Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Schervish, M

Dominating countably many forecasts

Authors: M. J. Schervish, Teddy Seidenfeld, J. B. Kadane

Abstract: We investigate differences between a simple Dominance Principle applied to sums of fair prices for variables and dominance applied to sums of forecasts for variables scored by proper scoring rules. In particular, we consider differences when fair prices and forecasts correspond to finitely additive expectations and dominance is applied with infinitely many prices and/or forecasts. We investigate differences between a simple Dominance Principle applied to sums of fair prices for variables and dominance applied to sums of forecasts for variables scored by proper scoring rules. In particular, we consider differences when fair prices and forecasts correspond to finitely additive expectations and dominance is applied with infinitely many prices and/or forecasts. △ Less

Submitted 26 May, 2014; originally announced May 2014.

Comments: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/14-AOS1203 the Annals of Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aos/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)

Report number: IMS-AOS-AOS1203

Journal ref: Annals of Statistics 2014, Vol. 42, No. 2, 728-756

Infinite Previsions and Finitely Additive Expectations

Authors: Mark J. Schervish, Teddy Seidenfeld, Joseph B. Kadane

Abstract: We give an extension of de Finetti's concept of coherence to unbounded (but real-valued) random variables that allows for gambling in the presence of infinite previsions. We present a finitely additive extension of the Daniell integral to unbounded random variables that we believe has advantages over Lebesgue-style integrals in the finitely additive setting. We also give a general version of the F… ▽ More We give an extension of de Finetti's concept of coherence to unbounded (but real-valued) random variables that allows for gambling in the presence of infinite previsions. We present a finitely additive extension of the Daniell integral to unbounded random variables that we believe has advantages over Lebesgue-style integrals in the finitely additive setting. We also give a general version of the Fundamental Theorem of Prevision to deal with conditional previsions and unbounded random variables. △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2013; originally announced August 2013.

Comments: 21 pages

MSC Class: 62C05; 62A01

Nonparametric risk bounds for time-series forecasting

Authors: Daniel J. McDonald, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi, Mark Schervish

Abstract: We derive generalization error bounds for traditional time-series forecasting models. Our results hold for many standard forecasting tools including autoregressive models, moving average models, and, more generally, linear state-space models. These non-asymptotic bounds need only weak assumptions on the data-generating process, yet allow forecasters to select among competing models and to guarante… ▽ More We derive generalization error bounds for traditional time-series forecasting models. Our results hold for many standard forecasting tools including autoregressive models, moving average models, and, more generally, linear state-space models. These non-asymptotic bounds need only weak assumptions on the data-generating process, yet allow forecasters to select among competing models and to guarantee, with high probability, that their chosen model will perform well. We motivate our techniques with and apply them to standard economic and financial forecasting tools---a GARCH model for predicting equity volatility and a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model (DSGE), the standard tool in macroeconomic forecasting. We demonstrate in particular how our techniques can aid forecasters and policy makers in choosing models which behave well under uncertainty and mis-specification. △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2016; v1 submitted 3 December, 2012; originally announced December 2012.

Comments: 34 pages, 3 figures

MSC Class: 62M20 (Primary) 91B84; 62G99 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Journal of Machine Learning Research. (2017). Vol 18. p. 1-40

Estimating beta-mixing coefficients via histograms

Authors: Daniel J. McDonald, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi, Mark Schervish

Abstract: The literature on statistical learning for time series often assumes asymptotic independence or "mixing" of the data-generating process. These mixing assumptions are never tested, nor are there methods for estimating mixing coefficients from data. Additionally, for many common classes of processes (Markov processes, ARMA processes, etc.) general functional forms for various mixing rates are known,… ▽ More The literature on statistical learning for time series often assumes asymptotic independence or "mixing" of the data-generating process. These mixing assumptions are never tested, nor are there methods for estimating mixing coefficients from data. Additionally, for many common classes of processes (Markov processes, ARMA processes, etc.) general functional forms for various mixing rates are known, but not specific coefficients. We present the first estimator for beta-mixing coefficients based on a single stationary sample path and show that it is risk consistent. Since mixing rates depend on infinite-dimensional dependence, we use a Markov approximation based on only a finite memory length $d$. We present convergence rates for the Markov approximation and show that as $d\rightarrow\infty$, the Markov approximation converges to the true mixing coefficient. Our estimator is constructed using $d$-dimensional histogram density estimates. Allowing asymptotics in the bandwidth as well as the dimension, we prove $L^1$ concentration for the histogram as an intermediate step. Simulations wherein the mixing rates are calculable and a real-data example demonstrate our methodology. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2016; v1 submitted 27 September, 2011; originally announced September 2011.

Comments: 30 pages, 8 figures. Longer version of arXiv:1103.0941 [stat.ML]

Journal ref: Electron. J. Statist. 9 (2015), no. 2, 2855--2883

Estimating $β$-mixing coefficients

Authors: Daniel J. McDonald, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi, Mark Schervish

Abstract: The literature on statistical learning for time series assumes the asymptotic independence or ``mixing' of the data-generating process. These mixing assumptions are never tested, nor are there methods for estimating mixing rates from data. We give an estimator for the $β$-mixing rate based on a single stationary sample path and show it is $L_1$-risk consistent. The literature on statistical learning for time series assumes the asymptotic independence or ``mixing' of the data-generating process. These mixing assumptions are never tested, nor are there methods for estimating mixing rates from data. We give an estimator for the $β$-mixing rate based on a single stationary sample path and show it is $L_1$-risk consistent. △ Less

Submitted 4 March, 2011; originally announced March 2011.

Comments: 9 pages, accepted by AIStats. CMU Statistics Technical Report

Journal ref: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS 2011), pp. 516--524

Correction. Improper regular conditional distributions

Authors: Teddy Seidenfeld, Mark J. Schervish, Joseph B. Kadane

Abstract: Correction to Annals of Probability 29 (2001) 1612--1624 [doi:10.1214/aop/1015345764]. Correction to Annals of Probability 29 (2001) 1612--1624 [doi:10.1214/aop/1015345764]. △ Less

Submitted 1 March, 2006; originally announced March 2006.

Comments: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/009117905000000503 in the Annals of Probability (http://www.imstat.org/aop/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)

Report number: IMS-AOP-AOP0111

Journal ref: Annals of Probability 2006, Vol. 34, No. 1, 423-426