-
The Next Generation Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration: History, Philosophy, and Culture
Authors:
Peter Galison,
Juliusz Doboszewski,
Jamee Elder,
Niels C. M. Martens,
Abhay Ashtekar,
Jonas Enander,
Marie Gueguen,
Elizabeth A. Kessler,
Roberto Lalli,
Martin Lesourd,
Alexandru Marcoci,
Sebastián Murgueitio Ramírez,
Priyamvada Natarajan,
James Nguyen,
Luis Reyes-Galindo,
Sophie Ritson,
Mike D. Schneider,
Emilie Skulberg,
Helene Sorgner,
Matthew Stanley,
Ann C. Thresher,
Jeroen Van Dongen,
James Owen Weatherall,
**gyi Wu,
Adrian Wüthrich
Abstract:
This white paper outlines the plans of the History Philosophy Culture Working Group of the Next Generation Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.
This white paper outlines the plans of the History Philosophy Culture Working Group of the Next Generation Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Is the Observable Universe Consistent with the Cosmological Principle?
Authors:
Pavan Kumar Aluri,
Paolo Cea,
Pravabati Chingangbam,
Ming-Chung Chu,
Roger G. Clowes,
Damien Hutsemékers,
Joby P. Kochappan,
Alexia M. Lopez,
Lang Liu,
Niels C. M. Martens,
C. J. A. P. Martins,
Konstantinos Migkas,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Pratyush Pranav,
Lior Shamir,
Ashok K. Singal,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,
Jenny Wagner,
Shao-Jiang Wang,
David L. Wiltshire,
Shek Yeung,
Lu Yin,
Wen Zhao
Abstract:
The Cosmological Principle (CP) -- the notion that the Universe is spatially isotropic and homogeneous on large scales -- underlies a century of progress in cosmology. It is conventionally formulated through the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) cosmologies as the spacetime metric, and culminates in the successful and highly predictive $Λ$-Cold-Dark-Matter ($Λ$CDM) model. Yet, tensions ha…
▽ More
The Cosmological Principle (CP) -- the notion that the Universe is spatially isotropic and homogeneous on large scales -- underlies a century of progress in cosmology. It is conventionally formulated through the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) cosmologies as the spacetime metric, and culminates in the successful and highly predictive $Λ$-Cold-Dark-Matter ($Λ$CDM) model. Yet, tensions have emerged within the $Λ$CDM model, most notably a statistically significant discrepancy in the value of the Hubble constant, $H_0$. Since the notion of cosmic expansion determined by a single parameter is intimately tied to the CP, implications of the $H_0$ tension may extend beyond $Λ$CDM to the CP itself. This review surveys current observational hints for deviations from the expectations of the CP, highlighting synergies and disagreements that warrant further study. Setting aside the debate about individual large structures, potential deviations from the CP include variations of cosmological parameters on the sky, discrepancies in the cosmic dipoles, and mysterious alignments in quasar polarizations and galaxy spins. While it is possible that a host of observational systematics are impacting results, it is equally plausible that precision cosmology may have outgrown the FLRW paradigm, an extremely pragmatic but non-fundamental symmetry assumption.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2023; v1 submitted 12 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Integrating Dark Matter, Modified Gravity, and the Humanities
Authors:
Niels C. M. Martens,
Miguel Ángel Carretero Sahuquillo,
Erhard Scholz,
Dennis Lehmkuhl,
Michael Krämer
Abstract:
Editorial of a special issue on dark matter & modified gravity, distributed across the journals Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Published version of the open access editorial (in SHPS) available here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.08.015. The six papers are collected here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/studies-in-…
▽ More
Editorial of a special issue on dark matter & modified gravity, distributed across the journals Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Published version of the open access editorial (in SHPS) available here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.08.015. The six papers are collected here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/studies-in-history-and-philosophy-of-science-part-b-studies-in-history-and-philosophy-of-modern-physics/special-issue/10CR71RJLWM.
△ Less
Submitted 23 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Dark Matter Realism
Authors:
Niels C. M. Martens
Abstract:
According to the standard model of cosmology, LambdaCDM, the mass-energy budget of the current stage of the universe is not dominated by the luminous matter that we are familiar with, but instead by some form of dark matter (and dark energy). It is thus tempting to adopt scientific realism about dark matter. However, there are barely any constraints on the myriad of possible properties of this ent…
▽ More
According to the standard model of cosmology, LambdaCDM, the mass-energy budget of the current stage of the universe is not dominated by the luminous matter that we are familiar with, but instead by some form of dark matter (and dark energy). It is thus tempting to adopt scientific realism about dark matter. However, there are barely any constraints on the myriad of possible properties of this entity -- it is not even certain that it is a form of matter. In light of this underdetermination I advocate caution: we should not (yet) be dark matter realists. The "not(-yet)-realism" that I have in mind is different from Hacking's (1989) anti-realism, in that it is semantic rather than epistemological. It also differs from the semantic anti-realism of logical empiricism, in that it is naturalistic, such that it may only be temporary and does not automatically apply to all other unobservables (or even just to all other astronomical unobservables, as with Hacking's anti-realism). The argument is illustrated with the analogy of the much longer history of the concept of a gene, as the current state of the concept of dark matter resembles in some relevant ways that of the early concept of genes.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Cartography of the space of theories: an interpretational chart for fields that are both (dark) matter and spacetime
Authors:
Niels C. M. Martens,
Dennis Lehmkuhl
Abstract:
This paper pushes back against the Democritean-Newtonian tradition of assuming a strict conceptual dichotomy between spacetime and matter. Our approach proceeds via the more narrow distinction between modified gravity/spacetime (MG) and dark matter (DM). A prequel paper argued that the novel field $Φ$ postulated by Berezhiani and Khoury's 'superfluid dark matter theory' is as much (dark) matter as…
▽ More
This paper pushes back against the Democritean-Newtonian tradition of assuming a strict conceptual dichotomy between spacetime and matter. Our approach proceeds via the more narrow distinction between modified gravity/spacetime (MG) and dark matter (DM). A prequel paper argued that the novel field $Φ$ postulated by Berezhiani and Khoury's 'superfluid dark matter theory' is as much (dark) matter as anything could possibly be, but also$-$below the critical temperature for superfluidity$-$as much (of a modification of) spacetime as anything could possibly be. Here we introduce and critically evaluate three groups of interpretations that one should consider for such Janus-faced theories. The consubstantiality interpretation holds that $Φ$ is both (dark) matter and a modification of spacetime, analogously to the sense in which Jesus (according to catholicism) is both human and god. The fundamendalist interpretations consider for each of these roles whether they are instantiated fundamentally or emergently. The breakdown interpretations focus on the question of whether $Φ$ signals the breakdown, in some sense to be specified, of the MG-DM dichotomy and perhaps even the broader spacetime-matter distinction. More generally, it is argued that hybrid theories urge a move towards a single space of theories, rather than two separate spaces of spacetime theories and matter theories, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 8 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Dark Matter = Modified Gravity? Scrutinising the spacetime-matter distinction through the modified gravity/ dark matter lens
Authors:
Niels C. M. Martens,
Dennis Lehmkuhl
Abstract:
This paper scrutinises the tenability of a strict conceptual distinction between space(time) and matter via the lens of the debate between modified gravity and dark matter. In particular, we consider Berezhiani and Khoury's novel 'superfluid dark matter theory' (SFDM) as a case study. Two families of criteria for being matter and being spacetime, respectively, are extracted from the literature. Ev…
▽ More
This paper scrutinises the tenability of a strict conceptual distinction between space(time) and matter via the lens of the debate between modified gravity and dark matter. In particular, we consider Berezhiani and Khoury's novel 'superfluid dark matter theory' (SFDM) as a case study. Two families of criteria for being matter and being spacetime, respectively, are extracted from the literature. Evaluation of the new scalar field postulated by SFDM according to these criteria reveals that it is as much (dark) matter as anything could possibly be, but also$-$below the critical temperature for superfluidity$-$as much (of a modification of) spacetime as anything could possibly be. A sequel paper examines possible interpretations of SFDM in light of this result, as well as the consequences for our understanding of (the importance of) the modified gravity/ dark matter distinction and the broader spacetime-matter distinction.
△ Less
Submitted 8 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
