-
Practical biological spread-out Bragg peak design of carbon beam
Authors:
Chang Hyeuk Kim,
Hwa-Ryun Lee,
Seduk Chang,
Hong Suk Jang,
Jeong Hwan Kim,
Dong Wook Park,
Won Taek Hwang,
Tea-Keun Yang
Abstract:
The carbon beams show more advantages on the biological properties compared with proton beams in radiation therapy. The carbon beam shows high linear energy transfer (LET) to medium and it increases the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). To design spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) of biological dose using carbon beam, a practical method was purposed by using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model and Ge…
▽ More
The carbon beams show more advantages on the biological properties compared with proton beams in radiation therapy. The carbon beam shows high linear energy transfer (LET) to medium and it increases the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). To design spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) of biological dose using carbon beam, a practical method was purposed by using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model and Geant4 based Monte Carlo simulation code. The various Bragg peak profiles and LET was calculated for each slice at the target region. To generate appropriate biological SOBP, a set of weighting factor, which is a power function in terms of energy step, was applied to the obtained each physical dose. The designed biological SOBP showed 1.34 % of uniformity.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.
-
Evaluation of Setup Uncertainties for Single-Fraction SRS by Comparing the Two Different Mask-Creation Methods
Authors:
Jong Geun Baek,
Hyun Soo Jang,
Young Kee Oh,
Hyun Jeong Lee,
Eng Chan Kim
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the setup uncertainties for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) based on the clinical data with the two different mask-creation methods using pretreatment CBCT imaging guidance. Dedicated frameless fixation BrainLAB masks for 23 patients were created as a routine mask (R-mask) making method, as explained in the BrainLAB user manual. The alte…
▽ More
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the setup uncertainties for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) based on the clinical data with the two different mask-creation methods using pretreatment CBCT imaging guidance. Dedicated frameless fixation BrainLAB masks for 23 patients were created as a routine mask (R-mask) making method, as explained in the BrainLAB user manual. The alternative masks (A-mask) which were created by modifying the cover range of the R-mask for the patient head were used for 23 patients. The systematic errors including the each mask and stereotactic target localizer were analyzed and the errors were calculated as the mean and standard deviation (SD) from the LR, SI, AP, and yaw setup corrections. In addition, the frequency of three-dimensional (3D) vector length were also analyzed. The values of the mean setup corrections for the R-mask in all directions were small; < 0.7 mm and < 0.1 degree, whereas the magnitudes of the SDs were relatively large compared to the mean values. In contrast to the R-mask, the means and SDs of the A-mask were smaller than those for the R-mask with the exception of the SD in the AP direction. The mean and SD in the yaw rotational direction in the R-mask and A-mask system were comparable. The 3D vector shifts of a larger magnitude occurred more frequently for the R-mask than the A-mask. The setup uncertainties for each mask with the stereotactic localizing system had an asymmetric offset towards the positive AP direction. The A-mask-creation method, which is capable of covering the top of the patient head is superior to that for R-mask, and thereby the use of the A-mask is encouraged for SF-SRS to reduce the setup uncertainties. Moreover, the careful mask making is required to prevent the possible setup uncertainties.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
Evaluation of the clinical usefulness of modulated Arc treatment
Authors:
Young Kyu Lee,
Hong Seok Jang,
Yeon Sil Kim,
Byung Ock Choi,
Sang Hee Nam,
Hyeong Wook Park,
Shin Wook Kim,
Hun Joo Shin,
Jae Choon Lee,
Ji Na Kim,
Sung Kwang Park,
** Young Kim,
Young-Nam Kang
Abstract:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of modulated arc (mARC) treatment techniques. The mARC treatment plans of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were performed in order to verify the clinical usefulness of mARC. A pre study was conducted to find the most competent plan condition of mARC treatment and the usefulness of mARC treatment plan was evaluated by c…
▽ More
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of modulated arc (mARC) treatment techniques. The mARC treatment plans of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were performed in order to verify the clinical usefulness of mARC. A pre study was conducted to find the most competent plan condition of mARC treatment and the usefulness of mARC treatment plan was evaluated by comparing it with the other Arc treatment plans such as Tomotherapy and RapidArc. In the case of mARC, the optimal condition for the mARC plan was determined by comparing the dosimetric performance of the mARC plans with the use of various parameters. The various parameters includes the photon energies (6 MV, 10 MV), optimization point angle (6°-10° intervals), and total segment number (36-59 segment). The best dosimetric performance of mARC was observed at 10 MV photon energy and the point angle 6 degree, and 59 segments. The each treatment plans of three different techniques were compared with the following parameters: conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), target coverage, dose in the OARs, monitor units (MU), beam on time and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). As a result, all three different treatment techniques show the similar target coverage. The mARC results the lowest V20 and MU per fraction compared with both RapidArc and Tomotherapy plan. The mARC plan reduces the beam on time as well. Therefore, the results of this study provided a satisfactory result which mARC technique is considered as a useful clinical technique for radiation treatment.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
Evaluation of Elekta SymmetryTM 4D IGRT system by using moving lung phantom
Authors:
Hun-Joo Shin,
Shin-Wook Kim,
Chul Seung Kay,
Jae-Hyuk Seo,
Gi-Woong Lee,
Ki-Mun Kang,
Hong Seok Jang,
Young-nam Kang
Abstract:
Purpose: 4D CBCT is a beneficial tool for the treatment of movable tumors, because it can help us to understand where the tumors are actually located and have a precise treatment plan. However, there is a limitation that general CBCT images cannot perfectly help the sophisticated registration. On the other hand, SymmetryTM 4D IGRT system of Elekta can offer the 4D CBCT registration option. In this…
▽ More
Purpose: 4D CBCT is a beneficial tool for the treatment of movable tumors, because it can help us to understand where the tumors are actually located and have a precise treatment plan. However, there is a limitation that general CBCT images cannot perfectly help the sophisticated registration. On the other hand, SymmetryTM 4D IGRT system of Elekta can offer the 4D CBCT registration option. In this study, we intend to evaluate the usefulness of SymmetryTM. Method and Materials: Planning CT images of the CIRS moving lung phantom were acquired from 4D MDCT. And they are sorted as 10 phases from 0% phase to 90% phase. The thickness of CT images was 1 mm. Acquired MDCT images were transferred to the contouring software and a virtual target was generated. An one arc VMAT plan was performed by using the treatment planning system on the virtual target. Finally, the movement of the phantom was verified through XVI SymmetryTM system. Results: The physical movement of CIRS moving lung phantom was +/- 10.0 mm in superior-inferior direction, +/- 1.0 mm in lateral direction, and +/- 2.5 mm in anterior-posterior direction. The movement of the phantom was measured from 4D MDCT registration as +/- 10.2 mm in superior-inferior direction, +/- 0.9 mm in lateral direction, and +/- 2.45 mm in anterior-posterior direction. The movement of the phantom was measured from SymmetryTM registration as +/- 10.1 mm in superior-inferior direction, +/- 0.9 mm in lateral direction, and +/- 2.4 mm in anterior/posterior direction. Conclusion: It is confirmed that 4D CBCT is a beneficial tool for the treatment of movable tumors. Therefore, 4D registration of SymmetryTM can increase the precision of the registration when a movable tumor is a target of radiation treatment.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
