-
Impacting the dayside Martian ionosphere from above and below: Effects of the impact of CIRs and ICMEs close to aphelion (April 2021) and during dust storms (June-July 2022) seen with MAVEN ROSE
Authors:
Marianna Felici,
Jennifer Segale,
Paul Withers,
Christina O. Lee,
Andrea Hughes,
Ed Thiemann,
Steve Bougher,
Candace Grey,
Shannon Curry
Abstract:
We use 62 electron density profiles collected by the Radio Occultation Science Experiment (ROSE), on MAVEN, when Mars was hit by CIRs and ICMEs close to aphelion (April 2021) and during two dust storms (June-July 2022) to examine the response of the Martian ionosphere to solar events and to solar events hitting during dust storms. We do so through three proxies - variation in total electron conten…
▽ More
We use 62 electron density profiles collected by the Radio Occultation Science Experiment (ROSE), on MAVEN, when Mars was hit by CIRs and ICMEs close to aphelion (April 2021) and during two dust storms (June-July 2022) to examine the response of the Martian ionosphere to solar events and to solar events hitting during dust storms. We do so through three proxies - variation in total electron content between 80 and 300 km altitude, peak density, and peak altitude - of the aforementioned 62 ROSE electron density profiles, relative to a characterisation of the ionosphere through solar minimum leading to solar maximum, specific to local time sector and season, presented in Segale et al., (COMPANION). We observe an increased Total Electron Content (TEC) between 80 and 300 km altitude up to 2.5 x 10(15) m(-2) in April 2021 and up to 5 x 10(15) m(-2) in June-July 2022 compared to the baseline photochemically produced ionosphere. This increase in TEC corresponds mainly to increases in the solar energetic particles flux (detected by MAVEN SEP) and electron fluxes (detected by MAVEN SWEA). In addition to solar events, in June-July 2022, an A storm and a B storm were occurring and merging on the surface of Mars. We observe a raise in peak altitude in general lower than expected during dust storms, possibly due to high values of solar wind dynamic pressure (derived from MAVEN SWIA). From 31 ROSE profiles collected in this time period that showed both the M2 and M1 layer, we observe that, on average, M1 and M2 peak altitudes raise the same amount, suggesting that the thermosphere might loft as a unit during dust storms. During this time period, several proton aurora events of variable brightness were detected with MAVEN IUVS underlining the complex and multifaceted impact of dust activity and extreme solar activity on the Martian ionosphere.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Improved modelling of SEP event onset within the WSA-Enlil-SEPMOD framework
Authors:
Erika Palmerio,
Janet G. Luhmann,
M. Leila Mays,
Ronald M. Caplan,
David Lario,
Ian G. Richardson,
Kathryn Whitman,
Christina O. Lee,
Beatriz Sánchez-Cano,
Nicolas Wijsen,
Yan Li,
Carlota Cardoso,
Marco Pinto,
Daniel Heyner,
Daniel Schmid,
Hans-Ulrich Auster,
David Fischer
Abstract:
Multi-spacecraft observations of solar energetic particle (SEP) events not only enable a deeper understanding and development of particle acceleration and transport theories, but also provide important constraints for model validation efforts. However, because of computational limitations, a given physics-based SEP model is usually best-suited to capture a particular phase of an SEP event, rather…
▽ More
Multi-spacecraft observations of solar energetic particle (SEP) events not only enable a deeper understanding and development of particle acceleration and transport theories, but also provide important constraints for model validation efforts. However, because of computational limitations, a given physics-based SEP model is usually best-suited to capture a particular phase of an SEP event, rather than its whole development from onset through decay. For example, magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models of the heliosphere often incorporate solar transients only at the outer boundary of their so-called coronal domain -- usually set at a heliocentric distance of 20-30 $R_{\odot}$. This means that particle acceleration at CME-driven shocks is also computed from this boundary onwards, leading to simulated SEP event onsets that can be many hours later than observed, since shock waves can form much lower in the solar corona. In this work, we aim to improve the modelled onset of SEP events by inserting a "fixed source" of particle injection at the outer boundary of the coronal domain of the coupled WSA-Enlil 3D MHD model of the heliosphere. The SEP model that we employ for this effort is SEPMOD, a physics-based test-particle code based on a field line tracer and adiabatic invariant conservation. We apply our initial tests and results of SEPMOD's fixed-source option to the 2021 October 9 SEP event, which was detected at five well-separated locations in the inner heliosphere -- Parker Solar Probe, STEREO-A, Solar Orbiter, BepiColombo, and near-Earth spacecraft.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Jovian electrons in the inner heliosphere: Opportunities for Multi-spacecraft Observations and Modeling
Authors:
R. D. Strauss,
N. Dresing,
N. E. Engelbrecht,
J. G. Mitchell,
P. Kühl,
S. Jensen,
S. Fleth,
B. Sánchez-Cano,
A. Posner,
J. S Rankin,
C. O. Lee,
J. P. van den Berg,
S. E. S. Ferreira,
B. Heber
Abstract:
In this paper we explore the idea of using multi-spacecraft observations of Jovian electrons to measure the 3D distribution of these particles in the inner heliosphere. We present simulations of Jovian electron intensities along selected spacecraft trajectories for 2021 and compare these, admittedly qualitatively, to these measurements. Using the data-model comparison we emphasize how such a study…
▽ More
In this paper we explore the idea of using multi-spacecraft observations of Jovian electrons to measure the 3D distribution of these particles in the inner heliosphere. We present simulations of Jovian electron intensities along selected spacecraft trajectories for 2021 and compare these, admittedly qualitatively, to these measurements. Using the data-model comparison we emphasize how such a study can be used to constrain the transport parameters in the inner heliosphere, and how this can lead to additional insight into energetic particle transport. Model results are also shown along the expected trajectories of selected spacecraft, including the off-ecliptic phase of the Solar Orbiter mission from 2025 onward. Lastly, we revisit the use of historical data and discuss upcoming missions that may contribute to Jovian electron measurements.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2023;
originally announced January 2024.
-
On the Mesoscale Structure of CMEs at Mercury's Orbit: BepiColombo and Parker Solar Probe Observations
Authors:
Erika Palmerio,
Fernando Carcaboso,
Leng Ying Khoo,
Tarik M. Salman,
Beatriz Sánchez-Cano,
Benjamin J. Lynch,
Yeimy J. Rivera,
Sanchita Pal,
Teresa Nieves-Chinchilla,
Andreas J. Weiss,
David Lario,
Johannes Z. D. Mieth,
Daniel Heyner,
Michael L. Stevens,
Orlando M. Romeo,
Andrei N. Zhukov,
Luciano Rodriguez,
Christina O. Lee,
Christina M. S. Cohen,
Laura Rodríguez-García,
Phyllis L. Whittlesey,
Nina Dresing,
Philipp Oleynik,
Immanuel C. Jebaraj,
David Fischer
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
On 2022 February 15, an impressive filament eruption was observed off the solar eastern limb from three remote-sensing viewpoints, namely Earth, STEREO-A, and Solar Orbiter. In addition to representing the most-distant observed filament at extreme ultraviolet wavelengths -- captured by Solar Orbiter's field of view extending to above 6 $R_{\odot}$ -- this event was also associated with the release…
▽ More
On 2022 February 15, an impressive filament eruption was observed off the solar eastern limb from three remote-sensing viewpoints, namely Earth, STEREO-A, and Solar Orbiter. In addition to representing the most-distant observed filament at extreme ultraviolet wavelengths -- captured by Solar Orbiter's field of view extending to above 6 $R_{\odot}$ -- this event was also associated with the release of a fast ($\sim$2200 km$\cdot$s$^{-1}$) coronal mass ejection (CME) that was directed towards BepiColombo and Parker Solar Probe. These two probes were separated by 2$^{\circ}$ in latitude, 4$^{\circ}$ in longitude, and 0.03 au in radial distance around the time of the CME-driven shock arrival in situ. The relative proximity of the two probes to each other and to the Sun ($\sim$0.35 au) allows us to study the mesoscale structure of CMEs at Mercury's orbit for the first time. We analyse similarities and differences in the main CME-related structures measured at the two locations, namely the interplanetary shock, the sheath region, and the magnetic ejecta. We find that, despite the separation between the two spacecraft being well within the typical uncertainties associated with determination of CME geometric parameters from remote-sensing observations, the two sets of in-situ measurements display some profound differences that make understanding of the overall 3D CME structure particularly challenging. Finally, we discuss our findings within the context of space weather at Mercury's distances and in terms of the need to investigate solar transients via spacecraft constellations with small separations, which has been gaining significant attention during recent years.
△ Less
Submitted 3 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
New Observations Needed to Advance Our Understanding of Coronal Mass Ejections
Authors:
Erika Palmerio,
Benjamin J. Lynch,
Christina O. Lee,
Lan K. Jian,
Teresa Nieves-Chinchilla,
Emma E. Davies,
Brian E. Wood,
Noé Lugaz,
Réka M. Winslow,
Tibor Török,
Nada Al-Haddad,
Florian Regnault,
Meng **,
Camilla Scolini,
Fernando Carcaboso,
Charles J. Farrugia,
Vincent E. Ledvina,
Cooper Downs,
Christina Kay,
Sanchita Pal,
Tarik M. Salman,
Robert C. Allen
Abstract:
Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are large eruptions from the Sun that propagate through the heliosphere after launch. Observational studies of these transient phenomena are usually based on 2D images of the Sun, corona, and heliosphere (remote-sensing data), as well as magnetic field, plasma, and particle samples along a 1D spacecraft trajectory (in-situ data). Given the large scales involved and th…
▽ More
Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are large eruptions from the Sun that propagate through the heliosphere after launch. Observational studies of these transient phenomena are usually based on 2D images of the Sun, corona, and heliosphere (remote-sensing data), as well as magnetic field, plasma, and particle samples along a 1D spacecraft trajectory (in-situ data). Given the large scales involved and the 3D nature of CMEs, such measurements are generally insufficient to build a comprehensive picture, especially in terms of local variations and overall geometry of the whole structure. This White Paper aims to address this issue by identifying the data sets and observational priorities that are needed to effectively advance our current understanding of the structure and evolution of CMEs, in both the remote-sensing and in-situ regimes. It also provides an outlook of possible missions and instruments that may yield significant improvements into the subject.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Work-Life Balance Starts with Proper Deadlines and Exemplary Agencies
Authors:
Noé Lugaz,
Réka M. Winslow,
Nada Al-Haddad,
Christina O. Lee,
Sarah K. Vines,
Katharine Reeves,
Amir Caspi,
Daniel Seaton,
Cooper Downs,
Lindsay Glesener,
Angelos Vourlidas,
Camilla Scolini,
Tibor Török,
Robert Allen,
Erika Palmerio
Abstract:
Diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs can only be implemented successfully if proper work-life balance is possible in Heliophysics (and in STEM field in general). One of the core issues stems from the culture of "work-above-life" associated with mission concepts, development, and implementation but also the expectations that seem to originate from numerous announcements from NASA (and oth…
▽ More
Diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs can only be implemented successfully if proper work-life balance is possible in Heliophysics (and in STEM field in general). One of the core issues stems from the culture of "work-above-life" associated with mission concepts, development, and implementation but also the expectations that seem to originate from numerous announcements from NASA (and other agencies). The benefits of work-life balance are well documented; however, the entire system surrounding research in Heliophysics hinders or discourages proper work-life balance. For example, there does not seem to be attention paid by NASA Headquarters (HQ) on the timing of their announcements regarding how it will be perceived by researchers, and how the timing may promote a culture where work trumps personal life. The same is true for remarks by NASA HQ program officers during panels or informal discussions, where seemingly innocuous comments may give a perception that work is expected after "normal" work hours. In addition, we are calling for work-life balance plans and implementation to be one of the criteria used for down-selection and confirmation of missions (Key Decision Points: KDP-B, KDP-C).
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
The 17 April 2021 widespread solar energetic particle event
Authors:
N. Dresing,
L. Rodríguez-García,
I. C. Jebaraj,
A. Warmuth,
S. Wallace,
L. Balmaceda,
T. Podladchikova,
R. D. Strauss,
A. Kouloumvakos,
C. Palmroos,
V. Krupar,
J. Gieseler,
Z. Xu,
J. G. Mitchell,
C. M. S. Cohen,
G. A. de Nolfo,
E. Palmerio,
F. Carcaboso,
E. K. J. Kilpua,
D. Trotta,
U. Auster,
E. Asvestari,
D. da Silva,
W. Dröge,
T. Getachew
, et al. (24 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Context. A solar eruption on 17 April 2021 produced a widespread Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) event that was observed by five longitudinally well-separated observers in the inner heliosphere at heliocentric distances of 0.42 to 1 au: BepiColombo, Parker Solar Probe, Solar Orbiter, STEREO A, and near-Earth spacecraft. The event produced relativistic electrons and protons. It was associated with a…
▽ More
Context. A solar eruption on 17 April 2021 produced a widespread Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) event that was observed by five longitudinally well-separated observers in the inner heliosphere at heliocentric distances of 0.42 to 1 au: BepiColombo, Parker Solar Probe, Solar Orbiter, STEREO A, and near-Earth spacecraft. The event produced relativistic electrons and protons. It was associated with a long-lasting solar hard X-ray flare and a medium fast Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) with a speed of 880 km/s driving a shock, an EUV wave as well as long-lasting radio burst activity showing four distinct type III burst. Methods. A multi-spacecraft analysis of remote-sensing and in-situ observations is applied to attribute the SEP observations at the different locations to the various potential source regions at the Sun. An ENLIL simulation is used to characterize the interplanetary state and its role for the energetic particle transport. The magnetic connection between each spacecraft and the Sun is determined. Based on a reconstruction of the coronal shock front we determine the times when the shock establishes magnetic connections with the different observers. Radio observations are used to characterize the directivity of the four main injection episodes, which are then employed in a 2D SEP transport simulation. Results. Timing analysis of the inferred SEP solar injection suggests different source processes being important for the electron and the proton event. Comparison among the characteristics and timing of the potential particle sources, such as the CME-driven shock or the flare, suggests a stronger shock contribution for the proton event and a more likely flare-related source of the electron event. Conclusions. We find that in this event an important ingredient for the wide SEP spread was the wide longitudinal range of about 110 degrees covered by distinct SEP injections.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Connecting Solar and Stellar Flares/CMEs: Expanding Heliophysics to Encompass Exoplanetary Space Weather
Authors:
B. J. Lynch,
B. E. Wood,
M. **,
T. Török,
X. Sun,
E. Palmerio,
R. A. Osten,
A. A. Vidotto,
O. Cohen,
J. D. Alvarado-Gómez,
J. J. Drake,
V. S. Airapetian,
Y. Notsu,
A. Veronig,
K. Namekata,
R. M. Winslow,
L. K. Jian,
A. Vourlidas,
N. Lugaz,
N. Al-Haddad,
W. B. Manchester,
C. Scolini,
C. J. Farrugia,
E. E. Davies,
T. Nieves-Chinchilla
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The aim of this white paper is to briefly summarize some of the outstanding gaps in the observations and modeling of stellar flares, CMEs, and exoplanetary space weather, and to discuss how the theoretical and computational tools and methods that have been developed in heliophysics can play a critical role in meeting these challenges. The maturity of data-inspired and data-constrained modeling of…
▽ More
The aim of this white paper is to briefly summarize some of the outstanding gaps in the observations and modeling of stellar flares, CMEs, and exoplanetary space weather, and to discuss how the theoretical and computational tools and methods that have been developed in heliophysics can play a critical role in meeting these challenges. The maturity of data-inspired and data-constrained modeling of the Sun-to-Earth space weather chain provides a natural starting point for the development of new, multidisciplinary research and applications to other stars and their exoplanetary systems. Here we present recommendations for future solar CME research to further advance stellar flare and CME studies. These recommendations will require institutional and funding agency support for both fundamental research (e.g. theoretical considerations and idealized eruptive flare/CME numerical modeling) and applied research (e.g. data inspired/constrained modeling and estimating exoplanetary space weather impacts). In short, we recommend continued and expanded support for: (1.) Theoretical and numerical studies of CME initiation and low coronal evolution, including confinement of "failed" eruptions; (2.) Systematic analyses of Sun-as-a-star observations to develop and improve stellar CME detection techniques and alternatives; (3.) Improvements in data-inspired and data-constrained MHD modeling of solar CMEs and their application to stellar systems; and (4.) Encouraging comprehensive solar--stellar research collaborations and conferences through new interdisciplinary and multi-agency/division funding mechanisms.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
CME Evolution in the Structured Heliosphere and Effects at Earth and Mars During Solar Minimum
Authors:
Erika Palmerio,
Christina O. Lee,
Ian G. Richardson,
Teresa Nieves-Chinchilla,
Luiz F. G. Dos Santos,
Jacob R. Gruesbeck,
Nariaki V. Nitta,
M. Leila Mays,
Jasper S. Halekas,
Cary Zeitlin,
Shaosui Xu,
Mats Holmström,
Yoshifumi Futaana,
Tamitha Mulligan,
Benjamin J. Lynch,
Janet G. Luhmann
Abstract:
The activity of the Sun alternates between a solar minimum and a solar maximum, the former corresponding to a period of "quieter" status of the heliosphere. During solar minimum, it is in principle more straightforward to follow eruptive events and solar wind structures from their birth at the Sun throughout their interplanetary journey. In this paper, we report analysis of the origin, evolution,…
▽ More
The activity of the Sun alternates between a solar minimum and a solar maximum, the former corresponding to a period of "quieter" status of the heliosphere. During solar minimum, it is in principle more straightforward to follow eruptive events and solar wind structures from their birth at the Sun throughout their interplanetary journey. In this paper, we report analysis of the origin, evolution, and heliospheric impact of a series of solar transient events that took place during the second half of August 2018, i.e. in the midst of the late declining phase of Solar Cycle 24. In particular, we focus on two successive coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and a following high-speed stream (HSS) on their way towards Earth and Mars. We find that the first CME impacted both planets, whilst the second caused a strong magnetic storm at Earth and went on to miss Mars, which nevertheless experienced space weather effects from the stream interacting region (SIR) preceding the HSS. Analysis of remote-sensing and in-situ data supported by heliospheric modelling suggests that CME--HSS interaction resulted in the second CME rotating and deflecting in interplanetary space, highlighting that accurately reproducing the ambient solar wind is crucial even during "simpler" solar minimum periods. Lastly, we discuss the upstream solar wind conditions and transient structures responsible for driving space weather effects at Earth and Mars.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
CMEs and SEPs During November-December 2020: A Challenge for Real-Time Space Weather Forecasting
Authors:
Erika Palmerio,
Christina O. Lee,
M. Leila Mays,
Janet G. Luhmann,
David Lario,
Beatriz Sánchez-Cano,
Ian G. Richardson,
Rami Vainio,
Michael L. Stevens,
Christina M. S. Cohen,
Konrad Steinvall,
Christian Möstl,
Andreas J. Weiss,
Teresa Nieves-Chinchilla,
Yan Li,
Davin E. Larson,
Daniel Heyner,
Stuart D. Bale,
Antoinette B. Galvin,
Mats Holmström,
Yuri V. Khotyaintsev,
Milan Maksimovic,
Igor G. Mitrofanov
Abstract:
Predictions of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and solar energetic particles (SEPs) are a central issue in space weather forecasting. In recent years, interest in space weather predictions has expanded to include impacts at other planets beyond Earth as well as spacecraft scattered throughout the heliosphere. In this sense, the scope of space weather science now encompasses the whole heliospheric sy…
▽ More
Predictions of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and solar energetic particles (SEPs) are a central issue in space weather forecasting. In recent years, interest in space weather predictions has expanded to include impacts at other planets beyond Earth as well as spacecraft scattered throughout the heliosphere. In this sense, the scope of space weather science now encompasses the whole heliospheric system, and multi-point measurements of solar transients can provide useful insights and validations for prediction models. In this work, we aim to analyse the whole inner heliospheric context between two eruptive flares that took place in late 2020, i.e. the M4.4 flare of November 29 and the C7.4 flare of December 7. This period is especially interesting because the STEREO-A spacecraft was located ~60° east of the Sun-Earth line, giving us the opportunity to test the capabilities of "predictions at 360°" using remote-sensing observations from the Lagrange L1 and L5 points as input. We simulate the CMEs that were ejected during our period of interest and the SEPs accelerated by their shocks using the WSA-Enlil-SEPMOD modelling chain and four sets of input parameters, forming a "mini-ensemble". We validate our results using in-situ observations at six locations, including Earth and Mars. We find that, despite some limitations arising from the models' architecture and assumptions, CMEs and shock-accelerated SEPs can be reasonably studied and forecast in real time at least out to several tens of degrees away from the eruption site using the prediction tools employed here.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2022; v1 submitted 30 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Predicting the Magnetic Fields of a Stealth CME Detected by Parker Solar Probe at 0.5 AU
Authors:
Erika Palmerio,
Christina Kay,
Nada Al-Haddad,
Benjamin J. Lynch,
Wenyuan Yu,
Michael L. Stevens,
Sanchita Pal,
Christina O. Lee
Abstract:
Stealth coronal mass ejection (CMEs) are eruptions from the Sun that are not associated with appreciable low-coronal signatures. Because they often cannot be linked to a well-defined source region on the Sun, analysis of their initial magnetic configuration and eruption dynamics is particularly problematic. In this manuscript, we address this issue by undertaking the first attempt at predicting th…
▽ More
Stealth coronal mass ejection (CMEs) are eruptions from the Sun that are not associated with appreciable low-coronal signatures. Because they often cannot be linked to a well-defined source region on the Sun, analysis of their initial magnetic configuration and eruption dynamics is particularly problematic. In this manuscript, we address this issue by undertaking the first attempt at predicting the magnetic fields of a stealth CME that erupted in 2020 June from the Earth-facing Sun. We estimate its source region with the aid of off-limb observations from a secondary viewpoint and photospheric magnetic field extrapolations. We then employ the Open Solar Physics Rapid Ensemble Information (OSPREI) modelling suite to evaluate its early evolution and forward-model its magnetic fields up to Parker Solar Probe, which detected the CME in situ at a heliocentric distance of 0.5 AU. We compare our hindcast prediction with in-situ measurements and a set of flux rope reconstructions, obtaining encouraging agreement on arrival time, spacecraft crossing location, and magnetic field profiles. This work represents a first step towards reliable understanding and forecasting of the magnetic configuration of stealth CMEs and slow, streamer-blowout events.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Recurrent Solar Energetic Particle Flux Enhancements Observed near Earth and Mars
Authors:
C. Krishnaprasad,
Smitha V. Thampi,
Anil Bhardwaj,
Christina O. Lee,
K. Kishore Kumar,
Tarun K. Pant
Abstract:
August 1 to November 15, 2016 period was characterized by the presence of Corotating Interaction Regions (CIRs) and a few weak Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) in the heliosphere. In this study we show recurrent energetic electron and proton enhancements observed near Earth (1 AU) and Mars (1.43-1.38 AU) during this period. The observations near Earth are using data from instruments aboard ACE, SOHO,…
▽ More
August 1 to November 15, 2016 period was characterized by the presence of Corotating Interaction Regions (CIRs) and a few weak Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) in the heliosphere. In this study we show recurrent energetic electron and proton enhancements observed near Earth (1 AU) and Mars (1.43-1.38 AU) during this period. The observations near Earth are using data from instruments aboard ACE, SOHO, and SDO whereas those near Mars are by the SEP, SWIA, and MAG instruments aboard MAVEN. During this period, the energetic electron fluxes observed near Earth and Mars showed prominent periodic enhancements over four solar rotations, with major periodicities of ~27 days and ~13 days. Periodic radar blackout/weakening of radar signals at Mars are observed by MARSIS/MEX, associated with these solar energetic electron enhancements. During this period, a weak CME and a High Speed Stream (HSS)-related interplanetary shock could interact with the CIR and enhance energetic proton fluxes near 1.43-1.38 AU, and as a result, ~27 day periodicity in proton fluxes is significantly diminished at 1.43-1.38 AU. These events also cause unexpected impact on the Martian topside ionosphere, such as topside ionospheric depletion and compression observed by LPW and NGIMS onboard MAVEN. These observations are unique not only because of the recurring nature of electron enhancements seen at two vantage points, but also because they reveal unexpected impact of the weak CME and interplanetary shock on the Martian ionosphere, which provide new insight into the impact of CME-HSS interactions on Martian plasma environment.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
On the Spatial Coherence of Magnetic Ejecta: Measurements of Coronal Mass Ejections by Multiple Spacecraft Longitudinally Separated by 0.01 AU
Authors:
N. Lugaz,
C. J. Farrugia,
R. M. Winslow,
N. Al-Haddad,
A. B. Galvin,
T. Nieves-Chinchilla,
C. O. Lee,
M. Janvier
Abstract:
Measurements of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) by multiple spacecraft at small radial separations but larger longitudinal separations is one of the ways to learn about the three-dimensional structure of CMEs. Here, we take advantage of the orbit of the Wind spacecraft that ventured to distances of up to 0.012 astronomical units (au) from the Sun-Earth line during the years 2000 to 2002. Combined wi…
▽ More
Measurements of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) by multiple spacecraft at small radial separations but larger longitudinal separations is one of the ways to learn about the three-dimensional structure of CMEs. Here, we take advantage of the orbit of the Wind spacecraft that ventured to distances of up to 0.012 astronomical units (au) from the Sun-Earth line during the years 2000 to 2002. Combined with measurements from ACE, which is in a tight halo orbit around L1, the multipoint measurements allow us to investigate how the magnetic field inside magnetic ejecta (MEs) changes on scales of 0.005 - 0.012 au. We identify 21 CMEs measured by these two spacecraft for longitudinal separations of 0.007 au or more. We find that the time-shifted correlation between 30-minute averages of the non-radial magnetic field components measured at the two spacecraft is systematically above 0.97 when the separation is 0.008 au or less, but is on average 0.89 for greater separations. Overall, these newly analyzed measurements, combined with 14 additional ones when the spacecraft separation is smaller, point towards a scale length of longitudinal magnetic coherence inside MEs of 0.25 - 0.35 au for the magnitude of the magnetic field but 0.06 - 0.12 au for the magnetic field components. This finding raises questions about the very nature of MEs. It also highlights the need for additional "mesoscale" multi-point measurements of CMEs with longitudinal separations of 0.01 - 0.2 au.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
