-
The piranha problem: Large effects swimming in a small pond
Authors:
Christopher Tosh,
Philip Greengard,
Ben Goodrich,
Andrew Gelman,
Aki Vehtari,
Daniel Hsu
Abstract:
In some scientific fields, it is common to have certain variables of interest that are of particular importance and for which there are many studies indicating a relationship with different explanatory variables. In such cases, particularly those where no relationships are known among the explanatory variables, it is worth asking under what conditions it is possible for all such claimed effects to…
▽ More
In some scientific fields, it is common to have certain variables of interest that are of particular importance and for which there are many studies indicating a relationship with different explanatory variables. In such cases, particularly those where no relationships are known among the explanatory variables, it is worth asking under what conditions it is possible for all such claimed effects to exist simultaneously. This paper addresses this question by reviewing some theorems from multivariate analysis showing that, unless the explanatory variables also have sizable dependencies with each other, it is impossible to have many such large effects. We discuss implications for the replication crisis in social science.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2024; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
A Fast Linear Regression via SVD and Marginalization
Authors:
Philip Greengard,
Andrew Gelman,
Aki Vehtari
Abstract:
We describe a numerical scheme for evaluating the posterior moments of Bayesian linear regression models with partial pooling of the coefficients. The principal analytical tool of the evaluation is a change of basis from coefficient space to the space of singular vectors of the matrix of predictors. After this change of basis and an analytical integration, we reduce the problem of finding moments…
▽ More
We describe a numerical scheme for evaluating the posterior moments of Bayesian linear regression models with partial pooling of the coefficients. The principal analytical tool of the evaluation is a change of basis from coefficient space to the space of singular vectors of the matrix of predictors. After this change of basis and an analytical integration, we reduce the problem of finding moments of a density over k + m dimensions, to finding moments of an m-dimensional density, where k is the number of coefficients and k + m is the dimension of the posterior. Moments can then be computed using, for example, MCMC, the trapezoid rule, or adaptive Gaussian quadrature. An evaluation of the SVD of the matrix of predictors is the dominant computational cost and is performed once during the precomputation stage. We demonstrate numerical results of the algorithm. The scheme described in this paper generalizes naturally to multilevel and multi-group hierarchical regression models where normal-normal parameters appear.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
When are Bayesian model probabilities overconfident?
Authors:
Oscar Oelrich,
Shutong Ding,
Måns Magnusson,
Aki Vehtari,
Mattias Villani
Abstract:
Bayesian model comparison is often based on the posterior distribution over the set of compared models. This distribution is often observed to concentrate on a single model even when other measures of model fit or forecasting ability indicate no strong preference. Furthermore, a moderate change in the data sample can easily shift the posterior model probabilities to concentrate on another model. W…
▽ More
Bayesian model comparison is often based on the posterior distribution over the set of compared models. This distribution is often observed to concentrate on a single model even when other measures of model fit or forecasting ability indicate no strong preference. Furthermore, a moderate change in the data sample can easily shift the posterior model probabilities to concentrate on another model. We document overconfidence in two high-profile applications in economics and neuroscience. To shed more light on the sources of overconfidence we derive the sampling variance of the Bayes factor in univariate and multivariate linear regression. The results show that overconfidence is likely to happen when i) the compared models give very different approximations of the data-generating process, ii) the models are very flexible with large degrees of freedom that are not shared between the models, and iii) the models underestimate the true variability in the data.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Limitations of "Limitations of Bayesian leave-one-out cross-validation for model selection"
Authors:
Aki Vehtari,
Daniel P. Simpson,
Yuling Yao,
Andrew Gelman
Abstract:
This article is an invited discussion of the article by Gronau and Wagenmakers (2018) that can be found at https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42113-018-0011-7.
This article is an invited discussion of the article by Gronau and Wagenmakers (2018) that can be found at https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42113-018-0011-7.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
