-
The Dark Machines Anomaly Score Challenge: Benchmark Data and Model Independent Event Classification for the Large Hadron Collider
Authors:
T. Aarrestad,
M. van Beekveld,
M. Bona,
A. Boveia,
S. Caron,
J. Davies,
A. De Simone,
C. Doglioni,
J. M. Duarte,
A. Farbin,
H. Gupta,
L. Hendriks,
L. Heinrich,
J. Howarth,
P. Jawahar,
A. Jueid,
J. Lastow,
A. Leinweber,
J. Mamuzic,
E. Merényi,
A. Morandini,
P. Moskvitina,
C. Nellist,
J. Ngadiuba,
B. Ostdiek
, et al. (14 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe the outcome of a data challenge conducted as part of the Dark Machines Initiative and the Les Houches 2019 workshop on Physics at TeV colliders. The challenged aims at detecting signals of new physics at the LHC using unsupervised machine learning algorithms. First, we propose how an anomaly score could be implemented to define model-independent signal regions in LHC searches. We defin…
▽ More
We describe the outcome of a data challenge conducted as part of the Dark Machines Initiative and the Les Houches 2019 workshop on Physics at TeV colliders. The challenged aims at detecting signals of new physics at the LHC using unsupervised machine learning algorithms. First, we propose how an anomaly score could be implemented to define model-independent signal regions in LHC searches. We define and describe a large benchmark dataset, consisting of >1 Billion simulated LHC events corresponding to $10~\rm{fb}^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. We then review a wide range of anomaly detection and density estimation algorithms, developed in the context of the data challenge, and we measure their performance in a set of realistic analysis environments. We draw a number of useful conclusions that will aid the development of unsupervised new physics searches during the third run of the LHC, and provide our benchmark dataset for future studies at https://www.phenoMLdata.org. Code to reproduce the analysis is provided at https://github.com/bostdiek/DarkMachines-UnsupervisedChallenge.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2021; v1 submitted 28 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Real-time Artificial Intelligence for Accelerator Control: A Study at the Fermilab Booster
Authors:
Jason St. John,
Christian Herwig,
Diana Kafkes,
Jovan Mitrevski,
William A. Pellico,
Gabriel N. Perdue,
Andres Quintero-Parra,
Brian A. Schupbach,
Kiyomi Seiya,
Nhan Tran,
Malachi Schram,
Javier M. Duarte,
Yunzhi Huang,
Rachael Keller
Abstract:
We describe a method for precisely regulating the gradient magnet power supply at the Fermilab Booster accelerator complex using a neural network trained via reinforcement learning. We demonstrate preliminary results by training a surrogate machine-learning model on real accelerator data to emulate the Booster environment, and using this surrogate model in turn to train the neural network for its…
▽ More
We describe a method for precisely regulating the gradient magnet power supply at the Fermilab Booster accelerator complex using a neural network trained via reinforcement learning. We demonstrate preliminary results by training a surrogate machine-learning model on real accelerator data to emulate the Booster environment, and using this surrogate model in turn to train the neural network for its regulation task. We additionally show how the neural networks to be deployed for control purposes may be compiled to execute on field-programmable gate arrays. This capability is important for operational stability in complicated environments such as an accelerator facility.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2021; v1 submitted 14 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
HL-LHC Computing Review: Common Tools and Community Software
Authors:
HEP Software Foundation,
:,
Thea Aarrestad,
Simone Amoroso,
Markus Julian Atkinson,
Joshua Bendavid,
Tommaso Boccali,
Andrea Bocci,
Andy Buckley,
Matteo Cacciari,
Paolo Calafiura,
Philippe Canal,
Federico Carminati,
Taylor Childers,
Vitaliano Ciulli,
Gloria Corti,
Davide Costanzo,
Justin Gage Dezoort,
Caterina Doglioni,
Javier Mauricio Duarte,
Agnieszka Dziurda,
Peter Elmer,
Markus Elsing,
V. Daniel Elvira,
Giulio Eulisse
, et al. (85 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Common and community software packages, such as ROOT, Geant4 and event generators have been a key part of the LHC's success so far and continued development and optimisation will be critical in the future. The challenges are driven by an ambitious physics programme, notably the LHC accelerator upgrade to high-luminosity, HL-LHC, and the corresponding detector upgrades of ATLAS and CMS. In this doc…
▽ More
Common and community software packages, such as ROOT, Geant4 and event generators have been a key part of the LHC's success so far and continued development and optimisation will be critical in the future. The challenges are driven by an ambitious physics programme, notably the LHC accelerator upgrade to high-luminosity, HL-LHC, and the corresponding detector upgrades of ATLAS and CMS. In this document we address the issues for software that is used in multiple experiments (usually even more widely than ATLAS and CMS) and maintained by teams of developers who are either not linked to a particular experiment or who contribute to common software within the context of their experiment activity. We also give space to general considerations for future software and projects that tackle upcoming challenges, no matter who writes it, which is an area where community convergence on best practice is extremely useful.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
