-
Geomagnetically Induced Currents (GICs) during Strong Geomagnetic Activity (Storms, Substorms, and Magnetic Pulsations) on 23-24 April 2023
Authors:
Irina Despirak,
Pavel Setsko,
Andris Lubchich,
Rajkumar Hajra,
Yaroslav Sakharov,
Gurbax Lakhina,
Vasiliy Selivanov,
Bruce Tsatnam Tsurutani
Abstract:
We analyzed intense geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) recorded during a complex space weather event observed on 23-24 April 2023. Two geomagnetic storms characterized by SYM/H intensities of -179 nT and -233 nT was caused by southward IMG Bz of -25 nT in the sheath fields and -33 nT in the magnetic cloud (MC) fields. GIC observations were divided into two local time sectors: nighttime (1700-…
▽ More
We analyzed intense geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) recorded during a complex space weather event observed on 23-24 April 2023. Two geomagnetic storms characterized by SYM/H intensities of -179 nT and -233 nT was caused by southward IMG Bz of -25 nT in the sheath fields and -33 nT in the magnetic cloud (MC) fields. GIC observations were divided into two local time sectors: nighttime (1700-2400 UT on 23 April) GICs observed during the interplanetary sheath magnetic storm, and morning sector (0200-0700 UT on 24 April) GICs observed during the MC magnetic storm. By using the direct measurements if GIC on several substations of Karelian-Kola power line (located in the north-west portion of Russia) and gas pipeline station near Mäntsälä (south of Finland), we managed to trace the meridional profile of GIC increase at different latitudes. It was shown that the night sector GIC intensification (~18-42 A) occurred in accordance with poleward expansion of the westward electrojet during substorm. On the other hand, the intense morning sector GICs (~12-46 A) were caused by Ps6 magnetic pulsations. In addition to the Ps6 pulsations, comparable in intensity morning GIC (~44 A) was associated with a local substorm-like disturbance caused by a high density solar wind structure, pissibly a coronal loop portion of an ICME.
△ Less
Submitted 26 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
NORAD Tracking of the February 2022 Starlink Satellites (and the Possible Immediate Loss of 32 Satellites)
Authors:
Fernando L. Guarnieri,
Bruce T. Tsurutani,
Rajkumar Hajra,
Ezequiel Echer,
Gurbax S. Lakhina
Abstract:
The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) tracking of the SpaceX Starlink satellite launch on February 03, 2022 is reviewed. Of the 49 Starlink satellites released into orbit, 38 were eventually lost. Thirty-two of the satellites were never tracked by NORAD. There have been three articles written proposing physical mechanisms to explain the satellite losses. It is argued that none of th…
▽ More
The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) tracking of the SpaceX Starlink satellite launch on February 03, 2022 is reviewed. Of the 49 Starlink satellites released into orbit, 38 were eventually lost. Thirty-two of the satellites were never tracked by NORAD. There have been three articles written proposing physical mechanisms to explain the satellite losses. It is argued that none of the proposed mechanisms can explain the immediate loss of 32 of the 49 satellites. The non-availability of telemetry data from the lost satellites has hindered the search for a physical mechanism to explain the density increase observed in a short time interval.
△ Less
Submitted 6 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Comments on "New Insights from the 2003 Halloween Storm into the Colaba 1600 nT Magnetic Depression during the 1859 Carrington Storm" by S. Ohtani (2022)
Authors:
Bruce T. Tsurutani,
Gurbax S. Lakhina,
Rajkumar Hajra
Abstract:
The Colaba, India ~-1600 nT magnetic spike caused by an interplanetary sheath magnetic field inducing a "dayside R1-field aligned current wedge" during the Carrington magnetic storm proposed by Ohtani (2022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030596) seems highly improbable. Normal interplanetary magnetic field intensities of ~5 nT have previously been shown to be sufficient to explain the ~+120 nT SI+…
▽ More
The Colaba, India ~-1600 nT magnetic spike caused by an interplanetary sheath magnetic field inducing a "dayside R1-field aligned current wedge" during the Carrington magnetic storm proposed by Ohtani (2022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030596) seems highly improbable. Normal interplanetary magnetic field intensities of ~5 nT have previously been shown to be sufficient to explain the ~+120 nT SI+ observed at Colaba during the storm (Tsurutani et al., 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024779). Magnetohydrodynamic theory (Kennel et al., 1985, https://doi.org/10.1029/GM034p0001) predicts a maximum of 4x magnetic field compression by a fast shock, giving an interplanetary sheath field of ~20 nT, a value too low to support the Ohtani (2022) hypothesis. The Ohtani (2022) (and Siscoe et al. 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.102) claim of a further 10x amplification of the interplanetary sheath fields has not been verified in near-Earth interplanetary sheaths. The original (Tsurutani et al., 2003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009504) hypothesis that an ICME magnetic cloud having southward magnetic fields of ~90 nT caused the Carrington magnetic storm main phase of peak SYM-H/Dst = -1760 nT seems more likely. The short time between the SI+ and the storm main phase onset implies a foreshortened interplanetary sheath. The extremely rapid recovery of the magnetic storm was hypothesized by Tsurutani et al. (2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024779) as being due to nonlinear ring current losses. We point out that the Hydro-Quebec 1989 storm was caused by multiple shock-sheaths and magnetic clouds (Lakhina & Tsurutani, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-016-0037-4) unlike the interplanetary causes of the Carrington storm. The Hydro-Quebec event was a "stealth" magnetic storm.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
The Possible Cause of the 40 SpaceX Starlink Satellite Losses in February 2022: Prompt Penetrating Electric Fields and the Dayside Equatorial and Midlatitude Ionospheric Convective Uplift
Authors:
Bruce T. Tsurutani,
James Green,
Rajkumar Hajra
Abstract:
On ~1613 UT, 3 February 2022 SpaceX launched 49 Starlink satellites from Cape Kennedy, Florida into ~210 km altitude orbits where they were to receive subsequent boosts. We assume that 9 satellites received subsequent boosts and succeeded in obtaining stable orbits. Several of the Starlink satellites reentered the atmosphere in the early morning hours of 7 February. Two magnetic storms occurred on…
▽ More
On ~1613 UT, 3 February 2022 SpaceX launched 49 Starlink satellites from Cape Kennedy, Florida into ~210 km altitude orbits where they were to receive subsequent boosts. We assume that 9 satellites received subsequent boosts and succeeded in obtaining stable orbits. Several of the Starlink satellites reentered the atmosphere in the early morning hours of 7 February. Two magnetic storms occurred one with a peak SYM-H intensity of -80 nT at ~1056 UT on 3 February and a second with a SYM-H peak intensity of -71 nT on ~2059 UT 4 February. The ESA polar orbiting Swarm B satellite data show that enhanced storm-time air mass densities occurred in dayside equatorial and midlatitudes at ~500 km altitude with a density peak increase of ~50% higher than quiet time daytime values. The nightside density peak increase was ~100-190% compared to quiet time nighttime values. Prompt penetration electric fields causing ExB uplift of the dayside F-region O+ ions and the downward convection of the nightside O+ ions can explain the Swarm B day-night asymmetry during the magnetic storm main phases and are the probable cause of the losses of the Starlink satellites. Our scenario for the 40 Starlink satellite losses is different from Dang et al. (2022) who assumed that the Starlink satellites received no boosts at 210 km altitude.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2022; v1 submitted 14 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Space Plasma Physics: A Review
Authors:
Bruce T. Tsurutani,
Gary P. Zank,
Veerle J. Sterken,
Kazunari Shibata,
Tsugunobu Nagai,
Anthony J. Mannucci,
David M. Malaspina,
Gurbax S. Lakhina,
Shrikanth G. Kanekal,
Keisuke Hosokawa,
Richard B. Horne,
Rajkumar Hajra,
Karl-Heinz Glassmeier,
C. Trevor Gaunt,
Peng-Fei Chen,
Syun-Ichi Akasofu
Abstract:
Owing to the ever-present solar wind, our vast solar system is full of plasmas. The turbulent solar wind, together with sporadic solar eruptions, introduces various space plasma processes and phenomena in the solar atmosphere all the way to the Earth's ionosphere and atmosphere and outward to interact with the interstellar media to form the heliopause and termination shock. Remarkable progress has…
▽ More
Owing to the ever-present solar wind, our vast solar system is full of plasmas. The turbulent solar wind, together with sporadic solar eruptions, introduces various space plasma processes and phenomena in the solar atmosphere all the way to the Earth's ionosphere and atmosphere and outward to interact with the interstellar media to form the heliopause and termination shock. Remarkable progress has been made in space plasma physics in the last 65 years, mainly due to sophisticated in-situ measurements of plasmas, plasma waves, neutral particles, energetic particles, and dust via space-borne satellite instrumentation. Additionally high technology ground-based instrumentation has led to new and greater knowledge of solar and auroral features. As a result, a new branch of space physics, i.e., space weather, has emerged since many of the space physics processes have a direct or indirect influence on humankind. After briefly reviewing the major space physics discoveries before rockets and satellites, we aim to review all our updated understanding on coronal holes, solar flares and coronal mass ejections, which are central to space weather events at Earth, solar wind, storms and substorms, magnetotail and substorms, emphasizing the role of the magnetotail in substorm dynamics, radiation belts/energetic magnetospheric particles, structures and space weather dynamics in the ionosphere, plasma waves, instabilities, and wave-particle interactions, long-period geomagnetic pulsations, auroras, geomagnetically induced currents (GICs), planetary magnetospheres and solar/stellar wind interactions with comets, moons and asteroids, interplanetary discontinuities, shocks and waves, interplanetary dust, space dusty plasmas and solar energetic particles and shocks, including the heliospheric termination shock. This paper is aimed to provide a panoramic view of space physics and space weather.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Solar flares observed by Rosetta at comet 67P
Authors:
N. J. T. Edberg,
F. L. Johansson,
A. I. Eriksson,
D. J. Andrews,
R. Hajra,
P. Henri,
C. Simon Wedlund,
M. Alho,
E. Thiemann
Abstract:
Context. The Rosetta spacecraft made continuous measurements of the coma of comet 67P/ Churyumov-Gerasimenko (67P) for more than two years. The plasma in the coma appeared very dynamic, and many factors control its variability. Aims. We wish to identify the effects of solar flares on the comet plasma and also their effect on the measurements by the Langmuir Probe Instrument (LAP). Methods. To iden…
▽ More
Context. The Rosetta spacecraft made continuous measurements of the coma of comet 67P/ Churyumov-Gerasimenko (67P) for more than two years. The plasma in the coma appeared very dynamic, and many factors control its variability. Aims. We wish to identify the effects of solar flares on the comet plasma and also their effect on the measurements by the Langmuir Probe Instrument (LAP). Methods. To identify the effects of flares, we proceeded from an existing flare catalog of Earth-directed solar flares, from which a new list was created that only included Rosetta-directed flares. We also used measurements of flares at Mars when at similar longitudes as Rosetta. The flare irradiance spectral model (FISM v.1) and its Mars equivalent (FISM-M) produce an extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) irradiance (10-120 nm) of the flares at 1 min resolution. LAP data and density measurements obtained with the Mutual Impedence Probe (MIP) from the time of arrival of the flares at Rosetta were examined to determine the flare effects. Results. From the vantage point of Earth, 1504 flares directed toward Rosetta occurred during the mission. In only 24 of these, that is, 1.6%, was the increase in EUV irradiance large enough to cause an observable effect in LAP data. Twenty-four Mars-directed flares were also observed in Rosetta data. The effect of the flares was to increase the photoelectron current by typically 1-5 nA. We find little evidence that the solar flares increase the plasma density, at least not above the background variability. Conclusions. Solar flares have a small effect on the photoelectron current of the LAP instrument, and they are not significant in comparison to other factors that control the plasma density in the coma. The photoelectron current can only be used for flare detection during periods of calm plasma conditions.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Plasma Density Structures at Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
Authors:
I. A. D. Engelhardt,
A. I. Eriksson,
G. Stenberg Wieser,
C. Goetz,
M. Rubin,
P. Henri,
H. Nilsson,
E. Odelstad,
R. Hajra,
X. Vallières
Abstract:
We present Rosetta RPC case study from four events at various radial distance, phase angle and local time from autumn 2015, just after perihelion of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Pulse like (high amplitude, up to minutes in time) signatures are seen with several RPC instruments in the plasma density (LAP, MIP), ion energy and flux (ICA) as well as magnetic field intensity (MAG). Furthermore the…
▽ More
We present Rosetta RPC case study from four events at various radial distance, phase angle and local time from autumn 2015, just after perihelion of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Pulse like (high amplitude, up to minutes in time) signatures are seen with several RPC instruments in the plasma density (LAP, MIP), ion energy and flux (ICA) as well as magnetic field intensity (MAG). Furthermore the cometocentric distance relative to the electron exobase is seen to be a good organizing parameter for the measured plasma variations. The closer Rosetta is to this boundary, the more pulses are measured. This is consistent with the pulses being filaments of plasma originating from the diamagnetic cavity boundary as predicted by simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
