-
Physics Opportunities for the Fermilab Booster Replacement
Authors:
John Arrington,
Joshua Barrow,
Brian Batell,
Robert Bernstein,
Nikita Blinov,
S. J. Brice,
Ray Culbertson,
Patrick deNiverville,
Vito Di Benedetto,
Jeff Eldred,
Angela Fava,
Laura Fields,
Alex Friedland,
Andrei Gaponenko,
Corrado Gatto,
Stefania Gori,
Roni Harnik,
Richard J. Hill,
Daniel M. Kaplan,
Kevin J. Kelly,
Mandy Kiburg,
Tom Kobilarcik,
Gordan Krnjaic,
Gabriel Lee,
B. R. Littlejohn
, et al. (27 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This white paper presents opportunities afforded by the Fermilab Booster Replacement and its various options. Its goal is to inform the design process of the Booster Replacement about the accelerator needs of the various options, allowing the design to be versatile and enable, or leave the door open to, as many options as possible. The physics themes covered by the paper include searches for dark…
▽ More
This white paper presents opportunities afforded by the Fermilab Booster Replacement and its various options. Its goal is to inform the design process of the Booster Replacement about the accelerator needs of the various options, allowing the design to be versatile and enable, or leave the door open to, as many options as possible. The physics themes covered by the paper include searches for dark sectors and new opportunities with muons.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
The Straw Tracking Detector for the Fermilab Muon $g-2$ Experiment
Authors:
B. T. King,
T. Albahri,
S. Al-Kilani,
D. Allspach,
D. Beckner,
A. Behnke,
T. J. V. Bowcock,
D. Boyden,
R. M. Carey,
J. Carroll,
B. C. K. Casey,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett,
M. Eads,
A. Epps,
S. B. Foster,
D. Gastler,
S. Grant,
T. Halewood-Leagas,
K. Hardin,
E. Hazen,
G. Hesketh,
D. J. Hollywood,
T. Jones,
C. Kenziora
, et al. (32 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermilab uses a gaseous straw tracking detector to make detailed measurements of the stored muon beam profile, which are essential for the experiment to achieve its uncertainty goals. Positrons from muon decays spiral inward and pass through the tracking detector before striking an electromagnetic calorimeter. The tracking detector is therefore located inside the vacuu…
▽ More
The Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermilab uses a gaseous straw tracking detector to make detailed measurements of the stored muon beam profile, which are essential for the experiment to achieve its uncertainty goals. Positrons from muon decays spiral inward and pass through the tracking detector before striking an electromagnetic calorimeter. The tracking detector is therefore located inside the vacuum chamber in a region where the magnetic field is large and non-uniform. As such, the tracking detector must have a low leak rate to maintain a high-quality vacuum, must be non-magnetic so as not to perturb the magnetic field and, to minimize energy loss, must have a low radiation length. The performance of the tracking detector has met or surpassed the design requirements, with adequate electronic noise levels, an average straw hit resolution of $(110 \pm 20) \,μ$m, a detection efficiency of 97% or higher, and no performance degradation or signs of aging. The tracking detector's measurements result in an otherwise unachievable understanding of the muon's beam motion, particularly at early times in the experiment's measurement period when there are a significantly greater number of muons decaying. This is vital to the statistical power of the experiment, as well as facilitating the precise extraction of several systematic corrections and uncertainties. This paper describes the design, construction, testing, commissioning, and performance of the tracking detector.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2022; v1 submitted 3 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
A measurement of proton-carbon forward scattering in a proof-of-principle test of the EMPHATIC spectrometer
Authors:
M. Pavin,
L. Aliaga-Soplin,
M. Barbi,
L. Bellantoni,
S. Bhadra,
B. Ferrazzi,
L. Fields,
A. Fiorentini,
T. Fukuda,
K. Gameil,
Y. Al Hakim,
M. Hartz,
B. Jamieson,
M. Kiburg,
N. Kolev,
H. Kawai,
A. Konaka,
P. Lebrun,
T. Lindner,
T. Mizuno,
N. Naganawa,
J. Paley,
R. Rivera,
G. Santucci,
O. Sato
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The next generation of long-baseline neutrino experiments will be capable of precision measurements of neutrino oscillation parameters, precision neutrino-nucleus scattering, and unprecedented sensitivity to physics beyond the Standard Model. Reduced uncertainties in neutrino fluxes are necessary to achieve high precision and sensitivity in these future precise neutrino measurements. New measureme…
▽ More
The next generation of long-baseline neutrino experiments will be capable of precision measurements of neutrino oscillation parameters, precision neutrino-nucleus scattering, and unprecedented sensitivity to physics beyond the Standard Model. Reduced uncertainties in neutrino fluxes are necessary to achieve high precision and sensitivity in these future precise neutrino measurements. New measurements of hadron-nucleus interaction cross sections are needed to reduce uncertainties of neutrino fluxes. We report measurements of the differential cross-section as a function of scattering angle for proton-carbon interactions with a single charged particle in the final state at beam momenta of 20, 30, and 120 GeV/c. These measurements are the result of a beam test for EMPHATIC, a hadron-scattering and hadron-production experiment. The total, elastic and inelastic cross-sections are also extracted from the data and compared to previous measurements. These results can be used in current and future long-baseline neutrino experiments, and demonstrate the feasibility of future measurements by an upgraded EMPHATIC spectrometer.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Beam dynamics corrections to the Run-1 measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment at Fermilab
Authors:
T. Albahri,
A. Anastasi,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey,
D. Cauz,
R. Chakraborty,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett
, et al. (152 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper presents the beam dynamics systematic corrections and their uncertainties for the Run-1 data set of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment. Two corrections to the measured muon precession frequency $ω_a^m$ are associated with well-known effects owing to the use of electrostatic quadrupole (ESQ) vertical focusing in the storage ring. An average vertically oriented motional magnetic field is fe…
▽ More
This paper presents the beam dynamics systematic corrections and their uncertainties for the Run-1 data set of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment. Two corrections to the measured muon precession frequency $ω_a^m$ are associated with well-known effects owing to the use of electrostatic quadrupole (ESQ) vertical focusing in the storage ring. An average vertically oriented motional magnetic field is felt by relativistic muons passing transversely through the radial electric field components created by the ESQ system. The correction depends on the stored momentum distribution and the tunes of the ring, which has relatively weak vertical focusing. Vertical betatron motions imply that the muons do not orbit the ring in a plane exactly orthogonal to the vertical magnetic field direction. A correction is necessary to account for an average pitch angle associated with their trajectories. A third small correction is necessary because muons that escape the ring during the storage time are slightly biased in initial spin phase compared to the parent distribution. Finally, because two high-voltage resistors in the ESQ network had longer than designed RC time constants, the vertical and horizontal centroids and envelopes of the stored muon beam drifted slightly, but coherently, during each storage ring fill. This led to the discovery of an important phase-acceptance relationship that requires a correction. The sum of the corrections to $ω_a^m$ is 0.50 $\pm$ 0.09 ppm; the uncertainty is small compared to the 0.43 ppm statistical precision of $ω_a^m$.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2021; v1 submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100)
Authors:
Mahiro Abe,
Philip Adamson,
Marcel Borcean,
Daniela Bortoletto,
Kieran Bridges,
Samuel P. Carman,
Swapan Chattopadhyay,
Jonathon Coleman,
Noah M. Curfman,
Kenneth DeRose,
Tejas Deshpande,
Savas Dimopoulos,
Christopher J. Foot,
Josef C. Frisch,
Benjamin E. Garber,
Steve Geer,
Valerie Gibson,
Jonah Glick,
Peter W. Graham,
Steve R. Hahn,
Roni Harnik,
Leonie Hawkins,
Sam Hindley,
Jason M. Hogan,
Yijun Jiang
, et al. (23 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
MAGIS-100 is a next-generation quantum sensor under construction at Fermilab that aims to explore fundamental physics with atom interferometry over a 100-meter baseline. This novel detector will search for ultralight dark matter, test quantum mechanics in new regimes, and serve as a technology pathfinder for future gravitational wave detectors in a previously unexplored frequency band. It combines…
▽ More
MAGIS-100 is a next-generation quantum sensor under construction at Fermilab that aims to explore fundamental physics with atom interferometry over a 100-meter baseline. This novel detector will search for ultralight dark matter, test quantum mechanics in new regimes, and serve as a technology pathfinder for future gravitational wave detectors in a previously unexplored frequency band. It combines techniques demonstrated in state-of-the-art 10-meter-scale atom interferometers with the latest technological advances of the world's best atomic clocks. MAGIS-100 will provide a development platform for a future kilometer-scale detector that would be sufficiently sensitive to detect gravitational waves from known sources. Here we present the science case for the MAGIS concept, review the operating principles of the detector, describe the instrument design, and study the detector systematics.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
