-
The LHCb upgrade I
Authors:
LHCb collaboration,
R. Aaij,
A. S. W. Abdelmotteleb,
C. Abellan Beteta,
F. Abudinén,
C. Achard,
T. Ackernley,
B. Adeva,
M. Adinolfi,
P. Adlarson,
H. Afsharnia,
C. Agapopoulou,
C. A. Aidala,
Z. Ajaltouni,
S. Akar,
K. Akiba,
P. Albicocco,
J. Albrecht,
F. Alessio,
M. Alexander,
A. Alfonso Albero,
Z. Aliouche,
P. Alvarez Cartelle,
R. Amalric,
S. Amato
, et al. (1298 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their select…
▽ More
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their selection in real time. The experiment's tracking system has been completely upgraded with a new pixel vertex detector, a silicon tracker upstream of the dipole magnet and three scintillating fibre tracking stations downstream of the magnet. The whole photon detection system of the RICH detectors has been renewed and the readout electronics of the calorimeter and muon systems have been fully overhauled. The first stage of the all-software trigger is implemented on a GPU farm. The output of the trigger provides a combination of totally reconstructed physics objects, such as tracks and vertices, ready for final analysis, and of entire events which need further offline reprocessing. This scheme required a complete revision of the computing model and rewriting of the experiment's software.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Muon identification for LHCb Run 3
Authors:
Lucio Anderlini,
Flavio Archilli,
Alessandro Cardini,
Violetta Cogoni,
Marianna Fontana,
Giacomo Graziani,
Nikita Kazeev,
Hilbrand Kuindersma,
Rolf Oldeman,
Matteo Palutan,
Marco Santimaria,
Barbara Sciascia,
Patrizia De Simone,
Ricardo Vazquez Gomez
Abstract:
Muon identification is of paramount importance for the physics programme of LHCb. In the upgrade phase, starting from Run 3 of the LHC, the trigger of the experiment will be solely based on software. The luminosity increase to $2\times10^{33}$ cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ will require an improvement of the muon identification criteria, aiming at performances equal or better than those of Run 2, but in a much…
▽ More
Muon identification is of paramount importance for the physics programme of LHCb. In the upgrade phase, starting from Run 3 of the LHC, the trigger of the experiment will be solely based on software. The luminosity increase to $2\times10^{33}$ cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ will require an improvement of the muon identification criteria, aiming at performances equal or better than those of Run 2, but in a much more challenging environment. In this paper, two new muon identification algorithms developed in view of the LHCb upgrade are presented, and their performance in terms of signal efficiency versus background reduction is shown.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2020; v1 submitted 4 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Long-term Operation of the Multi-Wire-Proportional-Chambers of the LHCb Muon System
Authors:
F. P. Albicocco,
L. Anderlini,
M. Anelli,
F. Archilli,
G. Auriemma,
W. Baldini,
G. Bencivenni,
N. Bondar,
B. Bochin,
D. Brundu,
S. Cadeddu,
P. Campana,
G. Carboni,
A. Cardini,
M. Carletti,
L. Casu,
A. Chubykin,
P. Ciambrone,
E. Dané,
P. De Simone,
M. Fontana,
P. Fresch,
M. Gatta,
G. Gavrilov,
S. Gets
, et al. (33 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The muon detector of LHCb, which comprises 1368 multi-wire-proportional-chambers (MWPC) for a total area of 435 m2, is the largest instrument of its kind exposed to such a high-radiation environment. In nine years of operation, from 2010 until 2018, we did not observe appreciable signs of ageing of the detector in terms of reduced performance. However, during such a long period, many chamber gas g…
▽ More
The muon detector of LHCb, which comprises 1368 multi-wire-proportional-chambers (MWPC) for a total area of 435 m2, is the largest instrument of its kind exposed to such a high-radiation environment. In nine years of operation, from 2010 until 2018, we did not observe appreciable signs of ageing of the detector in terms of reduced performance. However, during such a long period, many chamber gas gaps suffered from HV trips. Most of the trips were due to Malter-like effects, characterised by the appearance of local self-sustained high currents, presumably originating from impurities induced during chamber production. Very effective, though long, recovery procedures were implemented with a HV training of the gaps in situ while taking data. The training allowed most of the affected chambers to be returned to their full functionality and the muon detector efficiency to be kept close to 100%. The possibility of making the recovery faster and even more effective by adding a small percentage of oxygen in the gas mixture has been studied and successfully tested.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2021; v1 submitted 6 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Measurement of the front-end dead-time of the LHCb muon detector and evaluation of its contribution to the muon detection inefficiency
Authors:
L. Anderlini,
M. Anelli,
F. Archilli,
G. Auriemma,
W. Baldini,
G. Bencivenni,
A. Bizzeti,
V. Bocci,
N. Bondar,
W. Bonivento,
B. Bochin,
C. Bozzi,
D. Brundu,
S. Cadeddu,
P. Campana,
G. Carboni,
A. Cardini,
M. Carletti,
L. Casu,
A. Chubykin,
P. Ciambrone,
E. Dané,
P. De Simone,
A. Falabella,
G. Felici
, et al. (39 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A method is described which allows to deduce the dead-time of the front-end electronics of the LHCb muon detector from a series of measurements performed at different luminosities at a bunch-crossing rate of 20 MHz. The measured values of the dead-time range from 70 ns to 100 ns. These results allow to estimate the performance of the muon detector at the future bunch-crossing rate of 40 MHz and at…
▽ More
A method is described which allows to deduce the dead-time of the front-end electronics of the LHCb muon detector from a series of measurements performed at different luminosities at a bunch-crossing rate of 20 MHz. The measured values of the dead-time range from 70 ns to 100 ns. These results allow to estimate the performance of the muon detector at the future bunch-crossing rate of 40 MHz and at higher luminosity.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2016; v1 submitted 28 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
Performance of the Muon Identification at LHCb
Authors:
F. Archilli,
W. Baldini,
G. Bencivenni,
N. Bondar,
W. Bonivento,
S. Cadeddu,
P. Campana,
A. Cardini,
P. Ciambrone,
X. Cid Vidal,
C. Deplano,
P. De Simone,
A. Falabella,
M. Frosini,
S. Furcas,
E. Furfaro,
M. Gandelman,
J. A. Hernando Morata,
G. Graziani,
A. Lai,
G. Lanfranchi,
J. H. Lopes,
O. Maev,
G. Manca,
G. Martellotti
, et al. (16 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The performance of the muon identification in LHCb is extracted from data using muons and hadrons produced in J/ψ->μμ, Λ->pπand D^{\star}->πD0(Kπ) decays. The muon identification procedure is based on the pattern of hits in the muon chambers. A momentum dependent binary requirement is used to reduce the probability of hadrons to be misidentified as muons to the level of 1%, kee** the muon effici…
▽ More
The performance of the muon identification in LHCb is extracted from data using muons and hadrons produced in J/ψ->μμ, Λ->pπand D^{\star}->πD0(Kπ) decays. The muon identification procedure is based on the pattern of hits in the muon chambers. A momentum dependent binary requirement is used to reduce the probability of hadrons to be misidentified as muons to the level of 1%, kee** the muon efficiency in the range of 95-98%. As further refinement, a likelihood is built for the muon and non-muon hypotheses. Adding a requirement on this likelihood that provides a total muon efficiency at the level of 93%, the hadron misidentification rates are below 0.6%.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2013; v1 submitted 2 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
-
Performance of the LHCb muon system
Authors:
A. A. Alves Jr,
L. Anderlini,
M. Anelli,
R. Antunes Nobrega,
G. Auriemma,
W. Baldini,
G. Bencivenni,
R. Berutti,
A. Bizzeti,
V. Bocci,
N. Bondar,
W. Bonivento,
B. Botchin,
S. Cadeddu,
P. Campana,
G. Carboni,
A. Cardini,
M. Carletti,
P. Ciambrone,
E. Dané S. De Capua,
V. De Leo,
C. Deplano,
P. De Simone,
F. Dettori,
A. Falabella
, et al. (48 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The performance of the LHCb Muon system and its stability across the full 2010 data taking with LHC running at ps = 7 TeV energy is studied. The optimization of the detector setting and the time calibration performed with the first collisions delivered by LHC is described. Particle rates, measured for the wide range of luminosities and beam operation conditions experienced during the run, are comp…
▽ More
The performance of the LHCb Muon system and its stability across the full 2010 data taking with LHC running at ps = 7 TeV energy is studied. The optimization of the detector setting and the time calibration performed with the first collisions delivered by LHC is described. Particle rates, measured for the wide range of luminosities and beam operation conditions experienced during the run, are compared with the values expected from simulation. The space and time alignment of the detectors, chamber efficiency, time resolution and cluster size are evaluated. The detector performance is found to be as expected from specifications or better. Notably the overall efficiency is well above the design requirements
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2013; v1 submitted 6 November, 2012;
originally announced November 2012.
-
Absolute luminosity measurements with the LHCb detector at the LHC
Authors:
The LHCb Collaboration,
R. Aaij,
B. Adeva,
M. Adinolfi,
C. Adrover,
A. Affolder,
Z. Ajaltouni,
J. Albrecht,
F. Alessio,
M. Alexander,
G. Alkhazov,
P. Alvarez Cartelle,
A. A. Alves Jr,
S. Amato,
Y. Amhis,
J. Anderson,
R. B. Appleby,
O. Aquines Gutierrez,
F. Archilli,
L. Arrabito,
A. Artamonov,
M. Artuso,
E. Aslanides,
G. Auriemma,
S. Bachmann
, et al. (549 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Absolute luminosity measurements are of general interest for colliding-beam experiments at storage rings. These measurements are necessary to determine the absolute cross-sections of reaction processes and are valuable to quantify the performance of the accelerator. Using data taken in 2010, LHCb has applied two methods to determine the absolute scale of its luminosity measurements for proton-prot…
▽ More
Absolute luminosity measurements are of general interest for colliding-beam experiments at storage rings. These measurements are necessary to determine the absolute cross-sections of reaction processes and are valuable to quantify the performance of the accelerator. Using data taken in 2010, LHCb has applied two methods to determine the absolute scale of its luminosity measurements for proton-proton collisions at the LHC with a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV. In addition to the classic "van der Meer scan" method a novel technique has been developed which makes use of direct imaging of the individual beams using beam-gas and beam-beam interactions. This beam imaging method is made possible by the high resolution of the LHCb vertex detector and the close proximity of the detector to the beams, and allows beam parameters such as positions, angles and widths to be determined. The results of the two methods have comparable precision and are in good agreement. Combining the two methods, an overall precision of 3.5% in the absolute luminosity determination is reached. The techniques used to transport the absolute luminosity calibration to the full 2010 data-taking period are presented.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2012; v1 submitted 13 October, 2011;
originally announced October 2011.
