-
Optimal consumption under a drawdown constraint over a finite horizon
Authors:
Xiaoshan Chen,
Xun Li,
Fahuai Yi,
Xiang Yu
Abstract:
This paper studies a finite horizon utility maximization problem on excessive consumption under a drawdown constraint up to the bankruptcy time. Our control problem is an extension of the one considered in Bahman et al. (2019) to the model with a finite horizon and also an extension of the one considered in Jeon and Oh (2022) to the model with zero interest rate. Contrary to Bahman et al. (2019),…
▽ More
This paper studies a finite horizon utility maximization problem on excessive consumption under a drawdown constraint up to the bankruptcy time. Our control problem is an extension of the one considered in Bahman et al. (2019) to the model with a finite horizon and also an extension of the one considered in Jeon and Oh (2022) to the model with zero interest rate. Contrary to Bahman et al. (2019), we encounter a parabolic nonlinear HJB variational inequality with a gradient constraint, in which some time-dependent free boundaries complicate the analysis significantly. Meanwhile, our methodology is built on technical PDE arguments, which differs substantially from the martingale approach in Jeon and Oh (2022). Using dual transform and considering some auxiliary parabolic variational inequalities with both gradient and function constraints, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the classical solution to the HJB variational inequality and characterize all associated free boundaries in analytical form. Consequently, the piecewise optimal feedback controls and some time-dependent thresholds of the wealth variable for different control expressions can be obtained.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Edge differentially private estimation in the $β$-model via jittering and method of moments
Authors:
**yuan Chang,
Qiao Hu,
Eric D. Kolaczyk,
Qiwei Yao,
Fengting Yi
Abstract:
A standing challenge in data privacy is the trade-off between the level of privacy and the efficiency of statistical inference. Here we conduct an in-depth study of this trade-off for parameter estimation in the $β$-model (Chatterjee, Diaconis and Sly, 2011) for edge differentially private network data released via jittering (Karwa, Krivitsky and Slavković, 2017). Unlike most previous approaches b…
▽ More
A standing challenge in data privacy is the trade-off between the level of privacy and the efficiency of statistical inference. Here we conduct an in-depth study of this trade-off for parameter estimation in the $β$-model (Chatterjee, Diaconis and Sly, 2011) for edge differentially private network data released via jittering (Karwa, Krivitsky and Slavković, 2017). Unlike most previous approaches based on maximum likelihood estimation for this network model, we proceed via method-of-moments. This choice facilitates our exploration of a substantially broader range of privacy levels - corresponding to stricter privacy - than has been to date. Over this new range we discover our proposed estimator for the parameters exhibits an interesting phase transition, with both its convergence rate and asymptotic variance following one of three different regimes of behavior depending on the level of privacy. Because identification of the operable regime is difficult if not impossible in practice, we devise a novel adaptive bootstrap procedure to construct uniform inference across different phases. In fact, leveraging this bootstrap we are able to provide for simultaneous inference of all parameters in the $β$-model (i.e., equal to the number of nodes), which, to our best knowledge, is the first result of its kind. Numerical experiments confirm the competitive and reliable finite sample performance of the proposed inference methods, next to a comparable maximum likelihood method, as well as significant advantages in terms of computational speed and memory.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2024; v1 submitted 19 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Optimal Investment Stop** Problem with Nonsmooth Utility in Finite Horizon
Authors:
Chonghu Guan,
Xun Li,
Zuoquan Xu,
Fahuai Yi
Abstract:
In this paper, we investigate an interesting and important stop** problem mixed with stochastic controls and a \textit{nonsmooth} utility over a finite time horizon. The paper aims to develop new methodologies, which are significantly different from those of mixed dynamic optimal control and stop** problems in the existing literature, to figure out a manager's decision. We formulate our model…
▽ More
In this paper, we investigate an interesting and important stop** problem mixed with stochastic controls and a \textit{nonsmooth} utility over a finite time horizon. The paper aims to develop new methodologies, which are significantly different from those of mixed dynamic optimal control and stop** problems in the existing literature, to figure out a manager's decision. We formulate our model to a free boundary problem of a fully \textit{nonlinear} equation. By means of a dual transformation, however, we can convert the above problem to a new free boundary problem of a \textit{linear} equation. Finally, using the corresponding inverse dual transformation, we apply the theoretical results established for the new free boundary problem to obtain the properties of the optimal strategy and the optimal stop** time to achieve a certain level for the original problem over a finite time investment horizon.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.
-
Optimal Investment with Stop** in Finite Horizon
Authors:
Xiongfei Jian,
Xun Li,
Fahuai Yi
Abstract:
In this paper, we investigate dynamic optimization problems featuring both stochastic control and optimal stop** in a finite time horizon. The paper aims to develop new methodologies, which are significantly different from those of mixed dynamic optimal control and stop** problems in the existing literature, to study a manager's decision. We formulate our model to a free boundary problem of a…
▽ More
In this paper, we investigate dynamic optimization problems featuring both stochastic control and optimal stop** in a finite time horizon. The paper aims to develop new methodologies, which are significantly different from those of mixed dynamic optimal control and stop** problems in the existing literature, to study a manager's decision. We formulate our model to a free boundary problem of a fully nonlinear equation. Furthermore, by means of a dual transformation for the above problem, we convert the above problem to a new free boundary problem of a linear equation. Finally, we apply the theoretical results to challenging, yet practically relevant and important, risk-sensitive problems in wealth management to obtain the properties of the optimal strategy and the right time to achieve a certain level over a finite time investment horizon.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
Non-trivial $m$-quasi-Einstein metrics on quadratic Lie groups
Authors:
Zhiqi Chen,
Ke Liang,
Fahuai Yi
Abstract:
We call a metric $m$-quasi-Einstein if $Ric_X^m$ (a modification of the $m$-Bakry-Emery Ricci tensor in terms of a suitable vector field $X$) is a constant multiple of the metric tensor. It is a generalization of Einstein metrics which contains Ricci solitons. In this paper, we focus on left-invariant vector fields and left-invariant Riemannian metrics on quadratic Lie groups. First we prove that…
▽ More
We call a metric $m$-quasi-Einstein if $Ric_X^m$ (a modification of the $m$-Bakry-Emery Ricci tensor in terms of a suitable vector field $X$) is a constant multiple of the metric tensor. It is a generalization of Einstein metrics which contains Ricci solitons. In this paper, we focus on left-invariant vector fields and left-invariant Riemannian metrics on quadratic Lie groups. First we prove that any left-invariant vector field $X$ such that the left-invariant Riemannian metric on a quadratic Lie group is $m$-quasi-Einstein is a Killing field. Then we construct infinitely many non-trivial $m$-quasi-Einstein metrics on solvable quadratic Lie groups $G(n)$ for $m$ finite.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2015; v1 submitted 9 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
