-
Crop-specific Optimization of Bifacial PV Arrays for Agrivoltaic Food-Energy Production: The Light-Productivity-Factor Approach
Authors:
Muhammad Hussnain Riaz,
Hassan Imran,
Habeel Alam,
Muhammad Ashraful Alam,
Nauman Zafar Butt
Abstract:
Agrivoltaics (AV) is an emerging technology having symbiotic benefits for food-energy-water needs of the growing world population and an inherent resilience against climate vulnerabilities. An agrivoltaic system must optimize sunlight-sharing between the solar panels and crops to maximize the food-energy yields, subject to appropriate constraints. Given the emerging diversity of monofacial and bif…
▽ More
Agrivoltaics (AV) is an emerging technology having symbiotic benefits for food-energy-water needs of the growing world population and an inherent resilience against climate vulnerabilities. An agrivoltaic system must optimize sunlight-sharing between the solar panels and crops to maximize the food-energy yields, subject to appropriate constraints. Given the emerging diversity of monofacial and bifacial farms, the lack of a standardized crop-specific metric (to evaluate the efficacy of the irradiance sharing) has made it difficult to optimize and assess the performance of agrivoltaic systems. Here we introduce a new metric, light productivity factor (LPF), that evaluates the effectiveness of irradiance sharing for a given crop type and PV array design. The metric allows us to identify optimal design parameters including the spatial PV array density, panel orientation, and single axis tracking schemes specific to the PAR needs of the crop. By definition, LPF equals 1 for PV-only or crop-only systems. The AV systems enhances LPF between 1 and 2 depending on the shade sensitivity of the crop, PV array configuration, and the season. While traditional fixed-tilt systems increase LPF significantly above 1, we find LPF is maximized at 2 for shade-tolerant crops with a solar farm based on single axis sun tracking scheme. Among the fixed tilt systems, East-West faced bifacial vertical solar farms is particularly promising because it produces smallest variability in the seasonal yield for shade sensitive crops, while providing LPF comparable to the standard North-South faced solar farms. Additional benefits include reduced soiling and ease of movement of large-scale combine-harvester and other farming equipment.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Optimum design of tracking bifacial solar farms -- A comprehensive global analysis of next-generation PV
Authors:
M. Tahir Patel,
M. Sojib Ahmed,
Hassan Imran,
Nauman Z. Butt,
M. Ryyan Khan,
Muhammad A. Alam
Abstract:
The bifacial gain of East-West vertical and South-facing optimally-tilted bifacial farms are well established. One wonders if bifacial gain (and the associated LCOE) may be further improved by tracking the sun. Tracking bifacial PV has advantages of improved temperature sensitivity, enhanced diffuse and albedo light collection, flattened energy-output, reduced soiling, etc. Monofacial tracking alr…
▽ More
The bifacial gain of East-West vertical and South-facing optimally-tilted bifacial farms are well established. One wonders if bifacial gain (and the associated LCOE) may be further improved by tracking the sun. Tracking bifacial PV has advantages of improved temperature sensitivity, enhanced diffuse and albedo light collection, flattened energy-output, reduced soiling, etc. Monofacial tracking already provides many of these advantages, therefore the relative merits of bifacial tracking are not obvious. In this paper, we use a detailed illumination and temperature-dependent bifacial solar farm model to show that bifacial tracking PV delivers up to 45% energy gain when compared to fixed-tilt bifacial PV near the equator, and ~10% bifacial energy gain over tracking monofacial farm with an albedo of 0.5. An optimum pitch further improves the gain of a tracking bifacial farm. Our results will broaden the scope and understanding of bifacial technology by demonstrating global trends in energy gain for worldwide deployment.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Module Technology for Agrivoltaics: Vertical Bifacial vs. Tilted Monofacial Farms
Authors:
Muhammad Hussnain Riaz,
Rehan Younas,
Hassan Imran,
Muhammad Ashraful Alam,
Nauman Zafar Butt
Abstract:
Agrivoltaics is an innovative approach in which solar photovoltaic (PV) energy generation is collocated with agricultural production to enable food-energy-water synergies and landscape ecological conservation. This dual-use requirement leads to unique co-optimization challenges (e.g. shading, soiling, spacing) that make module technology and farm topology choices distinctly different from traditio…
▽ More
Agrivoltaics is an innovative approach in which solar photovoltaic (PV) energy generation is collocated with agricultural production to enable food-energy-water synergies and landscape ecological conservation. This dual-use requirement leads to unique co-optimization challenges (e.g. shading, soiling, spacing) that make module technology and farm topology choices distinctly different from traditional solar farms. Here we compare the performance of the traditional optimally-titled North/South (N/S) faced monofacial farms with a potential alternative based on vertical East/West (E/W)-faced bifacial farms. Remarkably, the vertical farm produces essentially the same energy output and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) compared to traditional farms as long as the PV array density is reduced to half or lower relative to that for the standard ground-mounted PV farms. Our results explain the relative merits of the traditional mono facial vs. vertical bifacial farms as a function of array density, acceptable PAR-deficit, and energy production. The combined PAR/Energy yields for the vertical bifacial farm may not always be superior, it could still be an attractive choice for agrivoltaics due to its distinct advantages such as minimum land coverage, least hindrance to the farm machinery and rainfall, inherent resilience to PV soiling, easier cleaning and cost advantages due to potentially reduced elevation.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2020; v1 submitted 2 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
