-
What an event is not: unravelling the identity of events in quantum theory and gravity
Authors:
Anne-Catherine de la Hamette,
Viktoria Kabel,
Časlav Brukner
Abstract:
We explore the notion of events at the intersection between quantum physics and gravity, inspired by recent research on superpositions of semiclassical spacetimes. By going through various experiments and thought experiments -- from a decaying atom, to the double-slit experiment, to the quantum switch -- we analyse which properties can and cannot be used to define events in such non-classical cont…
▽ More
We explore the notion of events at the intersection between quantum physics and gravity, inspired by recent research on superpositions of semiclassical spacetimes. By going through various experiments and thought experiments -- from a decaying atom, to the double-slit experiment, to the quantum switch -- we analyse which properties can and cannot be used to define events in such non-classical contexts. Our findings suggest an operational, context-dependent definition of events which emphasises that their properties can be accessed without destroying or altering observed phenomena. We discuss the implications of this understanding of events for indefinite causal order as well as the non-absoluteness of events in the Wigner's friend thought experiment. These findings provide a first step for develo** a notion of event in quantum spacetime.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Identification is Pointless: Quantum Reference Frames, Localisation of Events, and the Quantum Hole Argument
Authors:
Viktoria Kabel,
Anne-Catherine de la Hamette,
Luca Apadula,
Carlo Cepollaro,
Henrique Gomes,
Jeremy Butterfield,
Časlav Brukner
Abstract:
The study of quantum reference frames (QRFs) is motivated by the idea of taking into account the quantum properties of the reference frames that we use, explicitly or implicitly, in our description of physical systems. Like a classical reference frame, a QRF can be used to define physical quantities such as time, position, momentum, and spin relationally. Unlike its classical analogue, it relativi…
▽ More
The study of quantum reference frames (QRFs) is motivated by the idea of taking into account the quantum properties of the reference frames that we use, explicitly or implicitly, in our description of physical systems. Like a classical reference frame, a QRF can be used to define physical quantities such as time, position, momentum, and spin relationally. Unlike its classical analogue, it relativises the notions of superposition and entanglement. Here, we provide a novel explanation for the frame-dependence of superposition and entanglement by tracing it back to the question of how configurations or locations are identified across different branches in superposition. We show that, in the presence of symmetries, whether a system is in 'the same' or 'different' configurations across the branches depends on the choice of QRF. Thus, sameness and difference-and, as a result, superposition and entanglement-lose their absolute meaning. We apply these ideas to semi-classical spacetimes in superposition and use coincidences of four scalar fields to construct a comparison map between the spacetime points in the different branches. This allows us to determine whether a given event is located at 'the same' or 'different' points in the superposed spacetimes. Since this feature depends on the choice of QRF, we argue that the localisation of an event should not be seen as an inherent property. This alleviates previously voiced concerns that QRF changes could have empirical consequences for interference experiments, such as the BMV proposal. Moreover, it implies that the number of events is equal in both the flat and the curved spacetime implementations of indefinite causal order. We conclude with the 'quantum hole argument' as a generalisation of Einstein's hole argument, arguing that not just spacetime points but also their identification across a superposition lose their absolute physical meaning.
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Controlling wave-particle duality with quantum entanglement
Authors:
Kai Wang,
Daniel R. Terno,
Caslav Brukner,
Shining Zhu,
Xiao-Song Ma
Abstract:
Wave-particle duality and entanglement are two fundamental characteristics of quantum mechanics. All previous works on experimental investigations in wave{particle properties of single photons (or single particles in general) show that a well-defined interferometer setting determines a well-defined property of single photons. Here we take a conceptual step forward and control the wave-particle pro…
▽ More
Wave-particle duality and entanglement are two fundamental characteristics of quantum mechanics. All previous works on experimental investigations in wave{particle properties of single photons (or single particles in general) show that a well-defined interferometer setting determines a well-defined property of single photons. Here we take a conceptual step forward and control the wave-particle property of single photons with quantum entanglement. By doing so, we experimentally test the complementarity principle in a scenario, in which the setting of the interferometer is not defined at any instance of the experiment, not even in principle. To achieve this goal, we send the photon of interest (S) into a quantum Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), in which the output beam splitter of the MZI is controlled by the quantum state of the second photon (C), who is entangled with a third photon (A). Therefore, the individual quantum state of photon C is undefined, which implements the undefined settings of the MZI for photon S. This is realized by using three cascaded phase-stable interferometers for three photons. There is typically no well-defined setting of the MZI, and thus the very formulation of the wave-particle properties becomes internally inconsistent.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Comment on Healey's "Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity"
Authors:
Veronika Baumann,
Flavio Del Santo,
Caslav Brukner
Abstract:
In this comment we critically review an argument against the existence of objective physical outcomes, recently proposed by R. Healey [Foundations of Physics, 48(11), 1568-1589]. We show that his gedankenexperiment, based on a combination of "Wigner's friend" scenarios and Bell's inequalities, suffers from the main criticism, that the computed correlation functions entering the Bell's inequality a…
▽ More
In this comment we critically review an argument against the existence of objective physical outcomes, recently proposed by R. Healey [Foundations of Physics, 48(11), 1568-1589]. We show that his gedankenexperiment, based on a combination of "Wigner's friend" scenarios and Bell's inequalities, suffers from the main criticism, that the computed correlation functions entering the Bell's inequality are in principle experimentally inaccessible, and hence the author's claim is not verifiable. We discuss perspectives for fixing that by adapting the proposed protocol and show that this, however, makes Healey's argument virtually equivalent to other previous, similar proposals that he explicitly criticises.
△ Less
Submitted 29 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
Quantum test of the equivalence principle for atoms in superpositions of internal energy eigenstates
Authors:
G. Rosi,
G. D'Amico,
L. Cacciapuoti,
F. Sorrentino,
M. Prevedelli,
M. Zych,
C. Brukner,
G. M. Tino
Abstract:
The Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP) has a central role in the understanding of gravity and space-time. In its weak form, or Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP), it directly implies equivalence between inertial and gravitational mass. Verifying this principle in a regime where the relevant properties of the test body must be described by quantum theory has profound implications. Here we report on…
▽ More
The Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP) has a central role in the understanding of gravity and space-time. In its weak form, or Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP), it directly implies equivalence between inertial and gravitational mass. Verifying this principle in a regime where the relevant properties of the test body must be described by quantum theory has profound implications. Here we report on a novel WEP test for atoms. A Bragg atom interferometer in a gravity gradiometer configuration compares the free fall of rubidium atoms prepared in two hyperfine states and in their coherent superposition. The use of the superposition state allows testing genuine quantum aspects of EEP with no classical analogue, which have remained completely unexplored so far. In addition, we measure the Eotvos ratio of atoms in two hyperfine levels with relative uncertainty in the low $10^{-9}$, improving previous results by almost two orders of magnitude.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2017; v1 submitted 7 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
-
Quantum and Classical Phases in Optomechanics
Authors:
Federico Armata,
Ludovico Latmiral,
Igor Pikovski,
Michael R. Vanner,
Caslav Brukner,
M. S. Kim
Abstract:
The control of quantum systems requires the ability to change and read-out the phase of a system. The non-commutativity of canonical conjugate operators can induce phases on quantum systems, which can be employed for implementing phase gates and for precision measurements. Here we study the phase acquired by a radiation field after its radiation pressure interaction with a mechanical oscillator, a…
▽ More
The control of quantum systems requires the ability to change and read-out the phase of a system. The non-commutativity of canonical conjugate operators can induce phases on quantum systems, which can be employed for implementing phase gates and for precision measurements. Here we study the phase acquired by a radiation field after its radiation pressure interaction with a mechanical oscillator, and compare the classical and quantum contributions. The classical description can reproduce the nonlinearity induced by the mechanical oscillator and the loss of correlations between mechanics and optical field at certain interaction times. Such features alone are therefore insufficient for probing the quantum nature of the interaction. Our results thus isolate genuine quantum contributions of the optomechanical interaction that could be probed in current experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2016; v1 submitted 19 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Obtaining tight bounds on higher-order interferences with a 5-path interferometer
Authors:
Thomas Kauten,
Robert Keil,
Thomas Kaufmann,
Benedikt Pressl,
Časlav Brukner,
Gregor Weihs
Abstract:
Within the established theoretical framework of quantum mechanics, interference always occurs between pairs of trajectories. Higher order interferences with multiple constituents are, however, excluded by Born's rule and can only exist in generalized probabilistic theories. Thus, high-precision experiments searching for such higher order interferences are a powerful method to distinguish between q…
▽ More
Within the established theoretical framework of quantum mechanics, interference always occurs between pairs of trajectories. Higher order interferences with multiple constituents are, however, excluded by Born's rule and can only exist in generalized probabilistic theories. Thus, high-precision experiments searching for such higher order interferences are a powerful method to distinguish between quantum mechanics and more general theories. Here, we perform such a test in optical multi-path interferometers. Our results rule out the existence of higher order interference terms to an extent which is more than four orders of magnitude smaller than the expected pairwise interference, refining previous bounds by two orders of magnitude. This establishes the hitherto tightest constraints on generalized interference theories.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2016; v1 submitted 13 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
Quantum non-locality - It ain't necessarily so...
Authors:
Marek Zukowski,
Caslav Brukner
Abstract:
Bell's theorem is 50 years old. Still there is a controversy about its implications. Much of it has its roots in confusion regarding the premises from which the theorem can be derived. Some claim that a derivation of Bell's inequalities requires just locality assumption, and nothing more. Violations of the inequalities are then interpreted as ``nonlocality'' or ``quantum nonlocality''. We show tha…
▽ More
Bell's theorem is 50 years old. Still there is a controversy about its implications. Much of it has its roots in confusion regarding the premises from which the theorem can be derived. Some claim that a derivation of Bell's inequalities requires just locality assumption, and nothing more. Violations of the inequalities are then interpreted as ``nonlocality'' or ``quantum nonlocality''. We show that such claims are unfounded and that every derivation of Bell's inequalities requires a premise -- in addition to locality and freedom of choice -- which is either assumed tacitly, or unconsciously, or is embedded in a single compound condition (like Bell's ``local causality''). The premise is equivalent to the assumption of existence of additional variables which do not appear in the quantum formalism (in form of determinism, or joint probability for outcomes of all conceivable measurements, or ``additional causes`'', or ``hidden variables'', ``complete description of the state'' or counterfactual definiteness, etc.). A certain irony is that perhaps the main message of violation of Bell's inequalities is that our notion of locality should be based on an operationally well-defined no-signalling condition, rather than on local causality.
△ Less
Submitted 19 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
