-
Quantum correlation measurements in interferometric gravitational wave detectors
Authors:
D. V. Martynov,
V. V. Frolov,
S. Kandhasamy,
K. Izumi,
H. Miao,
N. Mavalvala,
E. D. Hall,
R. Lanza,
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
C. Adams,
R. X. Adhikari,
S. B. Anderson,
A. Ananyeva,
S. Appert,
K. Arai,
S. M. Aston,
S. W. Ballmer,
D. Barker,
B. Barr,
L. Barsotti,
J. Bartlett,
I. Bartos,
J. C. Batch
, et al. (177 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Quantum fluctuations in the phase and amplitude quadratures of light set limitations on the sensitivity of modern optical instruments. The sensitivity of the interferometric gravitational wave detectors, such as the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory (LIGO), is limited by quantum shot noise, quantum radiation pressure noise, and a set of classical noises. We show how the…
▽ More
Quantum fluctuations in the phase and amplitude quadratures of light set limitations on the sensitivity of modern optical instruments. The sensitivity of the interferometric gravitational wave detectors, such as the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory (LIGO), is limited by quantum shot noise, quantum radiation pressure noise, and a set of classical noises. We show how the quantum properties of light can be used to distinguish these noises using correlation techniques. Particularly, in the first part of the paper we show estimations of the coating thermal noise and gas phase noise, hidden below the quantum shot noise in the Advanced LIGO sensitivity curve. We also make projections on the observatory sensitivity during the next science runs. In the second part of the paper we discuss the correlation technique that reveals the quantum radiation pressure noise from the background of classical noises and shot noise. We apply this technique to the Advanced LIGO data, collected during the first science run, and experimentally estimate the quantum correlations and quantum radiation pressure noise in the interferometer for the first time.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
The Advanced LIGO Photon Calibrators
Authors:
S. Karki,
D. Tuyenbayev,
S. Kandhasamy,
B. P. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
E. H. Anders,
J. Berliner,
J. Betzwieser,
H. P. Daveloza,
C. Cahillane,
L. Canete,
C. Conley,
J. R. Gleason,
E. Goetz,
J. S. Kissel,
K. Izumi,
G. Mendell,
V. Quetschke,
M. Rodruck,
S. Sachdev,
T. Sadecki,
P. B. Schwinberg,
A. Sottile,
M. Wade,
A. J. Weinstein
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The two interferometers of the Laser Interferometry Gravitaional-wave Observatory (LIGO) recently detected gravitational waves from the mergers of binary black hole systems. Accurate calibration of the output of these detectors was crucial for the observation of these events, and the extraction of parameters of the sources. The principal tools used to calibrate the responses of the second-generati…
▽ More
The two interferometers of the Laser Interferometry Gravitaional-wave Observatory (LIGO) recently detected gravitational waves from the mergers of binary black hole systems. Accurate calibration of the output of these detectors was crucial for the observation of these events, and the extraction of parameters of the sources. The principal tools used to calibrate the responses of the second-generation (Advanced) LIGO detectors to gravitational waves are systems based on radiation pressure and referred to as Photon Calibrators. These systems, which were completely redesigned for Advanced LIGO, include several significant upgrades that enable them to meet the calibration requirements of second-generation gravitational wave detectors in the new era of gravitational-wave astronomy. We report on the design, implementation, and operation of these Advanced LIGO Photon Calibrators that are currently providing fiducial displacements on the order of $10^{-18}$ m/$\sqrt{\textrm{Hz}}$ with accuracy and precision of better than 1 %.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
-
The Sensitivity of the Advanced LIGO Detectors at the Beginning of Gravitational Wave Astronomy
Authors:
D. V. Martynov,
E. D. Hall,
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
C. Adams,
R. X. Adhikari,
R. A. Anderson,
S. B. Anderson,
K. Arai,
M. A. Arain,
S. M. Aston,
L. Austin,
S. W. Ballmer,
M. Barbet,
D. Barker,
B. Barr,
L. Barsotti,
J. Bartlett,
M. A. Barton,
I. Bartos,
J. C. Batch,
A. S. Bell,
I. Belopolski,
J. Bergman
, et al. (239 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) consists of two widely separated 4 km laser interferometers designed to detect gravitational waves from distant astrophysical sources in the frequency range from 10 Hz to 10 kHz. The first observation run of the Advanced LIGO detectors started in September 2015 and ended in January 2016. A strain sensitivity of better than…
▽ More
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) consists of two widely separated 4 km laser interferometers designed to detect gravitational waves from distant astrophysical sources in the frequency range from 10 Hz to 10 kHz. The first observation run of the Advanced LIGO detectors started in September 2015 and ended in January 2016. A strain sensitivity of better than $10^{-23}/\sqrt{\text{Hz}}$ was achieved around 100 Hz. Understanding both the fundamental and the technical noise sources was critical for increasing the observable volume in the universe. The average distance at which coalescing binary black hole systems with individual masses of 30 $M_\odot$ could be detected was 1.3 Gpc. Similarly, the range for binary neutron star inspirals was about 75 Mpc. With respect to the initial detectors, the observable volume of Universe increased respectively by a factor 69 and 43. These improvements allowed Advanced LIGO to detect the gravitational wave signal from the binary black hole coalescence, known as GW150914.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2018; v1 submitted 1 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Calibration of the Advanced LIGO detectors for the discovery of the binary black-hole merger GW150914
Authors:
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration,
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
P. A. Altin,
D. V. Amariutei,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai,
M. C. Araya,
C. C. Arceneaux,
J. S. Areeda,
K. G. Arun
, et al. (702 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In Advanced LIGO, detection and astrophysical source parameter estimation of the binary black hole merger GW150914 requires a calibrated estimate of the gravitational-wave strain sensed by the detectors. Producing an estimate from each detector's differential arm length control loop readout signals requires applying time domain filters, which are designed from a frequency domain model of the detec…
▽ More
In Advanced LIGO, detection and astrophysical source parameter estimation of the binary black hole merger GW150914 requires a calibrated estimate of the gravitational-wave strain sensed by the detectors. Producing an estimate from each detector's differential arm length control loop readout signals requires applying time domain filters, which are designed from a frequency domain model of the detector's gravitational-wave response. The gravitational-wave response model is determined by the detector's opto-mechanical response and the properties of its feedback control system. The measurements used to validate the model and characterize its uncertainty are derived primarily from a dedicated photon radiation pressure actuator, with cross-checks provided by optical and radio frequency references. We describe how the gravitational-wave readout signal is calibrated into equivalent gravitational-wave-induced strain and how the statistical uncertainties and systematic errors are assessed. Detector data collected over 38 calendar days, from September 12 to October 20, 2015, contain the event GW150914 and approximately 16 of coincident data used to estimate the event false alarm probability. The calibration uncertainty is less than 10% in magnitude and 10 degrees in phase across the relevant frequency band 20 Hz to 1 kHz.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2017; v1 submitted 11 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
