-
Fixed non-stockout-probability policies for the single-item lost-sales model
Authors:
Ton de Kok
Abstract:
We consider the classical discrete time lost-sales model under stationary continuous demand and linear holding and penalty costs and positive constant lead time. To date the optimal policy structure is only known implicitly by solving numerically the Bellman equations. In this paper we derive the first optimality equation for the lost-sales model. We propose a fixed non-stockout-probability (FP3)…
▽ More
We consider the classical discrete time lost-sales model under stationary continuous demand and linear holding and penalty costs and positive constant lead time. To date the optimal policy structure is only known implicitly by solving numerically the Bellman equations. In this paper we derive the first optimality equation for the lost-sales model. We propose a fixed non-stockout-probability (FP3) policy, implying that each period the order size ensures that P3, the probability of no-stockout at the end of the period of arrival of this order, equals some target value. The FP3-policy can be computed efficiently and accurately from an exact recursive expression and two-moment fits to the emerging random variables. We use the lost-sales optimality equation to compute the optimal FP3-policy. Comparison against the optimal policy for discrete demand suggests that the fixed P3-policy is close-to-optimal. An extensive numerical experiment shows that the FP3-policy outperforms other policies proposed in literature in 97% of all cases. Under the FP3-policy, the volatility of the replenishment process is much lower than the volatility of the demand process. This cv-reduction holds a promise for substantial cost reduction at upstream stages in the supply chain of the end-item under consideration, compared to the situation with backlogging.
△ Less
Submitted 14 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Synchronization in a Two-supplier Assembly System: Combining a Fixed Lead-time Module with Capacitated Make-to-Order Production
Authors:
Mirjam S Meijer,
Willem van Jaarsveld,
Ton de Kok
Abstract:
A high-tech manufacturer often produces products that consist of many modules. These modules are either sourced from one of its suppliers or produced in-house. In this paper we study an assembly system in which one module is sourced from a supplier with a fixed lead-time, while the other module is produced by the manufacturer itself in a make-to-order production system. Since unavailability of one…
▽ More
A high-tech manufacturer often produces products that consist of many modules. These modules are either sourced from one of its suppliers or produced in-house. In this paper we study an assembly system in which one module is sourced from a supplier with a fixed lead-time, while the other module is produced by the manufacturer itself in a make-to-order production system. Since unavailability of one of the modules has costly consequences for the production of the end-product, it is important to coordinate between the ordering policy for one module and the production of the other. We propose an order policy for the lead-time module with base-stock levels depending on the number of outstanding orders in the production system of the in-house produced module. We prove monotonicity properties of this policy and show optimality. Furthermore, we conduct a computational experiment to evaluate how the costs of this policy compare to those of a policy with fixed base-stock levels and show that average savings of 17% are attained.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Contingent Penalty and Contingent Renewal Supply Contracts in High-Tech Industry
Authors:
Mirjam S Meijer,
Willem van Jaarsveld,
Ton de Kok,
Christopher S Tang
Abstract:
Unlike consumer goods industry, a high-tech manufacturer (OEM) often amortizes new product development costs over multiple generations, where demand for each generation is based on advance orders and additional uncertain demand. Also, due to economic reasons and regulations, high-tech OEMs usually source from a single supplier. Relative to the high retail price, the wholesale price for a supplier…
▽ More
Unlike consumer goods industry, a high-tech manufacturer (OEM) often amortizes new product development costs over multiple generations, where demand for each generation is based on advance orders and additional uncertain demand. Also, due to economic reasons and regulations, high-tech OEMs usually source from a single supplier. Relative to the high retail price, the wholesale price for a supplier to produce high-tech components is low. Consequently, incentives are misaligned: the OEM faces relatively high under-stock costs and the supplier faces high over-stock costs. In this paper, we examine supply contracts that are intended to align the incentives between a high-tech OEM and a supplier so that the supplier will invest adequate and yet non-verifiable capacity to meet the OEM's uncertain demand. When focusing on a single generation, the manufacturer can coordinate a decentralized supply chain and extract all surplus by augmenting a traditional wholesale price contract with a "contingent penalty" should the supplier fail to fulfill the OEM's demand. When the resulting penalty is too high to be enforceable, we consider a new class of "contingent renewal" wholesale price contracts with a stipulation: the OEM will renew the contract with the incumbent supplier for the next generation only when the supplier can fulfill the demand for the current generation. By using non-renewal as an implicit penalty, we show that the contingent renewal contract can coordinate the supply chain. While the OEM can capture the bulk of the supply chain profit, this innovative contract cannot enable the OEM to extract the entire surplus.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
