-
The LHCb upgrade I
Authors:
LHCb collaboration,
R. Aaij,
A. S. W. Abdelmotteleb,
C. Abellan Beteta,
F. Abudinén,
C. Achard,
T. Ackernley,
B. Adeva,
M. Adinolfi,
P. Adlarson,
H. Afsharnia,
C. Agapopoulou,
C. A. Aidala,
Z. Ajaltouni,
S. Akar,
K. Akiba,
P. Albicocco,
J. Albrecht,
F. Alessio,
M. Alexander,
A. Alfonso Albero,
Z. Aliouche,
P. Alvarez Cartelle,
R. Amalric,
S. Amato
, et al. (1298 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their select…
▽ More
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their selection in real time. The experiment's tracking system has been completely upgraded with a new pixel vertex detector, a silicon tracker upstream of the dipole magnet and three scintillating fibre tracking stations downstream of the magnet. The whole photon detection system of the RICH detectors has been renewed and the readout electronics of the calorimeter and muon systems have been fully overhauled. The first stage of the all-software trigger is implemented on a GPU farm. The output of the trigger provides a combination of totally reconstructed physics objects, such as tracks and vertices, ready for final analysis, and of entire events which need further offline reprocessing. This scheme required a complete revision of the computing model and rewriting of the experiment's software.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Shell viscosity estimation of lipid-coated microbubbles
Authors:
Marco Cattaneo,
Outi Supponen
Abstract:
Understanding the shell rheology of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles is vital for anticipating their bioeffects in clinical practice. Past studies using sophisticated acoustic and optical techniques have made enormous progress in this direction, enabling the development of shell models that adequately reproduce the nonlinear behaviour of the coated microbubble under acoustic excitation. Howe…
▽ More
Understanding the shell rheology of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles is vital for anticipating their bioeffects in clinical practice. Past studies using sophisticated acoustic and optical techniques have made enormous progress in this direction, enabling the development of shell models that adequately reproduce the nonlinear behaviour of the coated microbubble under acoustic excitation. However, there have also been puzzling discrepancies and missing physical explanations for the dependency of shell viscosity on the equilibrium bubble radius, which demands further experimental investigations. In this study, we aim to unravel the cause of such behaviour by performing a refined characterisation of the shell viscosity. We use ultra-high-speed microscopy imaging, optical trap** and wide-field fluorescence to accurately record the individual microbubble response upon ultrasound driving across a range of bubble sizes. An advanced model of bubble dynamics is validated and employed to infer the shell viscosity of single bubbles from their radial time evolution. The resulting values reveal a prominent variability of the shell viscosity of about an order of magnitude and no dependency on the bubble size, which is contrary to previous studies. We find that the method called bubble spectroscopy, which has been used extensively in the past to determine the shell viscosity, is highly sensitive to methodology inaccuracies, and we demonstrate through analytical arguments that the previously reported unphysical trends are an artifact of these biases. We also show the importance of correct bubble sizing, as errors in this aspect can also lead to unphysical trends in shell viscosity, when estimated through a nonlinear fitting from the time response of the bubble.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2023; v1 submitted 13 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
A Comparison of CPU and GPU implementations for the LHCb Experiment Run 3 Trigger
Authors:
R. Aaij,
M. Adinolfi,
S. Aiola,
S. Akar,
J. Albrecht,
M. Alexander,
S. Amato,
Y. Amhis,
F. Archilli,
M. Bala,
G. Bassi,
L. Bian,
M. P. Blago,
T. Boettcher,
A. Boldyrev,
S. Borghi,
A. Brea Rodriguez,
L. Calefice,
M. Calvo Gomez,
D. H. Cámpora Pérez,
A. Cardini,
M. Cattaneo,
V. Chobanova,
G. Ciezarek,
X. Cid Vidal
, et al. (135 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb experiment at CERN is undergoing an upgrade in preparation for the Run 3 data taking period of the LHC. As part of this upgrade the trigger is moving to a fully software implementation operating at the LHC bunch crossing rate. We present an evaluation of a CPU-based and a GPU-based implementation of the first stage of the High Level Trigger. After a detailed comparison both options are fo…
▽ More
The LHCb experiment at CERN is undergoing an upgrade in preparation for the Run 3 data taking period of the LHC. As part of this upgrade the trigger is moving to a fully software implementation operating at the LHC bunch crossing rate. We present an evaluation of a CPU-based and a GPU-based implementation of the first stage of the High Level Trigger. After a detailed comparison both options are found to be viable. This document summarizes the performance and implementation details of these options, the outcome of which has led to the choice of the GPU-based implementation as the baseline.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2022; v1 submitted 9 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Design and performance of the LHCb trigger and full real-time reconstruction in Run 2 of the LHC
Authors:
R. Aaij,
S. Akar,
J. Albrecht,
M. Alexander,
A. Alfonso Albero,
S. Amerio,
L. Anderlini,
P. d'Argent,
A. Baranov,
W. Barter,
S. Benson,
D. Bobulska,
T. Boettcher,
S. Borghi,
E. E. Bowen,
L. Brarda,
C. Burr,
J. -P. Cachemiche,
M. Calvo Gomez,
M. Cattaneo,
H. Chanal,
M. Chapman,
M. Chebbi,
M. Chefdeville,
P. Ciambrone
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb collaboration has redesigned its trigger to enable the full offline detector reconstruction to be performed in real time. Together with the real-time alignment and calibration of the detector, and a software infrastructure to make persistent the high-level physics objects produced during real-time processing, this redesign enabled the widespread deployment of real-time analysis during Run…
▽ More
The LHCb collaboration has redesigned its trigger to enable the full offline detector reconstruction to be performed in real time. Together with the real-time alignment and calibration of the detector, and a software infrastructure to make persistent the high-level physics objects produced during real-time processing, this redesign enabled the widespread deployment of real-time analysis during Run 2. We describe the design of the Run 2 trigger and real-time reconstruction, and present data-driven performance measurements for a representative sample of LHCb's physics programme.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2019; v1 submitted 27 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
A Roadmap for HEP Software and Computing R&D for the 2020s
Authors:
Johannes Albrecht,
Antonio Augusto Alves Jr,
Guilherme Amadio,
Giuseppe Andronico,
Nguyen Anh-Ky,
Laurent Aphecetche,
John Apostolakis,
Makoto Asai,
Luca Atzori,
Marian Babik,
Giuseppe Bagliesi,
Marilena Bandieramonte,
Sunanda Banerjee,
Martin Barisits,
Lothar A. T. Bauerdick,
Stefano Belforte,
Douglas Benjamin,
Catrin Bernius,
Wahid Bhimji,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Ian Bird,
Catherine Biscarat,
Jakob Blomer,
Kenneth Bloom,
Tommaso Boccali
, et al. (285 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for…
▽ More
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for the HL-LHC in particular, it is critical that all of the collaborating stakeholders agree on the software goals and priorities, and that the efforts complement each other. In this spirit, this white paper describes the R&D activities required to prepare for this software upgrade.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2018; v1 submitted 18 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Tesla : an application for real-time data analysis in High Energy Physics
Authors:
R. Aaij,
S. Amato,
L. Anderlini,
S. Benson,
M. Cattaneo,
M. Clemencic,
B. Couturier,
M. Frank,
V. V. Gligorov,
T. Head,
C. Jones,
I. Komarov,
O. Lupton,
R. Matev,
G. Raven,
B. Sciascia,
T. Skwarnicki,
P. Spradlin,
S. Stahl,
B. Storaci,
M. Vesterinen
Abstract:
Upgrades to the LHCb computing infrastructure in the first long shutdown of the LHC have allowed for high quality decay information to be calculated by the software trigger making a separate offline event reconstruction unnecessary. Furthermore, the storage space of the triggered candidate is an order of magnitude smaller than the entire raw event that would otherwise need to be persisted. Tesla,…
▽ More
Upgrades to the LHCb computing infrastructure in the first long shutdown of the LHC have allowed for high quality decay information to be calculated by the software trigger making a separate offline event reconstruction unnecessary. Furthermore, the storage space of the triggered candidate is an order of magnitude smaller than the entire raw event that would otherwise need to be persisted. Tesla, following the LHCb renowned physicist naming convention, is an application designed to process the information calculated by the trigger, with the resulting output used to directly perform physics measurements.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Application of vertex and mass constraints in track-based alignment
Authors:
J. Amoraal,
J. Blouw,
S. Blusk,
S. Borghi,
M. Cattaneo,
N. Chiapolini,
G. Conti,
M. Deissenroth,
F. Dupertuis,
R. van der Eijk,
V. Fave,
M. Gersabeck,
A. Hicheur,
W. Hulsbergen,
D. Hutchcroft,
A. Kozlinskiy,
R. W. Lambert,
F. Maciuc,
R. Marki,
M. Martinelli,
M. Merk,
M. Needham,
L. Nicolas,
J. Palacios,
C. Parkes
, et al. (14 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The software alignment of planar tracking detectors using samples of charged particle trajectories may lead to global detector distortions that affect vertex and momentum resolution. We present an alignment procedure that constrains such distortions by making use of samples of decay vertices reconstructed from two or more trajectories and putting constraints on their invariant mass. We illustrate…
▽ More
The software alignment of planar tracking detectors using samples of charged particle trajectories may lead to global detector distortions that affect vertex and momentum resolution. We present an alignment procedure that constrains such distortions by making use of samples of decay vertices reconstructed from two or more trajectories and putting constraints on their invariant mass. We illustrate the method by using a sample of invariant-mass constrained vertices from D^0 --> K^- pi^+ decays to remove a curvature bias in the LHCb spectrometer.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2013; v1 submitted 19 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
-
Absolute luminosity measurements with the LHCb detector at the LHC
Authors:
The LHCb Collaboration,
R. Aaij,
B. Adeva,
M. Adinolfi,
C. Adrover,
A. Affolder,
Z. Ajaltouni,
J. Albrecht,
F. Alessio,
M. Alexander,
G. Alkhazov,
P. Alvarez Cartelle,
A. A. Alves Jr,
S. Amato,
Y. Amhis,
J. Anderson,
R. B. Appleby,
O. Aquines Gutierrez,
F. Archilli,
L. Arrabito,
A. Artamonov,
M. Artuso,
E. Aslanides,
G. Auriemma,
S. Bachmann
, et al. (549 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Absolute luminosity measurements are of general interest for colliding-beam experiments at storage rings. These measurements are necessary to determine the absolute cross-sections of reaction processes and are valuable to quantify the performance of the accelerator. Using data taken in 2010, LHCb has applied two methods to determine the absolute scale of its luminosity measurements for proton-prot…
▽ More
Absolute luminosity measurements are of general interest for colliding-beam experiments at storage rings. These measurements are necessary to determine the absolute cross-sections of reaction processes and are valuable to quantify the performance of the accelerator. Using data taken in 2010, LHCb has applied two methods to determine the absolute scale of its luminosity measurements for proton-proton collisions at the LHC with a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV. In addition to the classic "van der Meer scan" method a novel technique has been developed which makes use of direct imaging of the individual beams using beam-gas and beam-beam interactions. This beam imaging method is made possible by the high resolution of the LHCb vertex detector and the close proximity of the detector to the beams, and allows beam parameters such as positions, angles and widths to be determined. The results of the two methods have comparable precision and are in good agreement. Combining the two methods, an overall precision of 3.5% in the absolute luminosity determination is reached. The techniques used to transport the absolute luminosity calibration to the full 2010 data-taking period are presented.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2012; v1 submitted 13 October, 2011;
originally announced October 2011.
-
Event Data Definition in LHCb
Authors:
Marco Cattaneo,
Gloria Corti,
Markus Frank,
Pere Mato Vila,
Silvia Miksch,
Stefan Roiser
Abstract:
We present the approach used for defining the event object model for the LHCb experiment. This approach is based on a high level modelling language, which is independent of the programming language used in the current implementation of the event data processing software. The different possibilities of object modelling languages are evaluated, and the advantages of a dedicated model based on XML…
▽ More
We present the approach used for defining the event object model for the LHCb experiment. This approach is based on a high level modelling language, which is independent of the programming language used in the current implementation of the event data processing software. The different possibilities of object modelling languages are evaluated, and the advantages of a dedicated model based on XML over other possible candidates are shown. After a description of the language itself, we explain the benefits obtained by applying this approach in the description of the event model of an experiment such as LHCb. Examples of these benefits are uniform and coherent map** of the object model to the implementation language across the experiment software development teams, easy maintenance of the event model, conformance to experiment coding rules, etc.
The description of the object model is parsed by means of a so called front-end which allows to feed several back-ends. We give an introduction to the model itself and to the currently implemented back-ends which produce information like programming language specific implementations of event objects or meta information about these objects. Meta information can be used for introspection of objects at run-time which is essential for functionalities like object persistency or interactive analysis. This object introspection package for C++ has been adopted by the LCG project as the starting point for the LCG object dictionary that is going to be developed in common for the LHC experiments.
The current status of the event object modelling and its usage in LHCb are presented and the prospects of further developments are discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2003;
originally announced June 2003.
