Optimal Needle Placement for Prostate Rotating-Shield Brachytherapy (RSBT)
Authors:
Jirong Yi,
Quentin E. Adams,
Karolyn M. Hopfensperger,
Ryan T. Flynn,
Yusung Kim,
John M. Buatti,
Weiyu Xu,
Xiaodong Wu
Abstract:
Purpose: To present an efficient NEEdle Position Optimization (NEEPO) algorithm for prostate rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT). With RSBT, the increased flexibility beyond conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) due to the partially shielded radiation source has been shown by Adams et al. in 2020 to enable improved urethra sparing (23.1%), enhanced dose escalation (29.9%), or both, w…
▽ More
Purpose: To present an efficient NEEdle Position Optimization (NEEPO) algorithm for prostate rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT). With RSBT, the increased flexibility beyond conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) due to the partially shielded radiation source has been shown by Adams et al. in 2020 to enable improved urethra sparing (23.1%), enhanced dose escalation (29.9%), or both, with 20 needles without NEEPO-optimized positions. Within this regime of improved dosimetry, we propose in this work that the benefits of RSBT can be maintained while also reducing the number of needles needed for the delivery. The goal of NEEPO is to provide the capability to further increase the dosimetric benefit of RSBT and to minimize the number of needles needed to satisfy a dosimetric goal. Methods: The NEEPO algorithm generates a needle pool for a given patient and then iteratively constructs a subset of needles from the pool based on relative needle importance as determined by total dwell times within needles. The NEEPO algorithm is based on a convex optimization formulation using a quadratic dosimetric penalty function, dwell time regularization by total variation, and a block sparsity regularization term to enable iterative removal of low-importance needles. RSBT treatment plans for 26 patients were generated using single fraction prescriptions with both dose escalation and urethra sparing goals, and compared to baseline HDR-BT treatment plans.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
Fast dose optimization for rotating shield brachytherapy
Authors:
Myung Cho,
Xiaodong Wu,
Hossein Dakhah,
Jirong Yi,
Ryan T. Flynn,
Yusung Kim,
Weiyu Xu
Abstract:
Purpose: To provide a fast computational method, based on the proximal graph solver (POGS) - a convex optimization solver using the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), for calculating an optimal treatment plan in rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT). RSBT treatment planning has more degrees of freedom than conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) due to the addition of em…
▽ More
Purpose: To provide a fast computational method, based on the proximal graph solver (POGS) - a convex optimization solver using the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), for calculating an optimal treatment plan in rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT). RSBT treatment planning has more degrees of freedom than conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) due to the addition of emission direction, and this necessitates a fast optimization technique to enable clinical usage. // Methods: The multi-helix RSBT (H-RSBT) delivery technique was considered with five representative cervical cancer patients. Treatment plans were generated for all patients using the POGS method and the previously considered commercial solver IBM CPLEX. The rectum, bladder, sigmoid, high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and HR-CTV boundary were the structures considered in our optimization problem, called the asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control. Dose calculation resolution was 1x1x3 mm^3 for all cases. The H-RSBT applicator has 6 helices, with 33.3 mm of translation along the applicator per helical rotation and 1.7 mm spacing between dwell positions, yielding 17.5 degree emission angle spacing per 5 mm along the applicator.// Results: For each patient, HR-CTV D90, HR-CTV D100, rectum D2cc, sigmoid D2cc, and bladder D2cc matched within 1% for CPLEX and POGS. Also, we obtained similar EQD2 figures between CPLEX and POGS. POGS was around 18 times faster than CPLEX. Over all patients, total optimization times were 32.1-65.4 seconds for CPLEX and 2.1-3.9 seconds for POGS. // Conclusions: POGS substantially reduced treatment plan optimization time around 18 times for RSBT with similar HR-CTV D90, OAR D2cc values, and EQD2 figure relative to CPLEX, which is significant progress toward clinical translation of RSBT. POGS is also applicable to conventional HDR-BT.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
