Showing 1–14 of 14 results for author: Arrington, J

ATHENA Detector Proposal -- A Totally Hermetic Electron Nucleus Apparatus proposed for IP6 at the Electron-Ion Collider

Authors: ATHENA Collaboration, J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, N. Agrawal, C. Aidala, W. Akers, M. Alekseev, M. M. Allen, F. Ameli, A. Angerami, P. Antonioli, N. J. Apadula, A. Aprahamian, W. Armstrong, M. Arratia, J. R. Arrington, A. Asaturyan, E. C. Aschenauer, K. Augsten, S. Aune, K. Bailey, C. Baldanza, M. Bansal, F. Barbosa, L. Barion , et al. (415 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: ATHENA has been designed as a general purpose detector capable of delivering the full scientific scope of the Electron-Ion Collider. Careful technology choices provide fine tracking and momentum resolution, high performance electromagnetic and hadronic calorimetry, hadron identification over a wide kinematic range, and near-complete hermeticity. This article describes the detector design and its e… ▽ More ATHENA has been designed as a general purpose detector capable of delivering the full scientific scope of the Electron-Ion Collider. Careful technology choices provide fine tracking and momentum resolution, high performance electromagnetic and hadronic calorimetry, hadron identification over a wide kinematic range, and near-complete hermeticity. This article describes the detector design and its expected performance in the most relevant physics channels. It includes an evaluation of detector technology choices, the technical challenges to realizing the detector and the R&D required to meet those challenges. △ Less

Submitted 13 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Journal ref: JINST 17 (2022) 10, P10019

The Solenoidal Large Intensity Device (SoLID) for JLab 12 GeV

Authors: John Arrington, Jay Benesch, Alexandre Camsonne, Jimmy Caylor, Jian-** Chen, Silviu Covrig Dusa, Alexander Emmert, George Evans, Haiyan Gao, J. Ole Hansen, Garth M. Huber, Sylvester Joosten, Vladimir Khachatryan, Nilanga Liyanage, Zein-Eddine Meziani, Michael Nycz, Chao Peng, Michael Paolone, Whit Seay, Paul A. Souder, Nikos Sparveris, Hubert Spiesberger, Ye Tian, Eric Voutier, Junqi Xie , et al. (6 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The Solenoidal Large Intensity Device (SoLID) is a new experimental apparatus planned for Hall A at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab). SoLID will combine large angular and momentum acceptance with the capability to handle very high data rates at high luminosity. With a slate of approved high-impact physics experiments, SoLID will push JLab to a new limit at the QCD intensit… ▽ More The Solenoidal Large Intensity Device (SoLID) is a new experimental apparatus planned for Hall A at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab). SoLID will combine large angular and momentum acceptance with the capability to handle very high data rates at high luminosity. With a slate of approved high-impact physics experiments, SoLID will push JLab to a new limit at the QCD intensity frontier that will exploit the full potential of its 12 GeV electron beam. In this paper, we present an overview of the rich physics program that can be realized with SoLID, which encompasses the tomography of the nucleon in 3-D momentum space from Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering (SIDIS), expanding the phase space in the search for new physics and novel hadronic effects in parity-violating DIS (PVDIS), a precision measurement of $J/ψ$ production at threshold that probes the gluon field and its contribution to the proton mass, tomography of the nucleon in combined coordinate and momentum space with deep exclusive reactions, and more. To meet the challenging requirements, the design of SoLID described here takes full advantage of recent progress in detector, data acquisition and computing technologies. In addition, we outline potential experiments beyond the currently approved program and discuss the physics that could be explored should upgrades of CEBAF become a reality in the future. △ Less

Submitted 12 February, 2023; v1 submitted 18 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: This white paper for the SoLID program at Jefferson Lab was prepared in part as an input to the 2023 NSAC Long Range Planning exercise. To be submitted to J. Phys. G

Physics Opportunities for the Fermilab Booster Replacement

Authors: John Arrington, Joshua Barrow, Brian Batell, Robert Bernstein, Nikita Blinov, S. J. Brice, Ray Culbertson, Patrick deNiverville, Vito Di Benedetto, Jeff Eldred, Angela Fava, Laura Fields, Alex Friedland, Andrei Gaponenko, Corrado Gatto, Stefania Gori, Roni Harnik, Richard J. Hill, Daniel M. Kaplan, Kevin J. Kelly, Mandy Kiburg, Tom Kobilarcik, Gordan Krnjaic, Gabriel Lee, B. R. Littlejohn , et al. (27 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This white paper presents opportunities afforded by the Fermilab Booster Replacement and its various options. Its goal is to inform the design process of the Booster Replacement about the accelerator needs of the various options, allowing the design to be versatile and enable, or leave the door open to, as many options as possible. The physics themes covered by the paper include searches for dark… ▽ More This white paper presents opportunities afforded by the Fermilab Booster Replacement and its various options. Its goal is to inform the design process of the Booster Replacement about the accelerator needs of the various options, allowing the design to be versatile and enable, or leave the door open to, as many options as possible. The physics themes covered by the paper include searches for dark sectors and new opportunities with muons. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: Snowmass white paper

Report number: FERMILAB-FN-1145, LA-UR-22-21987

A direct-sampling RF receiver for MOLLER beam charge measurement

Authors: Yuan Mei, Shujie Li, John Arrington, Joseph Camilleri, Aled Cuda, James Egelhoff, Yury Kolomensky, Ernst Sichtermann

Abstract: We have developed and tested a direct-sampling RF receiver capable of measuring the amplitude of a 1497 MHz sinusoidal signal in 0.5 ms integration windows to within <10 ppm relative uncertainty. The receiver is intended for measuring signals from beam current monitoring cavities on the beamline of the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) at Jefferson Laboratory. The signal streng… ▽ More We have developed and tested a direct-sampling RF receiver capable of measuring the amplitude of a 1497 MHz sinusoidal signal in 0.5 ms integration windows to within <10 ppm relative uncertainty. The receiver is intended for measuring signals from beam current monitoring cavities on the beamline of the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) at Jefferson Laboratory. The signal strength, frequency, and integration window are consistent with the thus far unmet requirements of the upcoming MOLLER experiment to measure the beam charge for different helicity states. △ Less

Submitted 18 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report

Authors: R. Abdul Khalek, A. Accardi, J. Adam, D. Adamiak, W. Akers, M. Albaladejo, A. Al-bataineh, M. G. Alexeev, F. Ameli, P. Antonioli, N. Armesto, W. R. Armstrong, M. Arratia, J. Arrington, A. Asaturyan, M. Asai, E. C. Aschenauer, S. Aune, H. Avagyan, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, B. Azmoun, A. Bacchetta, M. D. Baker, F. Barbosa, L. Barion , et al. (390 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This report describes the physics case, the resulting detector requirements, and the evolving detector concepts for the experimental program at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). The EIC will be a powerful new high-luminosity facility in the United States with the capability to collide high-energy electron beams with high-energy proton and ion beams, providing access to those regions in the nucleon… ▽ More This report describes the physics case, the resulting detector requirements, and the evolving detector concepts for the experimental program at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). The EIC will be a powerful new high-luminosity facility in the United States with the capability to collide high-energy electron beams with high-energy proton and ion beams, providing access to those regions in the nucleon and nuclei where their structure is dominated by gluons. Moreover, polarized beams in the EIC will give unprecedented access to the spatial and spin structure of the proton, neutron, and light ions. The studies leading to this document were commissioned and organized by the EIC User Group with the objective of advancing the state and detail of the physics program and develo** detector concepts that meet the emerging requirements in preparation for the realization of the EIC. The effort aims to provide the basis for further development of concepts for experimental equipment best suited for the science needs, including the importance of two complementary detectors and interaction regions. This report consists of three volumes. Volume I is an executive summary of our findings and developed concepts. In Volume II we describe studies of a wide range of physics measurements and the emerging requirements on detector acceptance and performance. Volume III discusses general-purpose detector concepts and the underlying technologies to meet the physics requirements. These considerations will form the basis for a world-class experimental program that aims to increase our understanding of the fundamental structure of all visible matter △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2021; v1 submitted 8 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: 902 pages, 415 authors, 151 institutions

Report number: BNL-220990-2021-FORE, JLAB-PHY-21-3198, LA-UR-21-20953

Journal ref: Nucl. Phys. A 1026 (2022) 122447

Opportunities for Nuclear Physics & Quantum Information Science

Authors: Ian C. Cloët, Matthew R. Dietrich, John Arrington, Alexei Bazavov, Michael Bishof, Adam Freese, Alexey V. Gorshkov, Anna Grassellino, Kawtar Hafidi, Zubin Jacob, Michael McGuigan, Yannick Meurice, Zein-Eddine Meziani, Peter Mueller, Christine Muschik, James Osborn, Matthew Otten, Peter Petreczky, Tomas Polakovic, Alan Poon, Raphael Pooser, Alessandro Roggero, Mark Saffman, Brent VanDevender, Jiehang Zhang , et al. (1 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This whitepaper is an outcome of the workshop Intersections between Nuclear Physics and Quantum Information held at Argonne National Laboratory on 28-30 March 2018 [www.phy.anl.gov/npqi2018/]. The workshop brought together 116 national and international experts in nuclear physics and quantum information science to explore opportunities for the two fields to collaborate on topics of interest to the… ▽ More This whitepaper is an outcome of the workshop Intersections between Nuclear Physics and Quantum Information held at Argonne National Laboratory on 28-30 March 2018 [www.phy.anl.gov/npqi2018/]. The workshop brought together 116 national and international experts in nuclear physics and quantum information science to explore opportunities for the two fields to collaborate on topics of interest to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, and more broadly to U.S. society and industry. The workshop consisted of 22 invited and 10 contributed talks, as well as three panel discussion sessions. Topics discussed included quantum computation, quantum simulation, quantum sensing, nuclear physics detectors, nuclear many-body problem, entanglement at collider energies, and lattice gauge theories. △ Less

Submitted 30 July, 2019; v1 submitted 13 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: 22 pages, Outcome of the workshop: Intersections between Nuclear Physics and Quantum Information

Technical Design Report for the Paul Scherrer Institute Experiment R-12-01.1: Studying the Proton "Radius" Puzzle with μp Elastic Scattering

Authors: R. Gilman, E. J. Downie, G. Ron, S. Strauch, A. Afanasev, A. Akmal, J. Arrington, H. Atac, C. Ayerbe-Gayoso, F. Benmokhtar, N. Benmouna, J. Bernauer, A. Blomberg, W. J. Briscoe, D. Cioffi, E. Cline, D. Cohen, E. O. Cohen, C. Collicott, K. Deiters, J. Diefenbach, B. Dongwi, D. Ghosal, A. Golossanov, R. Gothe , et al. (34 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The difference in proton radii measured with $μp$ atoms and with $ep$ atoms and scattering remains an unexplained puzzle. The PSI MUSE proposal is to measure $μp$ and $e p$ scattering in the same experiment at the same time. The experiment will determine cross sections, two-photon effects, form factors, and radii independently for the two reactions, and will allow $μp$ and $ep$ results to be compa… ▽ More The difference in proton radii measured with $μp$ atoms and with $ep$ atoms and scattering remains an unexplained puzzle. The PSI MUSE proposal is to measure $μp$ and $e p$ scattering in the same experiment at the same time. The experiment will determine cross sections, two-photon effects, form factors, and radii independently for the two reactions, and will allow $μp$ and $ep$ results to be compared with reduced systematic uncertainties. These data should provide the best test of lepton universality in a scattering experiment to date, about an order of magnitude improvement over previous tests. Measuring scattering with both particle polarities will allow a test of two-photon exchange at the sub-percent level, about a factor of four improvement on uncertainties and over an order of magnitude more data points than previous low momentum transfer determinations, and similar to the current generation of higher momentum transfer electron experiments. The experiment has the potential to demonstrate whether the $μp$ and $ep$ interactions are consistent or different, and whether any difference results from novel physics or two-photon exchange. The uncertainties are such that if the discrepancy is real it should be confirmed with $\approx$5$σ$ significance, similar to that already established between the regular and muonic hydrogen Lamb shift. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

The SeaQuest Spectrometer at Fermilab

Authors: SeaQuest Collaboration, C. A. Aidala, J. R. Arrington, C. Ayuso, B. M. Bowen, M. L. Bowen, K. L. Bowling, A. W. Brown, C. N. Brown, R. Byrd, R. E. Carlisle, T. Chang, W. -C. Chang, A. Chen, J. -Y. Chen, D. C. Christian, X. Chu, B. P. Dannowitz, M. Daugherity, M. Diefenthaler, J. Dove, C. Durandet, L. El Fassi, E. Erdos, D. M. Fox , et al. (73 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The SeaQuest spectrometer at Fermilab was designed to detect oppositely-charged pairs of muons (dimuons) produced by interactions between a 120 GeV proton beam and liquid hydrogen, liquid deuterium and solid nuclear targets. The primary physics program uses the Drell-Yan process to probe antiquark distributions in the target nucleon. The spectrometer consists of a target system, two dipole magnets… ▽ More The SeaQuest spectrometer at Fermilab was designed to detect oppositely-charged pairs of muons (dimuons) produced by interactions between a 120 GeV proton beam and liquid hydrogen, liquid deuterium and solid nuclear targets. The primary physics program uses the Drell-Yan process to probe antiquark distributions in the target nucleon. The spectrometer consists of a target system, two dipole magnets and four detector stations. The upstream magnet is a closed-aperture solid iron magnet which also serves as the beam dump, while the second magnet is an open aperture magnet. Each of the detector stations consists of scintillator hodoscopes and a high-resolution tracking device. The FPGA-based trigger compares the hodoscope signals to a set of pre-programmed roads to determine if the event contains oppositely-signed, high-mass muon pairs. △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2019; v1 submitted 29 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Report number: FERMILAB-PUB-17-209-E

Comment on "Breakdown of the expansion of finite-size corrections to the hydrogen Lamb shift in moments of charge distribution"

Authors: J. Arrington

Abstract: In a recent paper, Hagelstein and Pascalutsa examine the error associated with an expansion of proton structure corrections to the Lamb shift in terms of moments of the charge distribution. They propose a small modification to a conventional parameterization of the proton's charge form factor and show that this can resolve the proton radius puzzle. However, while the size of the "bump" they add to… ▽ More In a recent paper, Hagelstein and Pascalutsa examine the error associated with an expansion of proton structure corrections to the Lamb shift in terms of moments of the charge distribution. They propose a small modification to a conventional parameterization of the proton's charge form factor and show that this can resolve the proton radius puzzle. However, while the size of the "bump" they add to the form factor is small, it is large compared to the total proton structure effects in the initial parameterization, yielding a final form factor that is unphysical. Reducing their modification to the point where the resulting form factor is physical does not allow for a resolution of the radius puzzle. △ Less

Submitted 2 February, 2016; originally announced February 2016.

Comments: Comment to appear (with Reply) in Physical Review A

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. A 93, 026501 (2016)

Hall A Annual Report 2014

Authors: M. M. Dalton, E. Chudakov, J. Gomez, D. W. Higinbotham, C. Keppel, R. Michaels, L. Myers, K. Aniol, S. Iqbal, N. See, J. R. Arrington, M. V. Ivanov, M. Mihovilovič, S. Širca, N. Muangma, Dien Nguyen, R. Pomatsalyuk, O. Glamazdin, V. Vereshchaka, S. Riordan, T. Su, V. Sulkosky, P. Zhu

Abstract: Report of the experimental activities in Hall A at Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility during 2013. Report of the experimental activities in Hall A at Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility during 2013. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Evaluation of the proton charge radius from e-p scattering

Authors: John Arrington, Ingo Sick

Abstract: In light of the proton radius puzzle, the discrepancy between measurements of the proton charge radius from muonic hydrogen and those from electronic hydrogen and electron-proton scattering measurements, we reexamine the charge radius extractions from electron scattering measurements. We provide a recommended value for the proton RMS charge radius, $r_E = 0.879 \pm 0.011$ fm, based on a global exa… ▽ More In light of the proton radius puzzle, the discrepancy between measurements of the proton charge radius from muonic hydrogen and those from electronic hydrogen and electron-proton scattering measurements, we reexamine the charge radius extractions from electron scattering measurements. We provide a recommended value for the proton RMS charge radius, $r_E = 0.879 \pm 0.011$ fm, based on a global examination of elastic e-p scattering data. The uncertainties include contributions to account for tension between different data sets and inconsistencies between radii using different extraction procedures. △ Less

Submitted 11 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Comments: Proceedings from the 2015 Workshop on Fundamental Constants

Extraction of the proton radius from electron-proton scattering data

Authors: Gabriel Lee, John R. Arrington, Richard J. Hill

Abstract: We perform a new analysis of electron-proton scattering data to determine the proton electric and magnetic radii, enforcing model-independent constraints from form factor analyticity. A wide-ranging study of possible systematic effects is performed. An improved analysis is developed that rebins data taken at identical kinematic settings, and avoids a scaling assumption of systematic errors with st… ▽ More We perform a new analysis of electron-proton scattering data to determine the proton electric and magnetic radii, enforcing model-independent constraints from form factor analyticity. A wide-ranging study of possible systematic effects is performed. An improved analysis is developed that rebins data taken at identical kinematic settings, and avoids a scaling assumption of systematic errors with statistical errors. Employing standard models for radiative corrections, our improved analysis of the 2010 Mainz A1 Collaboration data yields a proton electric radius $r_E = 0.895(20)$ fm and magnetic radius $r_M = 0.776(38)$ fm. A similar analysis applied to world data (excluding Mainz data) implies $r_E = 0.916(24)$ fm and $r_M = 0.914(35)$ fm. The Mainz and world values of the charge radius are consistent, and a simple combination yields a value $r_E = 0.904(15)$ fm that is $4σ$ larger than the CREMA Collaboration muonic hydrogen determination. The Mainz and world values of the magnetic radius differ by $2.7σ$, and a simple average yields $r_M= 0.851(26)$ fm. The circumstances under which published muonic hydrogen and electron scattering data could be reconciled are discussed, including a possible deficiency in the standard radiative correction model which requires further analysis. △ Less

Submitted 28 July, 2015; v1 submitted 6 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Comments: 26 pages, 10 figures, 4 supplementary data files with explanatory text. v2: As published in PRD including supplementary material. Added comparison to alternate model for correlated systematic errors and more references. Updated fit values with minor changes from v1

Report number: EFI Preprint 14-35

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. D 92, 013013 (2015)

Hall A Annual Report 2012

Authors: S. Riordan, C. Keppel, K. Aniol, J. Annand, J. Arrington, T. Averett, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, E. Brash, G. D. Cates, J. -P. Chen, E. Chudakov, D. Flay, G. B. Franklin, M. Friedman, O. Glamazdin, J. Gomez, C. Hanretty, J. -O. Hansen, C. Hyde, M. K. Jones, I. Korover, J. J. LeRose, R. A. Lindgren, N. Liyanage, E. Long , et al. (24 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Report over the experimental activities in Hall A at Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. Report over the experimental activities in Hall A at Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

The lead-glass electromagnetic calorimeters for the magnetic spectrometers in Hall C at Jefferson Lab

Authors: H. Mkrtchyan, R. Carlini, V. Tadevosyan, J. Arrington, A. Asaturyan, M. E. Christy, D. Dutta, R. Ent, H. C. Fenker, D. Gaskell, T. Horn, M. K. Jones, C. E. Keppel, D. J. Mack, S. P. Malace, A. Mkrtchyan, M. I. Niculescu, J. Seely, V. Tvaskis, S. A. Wood, S. Zhamkochyan

Abstract: The electromagnetic calorimeters of the various magnetic spectrometers in Hall C at Jefferson Lab are presented. For the existing HMS and SOS spectrometers design considerations, relevant construction information, and comparisons of simulated and experimental results are included. The energy resolution of the HMS and SOS calorimeters is better than $σ/E \sim 6%/\sqrt E $, and pion/electron ($π/e$)… ▽ More The electromagnetic calorimeters of the various magnetic spectrometers in Hall C at Jefferson Lab are presented. For the existing HMS and SOS spectrometers design considerations, relevant construction information, and comparisons of simulated and experimental results are included. The energy resolution of the HMS and SOS calorimeters is better than $σ/E \sim 6%/\sqrt E $, and pion/electron ($π/e$) separation of about 100:1 has been achieved in energy range 1 -- 5 GeV. Good agreement has been observed between the experimental and simulated energy resolutions, but simulations systematically exceed experimentally determined $π^-$ suppression factors by close to a factor of two. For the SHMS spectrometer presently under construction details on the design and accompanying GEANT4 simulation efforts are given. The anticipated performance of the new calorimeter is predicted over the full momentum range of the SHMS. Good electron/hadron separation is anticipated by combining the energy deposited in an initial (preshower) calorimeter layer with the total energy deposited in the calorimeter. △ Less

Submitted 28 April, 2012; originally announced April 2012.

Comments: 22 pages, 33 figures