-
e-injective coloring: injective and 2-distance colorings conjectures
Authors:
Shahrzad Sadat Mirdamad,
Doost Ali Mojdeh
Abstract:
An injective coloring of a given graph G = (V, E) is a vertex coloring of G such that any two vertices with common neighbor receive distinct colors. An e-injective coloring of a graph G is a vertex coloring of G such that any two vertices with common edge neighbor receive distinct colors; in the other words, if u and v are the end of a path P4 in a graph G, then they are assigned with different la…
▽ More
An injective coloring of a given graph G = (V, E) is a vertex coloring of G such that any two vertices with common neighbor receive distinct colors. An e-injective coloring of a graph G is a vertex coloring of G such that any two vertices with common edge neighbor receive distinct colors; in the other words, if u and v are the end of a path P4 in a graph G, then they are assigned with different labels. With this new definition, we want to take a review at injective coloring of a graph from the new point of view. For this purpose, we will have a comparison between e-injective coloring with usual coloring, injective coloring, and 2-distance coloring. As well, we review the conjectures raised so far in the literature of injective coloring and 2-distance coloring, from the new approach, e-injective coloring. Finally, we precisely investigate the e-injective coloring of trees, join of two graphs, a family of standard graphs, grid graphs, cylinder graphs and tori graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2024; v1 submitted 5 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Paired coalition in graphs
Authors:
Mohammad Reza Samadzadeh,
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Reza nadimi
Abstract:
\noindent A paired coalition in a graph $G=(V,E)$ consists of two disjoint sets of vertices $V_1$ and $V_2$, neither of which is a paired dominating set but whose union $V_1 \cup V_2$ is a paired dominating set. A paired coalition partition (abbreviated $pc$-partition) in a graph $G$ is a vertex partition $π= \lbrace V_1,V_2,\dots ,V_k \rbrace$ such that each set $V_i$ of $π$ is not a paired domin…
▽ More
\noindent A paired coalition in a graph $G=(V,E)$ consists of two disjoint sets of vertices $V_1$ and $V_2$, neither of which is a paired dominating set but whose union $V_1 \cup V_2$ is a paired dominating set. A paired coalition partition (abbreviated $pc$-partition) in a graph $G$ is a vertex partition $π= \lbrace V_1,V_2,\dots ,V_k \rbrace$ such that each set $V_i$ of $π$ is not a paired dominating set but forms a paired coalition with another set $V_j \in π$. The paired coalition graph $PCG(G,π) $ of the graph $G$ and the $pc$-partition $π$ of $G$, is the graph whose vertices correspond one-to-one with the sets of $π$, and two vertices $V_i$ and $V_j$ are adjacent in $PCG(G,π) $ if and only if their corresponding sets $V_i$ and $V_j$ form a paired coalition in $G$. In this paper, we initiate the study of paired coalition partitions and paired coalition graphs. In particular, we determine the paired coalition number of paths and cycles, obtain some results on paired coalition partitions in trees and characterize pair coalition graphs of paths, cycles and trees. We also characterize triangle-free graphs $G$ with $PC(G)=n$ and unicyclic graphs $G$ with $PC(G)=n-2$.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2024; v1 submitted 16 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Edge-Locating Coloring of Graphs
Authors:
M. Korivand,
D. A. Mojdeh,
Edy Tri Baskoro,
A. Erfanian
Abstract:
An edge-locating coloring of a simple connected graph $G$ is a partition of its edge set into matchings such that the vertices of $G$ are distinguished by the distance to the matchings. The minimum number of the matchings of $G$ that admits an edge-locating coloring is the edge-locating chromatic number of $G$, and denoted by $χ'_L(G)$. In this paper we initiate to introduce the concept of edge-lo…
▽ More
An edge-locating coloring of a simple connected graph $G$ is a partition of its edge set into matchings such that the vertices of $G$ are distinguished by the distance to the matchings. The minimum number of the matchings of $G$ that admits an edge-locating coloring is the edge-locating chromatic number of $G$, and denoted by $χ'_L(G)$. In this paper we initiate to introduce the concept of edge-locating coloring and determine the exact values $χ'_L(G)$ of some custom graphs. The graphs $G$ with $χ'_L(G)\in \{2,m\}$ are characterized, where $m$ is the size of $G$. We investigate the relationship between order, diameter, and edge-locating chromatic number of $G$. For a complete graph $K_n$, we obtain the exact values of $χ'_L(K_n)$ and $χ'_L(K_n-M)$, where $M$ is a maximum matching; indeed this result is also extended for any graph. We will determine the edge-locating chromatic number of join graph $G+H$, where $G$ and $H$ are some well-known graphs. In particular, for any graph $G$, we show a relationship between $χ'_L(G+K_1)$ and $Δ(G)$. We investigate the edge-locating chromatic number of trees and present a characterization bound for any tree in terms of maximum degree, number of leaves, and the support vertices of trees. Finally, we prove that any edge-locating coloring of a graph is an edge distinguishing coloring.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Independent coalition in graphs: existence and characterization
Authors:
Mohammad Reza Samadzadeh,
Doost Ali Mojdeh
Abstract:
An independent coalition in a graph $G$ consists of two disjoint sets of vertices $V_1$ and $V_2$ neither of which is an independent dominating set but whose union $V_1 \cup V_2$ is an independent dominating set. An independent coalition partition, abbreviated, $ic$-partition, in a graph $G$ is a vertex partition $π= \lbrace V_1,V_2,\dots ,V_k \rbrace$ such that each set $V_i$ of $π$ either is a s…
▽ More
An independent coalition in a graph $G$ consists of two disjoint sets of vertices $V_1$ and $V_2$ neither of which is an independent dominating set but whose union $V_1 \cup V_2$ is an independent dominating set. An independent coalition partition, abbreviated, $ic$-partition, in a graph $G$ is a vertex partition $π= \lbrace V_1,V_2,\dots ,V_k \rbrace$ such that each set $V_i$ of $π$ either is a singleton dominating set, or is not an independent dominating set but forms an independent coalition with another set $V_j \in π$.
The maximum number of classes of an $ic$-partition of $G$ is the independent coalition number of $G$, denoted by $IC(G)$. In this paper we study the concept of $ic$-partition. In particular, we discuss the possibility of the existence of $ic$-partitions in graphs and introduce a family of graphs for which no $ic$-partition exists. We also determine the independent coalition number of some classes of graphs and investigate graphs $G$ of order $n$ with $IC(G)\in\{1,2,3,4,n\}$ and the trees $T$ of order $n$ with $IC(T)=n-1$.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2023; v1 submitted 3 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Edge coalitions in graphs
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Iman Masoumi
Abstract:
An edge coalition in a graph $G=(V,E)$ consists of two disjoint sets of edges $E_1$ and $E_2$, neither of which is an edge dominating set but whose union $E_1\cup E_2$ is an edge dominating set. An edge coalition partition in a graph $G$ of order $n=|V|$ and size $m$ is an edge partition $π=\{E_1,\cdots,E_k\}$ so that every set $E_i$ of $π$ either is a singleton edge dominating set, or is not an e…
▽ More
An edge coalition in a graph $G=(V,E)$ consists of two disjoint sets of edges $E_1$ and $E_2$, neither of which is an edge dominating set but whose union $E_1\cup E_2$ is an edge dominating set. An edge coalition partition in a graph $G$ of order $n=|V|$ and size $m$ is an edge partition $π=\{E_1,\cdots,E_k\}$ so that every set $E_i$ of $π$ either is a singleton edge dominating set, or is not an edge dominating set but forms an edge coalition with another set $E_j$ which is not an edge dominating set. In this paper we introduce the concept of edge coalition and show that there exists edge coalition for some graphs and trees. The graphs $G$ with small and size number of edge coalition are characterized. Finally, coalition graphs of special graphs are studied.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Majority dominator colorings of graphs
Authors:
Marcin Anholcer,
Azam Sadat Emadi,
Doost Ali Mojdeh
Abstract:
Let $G$ be a simple graph of order $n$. A majority dominator coloring of a graph $G$ is proper coloring in which each vertex of the graph dominates at least half of one color class. The majority dominator chromatic number $χ_{md}(G)$ is the minimum number of color classes in a majority dominator coloring of $G$. In this paper we study properties of the majority dominator coloring of a graph. We ob…
▽ More
Let $G$ be a simple graph of order $n$. A majority dominator coloring of a graph $G$ is proper coloring in which each vertex of the graph dominates at least half of one color class. The majority dominator chromatic number $χ_{md}(G)$ is the minimum number of color classes in a majority dominator coloring of $G$. In this paper we study properties of the majority dominator coloring of a graph. We obtain tight upper and lower bounds in terms of chromatic number, dominator chromatic number, maximum degree, domination and independence number. We also study majority dominator coloring number of selected families of graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 28 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Revisiting $k$-tuple dominating sets with emphasis on small values of $k$
Authors:
Babak Samadi,
Nasrin Soltankhah,
Doost Ali Mojdeh
Abstract:
For any graph $G$ of order $n$ with degree sequence $d_{1}\geq\cdots\geq d_{n}$, we define the double Slater number $s\ell_{\times2}(G)$ as the smallest integer $t$ such that $t+d_{1}+\cdots+d_{t-e}\geq2n-p$ in which $e$ and $p$ are the number of end-vertices and penultimate vertices of $G$, respectively. We show that $γ_{\times2}(G)\geq s\ell_{\times2}(G)$, where $γ_{\times2}(G)$ is the well-know…
▽ More
For any graph $G$ of order $n$ with degree sequence $d_{1}\geq\cdots\geq d_{n}$, we define the double Slater number $s\ell_{\times2}(G)$ as the smallest integer $t$ such that $t+d_{1}+\cdots+d_{t-e}\geq2n-p$ in which $e$ and $p$ are the number of end-vertices and penultimate vertices of $G$, respectively. We show that $γ_{\times2}(G)\geq s\ell_{\times2}(G)$, where $γ_{\times2}(G)$ is the well-known double domination number of a graph $G$ with no isolated vertices. We prove that the problem of deciding whether the equality holds for a given graph is NP-complete even when restricted to $4$-partite graphs. We also prove that the problem of computing $γ_{\times2}(G)$ in NP-hard even for comparability graphs of diameter two. Some results concerning these two parameters are given in this paper improving and generalizing some earlier results on double domination in graphs. We give an upper bound on the $k$-tuple domatic number of graphs with characterization of all graphs attaining the bound. Finally, we characterize the family of all full graphs, leading to a solution to an open problem given in a paper by Cockayne and Hedetniemi ($1977$).
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Restrained condition on double Roman dominating functions
Authors:
Babak Samadi,
Nasrin Soltankhah,
H. Abdollahzadeh Ahangar,
M. Chellali,
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
S. M. Sheikholeslami,
J. C. Valenzuela-Tripodoro
Abstract:
We continue the study of restrained double Roman domination in graphs. For a graph $G=\big{(}V(G),E(G)\big{)}$, a double Roman dominating function $f$ is called a restrained double Roman dominating function (RDRD function) if the subgraph induced by $\{v\in V(G)\mid f(v)=0\}$ has no isolated vertices. The restrained double Roman domination number (RDRD number) $γ_{rdR}(G)$ is the minimum weight…
▽ More
We continue the study of restrained double Roman domination in graphs. For a graph $G=\big{(}V(G),E(G)\big{)}$, a double Roman dominating function $f$ is called a restrained double Roman dominating function (RDRD function) if the subgraph induced by $\{v\in V(G)\mid f(v)=0\}$ has no isolated vertices. The restrained double Roman domination number (RDRD number) $γ_{rdR}(G)$ is the minimum weight $\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)$ taken over all RDRD functions of $G$.
We first prove that the problem of computing $γ_{rdR}$ is NP-hard even for planar graphs, but it is solvable in linear time when restricted to bounded clique-width graphs such as trees, cographs and distance-hereditary graphs. Relationships between $γ_{rdR}$ and some well-known parameters such as restrained domination number $γ_{r}$, domination number $γ$ and restrained Roman domination number $γ_{rR}$ are investigated in this paper by bounding $γ_{rdR}$ from below and above involving $γ_{r}$, $γ$ and $γ_{rR}$ for general graphs, respectively. We prove that $γ_{rdR}(T)\geq n+2$ for any tree $T\neq K_{1,n-1}$ of order $n\geq2$ and characterize the family of all trees attaining the lower bound. The characterization of graphs with small RDRD numbers is given in this paper.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2022; v1 submitted 11 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Restrained double Roman domination of a graph
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Iman Masoumi,
Lutz Volkmann
Abstract:
For a graph G=(V,E), a restrained double Roman dominating function is a function f:V\rightarrow\{0,1,2,3\} having the property that if f(v)=0, then the vertex v must have at least two neighbors assigned 2 under f or one neighbor w with f(w)=3, and if f(v)=1, then the vertex v must have at least one neighbor w with f(w)\geq2, and at the same time, the subgraph G[V_0] which includes vertices with ze…
▽ More
For a graph G=(V,E), a restrained double Roman dominating function is a function f:V\rightarrow\{0,1,2,3\} having the property that if f(v)=0, then the vertex v must have at least two neighbors assigned 2 under f or one neighbor w with f(w)=3, and if f(v)=1, then the vertex v must have at least one neighbor w with f(w)\geq2, and at the same time, the subgraph G[V_0] which includes vertices with zero labels has no isolated vertex. The weight of a restrained double Roman dominating function f is the sum f(V)=\sum_{v\in V}f(v), and the minimum weight of a restrained double Roman dominating function on G is the restrained double Roman domination number of G. We initiate the study of restrained double Roman domination with proving that the problem of computing this parameter is NP-hard. Then we present an upper bound on the restrained double Roman domination number of a connected graph G in terms of the order of G and characterize the graphs attaining this bound. We study the restrained double Roman domination versus the restrained Roman domination. Finally, we characterized all trees T attaining the exhibited bound.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Restrained Italian domination in graphs
Authors:
Babak Samadi,
Morteza Alishahi,
Iman Masoumi,
Doost Ali Mojdeh
Abstract:
For a graph $G=(V(G),E(G))$, an Italian dominating function (ID function) $f:V(G)\rightarrow\{0,1,2\}$ has the property that for every vertex $v\in V(G)$ with $f(v)=0$, either $v$ is adjacent to a vertex assigned $2$ under $f$ or $v$ is adjacent to least two vertices assigned $1$ under $f$. The weight of an ID function is $\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)$. The Italian domination number is the minimum weight…
▽ More
For a graph $G=(V(G),E(G))$, an Italian dominating function (ID function) $f:V(G)\rightarrow\{0,1,2\}$ has the property that for every vertex $v\in V(G)$ with $f(v)=0$, either $v$ is adjacent to a vertex assigned $2$ under $f$ or $v$ is adjacent to least two vertices assigned $1$ under $f$. The weight of an ID function is $\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)$. The Italian domination number is the minimum weight taken over all ID functions of $G$.
In this paper, we initiate the study of a variant of ID functions. A restrained Italian dominating function (RID function) $f$ of $G$ is an ID function of $G$ for which the subgraph induced by $\{v\in V(G)\mid f(v)=0\}$ has no isolated vertices, and the restrained Italian domination number $γ_{rI}(G)$ is the minimum weight taken over all RID functions of $G$. We first prove that the problem of computing this parameter is NP-hard, even when restricted to bipartite graphs and chordal graphs as well as planar graphs with maximum degree five. We prove that $γ_{rI}(T)$ for a tree $T$ of order $n\geq3$ different from the double star $S_{2,2}$ can be bounded from below by $(n+3)/2$. Moreover, all extremal trees for this lower bound are characterized in this paper. We also give some sharp bounds on this parameter for general graphs and give the characterizations of graphs $G$ with small or large $γ_{rI}(G)$.
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Covering Italian domination in graphs
Authors:
Abdollah Khodkar,
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Babak Samadi,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
For a graph $G=(V(G),E(G))$, an Italian dominating function (ID function) of $G$ is a function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ such that for each vertex $v\in V(G)$ with $f(v)=0$, $f(N(v))\geq2$, that is, either there is a vertex $u \in N(v)$ with $f (u) = 2$ or there are two vertices $x,y\in N(v)$ with $f(x)=f(y)=1$. A function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ is a covering Italian dominating function…
▽ More
For a graph $G=(V(G),E(G))$, an Italian dominating function (ID function) of $G$ is a function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ such that for each vertex $v\in V(G)$ with $f(v)=0$, $f(N(v))\geq2$, that is, either there is a vertex $u \in N(v)$ with $f (u) = 2$ or there are two vertices $x,y\in N(v)$ with $f(x)=f(y)=1$. A function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ is a covering Italian dominating function (CID function) of $G$ if $f$ is an ID function and $\{v\in V(G)\mid f(v)\neq0\}$ is a vertex cover set. The covering Italian domination number (CID number) $γ_{cI}(G)$ is the minimum weight taken over all CID functions of $G$.
In this paper, we study the CID number in graphs. We show that the problem of computing this parameter is NP-hard even when restricted to some well-known families of graphs, and find some bounds on this parameter. We characterize the family of graphs for which their CID numbers attain the upper bound twice their vertex cover number as well as all claw-free graphs whose CID numbers attain the lower bound half of their orders. We also give the characterizations of some families of graphs with small or large CID numbers.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Total vertex product irregularity strength of graphs
Authors:
Marcin Anholcer,
Azam Sadat Emadi,
Doost Ali Mojdeh
Abstract:
Consider a simple graph $G$. We call a labeling $w:E(G)\cup V(G)\rightarrow \{1, 2, \dots, s\}$ (\textit{total vertex}) \textit{product-irregular}, if all product degrees $pd_G(v)$ induced by this labeling are distinct, where $pd_G(v)=w(v)\times\prod_{e\ni v}w(e)$. The strength of $w$ is $s$, the maximum number used to label the members of $E(G)\cup V(G)$. The minimum value of $s$ that allows some…
▽ More
Consider a simple graph $G$. We call a labeling $w:E(G)\cup V(G)\rightarrow \{1, 2, \dots, s\}$ (\textit{total vertex}) \textit{product-irregular}, if all product degrees $pd_G(v)$ induced by this labeling are distinct, where $pd_G(v)=w(v)\times\prod_{e\ni v}w(e)$. The strength of $w$ is $s$, the maximum number used to label the members of $E(G)\cup V(G)$. The minimum value of $s$ that allows some irregular labeling is called \textit{the total vertex product irregularity strength} and denoted $tvps(G)$. We provide some general bounds, as well as exact values for chosen families of graphs. Keywords: product-irregular labeling, total vertex product irregularity strength, vertex-distinguishing labeling.
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2020; v1 submitted 27 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
On the upper Bound of double Roman dominating function
Authors:
Atieh Teimourzadeh,
Doost Ali Mojdeh
Abstract:
A double Roman Dominating function on a graph $G$ is a function $ f:V\rightarrow \{0,1,2,3\}$ such that the following conditions hold. If $f(v)=0$, then vertex $v$ must have at least two neighbors in $V_2$ or one neighbor in $V_3$ and if $f(v)=1$, then vertex $v$ must have at least one neighbor in $V_2\bigcup V_3$. The weight of a double Roman dominating function is the sum…
▽ More
A double Roman Dominating function on a graph $G$ is a function $ f:V\rightarrow \{0,1,2,3\}$ such that the following conditions hold. If $f(v)=0$, then vertex $v$ must have at least two neighbors in $V_2$ or one neighbor in $V_3$ and if $f(v)=1$, then vertex $v$ must have at least one neighbor in $V_2\bigcup V_3$. The weight of a double Roman dominating function is the sum $w_f=\sum_{v\in V(G)}{f(v)}$. In this paper, we improve the upper bounds of $γ_{dR}(G)$ that has already obtained and we show that $γ_{dR}(G)\leq\dfrac{12n}{11}$, for any graph with $δ(G) \ge 2$. This bound improve the bounds that have already been presented in \cite{chen} and \cite{kkcs}. Finally we prove the conjecture posed in \cite{kkcs}.
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
The Laplacian eigenvalue 2 of bicyclic graphs
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Mohammad Habibi,
Masoumeh Farkhondeh
Abstract:
If $G$ is a graph, its Laplacian is the difference between diagonal matrix of its vertex degrees and its adjacency matrix. A one-edge connection of two graphs $G_{1}$ and $G_{2}$ is a graph $G=G_{1}\odot G_{2}$ with $V(G)=V(G_{1})\cup V(G_{2})$ and $E(G)= E(G_{1})\cup E(G_{2})\cup \{e=uv\}$ where $u\in V(G_1)$ and $v\in V(G_2)$. In this paper, we consider the eigenvector of unicycle graphs. We stu…
▽ More
If $G$ is a graph, its Laplacian is the difference between diagonal matrix of its vertex degrees and its adjacency matrix. A one-edge connection of two graphs $G_{1}$ and $G_{2}$ is a graph $G=G_{1}\odot G_{2}$ with $V(G)=V(G_{1})\cup V(G_{2})$ and $E(G)= E(G_{1})\cup E(G_{2})\cup \{e=uv\}$ where $u\in V(G_1)$ and $v\in V(G_2)$. In this paper, we consider the eigenvector of unicycle graphs. We study the relationship between the Laplacian eigenvalue $2$ of unicyclic graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$; and bicyclic graphs $G=G_{1}\odot G_{2}$. We also characterize the broken sun graphs and the one edge connection of two broken sun graphs by their Laplacian eigenvalue $2$.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Outer independent double Roman domination number of graphs
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Babak Samadi,
Zehui Shao,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
A double Roman dominating function of a graph $G$ is a function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2,3\}$ having the property that for each vertex $v$ with $f(v)=0$, there exists $u\in N(v)$ with $f(u)=3$, or there are $u,w\in N(v)$ with $f(u)=f(w)=2$, and if $f(v)=1$, then $v$ is adjacent to a vertex assigned at least $2$ under $f$. The double Roman domination number $γ_{dR}(G)$ is the minimum weight…
▽ More
A double Roman dominating function of a graph $G$ is a function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2,3\}$ having the property that for each vertex $v$ with $f(v)=0$, there exists $u\in N(v)$ with $f(u)=3$, or there are $u,w\in N(v)$ with $f(u)=f(w)=2$, and if $f(v)=1$, then $v$ is adjacent to a vertex assigned at least $2$ under $f$. The double Roman domination number $γ_{dR}(G)$ is the minimum weight $f(V(G))=\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)$ among all double Roman dominating functions of $G$. An outer independent double Roman dominating function is a double Roman dominating function $f$ for which the set of vertices assigned $0$ under $f$ is independent. The outer independent double Roman domination number $γ_{oidR}(G)$ is the minimum weight taken over all outer independent double Roman dominating functions of $G$.
In this work, we present some contributions to the study of outer independent double Roman domination in graphs. Characterizations of the families of all connected graphs with small outer independent double Roman domination numbers, and tight lower and upper bounds on this parameter are given. We moreover bound this parameter for a tree $T$ from below by two times the vertex cover number of $T$ plus one. We also prove that the decision problem associated with $γ_{oidR}(G)$ is NP-complete even when restricted to planar graphs with maximum degree at most four. Finally, we give an exact formula for this parameter concerning the corona graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 20 August, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Double domination and total $2$-domination in digraphs and their dual problems
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Babak Samadi
Abstract:
A subset $S$ of vertices of a digraph $D$ is a double dominating set (total $2$-dominating set) if every vertex not in $S$ is adjacent from at least two vertices in $S$, and every vertex in $S$ is adjacent from at least one vertex in $S$ (the subdigraph induced by $S$ has no isolated vertices). The double domination number (total $2$-domination number) of a digraph $D$ is the minimum cardinality o…
▽ More
A subset $S$ of vertices of a digraph $D$ is a double dominating set (total $2$-dominating set) if every vertex not in $S$ is adjacent from at least two vertices in $S$, and every vertex in $S$ is adjacent from at least one vertex in $S$ (the subdigraph induced by $S$ has no isolated vertices). The double domination number (total $2$-domination number) of a digraph $D$ is the minimum cardinality of a double dominating set (total $2$-dominating set) in $D$. In this work, we investigate these concepts which can be considered as two extensions of double domination in graphs to digraphs, along with the concepts $2$-limited packing and total $2$-limited packing which have close relationships with the above-mentioned concepts.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Global offensive $k$-alliances in digraphs
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Babak Samadi,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
In this paper, we initiate the study of global offensive $k$-alliances in digraphs. Given a digraph $D=(V(D),A(D))$, a global offensive $k$-alliance in a digraph $D$ is a subset $S\subseteq V(D)$ such that every vertex outside of $S$ has at least one in-neighbor from $S$ and also at least $k$ more in-neighbors from $S$ than from outside of $S$, by assuming $k$ is an integer lying between two minus…
▽ More
In this paper, we initiate the study of global offensive $k$-alliances in digraphs. Given a digraph $D=(V(D),A(D))$, a global offensive $k$-alliance in a digraph $D$ is a subset $S\subseteq V(D)$ such that every vertex outside of $S$ has at least one in-neighbor from $S$ and also at least $k$ more in-neighbors from $S$ than from outside of $S$, by assuming $k$ is an integer lying between two minus the maximum in-degree of $D$ and the maximum in-degree of $D$. The global offensive $k$-alliance number $γ_{k}^{o}(D)$ is the minimum cardinality among all global offensive $k$-alliances in $D$. In this article we begin the study of the global offensive $k$-alliance number of digraphs. For instance, we prove that finding the global offensive $k$-alliance number of digraphs $D$ is an NP-hard problem for any value $k\in \{2-Δ^-(D),\dots,Δ^-(D)\}$ and that it remains NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite digraphs when we consider the non-negative values of $k$ given in the interval above. Based on these facts, lower bounds on $γ_{k}^{o}(D)$ with characterizations of all digraphs attaining the bounds are given in this work. We also bound this parameter for bipartite digraphs from above. For the particular case $k=1$, an immediate result from the definition shows that $γ(D)\leq γ_{1}^{o}(D)$ for all digraphs $D$, in which $γ(D)$ stands for the domination number of $D$. We show that these two digraph parameters are the same for some infinite families of digraphs like rooted trees and contrafunctional digraphs. Moreover, we show that the difference between $γ_{1}^{o}(D)$ and $γ(D)$ can be arbitrary large for directed trees and connected functional digraphs.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
The multiplicity of the Laplacian eigenvalue $2$ in some bicyclic graphs
Authors:
Masoumeh Farkhondeh,
Mohammad Habibi,
Dost Ali Mojdeh,
Yongsheng Rao
Abstract:
The Laplacian matrix of a graph $G$ is denoted by $L(G)=D(G)-A(G)$, where $D(G)=diag(d(v_{1}),\ldots , d(v_{n}))$ is a diagonal matrix and $A(G)$ is the adjacency matrix of $G$. Let $G_1$ and $G_2$ be two graphs. A one-edge connection of two graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ is a graph $G=G_1\odot_{uv} G_2$ with $V(G)=V(G_1)\cup V(G_2)$ and $E(G)= E(G_1)\cup E(G_2)\cup \{e=uv\}$, where $u\in V(G_1)$ and…
▽ More
The Laplacian matrix of a graph $G$ is denoted by $L(G)=D(G)-A(G)$, where $D(G)=diag(d(v_{1}),\ldots , d(v_{n}))$ is a diagonal matrix and $A(G)$ is the adjacency matrix of $G$. Let $G_1$ and $G_2$ be two graphs. A one-edge connection of two graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ is a graph $G=G_1\odot_{uv} G_2$ with $V(G)=V(G_1)\cup V(G_2)$ and $E(G)= E(G_1)\cup E(G_2)\cup \{e=uv\}$, where $u\in V(G_1)$ and $v\in V(G_2)$. We investigate the multiplicity of the Laplacian eigenvalue $2$ of $G_1\odot_{uv} G_2$, while the unicyclic graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ have $2$ among their Laplacian eigenvalues, by using their Laplacian characteristic polynomials. Some structural conditions ensuring the presence of the existence $2$ in the $G=G_1\odot_{uv} G_2$ where both $G_1$ and $G_2$ have $2$ as Laplacian eigenvalue, have been investigated, while, here we study the existence Laplacian eigenvalue $2$ in $G=G_1\odot_{uv} G_2$ where at most one of $G_1$ or $G_2$ has $2$ as Laplacian eigenvalue.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2020; v1 submitted 28 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Independent double Roman domination in graphs
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Zhila Mansouri
Abstract:
An independent double Roman dominating function (IDRDF) on a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2,3\}$ having the property that if $f(v)=0$, then the vertex $v$ has at least two neighbors assigned $2$ under $f$ or one neighbor $w$ with assigned $3$ under $f$, and if $f(v)=1$, then there exists $w\in N(v)$ with $f(w)\geq2$ such that the positive weight vertices are independent.…
▽ More
An independent double Roman dominating function (IDRDF) on a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2,3\}$ having the property that if $f(v)=0$, then the vertex $v$ has at least two neighbors assigned $2$ under $f$ or one neighbor $w$ with assigned $3$ under $f$, and if $f(v)=1$, then there exists $w\in N(v)$ with $f(w)\geq2$ such that the positive weight vertices are independent. The weight of an IDRDF is the value $\sum_{u\in V}f(u)$. The independent double Roman domination number $i_{dR}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum weight of an IDRDF on G. We initiate the study of the independent double Roman domination and show its relationships to both independent domination number (IDN) and independent Roman $\{2\}$-domination number (IR2DN). We present several sharp bounds on the IDRDN of a graph $G$ in terms of the order of $G$, maximum degree and the minimum size of edge cover. Finally, we show that, any ordered pair $(a,b)$ is realizable as the IDN and IDRDN of some non-trivial tree if and only if $2a + 1 \le b \le 3a$.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
(Open) packing number of some graph products
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Iztok Peterin,
Babak Samadi,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
The packing number of a graph $G$ is the maximum number of closed neighborhoods of vertices in $G$ with pairwise empty intersections. Similarly, the open packing number of $G$ is the maximum number of open neighborhoods in $G$ with pairwise empty intersections. We consider the packing and open packing numbers on graph products. In particular we give a complete solution with respect to some propert…
▽ More
The packing number of a graph $G$ is the maximum number of closed neighborhoods of vertices in $G$ with pairwise empty intersections. Similarly, the open packing number of $G$ is the maximum number of open neighborhoods in $G$ with pairwise empty intersections. We consider the packing and open packing numbers on graph products. In particular we give a complete solution with respect to some properties of factors in the case of lexicographic and rooted products. For Cartesian, strong and direct products, we present several lower and upper bounds on these parameters.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2020; v1 submitted 21 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
On three outer-independent domination related parameters in graphs
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Iztok Peterin,
Babak Samadi,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
Let $G$ be a graph and let $S\subseteq V(G)$. The set $S$ is a double outer-independent dominating set of $G$ if $|N[v]\cap D|\geq2$, for all $v\in V(G)$, and $V(G)\setminus S$ is independent. Similarly, $S$ is a $2$-outer-independent dominating set, if every vertex from $V(G)\setminus S$ has at least two neighbors in $S$ and $V(G)\setminus S$ is independent. Finally, $S$ is a total outer-independ…
▽ More
Let $G$ be a graph and let $S\subseteq V(G)$. The set $S$ is a double outer-independent dominating set of $G$ if $|N[v]\cap D|\geq2$, for all $v\in V(G)$, and $V(G)\setminus S$ is independent. Similarly, $S$ is a $2$-outer-independent dominating set, if every vertex from $V(G)\setminus S$ has at least two neighbors in $S$ and $V(G)\setminus S$ is independent. Finally, $S$ is a total outer-independent dominating set if every vertex from $V(G)$ has a neighbor in $S$ and the complement of $S$ is an independent set. The double, total or $2$-outer-independent domination number of $G$ is the smallest possible cardinality of any double, total or $2$-outer-independent dominating set of $G$, respectively. In this paper, the $2$-outer-independent, the total outer-independent and the double outer-independent domination numbers of graphs are investigated. We prove some Nordhaus-Gaddum type inequalities, derive their computational complexity and present several bounds for them.
△ Less
Submitted 28 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
Bounds on the nonnegative signed domination number of graphs
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Babak Samadi,
Lutz Volkmann
Abstract:
The aim of this work is to investigate the nonnegative signed domination number $γ^{NN}_s$ with emphasis on regular, ($r+1$)-clique-free graphs and trees. We give lower and upper bounds on $γ^{NN}_s$ for regular graphs and prove that $n/3$ is the best possible upper bound on this parameter for a cubic graph of order $n$, specifically. As an application of the classic theorem of Turán we bound…
▽ More
The aim of this work is to investigate the nonnegative signed domination number $γ^{NN}_s$ with emphasis on regular, ($r+1$)-clique-free graphs and trees. We give lower and upper bounds on $γ^{NN}_s$ for regular graphs and prove that $n/3$ is the best possible upper bound on this parameter for a cubic graph of order $n$, specifically. As an application of the classic theorem of Turán we bound $γ^{NN}_s(G)$ from below, for an ($r+1$)-clique-free graph $G$ and characterize all such graphs for which the equality holds, which corrects and generalizes a result for bipartite graphs in [Electron. J. Graph Theory Appl. 4 (2) (2016), 231--237], simultaneously. Also, we bound $γ^{NN}_s(T)$ for a tree $T$ from above and below and characterize all trees attaining the bounds.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Some notes on the signed bad number in bipartite graphs
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Babak Samadi
Abstract:
In this paper, we deal with the signed bad number and the negative decision number of graphs. We show that two upper bounds concerning these two parameters for bipartite graphs in papers [Discrete Math. Algorithms Appl. 1 (2011), 33--41] and [Australas. J. Combin. 41 (2008), 263--272] are not true as they stand. We correct them by presenting more general bounds for triangle-free graphs by using th…
▽ More
In this paper, we deal with the signed bad number and the negative decision number of graphs. We show that two upper bounds concerning these two parameters for bipartite graphs in papers [Discrete Math. Algorithms Appl. 1 (2011), 33--41] and [Australas. J. Combin. 41 (2008), 263--272] are not true as they stand. We correct them by presenting more general bounds for triangle-free graphs by using the classic theorem of Mantel from the extremal graph theory and characterize all triangle-free graphs attaining these bounds.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Packing and domination parameters in digraphs
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Babak Samadi,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
Given a digraph $D=(V,A)$, a set $B\subset V$ is a packing set in $D$ if there are no arcs joining vertices of $B$ and for any two vertices $x,y\in B$ the sets of in-neighbors of $x$ and $y$ are disjoint. The set $S$ is a dominating set (an open dominating set) in $D$ if every vertex not in $S$ (in $V$) has an in-neighbor in $S$. Moreover, a dominating set $S$ is called a total dominating set if t…
▽ More
Given a digraph $D=(V,A)$, a set $B\subset V$ is a packing set in $D$ if there are no arcs joining vertices of $B$ and for any two vertices $x,y\in B$ the sets of in-neighbors of $x$ and $y$ are disjoint. The set $S$ is a dominating set (an open dominating set) in $D$ if every vertex not in $S$ (in $V$) has an in-neighbor in $S$. Moreover, a dominating set $S$ is called a total dominating set if the subgraph induced by $S$ has no isolated vertices. The packing sets of maximum cardinality and the (total, open) dominating sets of minimum cardinality in digraphs are studied in this article. We prove that the two optimal sets concerning packing and domination achieve the same value for directed trees, and give some applications of it. We also show analogous equalities for all connected contrafunctional digraphs, and characterize all such digraphs $D$ for which such equalities are satisfied. Moreover, sharp bounds on the maximum and the minimum cardinalities of packing and dominating sets, respectively, are given for digraphs. Finally, we present solutions for two open problems, concerning total and open dominating sets of minimum cardinality, pointed out in [Australas. J. Combin. 39 (2007), 283--292].
△ Less
Submitted 10 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Domination Critical Knodel Graphs
Authors:
D. A. Mojdeh,
S. R. Musawi,
E. Nazari
Abstract:
A set $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a dominating set if each vertex of $V(G)\setminus D$ is adjacent to some vertex of $D$. The domination number of $G$, $γ(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. A graph $G$ is called domination vertex critical, or just $γ$-critical if removal of any vertex decreases the domination number. A graph $G$ is called domination vertex stable, or…
▽ More
A set $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a dominating set if each vertex of $V(G)\setminus D$ is adjacent to some vertex of $D$. The domination number of $G$, $γ(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. A graph $G$ is called domination vertex critical, or just $γ$-critical if removal of any vertex decreases the domination number. A graph $G$ is called domination vertex stable, or just $γ$-stable, if removal of any vertex does not decrease the domination number. For an even integer $n\ge 2$ and $1\le Δ\le \lfloor \log_2n \rfloor$, a Knödel graph $W_{Δ,n}$ is a $Δ$-regular bipartite graph of even order $n$, with vertices $(i,j)$, for $i=1,2$ and $0\le j \le n/2-1$, where for every $j$, $0\le j \le n/2-1$, there is an edge between vertex $(1,j)$ and every vertex $(2,j+2^k-1$ (mod (n/2)), for $k=0,1,\cdots,Δ-1$. in this paper, we study the domination criticality and domination stability of Knödel graphs. We charactrize the 3-regular and 4-regular Knödel graphs by $γ$-criticality or $γ$-stability.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
On the distance domination number of bipartite graphs
Authors:
D. A. Mojdeh,
S. R. Musawi,
E. Nazari
Abstract:
A subset $D\subseteq V(G)$ is called a $k$-distance dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V(G)\setminus D$ is within distance $k$ from some vertex of $D$. The minimum cardinality among all $k$-distance dominating sets of $G$ is called the $k$-distance domination number of $G$. In this note we give upper bound on the $k$-distance domination number of a connected bipartite graph and improve some…
▽ More
A subset $D\subseteq V(G)$ is called a $k$-distance dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V(G)\setminus D$ is within distance $k$ from some vertex of $D$. The minimum cardinality among all $k$-distance dominating sets of $G$ is called the $k$-distance domination number of $G$. In this note we give upper bound on the $k$-distance domination number of a connected bipartite graph and improve some results have been given like Theorem 2.1 and 2,7 in [Tian and Xu, A note on distance domination of graphs, Australian Journal of Combinatorics, 43 (2009), 181-190].
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Domination in 4-regular Knödel graphs
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Seyed Reza Musawi,
Esmaeil Nazari
Abstract:
A subset $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a dominating set if for each $u\in V(G)\setminus D$, $u$ is adjacent to some vertex $v\in D$. The domination number, $γ(G)$ of $G$, is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. For an even integer $n\ge2$ and $1\leΔ\le\lfloor\log_2n\rfloor$, a Knödel graph $W_{Δ,n}$ is a $Delta$-regular bipartite graph of even order $n$, with vertices$(i,j)$, fo…
▽ More
A subset $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a dominating set if for each $u\in V(G)\setminus D$, $u$ is adjacent to some vertex $v\in D$. The domination number, $γ(G)$ of $G$, is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. For an even integer $n\ge2$ and $1\leΔ\le\lfloor\log_2n\rfloor$, a Knödel graph $W_{Δ,n}$ is a $Delta$-regular bipartite graph of even order $n$, with vertices$(i,j)$, for $i=1,2$ and $0\le j\le n/2-1$, where for every $j$, $0\le j\le n/2-1$, there is an edge between $(1,j)$ and $(2,j+2^k-1 \text{(mod(n/2)})$, for $k=0,1,\cdots,Δ-1$. In this paper, we determine the domination number in $4$-regular Knödel graphs $W_{4,n}$.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
Total domination in cubic Knödel graphs
Authors:
Doost Ali Mojdeh,
Seyed Reza Musawi,
Esmaeil Nazari,
Nader Jafari Rad
Abstract:
A subset $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a \textit{dominating set} if for each $u\in V(G)\setminus D$, $u$ is adjacent to some vertex $v\in D$. The \textit{dominating number}, $γ(G)$ of $G$, is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. A set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is a \textit{total dominating set} if for each $u\in V(G)$, $u$ is adjacent to some vertex $v\in D$. the The \textit{total domin…
▽ More
A subset $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a \textit{dominating set} if for each $u\in V(G)\setminus D$, $u$ is adjacent to some vertex $v\in D$. The \textit{dominating number}, $γ(G)$ of $G$, is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$. A set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is a \textit{total dominating set} if for each $u\in V(G)$, $u$ is adjacent to some vertex $v\in D$. the The \textit{total dominating number}, $γ_t(G)$ of $G$, is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of $G$. For an even integer $n\ge2$ and $1\leΔ\le\lfloor\log_2n\rfloor$, a \textit{Knödel graph} $W_{Δ,n}$ is a $Δ$-regular bipartite graph of even order $n$, with vertices $(i,j)$, for $i=1,2$ and $0\le j\le n/2-1$, where for every $j$,$0\le j\le n/2-1$,there is an edge between vertex $(1,j)$ and every vertex $(2,j+2^k-1 \text{(mod(n/2)})$, for $k=0,1,\cdots,Δ-1$. In this paper, we determine the total domination number in $3$-regular Knödel graphs $W_{3,n}$.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
On the packing numbers in graphs
Authors:
D. A. Mojdeh,
B. Samadi,
A. Khodkar,
H. R. Golmohammadi
Abstract:
In this paper, we find upper bounds on the open packing and $k$-limited packing numbers with emphasis on the cases $k=1$ and $k=2$. We solve the problem of characterizing all connected graphs on $n$ vertices with $ρ_{o}(G)=n/δ(G)$ which was presented in 2015 by Hamid and Saravanakumar. Also, by establishing a relation between the $k$-limited packing number and double domination number we improve t…
▽ More
In this paper, we find upper bounds on the open packing and $k$-limited packing numbers with emphasis on the cases $k=1$ and $k=2$. We solve the problem of characterizing all connected graphs on $n$ vertices with $ρ_{o}(G)=n/δ(G)$ which was presented in 2015 by Hamid and Saravanakumar. Also, by establishing a relation between the $k$-limited packing number and double domination number we improve two upper bounds given by Chellali and Haynes in 2005.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
Packing parameters in graphs: New bounds and a solution to an open problem
Authors:
D. A. Mojdeh,
Babak Samadi
Abstract:
In this paper, we investigate the packing parameters in graphs. By applying the Mantel's theorem, We give upper bounds on packing and open packing numbers of triangle-free graphs along with characterizing the graphs for which the equalities hold and exhibit sharp Nordhaus-Gaddum type inequalities for packing numbers. We also solve the open problem of characterizing all connected graphs with…
▽ More
In this paper, we investigate the packing parameters in graphs. By applying the Mantel's theorem, We give upper bounds on packing and open packing numbers of triangle-free graphs along with characterizing the graphs for which the equalities hold and exhibit sharp Nordhaus-Gaddum type inequalities for packing numbers. We also solve the open problem of characterizing all connected graphs with $ρ_{o}(G)=n-ω(G)$ posed in [S. Hamid and S. Saravanakumar, {\em Packing parameters in graphs}, Discuss Math. Graph Theory, 35 (2015), 5--16].
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2017; v1 submitted 24 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
Nordhaus-Gaddum type inequalities for multiple domination and packing parameters in graphs
Authors:
D. A. Mojdeh,
Babak Samadi,
Lutz Volkmann
Abstract:
We study the Nordhaus-Gaddum type results for $(k-1,k,j)$ and $k$-domination numbers of a graph $G$ and investigate these bounds for the $k$-limited packing and $k$-total limited packing numbers in graphs. As the special case $(k-1,k,j)=(1,2,0)$ we give an upper bound on $dd(G)+dd(\overline{G})$ stronger than that presented by Harary and Haynes (1996). Moreover, we establish upper bounds on the su…
▽ More
We study the Nordhaus-Gaddum type results for $(k-1,k,j)$ and $k$-domination numbers of a graph $G$ and investigate these bounds for the $k$-limited packing and $k$-total limited packing numbers in graphs. As the special case $(k-1,k,j)=(1,2,0)$ we give an upper bound on $dd(G)+dd(\overline{G})$ stronger than that presented by Harary and Haynes (1996). Moreover, we establish upper bounds on the sum and product of packing and open packing numbers and characterize all graphs attaining these bounds.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2017; v1 submitted 20 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
On the inverse signed total domination number in graphs
Authors:
D. A. Mojdeh,
Babak Samadi
Abstract:
In this paper, we study the inverse signed total domination number in graphs and present new lower and upper bounds on this parameter. For example by making use of the classic theorem of Turan (1941), we present a sharp upper bound for graphs with no induced complete subgraph of order greater than two. Also, we bound this parameter for a tree in terms of its order and the number of leaves and char…
▽ More
In this paper, we study the inverse signed total domination number in graphs and present new lower and upper bounds on this parameter. For example by making use of the classic theorem of Turan (1941), we present a sharp upper bound for graphs with no induced complete subgraph of order greater than two. Also, we bound this parameter for a tree in terms of its order and the number of leaves and characterize all trees attaining this bound.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
New bounds on the signed total domination number of graphs
Authors:
S. M. Hosseini Moghaddam,
D. A. Mojdeh,
Babak Samadi,
L. Volkmann
Abstract:
In this paper, we study the signed total domination number in graphs and present new sharp lower and upper bounds for this parameter. For example by making use of the classic theorem of Turan, we present a sharp lower bound on this parameter for graphs with no complete graph of order r+1 as a subgraph. Also, we prove that n-2(s-s') is an upper bound on the signed total domination number of any tre…
▽ More
In this paper, we study the signed total domination number in graphs and present new sharp lower and upper bounds for this parameter. For example by making use of the classic theorem of Turan, we present a sharp lower bound on this parameter for graphs with no complete graph of order r+1 as a subgraph. Also, we prove that n-2(s-s') is an upper bound on the signed total domination number of any tree of order n with s support vertices and s' support vertives of degree two. Moreover, we characterize all trees attainig this bound.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.
