-
MRSNet: Metabolite Quantification from Edited Magnetic Resonance Spectra With Convolutional Neural Networks
Authors:
M. Chandler,
C. Jenkins,
S. M. Shermer,
F. C. Langbein
Abstract:
Quantification of metabolites from magnetic resonance spectra (MRS) has many applications in medicine and psychology, but remains a challenging task despite considerable research efforts. For example, the neurotransmitter $γ$-aminobutyric acid (GABA), present in very low concentration in vivo, regulates inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain and is involved in several processes outside the brai…
▽ More
Quantification of metabolites from magnetic resonance spectra (MRS) has many applications in medicine and psychology, but remains a challenging task despite considerable research efforts. For example, the neurotransmitter $γ$-aminobutyric acid (GABA), present in very low concentration in vivo, regulates inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain and is involved in several processes outside the brain. Reliable quantification is required to determine its role in various physiological and pathological conditions. We present a novel approach to quantification of metabolites from MRS with convolutional neural networks --- MRSNet. MRSNet is trained to perform the multi-class regression problem of identifying relative metabolite concentrations from given input spectra, focusing specifically on the quantification of GABA, which is particularly difficult to resolve. Typically it can only be detected at all using special editing acquisition sequences such as MEGA-PRESS. A large range of network structures, data representations and automatic processing methods are investigated. Results are benchmarked using experimental datasets from test objects of known composition and compared to state-of-the-art quantification methods: LCModel, jMRUI (AQUES, QUEST), TARQUIN, VeSPA and Gannet. The results show that the overall accuracy and precision of metabolite quantification is improved using convolutional neural networks.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Benchmarking GABA Quantification: A Ground Truth Data Set and Comparative Analysis of TARQUIN, LCModel, jMRUI and Gannet
Authors:
C. Jenkins,
M. Chandler,
F. C. Langbein,
S. M. Shermer
Abstract:
Many tools exist for the quantification of GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data. Despite a recent consensus effort by the MRS community, literature comparing them is sparse but indicates a methodological bias. While invivo data sets can ascertain the level of agreement between tools, ground-truth is required to establish accuracy, and investigate the sources of discrepancy. We pr…
▽ More
Many tools exist for the quantification of GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data. Despite a recent consensus effort by the MRS community, literature comparing them is sparse but indicates a methodological bias. While invivo data sets can ascertain the level of agreement between tools, ground-truth is required to establish accuracy, and investigate the sources of discrepancy. We present a novel approach to benchmarking GABA quantification tools, using several series of phantom experiments with iterated GABA concentration. Each series presents a different set of background metabolites and environmental conditions allowing comparison of not only individual estimates, but the ability of tools to characterise changes in GABA across a range of potential confounds. The methodology of the phantom experiments is presented, as well as characterisation of the data. We also perform an initial comparative analysis of several common MRS quantification tools and in-house code, to illustrate utility of the dataset and the potential bias introduced by different quantification methods. The GABA-to-NAA ratios reported by each tool are compared to the ground-truth, and estimation accuracy is assessed by linear regression of this relationship. While the linearity of GABA-to-NAA gradients is generally captured by all of the tools, a large variation in the slope, offset and environmental stability of the gradient is observed. The primary driver of differences in linear combination modelling is the choice of basis function. However, tools employing a common basis and pre-processing still produce differences on the order of 4%. Less-strictly parametrised fitting approaches appear to improve the robustness of quantification, but accurate modelling of edit efficiency calculations is still necessary to avoid systematic offsets. In general, the level of variation suggests that comparisons across...
△ Less
Submitted 8 May, 2021; v1 submitted 4 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Dangerous human-made interference with climate: A GISS modelE study
Authors:
J. Hansen,
M. Sato,
R. Ruedy,
P. Kharecha,
A. Lacis,
R. Miller,
L. Nazarenko,
K. Lo,
G. A. Schmidt,
G. Russell,
I. Aleinov,
S. Bauer,
E. Baum,
B. Cairns,
V. Canuto,
M. Chandler,
Y. Cheng,
A. Cohen,
A. Del Genio,
G. Faluvegi,
E. Fleming,
A. Friend,
T. Hall,
C. Jackman,
J. Jonas
, et al. (22 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We investigate the issue of "dangerous human-made interference with climate" using simulations with GISS modelE driven by measured or estimated forcings for 1880-2003 and extended to 2100 for IPCC greenhouse gas scenarios as well as the 'alternative' scenario of Hansen and Sato. Identification of 'dangerous' effects is partly subjective, but we find evidence that added global warming of more tha…
▽ More
We investigate the issue of "dangerous human-made interference with climate" using simulations with GISS modelE driven by measured or estimated forcings for 1880-2003 and extended to 2100 for IPCC greenhouse gas scenarios as well as the 'alternative' scenario of Hansen and Sato. Identification of 'dangerous' effects is partly subjective, but we find evidence that added global warming of more than 1 degree C above the level in 2000 has effects that may be highly disruptive. The alternative scenario, with peak added forcing ~1.5 W/m2 in 2100, keeps further global warming under 1 degree C if climate sensitivity is \~3 degrees C or less for doubled CO2. We discuss three specific sub-global topics: Arctic climate change, tropical storm intensification, and ice sheet stability. Growth of non-CO2 forcings has slowed in recent years, but CO2 emissions are now surging well above the alternative scenario. Prompt actions to slow CO2 emissions and decrease non-CO2 forcings are needed to achieve the low forcing of the alternative scenario.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2006;
originally announced October 2006.
-
Climate simulations for 1880-2003 with GISS modelE
Authors:
J. Hansen,
M. Sato,
R. Ruedy,
P. Kharecha,
A. Lacis,
R. Miller,
L. Nazarenko,
K. Lo,
G. A. Schmidt,
G. Russell,
I. Aleinov,
S. Bauer,
E. Baum,
B. Cairns,
V. Canuto,
M. Chandler,
Y. Cheng,
A. Cohen,
A. Del Genio,
G. Faluvegi,
E. Fleming,
A. Friend,
T. Hall,
C. Jackman,
J. Jonas
, et al. (22 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We carry out climate simulations for 1880-2003 with GISS modelE driven by ten measured or estimated climate forcings. An ensemble of climate model runs is carried out for each forcing acting individually and for all forcing mechanisms acting together. We compare side-by-side simulated climate change for each forcing, all forcings, observations, unforced variability among model ensemble members,…
▽ More
We carry out climate simulations for 1880-2003 with GISS modelE driven by ten measured or estimated climate forcings. An ensemble of climate model runs is carried out for each forcing acting individually and for all forcing mechanisms acting together. We compare side-by-side simulated climate change for each forcing, all forcings, observations, unforced variability among model ensemble members, and, if available, observed variability. Discrepancies between observations and simulations with all forcings are due to model deficiencies, inaccurate or incomplete forcings, and imperfect observations. Although there are notable discrepancies between model and observations, the fidelity is sufficient to encourage use of the model for simulations of future climate change. By using a fixed well-documented model and accurately defining the 1880-2003 forcings, we aim to provide a benchmark against which the effect of improvements in the model, climate forcings, and observations can be tested. Principal model deficiencies include unrealistically weak tropical El Nino-like variability and a poor distribution of sea ice, with too much sea ice in the Northern Hemisphere and too little in the Southern Hemisphere. The greatest uncertainties in the forcings are the temporal and spatial variations of anthropogenic aerosols and their indirect effects on clouds.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2007; v1 submitted 16 October, 2006;
originally announced October 2006.