-
Workshop on a future muon program at FNAL
Authors:
S. Corrodi,
Y. Oksuzian,
A. Edmonds,
J. Miller,
H. N. Tran,
R. Bonventre,
D. N. Brown,
F. Meot,
V. Singh,
Y. Kolomensky,
S. Tripathy,
L. Borrel,
M. Bub,
B. Echenard,
D. G. Hitlin,
H. Jafree,
S. Middleton,
R. Plestid,
F. C. Porter,
R. Y. Zhu,
L. Bottura,
E. Pinsard,
A. M. Teixeira,
C. Carelli,
D. Ambrose
, et al. (68 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Snowmass report on rare processes and precision measurements recommended Mu2e-II and a next generation muon facility at Fermilab (Advanced Muon Facility) as priorities for the frontier. The Workshop on a future muon program at FNAL was held in March 2023 to discuss design studies for Mu2e-II, organizing efforts for the next generation muon facility, and identify synergies with other efforts (e…
▽ More
The Snowmass report on rare processes and precision measurements recommended Mu2e-II and a next generation muon facility at Fermilab (Advanced Muon Facility) as priorities for the frontier. The Workshop on a future muon program at FNAL was held in March 2023 to discuss design studies for Mu2e-II, organizing efforts for the next generation muon facility, and identify synergies with other efforts (e.g., muon collider). Topics included high-power targetry, status of R&D for Mu2e-II, development of compressor rings, FFA and concepts for muon experiments (conversion, decays, muonium and other opportunities) at AMF. This document summarizes the workshop discussions with a focus on future R&D tasks needed to realize these concepts.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Software and Computing for Small HEP Experiments
Authors:
Dave Casper,
Maria Elena Monzani,
Benjamin Nachman,
Costas Andreopoulos,
Stephen Bailey,
Deborah Bard,
Wahid Bhimji,
Giuseppe Cerati,
Grigorios Chachamis,
Jacob Daughhetee,
Miriam Diamond,
V. Daniel Elvira,
Alden Fan,
Krzysztof Genser,
Paolo Girotti,
Scott Kravitz,
Robert Kutschke,
Vincent R. Pascuzzi,
Gabriel N. Perdue,
Erica Snider,
Elizabeth Sexton-Kennedy,
Graeme Andrew Stewart,
Matthew Szydagis,
Eric Torrence,
Christopher Tunnell
Abstract:
This white paper briefly summarized key conclusions of the recent US Community Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2021) workshop on Software and Computing for Small High Energy Physics Experiments.
This white paper briefly summarized key conclusions of the recent US Community Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2021) workshop on Software and Computing for Small High Energy Physics Experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 27 December, 2022; v1 submitted 15 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Detector and Beamline Simulation for Next-Generation High Energy Physics Experiments
Authors:
Sunanda Banerjee,
D. N. Brown,
David N. Brown,
Paolo Calafiura,
Jacob Calcutt,
Philippe Canal,
Miriam Diamond,
Daniel Elvira,
Thomas Evans,
Renee Fatemi,
Krzysztof Genser,
Robert Hatcher,
Alexander Himmel,
Seth R. Johnson,
Soon Yung Jun,
Michael Kelsey,
Evangelos Kourlitis,
Robert K. Kutschke,
Guilherme Lima,
Kevin Lynch,
Kendall Mahn,
Zachary Marshall,
Michael Mooney,
Adam Para,
Vincent R. Pascuzzi
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The success of high energy physics programs relies heavily on accurate detector simulations and beam interaction modeling. The increasingly complex detector geometries and beam dynamics require sophisticated techniques in order to meet the demands of current and future experiments. Common software tools used today are unable to fully utilize modern computational resources, while data-recording rat…
▽ More
The success of high energy physics programs relies heavily on accurate detector simulations and beam interaction modeling. The increasingly complex detector geometries and beam dynamics require sophisticated techniques in order to meet the demands of current and future experiments. Common software tools used today are unable to fully utilize modern computational resources, while data-recording rates are often orders of magnitude larger than what can be produced via simulation. In this paper, we describe the state, current and future needs of high energy physics detector and beamline simulations and related challenges, and we propose a number of possible ways to address them.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2022; v1 submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Response to NITRD, NCO, NSF Request for Information on "Update to the 2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan"
Authors:
J. Amundson,
J. Annis,
C. Avestruz,
D. Bowring,
J. Caldeira,
G. Cerati,
C. Chang,
S. Dodelson,
D. Elvira,
A. Farahi,
K. Genser,
L. Gray,
O. Gutsche,
P. Harris,
J. Kinney,
J. B. Kowalkowski,
R. Kutschke,
S. Mrenna,
B. Nord,
A. Para,
K. Pedro,
G. N. Perdue,
A. Scheinker,
P. Spentzouris,
J. St. John
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a response to the 2018 Request for Information (RFI) from the NITRD, NCO, NSF regarding the "Update to the 2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan." Through this document, we provide a response to the question of whether and how the National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan (NAIRDSP) should be updated from the perspect…
▽ More
We present a response to the 2018 Request for Information (RFI) from the NITRD, NCO, NSF regarding the "Update to the 2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan." Through this document, we provide a response to the question of whether and how the National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan (NAIRDSP) should be updated from the perspective of Fermilab, America's premier national laboratory for High Energy Physics (HEP). We believe the NAIRDSP should be extended in light of the rapid pace of development and innovation in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) since 2016, and present our recommendations below. AI has profoundly impacted many areas of human life, promising to dramatically reshape society --- e.g., economy, education, science --- in the coming years. We are still early in this process. It is critical to invest now in this technology to ensure it is safe and deployed ethically. Science and society both have a strong need for accuracy, efficiency, transparency, and accountability in algorithms, making investments in scientific AI particularly valuable. Thus far the US has been a leader in AI technologies, and we believe as a national Laboratory it is crucial to help maintain and extend this leadership. Moreover, investments in AI will be important for maintaining US leadership in the physical sciences.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Machine Learning in High Energy Physics Community White Paper
Authors:
Kim Albertsson,
Piero Altoe,
Dustin Anderson,
John Anderson,
Michael Andrews,
Juan Pedro Araque Espinosa,
Adam Aurisano,
Laurent Basara,
Adrian Bevan,
Wahid Bhimji,
Daniele Bonacorsi,
Bjorn Burkle,
Paolo Calafiura,
Mario Campanelli,
Louis Capps,
Federico Carminati,
Stefano Carrazza,
Yi-fan Chen,
Taylor Childers,
Yann Coadou,
Elias Coniavitis,
Kyle Cranmer,
Claire David,
Douglas Davis,
Andrea De Simone
, et al. (103 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Machine learning has been applied to several problems in particle physics research, beginning with applications to high-level physics analysis in the 1990s and 2000s, followed by an explosion of applications in particle and event identification and reconstruction in the 2010s. In this document we discuss promising future research and development areas for machine learning in particle physics. We d…
▽ More
Machine learning has been applied to several problems in particle physics research, beginning with applications to high-level physics analysis in the 1990s and 2000s, followed by an explosion of applications in particle and event identification and reconstruction in the 2010s. In this document we discuss promising future research and development areas for machine learning in particle physics. We detail a roadmap for their implementation, software and hardware resource requirements, collaborative initiatives with the data science community, academia and industry, and training the particle physics community in data science. The main objective of the document is to connect and motivate these areas of research and development with the physics drivers of the High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider and future neutrino experiments and identify the resource needs for their implementation. Additionally we identify areas where collaboration with external communities will be of great benefit.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2019; v1 submitted 8 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group - Detector Simulation
Authors:
HEP Software Foundation,
:,
J Apostolakis,
M Asai,
S Banerjee,
R Bianchi,
P Canal,
R Cenci,
J Chapman,
G Corti,
G Cosmo,
S Easo,
L de Oliveira,
A Dotti,
V Elvira,
S Farrell,
L Fields,
K Genser,
A Gheata,
M Gheata,
J Harvey,
F Hariri,
R Hatcher,
K Herner,
M Hildreth
, et al. (40 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A working group on detector simulation was formed as part of the high-energy physics (HEP) Software Foundation's initiative to prepare a Community White Paper that describes the main software challenges and opportunities to be faced in the HEP field over the next decade. The working group met over a period of several months in order to review the current status of the Full and Fast simulation appl…
▽ More
A working group on detector simulation was formed as part of the high-energy physics (HEP) Software Foundation's initiative to prepare a Community White Paper that describes the main software challenges and opportunities to be faced in the HEP field over the next decade. The working group met over a period of several months in order to review the current status of the Full and Fast simulation applications of HEP experiments and the improvements that will need to be made in order to meet the goals of future HEP experimental programmes. The scope of the topics covered includes the main components of a HEP simulation application, such as MC truth handling, geometry modeling, particle propagation in materials and fields, physics modeling of the interactions of particles with matter, the treatment of pileup and other backgrounds, as well as signal processing and digitisation. The resulting work programme described in this document focuses on the need to improve both the software performance and the physics of detector simulation. The goals are to increase the accuracy of the physics models and expand their applicability to future physics programmes, while achieving large factors in computing performance gains consistent with projections on available computing resources.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
HEP Community White Paper on Software trigger and event reconstruction: Executive Summary
Authors:
Johannes Albrecht,
Kenneth Bloom,
Tommaso Boccali,
Antonio Boveia,
Michel De Cian,
Caterina Doglioni,
Agnieszka Dziurda,
Amir Farbin,
Conor Fitzpatrick,
Frank Gaede,
Simon George,
Vladimir Gligorov,
Hadrien Grasland,
Lucia Grillo,
Benedikt Hegner,
William Kalderon,
Sami Kama,
Patrick Koppenburg,
Slava Krutelyov,
Rob Kutschke,
Walter Lampl,
David Lange,
Ed Moyse,
Andrew Norman,
Marko Petric
, et al. (17 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Realizing the physics programs of the planned and upgraded high-energy physics (HEP) experiments over the next 10 years will require the HEP community to address a number of challenges in the area of software and computing. For this reason, the HEP software community has engaged in a planning process over the past two years, with the objective of identifying and prioritizing the research and devel…
▽ More
Realizing the physics programs of the planned and upgraded high-energy physics (HEP) experiments over the next 10 years will require the HEP community to address a number of challenges in the area of software and computing. For this reason, the HEP software community has engaged in a planning process over the past two years, with the objective of identifying and prioritizing the research and development required to enable the next generation of HEP detectors to fulfill their full physics potential. The aim is to produce a Community White Paper which will describe the community strategy and a roadmap for software and computing research and development in HEP for the 2020s. The topics of event reconstruction and software triggers were considered by a joint working group and are summarized together in this document.
△ Less
Submitted 23 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
HEP Community White Paper on Software trigger and event reconstruction
Authors:
Johannes Albrecht,
Kenneth Bloom,
Tommaso Boccali,
Antonio Boveia,
Michel De Cian,
Caterina Doglioni,
Agnieszka Dziurda,
Amir Farbin,
Conor Fitzpatrick,
Frank Gaede,
Simon George,
Vladimir Gligorov,
Hadrien Grasland,
Lucia Grillo,
Benedikt Hegner,
William Kalderon,
Sami Kama,
Patrick Koppenburg,
Slava Krutelyov,
Rob Kutschke,
Walter Lampl,
David Lange,
Ed Moyse,
Andrew Norman,
Marko Petric
, et al. (17 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Realizing the physics programs of the planned and upgraded high-energy physics (HEP) experiments over the next 10 years will require the HEP community to address a number of challenges in the area of software and computing. For this reason, the HEP software community has engaged in a planning process over the past two years, with the objective of identifying and prioritizing the research and devel…
▽ More
Realizing the physics programs of the planned and upgraded high-energy physics (HEP) experiments over the next 10 years will require the HEP community to address a number of challenges in the area of software and computing. For this reason, the HEP software community has engaged in a planning process over the past two years, with the objective of identifying and prioritizing the research and development required to enable the next generation of HEP detectors to fulfill their full physics potential. The aim is to produce a Community White Paper which will describe the community strategy and a roadmap for software and computing research and development in HEP for the 2020s. The topics of event reconstruction and software triggers were considered by a joint working group and are summarized together in this document.
△ Less
Submitted 23 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Expression of Interest for Evolution of the Mu2e Experiment
Authors:
F. Abusalma,
D. Ambrose,
A. Artikov,
R. Bernstein,
G. C. Blazey,
C. Bloise,
S. Boi,
T. Bolton,
J. Bono,
R. Bonventre,
D. Bowring,
D. Brown,
D. Brown,
K. Byrum,
M. Campbell,
J. -F. Caron,
F. Cervelli,
D. Chokheli,
K. Ciampa,
R. Ciolini,
R. Coleman,
D. Cronin-Hennessy,
R. Culbertson,
M. A. Cummings,
A. Daniel
, et al. (103 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We propose an evolution of the Mu2e experiment, called Mu2e-II, that would leverage advances in detector technology and utilize the increased proton intensity provided by the Fermilab PIP-II upgrade to improve the sensitivity for neutrinoless muon-to-electron conversion by one order of magnitude beyond the Mu2e experiment, providing the deepest probe of charged lepton flavor violation in the fores…
▽ More
We propose an evolution of the Mu2e experiment, called Mu2e-II, that would leverage advances in detector technology and utilize the increased proton intensity provided by the Fermilab PIP-II upgrade to improve the sensitivity for neutrinoless muon-to-electron conversion by one order of magnitude beyond the Mu2e experiment, providing the deepest probe of charged lepton flavor violation in the foreseeable future. Mu2e-II will use as much of the Mu2e infrastructure as possible, providing, where required, improvements to the Mu2e apparatus to accommodate the increased beam intensity and cope with the accompanying increase in backgrounds.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
A Roadmap for HEP Software and Computing R&D for the 2020s
Authors:
Johannes Albrecht,
Antonio Augusto Alves Jr,
Guilherme Amadio,
Giuseppe Andronico,
Nguyen Anh-Ky,
Laurent Aphecetche,
John Apostolakis,
Makoto Asai,
Luca Atzori,
Marian Babik,
Giuseppe Bagliesi,
Marilena Bandieramonte,
Sunanda Banerjee,
Martin Barisits,
Lothar A. T. Bauerdick,
Stefano Belforte,
Douglas Benjamin,
Catrin Bernius,
Wahid Bhimji,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Ian Bird,
Catherine Biscarat,
Jakob Blomer,
Kenneth Bloom,
Tommaso Boccali
, et al. (285 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for…
▽ More
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for the HL-LHC in particular, it is critical that all of the collaborating stakeholders agree on the software goals and priorities, and that the efforts complement each other. In this spirit, this white paper describes the R&D activities required to prepare for this software upgrade.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2018; v1 submitted 18 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Mu2e Technical Design Report
Authors:
L. Bartoszek,
E. Barnes,
J. P. Miller,
J. Mott,
A. Palladino,
J. Quirk,
B. L. Roberts,
J. Crnkovic,
V. Polychronakos,
V. Tishchenko,
P. Yamin,
C. -h. Cheng,
B. Echenard,
K. Flood,
D. G. Hitlin,
J. H. Kim,
T. S. Miyashita,
F. C. Porter,
M. Röhrken,
J. Trevor,
R. -Y. Zhu,
E. Heckmaier,
T. I. Kang,
G. Lim,
W. Molzon
, et al. (238 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab will search for charged lepton flavor violation via the coherent conversion process mu- N --> e- N with a sensitivity approximately four orders of magnitude better than the current world's best limits for this process. The experiment's sensitivity offers discovery potential over a wide array of new physics models and probes mass scales well beyond the reach of the L…
▽ More
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab will search for charged lepton flavor violation via the coherent conversion process mu- N --> e- N with a sensitivity approximately four orders of magnitude better than the current world's best limits for this process. The experiment's sensitivity offers discovery potential over a wide array of new physics models and probes mass scales well beyond the reach of the LHC. We describe herein the preliminary design of the proposed Mu2e experiment. This document was created in partial fulfillment of the requirements necessary to obtain DOE CD-2 approval.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2015; v1 submitted 21 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
-
Planning the Future of U.S. Particle Physics (Snowmass 2013): Chapter 8: Instrumentation Frontier
Authors:
M. Demarteau,
R. Lipton,
H. Nicholson,
I. Shipsey,
D. Akerib,
A. Albayrak-Yetkin,
J. Alexander,
J. Anderson,
M. Artuso,
D. Asner,
R. Ball,
M. Battaglia,
C. Bebek,
J. Beene,
Y. Benhammou,
E. Bentefour,
M. Bergevin,
A. Bernstein,
B. Bilki,
E. Blucher,
G. Bolla,
D. Bortoletto,
N. Bowden,
G. Brooijmans,
K. Byrum
, et al. (189 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
These reports present the results of the 2013 Community Summer Study of the APS Division of Particles and Fields ("Snowmass 2013") on the future program of particle physics in the U.S. Chapter 8, on the Instrumentation Frontier, discusses the instrumentation needs of future experiments in the Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic Frontiers, promising new technologies for particle physics research, and iss…
▽ More
These reports present the results of the 2013 Community Summer Study of the APS Division of Particles and Fields ("Snowmass 2013") on the future program of particle physics in the U.S. Chapter 8, on the Instrumentation Frontier, discusses the instrumentation needs of future experiments in the Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic Frontiers, promising new technologies for particle physics research, and issues of gathering resources for long-term research in this area.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Snowmass Computing Frontier: Software Development, Staffing and Training
Authors:
David Brown,
Peter Elmer,
Ruth Pordes,
David Asner,
Gregory Dubois-Felsmann,
V. Daniel Elvira,
Robert Hatcher,
Chris Jones,
Robert Kutschke,
David Lange,
Elizabeth Sexton-Kennedy,
Craig Tull
Abstract:
Report of the Snowmass CpF-I4 subgroup on Software Development, Staffing and Training
Report of the Snowmass CpF-I4 subgroup on Software Development, Staffing and Training
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
-
Mu2e Conceptual Design Report
Authors:
The Mu2e Project,
Collaboration,
:,
R. J. Abrams,
D. Alezander,
G. Ambrosio,
N. Andreev,
C. M. Ankenbrandt,
D. M. Asner,
D. Arnold,
A. Artikov,
E. Barnes,
L. Bartoszek,
R. H. Bernstein,
K. Biery,
V. Biliyar,
R. Bonicalzi,
R. Bossert,
M. Bowden,
J. Brandt,
D. N. Brown,
J. Budagov,
M. Buehler,
A. Burov,
R. Carcagno
, et al. (203 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Mu2e at Fermilab will search for charged lepton flavor violation via the coherent conversion process mu- N --> e- N with a sensitivity approximately four orders of magnitude better than the current world's best limits for this process. The experiment's sensitivity offers discovery potential over a wide array of new physics models and probes mass scales well beyond the reach of the LHC. We describe…
▽ More
Mu2e at Fermilab will search for charged lepton flavor violation via the coherent conversion process mu- N --> e- N with a sensitivity approximately four orders of magnitude better than the current world's best limits for this process. The experiment's sensitivity offers discovery potential over a wide array of new physics models and probes mass scales well beyond the reach of the LHC. We describe herein the conceptual design of the proposed Mu2e experiment. This document was created in partial fulfillment of the requirements necessary to obtain DOE CD-1 approval, which was granted July 11, 2012.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2012;
originally announced November 2012.
-
Tevatron Beam Position Monitor Upgrade
Authors:
G. Annala,
B. Banerjee,
B. Barker,
T. Boes,
M. Bowden,
C. Briegel,
G. Cancelo,
G. Duerling,
B. Forster,
S. Foulkes,
B. Haynes,
B. Hendricks,
T. Kasza,
R. Kutschke,
R. Mahlum,
M. Martens,
M. Olson,
V. Pavlicek,
L. Piccoli,
P. Prieto,
J. Steimel,
K. Treptow,
M. Votava,
D. Voy,
M. Wendt
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper describes the development of a digital-based Beam Position System which was designed, developed, and adapted for the Tevatron during Collider Run II.
This paper describes the development of a digital-based Beam Position System which was designed, developed, and adapted for the Tevatron during Collider Run II.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
-
The BTeV Software Tutorial Suite
Authors:
Robert K. Kutschke
Abstract:
The BTeV Collaboration is starting to develop its C++ based offline software suite, an integral part of which is a series of tutorials. These tutorials are targeted at a diverse audience, including new graduate students, experienced physicists with little or no C++ experience, those with just enough C++ to be dangerous, and experts who need only an overview of the available tools. The tutorials…
▽ More
The BTeV Collaboration is starting to develop its C++ based offline software suite, an integral part of which is a series of tutorials. These tutorials are targeted at a diverse audience, including new graduate students, experienced physicists with little or no C++ experience, those with just enough C++ to be dangerous, and experts who need only an overview of the available tools. The tutorials must both teach C++ in general and the BTeV specific tools in particular. Finally, they must teach physicists how to find and use the detailed documentation. This report will review the status of the BTeV experiment, give an overview of the plans for and the state of the software and will then describe the plans for the tutorial suite.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2003;
originally announced June 2003.
