Fair coins tend to land on the same side they started: Evidence from 350,757 flips
Authors:
František Bartoš,
Alexandra Sarafoglou,
Henrik R. Godmann,
Amir Sahrani,
David Klein Leunk,
Pierre Y. Gui,
David Voss,
Kaleem Ullah,
Malte J. Zoubek,
Franziska Nippold,
Frederik Aust,
Felipe F. Vieira,
Chris-Gabriel Islam,
Anton J. Zoubek,
Sara Shabani,
Jonas Petter,
Ingeborg B. Roos,
Adam Finnemann,
Aaron B. Lob,
Madlen F. Hoffstadt,
Jason Nak,
Jill de Ron,
Koen Derks,
Karoline Huth,
Sjoerd Terpstra
, et al. (25 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Many people have flipped coins but few have stopped to ponder the statistical and physical intricacies of the process. In a preregistered study we collected $350{,}757$ coin flips to test the counterintuitive prediction from a physics model of human coin tossing developed by Diaconis, Holmes, and Montgomery (DHM; 2007). The model asserts that when people flip an ordinary coin, it tends to land on…
▽ More
Many people have flipped coins but few have stopped to ponder the statistical and physical intricacies of the process. In a preregistered study we collected $350{,}757$ coin flips to test the counterintuitive prediction from a physics model of human coin tossing developed by Diaconis, Holmes, and Montgomery (DHM; 2007). The model asserts that when people flip an ordinary coin, it tends to land on the same side it started -- DHM estimated the probability of a same-side outcome to be about 51%. Our data lend strong support to this precise prediction: the coins landed on the same side more often than not, $\text{Pr}(\text{same side}) = 0.508$, 95% credible interval (CI) [$0.506$, $0.509$], $\text{BF}_{\text{same-side bias}} = 2359$. Furthermore, the data revealed considerable between-people variation in the degree of this same-side bias. Our data also confirmed the generic prediction that when people flip an ordinary coin -- with the initial side-up randomly determined -- it is equally likely to land heads or tails: $\text{Pr}(\text{heads}) = 0.500$, 95% CI [$0.498$, $0.502$], $\text{BF}_{\text{heads-tails bias}} = 0.182$. Furthermore, this lack of heads-tails bias does not appear to vary across coins. Additional exploratory analyses revealed that the within-people same-side bias decreased as more coins were flipped, an effect that is consistent with the possibility that practice makes people flip coins in a less wobbly fashion. Our data therefore provide strong evidence that when some (but not all) people flip a fair coin, it tends to land on the same side it started. Our data provide compelling statistical support for the DHM physics model of coin tossing.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2024; v1 submitted 6 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
Slow-scale split-step tau-leap method for stiff stochastic chemical systems
Authors:
Viktor Reshniak,
Abdul Khaliq,
David Voss
Abstract:
Tau-lea** is a family of algorithms for the approximate simulation of the discrete state continuous time Markov chains. Motivation for the development of such methods can be found, for instance, in the fields of chemical kinetics and systems biology. It is known that the dynamical behavior of biochemical systems is often intrinsically stiff representing a serious challenge for their numerical ap…
▽ More
Tau-lea** is a family of algorithms for the approximate simulation of the discrete state continuous time Markov chains. Motivation for the development of such methods can be found, for instance, in the fields of chemical kinetics and systems biology. It is known that the dynamical behavior of biochemical systems is often intrinsically stiff representing a serious challenge for their numerical approximation. The naive extension of stiff deterministic solvers to stochastic integration often yields numerical solutions with either impractically large relaxation times or incorrectly resolved covariance. In this paper, we propose a splitting heuristic which helps to resolve some of these issues. The proposed integrator contains a number of unknown parameters which are estimated for each particular problem from the moment equations of the corresponding linearized system. We show that this method is able to reproduce the exact mean and variance of the linear scalar test equation and demonstrates a good accuracy for the arbitrarily stiff systems at least in the linear case. The numerical examples for both linear and nonlinear systems are also provided and the obtained results confirm the efficiency of the considered splitting approach.
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2018; v1 submitted 23 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
Split-step Milstein methods for multi-channel stiff stochastic differential systems
Authors:
V. Reshniak,
A. Q. M. Khaliq,
D. A. Voss,
G. Zhang
Abstract:
We consider split-step Milstein methods for the solution of stiff stochastic differential equations with an emphasis on systems driven by multi-channel noise. We show their strong order of convergence and investigate mean-square stability properties for different noise and drift structures. The stability matrices are established in a form convenient for analyzing their impact arising from differen…
▽ More
We consider split-step Milstein methods for the solution of stiff stochastic differential equations with an emphasis on systems driven by multi-channel noise. We show their strong order of convergence and investigate mean-square stability properties for different noise and drift structures. The stability matrices are established in a form convenient for analyzing their impact arising from different deterministic drift integrators. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness and reliability of these methods.
△ Less
Submitted 25 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
