The ECFA Early Career Researcher's Panel: composition, structure, and activities, 2021 -- 2022
Authors:
ECFA Early-Career Researcher Panel,
:,
Andrei Alexandru Geanta,
Chiara Amendola,
Liliana Apolinario,
Jan-Hendrik Arling,
Adi Ashkenazi,
Kamil Augsten,
Emanuele Bagnaschi,
Evelin Bakos,
Liron Barak,
Diogo Bastos,
Giovanni Benato,
Bugra Bilin,
Neven Blaskovic Kraljevic,
Lydia Brenner,
Francesco Brizioli,
Antoine Camper,
Alessandra Camplani,
Xabier Cid Vidal,
Hüseyin Dag,
Flavia de Almeida Dias,
Jordy Degens,
Eleonora Diociaiuti,
Laurent Dufour
, et al. (52 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The European Committee for Future Accelerators (ECFA) Early Career Researcher's (ECR) panel, which represents the interests of the ECR community to ECFA, officially began its activities in January 2021. In the first two years, the panel has defined its own internal structure, responded to ECFA requests for feedback, and launched its own initiatives to better understand and support the diverse inte…
▽ More
The European Committee for Future Accelerators (ECFA) Early Career Researcher's (ECR) panel, which represents the interests of the ECR community to ECFA, officially began its activities in January 2021. In the first two years, the panel has defined its own internal structure, responded to ECFA requests for feedback, and launched its own initiatives to better understand and support the diverse interests of early career researchers. This report summarises the panel composition and structure, as well as the different activities the panel has been involved with during the first two years of its existence.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
Simple and statistically sound recommendations for analysing physical theories
Authors:
Shehu S. AbdusSalam,
Fruzsina J. Agocs,
Benjamin C. Allanach,
Peter Athron,
Csaba Balázs,
Emanuele Bagnaschi,
Philip Bechtle,
Oliver Buchmueller,
Ankit Beniwal,
Jihyun Bhom,
Sanjay Bloor,
Torsten Bringmann,
Andy Buckley,
Anja Butter,
José Eliel Camargo-Molina,
Marcin Chrzaszcz,
Jan Conrad,
Jonathan M. Cornell,
Matthias Danninger,
Jorge de Blas,
Albert De Roeck,
Klaus Desch,
Matthew Dolan,
Herbert Dreiner,
Otto Eberhardt
, et al. (50 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Physical theories that depend on many parameters or are tested against data from many different experiments pose unique challenges to statistical inference. Many models in particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology fall into one or both of these categories. These issues are often sidestepped with statistically unsound ad hoc methods, involving intersection of parameter intervals estimated by mul…
▽ More
Physical theories that depend on many parameters or are tested against data from many different experiments pose unique challenges to statistical inference. Many models in particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology fall into one or both of these categories. These issues are often sidestepped with statistically unsound ad hoc methods, involving intersection of parameter intervals estimated by multiple experiments, and random or grid sampling of model parameters. Whilst these methods are easy to apply, they exhibit pathologies even in low-dimensional parameter spaces, and quickly become problematic to use and interpret in higher dimensions. In this article we give clear guidance for going beyond these procedures, suggesting where possible simple methods for performing statistically sound inference, and recommendations of readily-available software tools and standards that can assist in doing so. Our aim is to provide any physicists lacking comprehensive statistical training with recommendations for reaching correct scientific conclusions, with only a modest increase in analysis burden. Our examples can be reproduced with the code publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4322283.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2022; v1 submitted 17 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
