-
Laser Laboratory Beam Alignment Skills: Course Package
Authors:
Glen D. Gillen
Abstract:
A series of tutorials, assessments, and instructor guides are presented as a complete package for an upper-level undergraduate, or lower-level graduate, laboratory-based course, or extended new-student seminar. The purpose of this package is to teach the students essential skills beneficial for working in an experimental optical laboratory by introducing them to fundamental laboratory skills, and…
▽ More
A series of tutorials, assessments, and instructor guides are presented as a complete package for an upper-level undergraduate, or lower-level graduate, laboratory-based course, or extended new-student seminar. The purpose of this package is to teach the students essential skills beneficial for working in an experimental optical laboratory by introducing them to fundamental laboratory skills, and advanced optical alignment techniques. It is assumed that the students do not have any prior optical laboratory training or experience and the tutorials are written using detailed step-by-step instructions for the students to follow independently without the need for continual instructor guidance. The tutorials are intended to establish a common fundamental knowledge base and set of optical alignment skills within the group of students taking the course. Two examples of the target student groups for this package are: (1) an upper-level undergraduate optics course with a laboratory component (i.e., an undergraduate institution similar to Cal Poly), or (2) a cohort of new graduate students to an experimental optical program whose undergraduate backgrounds can span anything from no experimental optical experience to extensive experimental optical experience (i.e., an experimental R1 doctoral university similar to the Institut für Angewandte Physik at the Universität Bonn). The accompanying assessments and instructor guides for each tutorial are provided in this package for the convenience of the course instructor(s) to use in the course as-is, or to use for their own reference of what skills to assess and how to tell if the student did the tasks correctly.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Magnetic Field Experiments Using a Phone
Authors:
Glen D. Gillen,
Katharina Gillen
Abstract:
To make physics experiments more directly relevant to everyday life and help students realize how their smart phones or tablets can be used as sensors for scientific measurements, we designed two introductory physics experiments to measure vector magnetic fields. These experiments were initially developed for students working remotely in an online course setting. However, the experiments can also…
▽ More
To make physics experiments more directly relevant to everyday life and help students realize how their smart phones or tablets can be used as sensors for scientific measurements, we designed two introductory physics experiments to measure vector magnetic fields. These experiments were initially developed for students working remotely in an online course setting. However, the experiments can also be used for in-person laboratory activities. The first activity uses the phone's three-dimensional sensors to determine the vector components and orientation of the background magnetic field at the students' locations. The resulting vector magnetic field is compared to the expected Earth's magnetic field for their location. The second experiment uses the phone sensors to measure the magnet field produced by the small magnet found in the speaker of common earbuds, or in-ear headphones. The students then carefully investigate the dependence of the magnitude of the field on the axial distance between the speaker magnet and the phone's sensors. Using a ring magnet approximation, advanced Excel curve-fitting methods are introduced to determine the radius of the magnet in the earbud and the distance between the magnet's location and the external surface of the earbud housing.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Increase Investment in Accessible Physics Labs: A Call to Action for the Physics Education Community
Authors:
Dimitri R. Dounas-Frazer,
Daniel Gillen,
Catherine M. Herne,
Erin Howard,
Rebecca S. Lindell,
G I. McGrew,
J. Reid Mumford,
Newton H. Nguyen,
L. C. Osadchuk,
Jamie Principato Crane,
Tyler M. Pugeda,
Kevauna Reeves,
Erin M. Scanlon,
David Spiecker,
Sheila Z. Xu
Abstract:
The American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) Committee on Laboratories assembled a task force whose charge was to write an open letter to the physics education community calling for increased investment in accessible lab courses. Contributors to this paper include students, staff, and faculty with and without disabilities who expressed interest in the open letter. In this document, we recog…
▽ More
The American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) Committee on Laboratories assembled a task force whose charge was to write an open letter to the physics education community calling for increased investment in accessible lab courses. Contributors to this paper include students, staff, and faculty with and without disabilities who expressed interest in the open letter. In this document, we recognize the need for making physics laboratories more accessible in all spaces (e.g., high school courses, graduate level courses, research labs). We focus on the experiences of students with disabilities in physics lab courses at the undergraduate level because that is the context for which the writing team had the most collective experience. The intended audiences for this document consist of undergraduate physics students, staff, and faculty, especially those who have direct stake in laboratory courses; physics departments; and member societies, including AAPT.
We begin by presenting our motivation for the document and the importance of accessibility and diversity in education and the workforce. We start with the broader context of accessibility, narrowing our focus to physics education and the current state of affairs and availability of accessible resources. Accessibility is then discussed in the specific context of physics laboratory courses, focusing on how barriers are created and can be lowered. In exploring ideas and strategies for improving accessibility, we recognize that the development of multiple pathways for laboratory investigation creates opportunities to expand learning opportunities for more students in physics lab programs.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Making Physics Courses Accessible for Blind Students: strategies for course administration, class meetings and course materials
Authors:
Megan Holt,
Daniel Gillen,
Chelsea Cook,
Christa Hixson Miller,
Sacha D. Nandlall,
Kevin Setter,
Cary Supalo,
Paul Thorman,
Suzanne Amador Kane
Abstract:
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) mandates that U.S. institutions of higher education provide "reasonable accommodations" to students with disabilities to ensure equal educational opportunities. However, despite the key role of physics as a gateway to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) studies, only limited resources exist for teaching physics to students who are blind…
▽ More
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) mandates that U.S. institutions of higher education provide "reasonable accommodations" to students with disabilities to ensure equal educational opportunities. However, despite the key role of physics as a gateway to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) studies, only limited resources exist for teaching physics to students who are blind or visually impaired. Here we share lessons from our experience creating an accessible physics curriculum for a blind physics major. The authors include the student himself, a blind physics B.S. who graduated from a different institution, a PhD chemist and consultant on STEM accessibility who is himself blind, and several sighted educators and course assistants who worked regularly with the students. Throughout this effort, we learned that many of the principles of universal design described herein enhanced learning for all of our students.
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2018; v1 submitted 24 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Comparison of Gaussian and super Gaussian laser beams for addressing atomic qubits
Authors:
Katharina Gillen-Christandl,
Glen D. Gillen,
M. J. Piotrowicz,
M. Saffman
Abstract:
We study the fidelity of single qubit quantum gates performed with two-frequency laser fields that have a Gaussian or super Gaussian spatial mode. Numerical simulations are used to account for imperfections arising from atomic motion in an optical trap, spatially varying Stark shifts of the trap** and control beams, and transverse and axial misalignment of the control beams. Numerical results th…
▽ More
We study the fidelity of single qubit quantum gates performed with two-frequency laser fields that have a Gaussian or super Gaussian spatial mode. Numerical simulations are used to account for imperfections arising from atomic motion in an optical trap, spatially varying Stark shifts of the trap** and control beams, and transverse and axial misalignment of the control beams. Numerical results that account for the three dimensional distribution of control light show that a super Gaussian mode with intensity $I\sim e^{-2(r/w_0)^n}$ provides reduced sensitivity to atomic motion and beam misalignment. Choosing a super Gaussian with $n=6$ the decay time of finite temperature Rabi oscillations can be increased by a factor of 60 compared to an $n=2$ Gaussian beam, while reducing crosstalk to neighboring qubit sites.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2016; v1 submitted 26 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
