids, and micrometeoroids. So far, the source of the volatiles sampled by the Lunar Crate…
▽ More
Returning humans to the Moon presents an unprecedented opportunity to determine the origin of volatiles stored in the permanently shaded regions (PSRs), which trace the history of lunar volcanic activity, solar wind surface chemistry, and volatile delivery to the Earth and Moon through impacts of comets, asteroids, and micrometeoroids. So far, the source of the volatiles sampled by the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) plume has remained undetermined. We show here that the source could not be volcanic outgassing and the composition is best explained by cometary impacts. Ruling out a volcanic source means that volatiles in the top 1-3 meters of the Cabeus PSR regolith may be younger than the latest volcanic outgassing event (~1 billion years ago; Gya).
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2022; v1 submitted 1 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
The nature and composition of Jupiter's building blocks derived from the water abundance measurements by the Juno spacecraft
Authors:
Olivier Mousis,
Jonathan I. Lunine,
Artyom Aguichine
Abstract:
The microwave radiometer aboard the Juno spacecraft provided a measurement of the water abundance found to range between 1 and 5.1 times the protosolar abundance of oxygen in the near-equatorial region of Jupiter. Here, we aim to combine this up-to-date oxygen determination, which is likely to be more representative of the bulk abundance than the Galileo probe subsolar value, with the other known…
▽ More
The microwave radiometer aboard the Juno spacecraft provided a measurement of the water abundance found to range between 1 and 5.1 times the protosolar abundance of oxygen in the near-equatorial region of Jupiter. Here, we aim to combine this up-to-date oxygen determination, which is likely to be more representative of the bulk abundance than the Galileo probe subsolar value, with the other known measurements of elemental abundances in Jupiter, to derive the formation conditions and initial composition of the building blocks agglomerated by the growing planet, and that determine the heavy element composition of its envelope. We investigate several cases of icy solids formation in the protosolar nebula, from the condensation of pure ices to the crystallization of mixtures of pure condensates and clathrates in various proportions. Each of these cases correspond to a distinct solid composition whose amount is adjusted in the envelope of Jupiter to match the O abundance measured by Juno. The volatile enrichments can be matched by a wide range of planetesimal compositions, from solids exclusively formed from pure condensates or from nearly exclusively clathrates, the latter case providing a slightly better fit. The total mass of volatiles needed in the envelope of Jupiter to match the observed enrichments is within the 4.3-39 Mearth range, depending on the crystallization scenario considered in the protosolar nebula. A wide range of masses of heavy elements derived from our fits is found compatible with the envelope's metallicity calculated from current interior models.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Cold traps of hypervolatiles in the protosolar nebula at the origin of comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS)'s peculiar composition
Authors:
Olivier Mousis,
Artyom Aguichine,
Alexis Bouquet,
Jonathan I. Lunine,
Grégoire Danger,
Kathleen E. Mandt,
Adrienn Luspay-Kuti
Abstract:
Recent observations of the long period comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS) indicate an unusually high N2/CO abundance ratio, typically larger than 0.05, and at least 2-3 times higher than the one measured in 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Another striking compositional feature of this comet is its heavy depletion in H2O, compared to other comets. Here, we investigate the formation circumstances of a generic c…
▽ More
Recent observations of the long period comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS) indicate an unusually high N2/CO abundance ratio, typically larger than 0.05, and at least 2-3 times higher than the one measured in 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Another striking compositional feature of this comet is its heavy depletion in H2O, compared to other comets. Here, we investigate the formation circumstances of a generic comet whose composition reproduces these two key features. We first envisage the possibility that this comet agglomerated from clathrates, but we find that such a scenario does not explain the observed low water abundance. We then alternatively investigate the possibility that the building blocks of the comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS) agglomerated from grains and pebbles made of pure condensates via the use of a disk model describing the radial transport of volatiles. We show that N2/CO ratios reproducing the value estimated in this comet can be found in grains condensed in the vicinity of the CO and N2 icelines. Moreover, high CO/H2O ratios (>100 times the initial gas phase value) can be found in grains condensed in the vicinity of the CO iceline. If the building blocks of a comet assembled from such grains, they should present N2/CO and CO/H2O ratios consistent with the measurements made in comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS)'s coma. Our scenario indicates that comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS) formed in a colder environment than the other comets that share more usual compositions. Our model also explains the unusual composition of the interstellar comet 2l/Borisov.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
A Possible Carbon-rich Interior in Super-Earth 55 Cancri e
Authors:
Nikku Madhusudhan,
Kanani K. M. Lee,
Olivier Mousis
Abstract:
Terrestrial planets in the solar system, such as the Earth, are oxygen-rich, with silicates and iron being the most common minerals in their interiors. However, the true chemical diversity of rocky planets orbiting other stars is yet unknown. Mass and radius measurements are used to constrain the interior compositions of super-Earths (exoplanets with masses of 1 - 10 Earth masses), and are typical…
▽ More
Terrestrial planets in the solar system, such as the Earth, are oxygen-rich, with silicates and iron being the most common minerals in their interiors. However, the true chemical diversity of rocky planets orbiting other stars is yet unknown. Mass and radius measurements are used to constrain the interior compositions of super-Earths (exoplanets with masses of 1 - 10 Earth masses), and are typically interpreted with planetary interior models that assume Earth-centric oxygen-rich compositions. Using such models, the super-Earth 55 Cancri e (mass of 8 Earth masses, radius of 2 Earth radii) has been suggested to bear an interior composition consisting of Fe, silicates, and an envelope (>= 10% by mass) of super-critical water. We report that the mass and radius of 55 Cancri e can also be explained by a carbon-rich solid interior made of Fe, C, SiC, and/or silicates and without a volatile envelope. While the data allow Fe mass fractions of up to 40%, a wide range of C, SiC and/or silicate mass fractions are possible. A carbon-rich 55 Cancri e is also plausible if its protoplanetary disk bore the same composition as its host star, which has been reported to be carbon-rich. However, more precise estimates of the stellar elemental abundances and observations of the planetary atmosphere are required to further constrain its interior composition. The possibility of a C-rich interior in 55 Cancri e opens a new regime of geochemistry and geophysics in extraterrestrial rocky planets, compared to terrestrial planets in the solar system.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2012;
originally announced October 2012.
