-
ODEs and Mandatory Voting
Authors:
Christoph Börgers,
Natasa Dragovic,
Anna Haensch,
Arkadz Kirshtein,
Lilla Orr
Abstract:
This paper presents mathematics relevant to the question whether voting should be mandatory. Assuming a static distribution of voters' political beliefs, we model how politicians might adjust their positions to raise their share of the vote. Various scenarios can be explored using our web-based app (see text for the link). Abstentions are found to have great impact on the dynamics of candidates, a…
▽ More
This paper presents mathematics relevant to the question whether voting should be mandatory. Assuming a static distribution of voters' political beliefs, we model how politicians might adjust their positions to raise their share of the vote. Various scenarios can be explored using our web-based app (see text for the link). Abstentions are found to have great impact on the dynamics of candidates, and in particular to introduce the possibility of discontinuous jumps in optimal candidate positions. This is a paper intended for undergraduate students. It is an unusual application of ODEs. We hope that it might help engage some students who may find it harder to connect with the more customary applications from the natural sciences.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2023; v1 submitted 2 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
A blue sky bifurcation in the dynamics of political candidates
Authors:
Christoph Börgers,
Bruce Boghosian,
Natasa Dragovic,
Anna Haensch
Abstract:
Political candidates often shift their positions opportunistically in hopes of capturing more votes. When there are only two candidates, the best strategy for each of them is often to move towards the other. This eventually results in two centrists with coalescing views. However, the strategy of moving towards the other candidate ceases to be optimal when enough voters abstain instead of voting fo…
▽ More
Political candidates often shift their positions opportunistically in hopes of capturing more votes. When there are only two candidates, the best strategy for each of them is often to move towards the other. This eventually results in two centrists with coalescing views. However, the strategy of moving towards the other candidate ceases to be optimal when enough voters abstain instead of voting for a centrist who does not represent their views. These observations, formalized in various ways, have been made many times. Our own formalization is based on differential equations. The surprise and main result derived from these equations is that the final candidate positions can jump discontinuously as the voters' loyalty towards their candidate wanes. The underlying mathematical mechanism is a blue sky bifurcation.
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2023; v1 submitted 15 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
A particle method for continuous Hegselmann-Krause opinion dynamics
Authors:
Bruce Boghosian,
Christoph Börgers,
Natasa Dragovic,
Anna Haensch,
Arkadz Kirshtein
Abstract:
We derive a differential-integral equation akin to the Hegselmann-Krause model of opinion dynamics, and propose a particle method for solving the equation. Numerical experiments demonstrate second-order convergence of the method in a weak sense. We also show that our differential-integral equation can equivalently be stated as a system of differential equations. An integration-by-parts argument th…
▽ More
We derive a differential-integral equation akin to the Hegselmann-Krause model of opinion dynamics, and propose a particle method for solving the equation. Numerical experiments demonstrate second-order convergence of the method in a weak sense. We also show that our differential-integral equation can equivalently be stated as a system of differential equations. An integration-by-parts argument that would typically yield an energy dissipation inequality in physical problems then yields a concentration inequality, showing that a natural measure of concentration increases monotonically.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
A geospatial bounded confidence model including mega-influencers with an application to Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy
Authors:
Anna Haensch,
Natasa Dragovic,
Christoph Börgers,
Bruce Boghosian
Abstract:
We introduce a geospatial bounded confidence model with mega-influencers, inspired by Hegselmann and Krause. The inclusion of geography gives rise to large-scale geospatial patterns evolving out of random initial data; that is, spatial clusters of like-minded agents emerge regardless of initialization. Mega-influencers and stochasticity amplify this effect, and soften local consensus. As an applic…
▽ More
We introduce a geospatial bounded confidence model with mega-influencers, inspired by Hegselmann and Krause. The inclusion of geography gives rise to large-scale geospatial patterns evolving out of random initial data; that is, spatial clusters of like-minded agents emerge regardless of initialization. Mega-influencers and stochasticity amplify this effect, and soften local consensus. As an application, we consider national views on Covid-19 vaccines. For a certain set of parameters, our model yields results comparable to real survey results on vaccine hesitancy from late 2020.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy and mega-influencers
Authors:
Anna Haensch,
Natasa Dragovic,
Christoph Börgers,
Bruce Boghosian
Abstract:
Covid-19 vaccines are widely available in the United States, yet our Covid-19 vaccination rates have remained far below 100%. Not only that, but CDC data shows that even in places where vaccine acceptance was proportionally high at the outset of the Covid-19 vaccination effort, that willingness has not necessarily translated into high rates of vaccination over the subsequent months. We model how s…
▽ More
Covid-19 vaccines are widely available in the United States, yet our Covid-19 vaccination rates have remained far below 100%. Not only that, but CDC data shows that even in places where vaccine acceptance was proportionally high at the outset of the Covid-19 vaccination effort, that willingness has not necessarily translated into high rates of vaccination over the subsequent months. We model how such a shift could have arisen, using parameters in agreement with data from the state of Alabama. The simulations suggest that in Alabama, local interactions would have favored the emergence of tight consensus around the initial majority view, which was to accept the Covid-19 vaccine. Yet this is not what happened. We therefore add to our model the impact of mega-influencers such as mass media, the governor of the state, etc. Our simulations show that a single vaccine-hesitant mega-influencer, reaching a large fraction of the population, can indeed cause the consensus to shift radically, from acceptance to hesitancy. Surprisingly this is true even when the mega-influencer only reaches individuals who are already somewhat inclined to agree with them, and under the conservative assumption that individuals give no more weight to the mega-influencer than they would give to a single one of their friends or neighbors. Our simulations also suggest that a competing mega-influencer with the opposite view can shift the mean population opinion back, but cannot restore the tightness of consensus around that view. Our code and data are distributed in the ODyN (Opinion Dynamic Networks) library available at https://github.com/annahaensch/ODyN.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2022; v1 submitted 18 January, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
