-
Reliable Real-time Seismic Signal/Noise Discrimination with Machine Learning
Authors:
Men-Andrin Meier,
Zachary E. Ross,
Anshul Ramachandran,
Ashwin Balakrishna,
Suraj Nair,
Peter Kundzicz,
Zefeng Li,
Jennifer Andrews,
Egill Hauksson,
Yisong Yue
Abstract:
In Earthquake Early Warning (EEW), every sufficiently impulsive signal is potentially the first evidence for an unfolding large earthquake. More often than not, however, impulsive signals are mere nuisance signals. One of the most fundamental - and difficult - tasks in EEW is to rapidly and reliably discriminate real local earthquake signals from all other signals. This discrimination is necessari…
▽ More
In Earthquake Early Warning (EEW), every sufficiently impulsive signal is potentially the first evidence for an unfolding large earthquake. More often than not, however, impulsive signals are mere nuisance signals. One of the most fundamental - and difficult - tasks in EEW is to rapidly and reliably discriminate real local earthquake signals from all other signals. This discrimination is necessarily based on very little information, typically a few seconds worth of seismic waveforms from a small number of stations. As a result, current EEW systems struggle to avoid discrimination errors, and suffer from false and missed alerts. In this study we show how modern machine learning classifiers can strongly improve real-time signal/noise discrimination. We develop and compare a series of non-linear classifiers with variable architecture depths, including fully connected, convolutional (CNN) and recurrent neural networks, and a model that combines a generative adversarial network with a random forest (GAN+RF). We train all classifiers on the same data set, which includes 374k local earthquake records (M3.0-9.1) and 946k impulsive noise signals. We find that all classifiers outperform existing simple linear classifiers, and that complex models trained directly on the raw signals yield the greatest degree of improvement. Using 3s long waveform snippets, the CNN and the GAN+RF classifiers both reach 99.5% precision and 99.3% recall on an independent validation data set. Most misclassifications stem from impulsive teleseismic records, and from incorrectly labeled records in the data set. Our results suggest that machine learning classifiers can strongly improve the reliability and speed of EEW alerts.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
PhaseLink: A Deep Learning Approach to Seismic Phase Association
Authors:
Zachary E. Ross,
Yisong Yue,
Men-Andrin Meier,
Egill Hauksson,
Thomas H. Heaton
Abstract:
Seismic phase association is a fundamental task in seismology that pertains to linking together phase detections on different sensors that originate from a common earthquake. It is widely employed to detect earthquakes on permanent and temporary seismic networks, and underlies most seismicity catalogs produced around the world. This task can be challenging because the number of sources is unknown,…
▽ More
Seismic phase association is a fundamental task in seismology that pertains to linking together phase detections on different sensors that originate from a common earthquake. It is widely employed to detect earthquakes on permanent and temporary seismic networks, and underlies most seismicity catalogs produced around the world. This task can be challenging because the number of sources is unknown, events frequently overlap in time, or can occur simultaneously in different parts of a network. We present PhaseLink, a framework based on recent advances in deep learning for grid-free earthquake phase association. Our approach learns to link phases together that share a common origin, and is trained entirely on tens of millions of synthetic sequences of P- and S-wave arrival times generated using a simple 1D velocity model. Our approach is simple to implement for any tectonic regime, suitable for real-time processing, and can naturally incorporate errors in arrival time picks. Rather than tuning a set of ad hoc hyperparameters to improve performance, PhaseLink can be improved by simply adding examples of problematic cases to the training dataset. We demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of PhaseLink on a challenging recent sequence from southern California, and synthesized sequences from Japan designed to test the point at which the method fails. For the examined datasets, PhaseLink can precisely associate P- and S-picks to events that are separated by ~12 seconds in origin time. This approach is expected to improve the resolution of seismicity catalogs, add stability to real-time seismic monitoring, and streamline automated processing of large seismic datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2019; v1 submitted 8 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Generalized Seismic Phase Detection with Deep Learning
Authors:
Zachary E. Ross,
Men-Andrin Meier,
Egill Hauksson,
Thomas H. Heaton
Abstract:
To optimally monitor earthquake-generating processes, seismologists have sought to lower detection sensitivities ever since instrumental seismic networks were started about a century ago. Recently, it has become possible to search continuous waveform archives for replicas of previously recorded events (template matching), which has led to at least an order of magnitude increase in the number of de…
▽ More
To optimally monitor earthquake-generating processes, seismologists have sought to lower detection sensitivities ever since instrumental seismic networks were started about a century ago. Recently, it has become possible to search continuous waveform archives for replicas of previously recorded events (template matching), which has led to at least an order of magnitude increase in the number of detected earthquakes and greatly sharpened our view of geological structures. Earthquake catalogs produced in this fashion, however, are heavily biased in that they are completely blind to events for which no templates are available, such as in previously quiet regions or for very large magnitude events. Here we show that with deep learning we can overcome such biases without sacrificing detection sensitivity. We trained a convolutional neural network (ConvNet) on the vast hand-labeled data archives of the Southern California Seismic Network to detect seismic body wave phases. We show that the ConvNet is extremely sensitive and robust in detecting phases, even when masked by high background noise, and when the ConvNet is applied to new data that is not represented in the training set (in particular, very large magnitude events). This generalized phase detection (GPD) framework will significantly improve earthquake monitoring and catalogs, which form the underlying basis for a wide range of basic and applied seismological research.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2019; v1 submitted 2 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
P-wave arrival picking and first-motion polarity determination with deep learning
Authors:
Zachary E. Ross,
Men-Andrin Meier,
Egill Hauksson
Abstract:
Determining earthquake hypocenters and focal mechanisms requires precisely measured P-wave arrival times and first-motion polarities. Automated algorithms for estimating these quantities have been less accurate than estimates by human experts, which is problematic for processing large data volumes. Here, we train convolutional neural networks to measure both quantities, which learn directly from s…
▽ More
Determining earthquake hypocenters and focal mechanisms requires precisely measured P-wave arrival times and first-motion polarities. Automated algorithms for estimating these quantities have been less accurate than estimates by human experts, which is problematic for processing large data volumes. Here, we train convolutional neural networks to measure both quantities, which learn directly from seismograms without the need for feature extraction. The networks are trained on 18.2 million manually picked seismograms for the southern California region. Through cross-validation on 1.2 million independent seismograms, the differences between the automated and manual picks have a standard deviation of 0.023 seconds. The polarities determined by the classifier have a precision of 95% when compared with analyst-determined polarities. We show that the classifier picks more polarities overall than the analysts, without sacrificing quality, resulting in almost double the number of focal mechanisms. The remarkable precision of the trained networks indicates that they can perform as well, or better, than expert seismologists.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
