-
The LHCb upgrade I
Authors:
LHCb collaboration,
R. Aaij,
A. S. W. Abdelmotteleb,
C. Abellan Beteta,
F. Abudinén,
C. Achard,
T. Ackernley,
B. Adeva,
M. Adinolfi,
P. Adlarson,
H. Afsharnia,
C. Agapopoulou,
C. A. Aidala,
Z. Ajaltouni,
S. Akar,
K. Akiba,
P. Albicocco,
J. Albrecht,
F. Alessio,
M. Alexander,
A. Alfonso Albero,
Z. Aliouche,
P. Alvarez Cartelle,
R. Amalric,
S. Amato
, et al. (1298 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their select…
▽ More
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their selection in real time. The experiment's tracking system has been completely upgraded with a new pixel vertex detector, a silicon tracker upstream of the dipole magnet and three scintillating fibre tracking stations downstream of the magnet. The whole photon detection system of the RICH detectors has been renewed and the readout electronics of the calorimeter and muon systems have been fully overhauled. The first stage of the all-software trigger is implemented on a GPU farm. The output of the trigger provides a combination of totally reconstructed physics objects, such as tracks and vertices, ready for final analysis, and of entire events which need further offline reprocessing. This scheme required a complete revision of the computing model and rewriting of the experiment's software.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
A Comparison of CPU and GPU implementations for the LHCb Experiment Run 3 Trigger
Authors:
R. Aaij,
M. Adinolfi,
S. Aiola,
S. Akar,
J. Albrecht,
M. Alexander,
S. Amato,
Y. Amhis,
F. Archilli,
M. Bala,
G. Bassi,
L. Bian,
M. P. Blago,
T. Boettcher,
A. Boldyrev,
S. Borghi,
A. Brea Rodriguez,
L. Calefice,
M. Calvo Gomez,
D. H. Cámpora Pérez,
A. Cardini,
M. Cattaneo,
V. Chobanova,
G. Ciezarek,
X. Cid Vidal
, et al. (135 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb experiment at CERN is undergoing an upgrade in preparation for the Run 3 data taking period of the LHC. As part of this upgrade the trigger is moving to a fully software implementation operating at the LHC bunch crossing rate. We present an evaluation of a CPU-based and a GPU-based implementation of the first stage of the High Level Trigger. After a detailed comparison both options are fo…
▽ More
The LHCb experiment at CERN is undergoing an upgrade in preparation for the Run 3 data taking period of the LHC. As part of this upgrade the trigger is moving to a fully software implementation operating at the LHC bunch crossing rate. We present an evaluation of a CPU-based and a GPU-based implementation of the first stage of the High Level Trigger. After a detailed comparison both options are found to be viable. This document summarizes the performance and implementation details of these options, the outcome of which has led to the choice of the GPU-based implementation as the baseline.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2022; v1 submitted 9 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
A fast and efficient SIMD track reconstruction algorithm for the LHCb Upgrade 1 VELO-PIX detector
Authors:
Arthur Hennequin,
Benjamin Couturier,
Vladimir Gligorov,
Sebastien Ponce,
Renato Quagliani,
Lionel Lacassagne
Abstract:
The upgraded CERN LHCb detector, due to start data taking in 2021, will have to reconstruct 4 TB/s of raw detector data in real time using commodity processors. This is one of the biggest real-time data processing challenges in any scientific domain. We present an intrinsically parallel reconstruction algorithm for the vertex detector of the LHCb experiment designed to optimally exploit multi-core…
▽ More
The upgraded CERN LHCb detector, due to start data taking in 2021, will have to reconstruct 4 TB/s of raw detector data in real time using commodity processors. This is one of the biggest real-time data processing challenges in any scientific domain. We present an intrinsically parallel reconstruction algorithm for the vertex detector of the LHCb experiment designed to optimally exploit multi-core general purpose architectures. We compare it to previous state-of-the-art scalar pattern recognition algorithms and show significantly faster processing and in some cases increased physics performance over all current alternatives. We evaluate the algorithm on two high-end architectures from two different vendors and discuss in detail the impact of different SIMD Instruction Set Architecture extensions on the performance.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Design and performance of the LHCb trigger and full real-time reconstruction in Run 2 of the LHC
Authors:
R. Aaij,
S. Akar,
J. Albrecht,
M. Alexander,
A. Alfonso Albero,
S. Amerio,
L. Anderlini,
P. d'Argent,
A. Baranov,
W. Barter,
S. Benson,
D. Bobulska,
T. Boettcher,
S. Borghi,
E. E. Bowen,
L. Brarda,
C. Burr,
J. -P. Cachemiche,
M. Calvo Gomez,
M. Cattaneo,
H. Chanal,
M. Chapman,
M. Chebbi,
M. Chefdeville,
P. Ciambrone
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb collaboration has redesigned its trigger to enable the full offline detector reconstruction to be performed in real time. Together with the real-time alignment and calibration of the detector, and a software infrastructure to make persistent the high-level physics objects produced during real-time processing, this redesign enabled the widespread deployment of real-time analysis during Run…
▽ More
The LHCb collaboration has redesigned its trigger to enable the full offline detector reconstruction to be performed in real time. Together with the real-time alignment and calibration of the detector, and a software infrastructure to make persistent the high-level physics objects produced during real-time processing, this redesign enabled the widespread deployment of real-time analysis during Run 2. We describe the design of the Run 2 trigger and real-time reconstruction, and present data-driven performance measurements for a representative sample of LHCb's physics programme.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2019; v1 submitted 27 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group --- Visualization
Authors:
Matthew Bellis,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Sebastien Binet,
Ciril Bohak,
Benjamin Couturier,
Hadrien Grasland,
Oliver Gutsche,
Sergey Linev,
Alex Martyniuk,
Thomas McCauley,
Edward Moyse,
Alja Mrak Tadel,
Mark Neubauer,
Jeremi Niedziela,
Leo Piilonen,
Jim Pivarski,
Martin Ritter,
Tai Sakuma,
Matevz Tadel,
Barthélémy von Haller,
Ilija Vukotic,
Ben Waugh
Abstract:
In modern High Energy Physics (HEP) experiments visualization of experimental data has a key role in many activities and tasks across the whole data chain: from detector development to monitoring, from event generation to reconstruction of physics objects, from detector simulation to data analysis, and all the way to outreach and education. In this paper, the definition, status, and evolution of d…
▽ More
In modern High Energy Physics (HEP) experiments visualization of experimental data has a key role in many activities and tasks across the whole data chain: from detector development to monitoring, from event generation to reconstruction of physics objects, from detector simulation to data analysis, and all the way to outreach and education. In this paper, the definition, status, and evolution of data visualization for HEP experiments will be presented. Suggestions for the upgrade of data visualization tools and techniques in current experiments will be outlined, along with guidelines for future experiments. This paper expands on the summary content published in the HSF \emph{Roadmap} Community White Paper~\cite{HSF-CWP-2017-01}
△ Less
Submitted 26 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group - Software Development, Deployment and Validation
Authors:
Benjamin Couturier,
Giulio Eulisse,
Hadrien Grasland,
Benedikt Hegner,
Michel Jouvin,
Meghan Kane,
Daniel S. Katz,
Thomas Kuhr,
David Lange,
Patricia Mendez Lorenzo,
Martin Ritter,
Graeme Andrew Stewart,
Andrea Valassi
Abstract:
The High Energy Phyiscs community has developed and needs to maintain many tens of millions of lines of code and to integrate effectively the work of thousands of developers across large collaborations. Software needs to be built, validated, and deployed across hundreds of sites. Software also has a lifetime of many years, frequently beyond that of the original developer, it must be developed with…
▽ More
The High Energy Phyiscs community has developed and needs to maintain many tens of millions of lines of code and to integrate effectively the work of thousands of developers across large collaborations. Software needs to be built, validated, and deployed across hundreds of sites. Software also has a lifetime of many years, frequently beyond that of the original developer, it must be developed with sustainability in mind. Adequate recognition of software development as a critical task in the HEP community needs to be fostered and an appropriate publication and citation strategy needs to be developed. As part of the HEP Softare Foundation's Community White Paper process a working group on Software Development, Deployment and Validation was formed to examine all of these issues, identify best practice and to formulare recommendations for the next decade. Its report is presented here.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2018; v1 submitted 21 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
A Roadmap for HEP Software and Computing R&D for the 2020s
Authors:
Johannes Albrecht,
Antonio Augusto Alves Jr,
Guilherme Amadio,
Giuseppe Andronico,
Nguyen Anh-Ky,
Laurent Aphecetche,
John Apostolakis,
Makoto Asai,
Luca Atzori,
Marian Babik,
Giuseppe Bagliesi,
Marilena Bandieramonte,
Sunanda Banerjee,
Martin Barisits,
Lothar A. T. Bauerdick,
Stefano Belforte,
Douglas Benjamin,
Catrin Bernius,
Wahid Bhimji,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Ian Bird,
Catherine Biscarat,
Jakob Blomer,
Kenneth Bloom,
Tommaso Boccali
, et al. (285 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for…
▽ More
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for the HL-LHC in particular, it is critical that all of the collaborating stakeholders agree on the software goals and priorities, and that the efforts complement each other. In this spirit, this white paper describes the R&D activities required to prepare for this software upgrade.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2018; v1 submitted 18 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Tesla : an application for real-time data analysis in High Energy Physics
Authors:
R. Aaij,
S. Amato,
L. Anderlini,
S. Benson,
M. Cattaneo,
M. Clemencic,
B. Couturier,
M. Frank,
V. V. Gligorov,
T. Head,
C. Jones,
I. Komarov,
O. Lupton,
R. Matev,
G. Raven,
B. Sciascia,
T. Skwarnicki,
P. Spradlin,
S. Stahl,
B. Storaci,
M. Vesterinen
Abstract:
Upgrades to the LHCb computing infrastructure in the first long shutdown of the LHC have allowed for high quality decay information to be calculated by the software trigger making a separate offline event reconstruction unnecessary. Furthermore, the storage space of the triggered candidate is an order of magnitude smaller than the entire raw event that would otherwise need to be persisted. Tesla,…
▽ More
Upgrades to the LHCb computing infrastructure in the first long shutdown of the LHC have allowed for high quality decay information to be calculated by the software trigger making a separate offline event reconstruction unnecessary. Furthermore, the storage space of the triggered candidate is an order of magnitude smaller than the entire raw event that would otherwise need to be persisted. Tesla, following the LHCb renowned physicist naming convention, is an application designed to process the information calculated by the trigger, with the resulting output used to directly perform physics measurements.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
