-
Software and Computing for Small HEP Experiments
Authors:
Dave Casper,
Maria Elena Monzani,
Benjamin Nachman,
Costas Andreopoulos,
Stephen Bailey,
Deborah Bard,
Wahid Bhimji,
Giuseppe Cerati,
Grigorios Chachamis,
Jacob Daughhetee,
Miriam Diamond,
V. Daniel Elvira,
Alden Fan,
Krzysztof Genser,
Paolo Girotti,
Scott Kravitz,
Robert Kutschke,
Vincent R. Pascuzzi,
Gabriel N. Perdue,
Erica Snider,
Elizabeth Sexton-Kennedy,
Graeme Andrew Stewart,
Matthew Szydagis,
Eric Torrence,
Christopher Tunnell
Abstract:
This white paper briefly summarized key conclusions of the recent US Community Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2021) workshop on Software and Computing for Small High Energy Physics Experiments.
This white paper briefly summarized key conclusions of the recent US Community Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2021) workshop on Software and Computing for Small High Energy Physics Experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 27 December, 2022; v1 submitted 15 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
HL-LHC Computing Review: Common Tools and Community Software
Authors:
HEP Software Foundation,
:,
Thea Aarrestad,
Simone Amoroso,
Markus Julian Atkinson,
Joshua Bendavid,
Tommaso Boccali,
Andrea Bocci,
Andy Buckley,
Matteo Cacciari,
Paolo Calafiura,
Philippe Canal,
Federico Carminati,
Taylor Childers,
Vitaliano Ciulli,
Gloria Corti,
Davide Costanzo,
Justin Gage Dezoort,
Caterina Doglioni,
Javier Mauricio Duarte,
Agnieszka Dziurda,
Peter Elmer,
Markus Elsing,
V. Daniel Elvira,
Giulio Eulisse
, et al. (85 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Common and community software packages, such as ROOT, Geant4 and event generators have been a key part of the LHC's success so far and continued development and optimisation will be critical in the future. The challenges are driven by an ambitious physics programme, notably the LHC accelerator upgrade to high-luminosity, HL-LHC, and the corresponding detector upgrades of ATLAS and CMS. In this doc…
▽ More
Common and community software packages, such as ROOT, Geant4 and event generators have been a key part of the LHC's success so far and continued development and optimisation will be critical in the future. The challenges are driven by an ambitious physics programme, notably the LHC accelerator upgrade to high-luminosity, HL-LHC, and the corresponding detector upgrades of ATLAS and CMS. In this document we address the issues for software that is used in multiple experiments (usually even more widely than ATLAS and CMS) and maintained by teams of developers who are either not linked to a particular experiment or who contribute to common software within the context of their experiment activity. We also give space to general considerations for future software and projects that tackle upcoming challenges, no matter who writes it, which is an area where community convergence on best practice is extremely useful.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
GEANT4 Parameter Tuning Using Professor
Authors:
V. Elvira,
L. Fields,
K. L. Genser,
R. Hatcher,
V. Ivanchenko,
M. Kelsey,
T. Koi,
G. N. Perdue,
A. Ribon,
V. Uzhinsky,
D. H. Wright,
J. Yarba,
S. Y. Jun
Abstract:
The Geant4 toolkit is used extensively in high energy physics to simulate the passage of particles through matter and to predict effects such as detector efficiencies and smearing. Geant4 uses many underlying models to predict particle interaction kinematics, and uncertainty in these models leads to uncertainty in high energy physics measurements. The Geant4 collaboration recently made free parame…
▽ More
The Geant4 toolkit is used extensively in high energy physics to simulate the passage of particles through matter and to predict effects such as detector efficiencies and smearing. Geant4 uses many underlying models to predict particle interaction kinematics, and uncertainty in these models leads to uncertainty in high energy physics measurements. The Geant4 collaboration recently made free parameters in some models accessible through partnership with Geant4 developers. We present a study of the impact of varying parameters in three Geant4 hadronic physics models on agreement with thin target datasets and describe fits to these datasets using the Professor model tuning framework. We find that varying parameters produces substantially better agreement with some datasets, but that more degrees of freedom are required for full agreement. This work is a first step towards a common framework for propagating uncertainties in Geant4 models to high energy physics measurements, and we outline future work required to complete that goal.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2020; v1 submitted 14 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group - Detector Simulation
Authors:
HEP Software Foundation,
:,
J Apostolakis,
M Asai,
S Banerjee,
R Bianchi,
P Canal,
R Cenci,
J Chapman,
G Corti,
G Cosmo,
S Easo,
L de Oliveira,
A Dotti,
V Elvira,
S Farrell,
L Fields,
K Genser,
A Gheata,
M Gheata,
J Harvey,
F Hariri,
R Hatcher,
K Herner,
M Hildreth
, et al. (40 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A working group on detector simulation was formed as part of the high-energy physics (HEP) Software Foundation's initiative to prepare a Community White Paper that describes the main software challenges and opportunities to be faced in the HEP field over the next decade. The working group met over a period of several months in order to review the current status of the Full and Fast simulation appl…
▽ More
A working group on detector simulation was formed as part of the high-energy physics (HEP) Software Foundation's initiative to prepare a Community White Paper that describes the main software challenges and opportunities to be faced in the HEP field over the next decade. The working group met over a period of several months in order to review the current status of the Full and Fast simulation applications of HEP experiments and the improvements that will need to be made in order to meet the goals of future HEP experimental programmes. The scope of the topics covered includes the main components of a HEP simulation application, such as MC truth handling, geometry modeling, particle propagation in materials and fields, physics modeling of the interactions of particles with matter, the treatment of pileup and other backgrounds, as well as signal processing and digitisation. The resulting work programme described in this document focuses on the need to improve both the software performance and the physics of detector simulation. The goals are to increase the accuracy of the physics models and expand their applicability to future physics programmes, while achieving large factors in computing performance gains consistent with projections on available computing resources.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
A Roadmap for HEP Software and Computing R&D for the 2020s
Authors:
Johannes Albrecht,
Antonio Augusto Alves Jr,
Guilherme Amadio,
Giuseppe Andronico,
Nguyen Anh-Ky,
Laurent Aphecetche,
John Apostolakis,
Makoto Asai,
Luca Atzori,
Marian Babik,
Giuseppe Bagliesi,
Marilena Bandieramonte,
Sunanda Banerjee,
Martin Barisits,
Lothar A. T. Bauerdick,
Stefano Belforte,
Douglas Benjamin,
Catrin Bernius,
Wahid Bhimji,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Ian Bird,
Catherine Biscarat,
Jakob Blomer,
Kenneth Bloom,
Tommaso Boccali
, et al. (285 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for…
▽ More
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for the HL-LHC in particular, it is critical that all of the collaborating stakeholders agree on the software goals and priorities, and that the efforts complement each other. In this spirit, this white paper describes the R&D activities required to prepare for this software upgrade.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2018; v1 submitted 18 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Impact of Detector Simulation in Particle Physics Collider Experiments
Authors:
V. Daniel Elvira
Abstract:
Through the last three decades, accurate simulation of the interactions of particles with matter and modeling of detector geometries has proven to be of critical importance to the success of the international high-energy physics (HEP) experimental programs. For example, the detailed detector modeling and accurate physics of the Geant4-based simulation software of the CMS and ATLAS particle physics…
▽ More
Through the last three decades, accurate simulation of the interactions of particles with matter and modeling of detector geometries has proven to be of critical importance to the success of the international high-energy physics (HEP) experimental programs. For example, the detailed detector modeling and accurate physics of the Geant4-based simulation software of the CMS and ATLAS particle physics experiments at the European Center of Nuclear Research (CERN) Large Hadron Collider (LHC) was a determinant factor for these collaborations to deliver physics results of outstanding quality faster than any hadron collider experiment ever before.
This review article highlights the impact of detector simulation on particle physics collider experiments. It presents numerous examples of the use of simulation, from detector design and optimization, through software and computing development and testing, to cases where the use of simulation samples made a difference in the precision of the physics results and publication turnaround, from data-taking to submission. It also presents estimates of the cost and economic impact of simulation in the CMS experiment.
Future experiments will collect orders of magnitude more data with increasingly complex detectors, taxing heavily the performance of simulation and reconstruction software. Consequently, exploring solutions to speed up simulation and reconstruction software to satisfy the growing demand of computing resources in a time of flat budgets is a matter that deserves immediate attention. The article ends with a short discussion on the potential solutions that are being considered, based on leveraging core count growth in multicore machines, using new generation coprocessors, and re-engineering HEP code for concurrency and parallel computing.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
Damped reaction field method and the accelerated convergence of the real space Ewald summation
Authors:
Victor H. Elvira,
Luis G. MacDowell
Abstract:
In this paper we study a general theoretical framework which allows to approximate the real space Ewald sum by means of effective force shifted screened potentials, together with a self term. Using this strategy it is possible to generalize the reaction field method, as a means to approximate the real space Ewald sum. We show that this method exhibits faster convergence of the Coulomb energy than…
▽ More
In this paper we study a general theoretical framework which allows to approximate the real space Ewald sum by means of effective force shifted screened potentials, together with a self term. Using this strategy it is possible to generalize the reaction field method, as a means to approximate the real space Ewald sum. We show that this method exhibits faster convergence of the Coulomb energy than several schemes proposed recently in the literature while enjoying a much more sound and clear electrostatic significance. In terms of the dam** parameter of the screened potential, we are able to identify two clearly distinct regimes of convergence. Firstly, a reaction field regime corresponding to the limit of small screening, where effective pair potentials converge faster than the Ewald sum. Secondly, an Ewald regime, where the plain real space Ewald sum converges faster. Tuning the screening parameter for optimal convergence occurs essentially at the crossover. The implication is that effective pair potentials are an alternative to the Ewald sum only in those cases where optimization of the convergence error is not possible.
△ Less
Submitted 7 November, 2014; v1 submitted 6 October, 2014;
originally announced October 2014.
-
Snowmass Computing Frontier: Software Development, Staffing and Training
Authors:
David Brown,
Peter Elmer,
Ruth Pordes,
David Asner,
Gregory Dubois-Felsmann,
V. Daniel Elvira,
Robert Hatcher,
Chris Jones,
Robert Kutschke,
David Lange,
Elizabeth Sexton-Kennedy,
Craig Tull
Abstract:
Report of the Snowmass CpF-I4 subgroup on Software Development, Staffing and Training
Report of the Snowmass CpF-I4 subgroup on Software Development, Staffing and Training
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
