-
Computing distances on Riemann surfaces
Authors:
Huck Stepanyants,
Alan Beardon,
Jeremy Paton,
Dmitri Krioukov
Abstract:
Riemann surfaces are among the simplest and most basic geometric objects. They appear as key players in many branches of physics, mathematics, and other sciences. Despite their widespread significance, how to compute distances between pairs of points on compact Riemann surfaces is surprisingly unknown, unless the surface is a sphere or a torus. This is because on higher-genus surfaces, the distanc…
▽ More
Riemann surfaces are among the simplest and most basic geometric objects. They appear as key players in many branches of physics, mathematics, and other sciences. Despite their widespread significance, how to compute distances between pairs of points on compact Riemann surfaces is surprisingly unknown, unless the surface is a sphere or a torus. This is because on higher-genus surfaces, the distance formula involves an infimum over infinitely many terms, so it cannot be evaluated in practice. Here we derive a computable distance formula for a broad class of Riemann surfaces. The formula reduces the infimum to a minimum over an explicit set consisting of finitely many terms. We also develop a distance computation algorithm, which cannot be expressed as a formula, but which is more computationally efficient on surfaces with high genuses. We illustrate both the formula and the algorithm in application to generalized Bolza surfaces, which are a particular class of highly symmetric compact Riemann surfaces of any genus greater than 1.
△ Less
Submitted 29 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Diameter of Compact Riemann Surfaces
Authors:
Huck Stepanyants,
Alan Beardon,
Jeremy Paton,
Dmitri Krioukov
Abstract:
Diameter is one of the most basic properties of a geometric object, while Riemann surfaces are one of the most basic geometric objects. Surprisingly, the diameter of compact Riemann surfaces is known exactly only for the sphere and the torus. For higher genuses, only very general but loose upper and lower bounds are available. The problem of calculating the diameter exactly has been intractable si…
▽ More
Diameter is one of the most basic properties of a geometric object, while Riemann surfaces are one of the most basic geometric objects. Surprisingly, the diameter of compact Riemann surfaces is known exactly only for the sphere and the torus. For higher genuses, only very general but loose upper and lower bounds are available. The problem of calculating the diameter exactly has been intractable since there is no simple expression for the distance between a pair of points on a high-genus surface. Here we prove that the diameters of a class of simple Riemann surfaces known as generalized Bolza surfaces of any genus greater than $1$ are equal to the radii of their fundamental polygons. This is the first exact result for the diameter of a compact hyperbolic manifold.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2024; v1 submitted 25 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Entropy of labeled versus unlabeled networks
Authors:
Jeremy Paton,
Harrison Hartle,
Huck Stepanyants,
Pim van der Hoorn,
Dmitri Krioukov
Abstract:
The structure of a network is an unlabeled graph, yet graphs in most models of complex networks are labeled by meaningless random integers. Is the associated labeling noise always negligible, or can it overpower the network-structural signal? To address this question, we introduce and consider the sparse unlabeled versions of popular network models, and compare their entropy against the original l…
▽ More
The structure of a network is an unlabeled graph, yet graphs in most models of complex networks are labeled by meaningless random integers. Is the associated labeling noise always negligible, or can it overpower the network-structural signal? To address this question, we introduce and consider the sparse unlabeled versions of popular network models, and compare their entropy against the original labeled versions. We show that labeled and unlabeled Erdos-Renyi graphs are entropically equivalent, even though their degree distributions are very different. The labeled and unlabeled versions of the configuration model may have different prefactors in their leading entropy terms, although this remains conjectural. Our main results are upper and lower bounds for the entropy of labeled and unlabeled one-dimensional random geometric graphs. We show that their unlabeled entropy is negligible in comparison with the labeled entropy. This means that in sparse networks the entropy of meaningless labeling may dominate the entropy of the network structure. The main implication of this result is that the common practice of using exchangeable models to reason about real-world networks with distinguishable nodes may introduce uncontrolled aberrations into conclusions made about these networks, suggesting a need for a thorough reexamination of the statistical foundations and key results of network science.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2022; v1 submitted 18 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
