Showing 1–14 of 14 results for author: Krener, A J

Linear Quadratic Gaussian Synthesis for a Heated/Cooled Rod Using Point Actuation and Point Sensing

Authors: Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: We consider a rod that is heated/cooled and sensed at multiple point locations. To stabilize it to a constant temperature we set up a Linear Quadratic Regulator that we explicitly solve by the method of completing the square to find the optimal linear state feedback for the point actuators. But we don't assume that the whole state is mesureable so we construct an infinite dimensional Kalman filter… ▽ More We consider a rod that is heated/cooled and sensed at multiple point locations. To stabilize it to a constant temperature we set up a Linear Quadratic Regulator that we explicitly solve by the method of completing the square to find the optimal linear state feedback for the point actuators. But we don't assume that the whole state is mesureable so we construct an infinite dimensional Kalman filter to estimate the whole state from a finite number of noisy point measurements. These two components yield a Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) Synthesis for the heat equation under point actuation and point sensing. △ Less

Submitted 4 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

MSC Class: 93C20

Boundary Control of the Beam Equation by Linear Quadratic Regulation

Authors: Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: We present and solve a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) for the boundary control of the beam equation. We use the simple technique of completing the square to get an explicit solution. By decoupling the spatial frequencies we are able to reduce an infinite dimensional LQR to an infinte family of two two dimensional LQRs each of which can be solved explicitly. We present and solve a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) for the boundary control of the beam equation. We use the simple technique of completing the square to get an explicit solution. By decoupling the spatial frequencies we are able to reduce an infinite dimensional LQR to an infinte family of two two dimensional LQRs each of which can be solved explicitly. △ Less

Submitted 19 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

MSC Class: 35G05; 93D15

Boundary Control of the Wave Equation via Linear Quadatic Regulation

Authors: Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: We consider the Linear Quadratic Regulation for the boundary control of the one dimensional linear wave equation under both Dirichlet and Neumann activation. For each activation we present a Riccati partial differential equation that we explicitly solve. The derivation the Riccati partial differential equations is by the simple and explicit technique of completing the square. We consider the Linear Quadratic Regulation for the boundary control of the one dimensional linear wave equation under both Dirichlet and Neumann activation. For each activation we present a Riccati partial differential equation that we explicitly solve. The derivation the Riccati partial differential equations is by the simple and explicit technique of completing the square. △ Less

Submitted 12 February, 2021; v1 submitted 23 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

MSC Class: 49L20; 93-08; 35L05

Optimal Boundary Control of a Nonlinear Reaction Diffusion Equation via Completing the Square and Al'brekht's Method

Authors: Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: The two contributions of this paper are as follows. The first is the solution of an infinite dimensional, boundary controlled Linear Quadratic Regulator by the simple and constructive method of completing the square. The second contribution is the extension of Al'brekht's method to the optimal stabilization of a boundary controlled, nonlinear Reaction Diffusion system. The two contributions of this paper are as follows. The first is the solution of an infinite dimensional, boundary controlled Linear Quadratic Regulator by the simple and constructive method of completing the square. The second contribution is the extension of Al'brekht's method to the optimal stabilization of a boundary controlled, nonlinear Reaction Diffusion system. △ Less

Submitted 11 July, 2022; v1 submitted 14 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Al'brekht's Method in Infinite Dimensions

Authors: Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: In 1961 E. G. Albrekht presented a method for the optimal stabilization of smooth, nonlinear, finite dimensional, continuous time control systems. This method has been extended to similar systems in discrete time and to some stochastic systems in continuous and discrete time. In this paper we extend Albrekht's method to the optimal stabilization of some smooth, nonlinear, infinite dimensional, con… ▽ More In 1961 E. G. Albrekht presented a method for the optimal stabilization of smooth, nonlinear, finite dimensional, continuous time control systems. This method has been extended to similar systems in discrete time and to some stochastic systems in continuous and discrete time. In this paper we extend Albrekht's method to the optimal stabilization of some smooth, nonlinear, infinite dimensional, continuous time control systems whose nonlinearities are described by Fredholm integral operators. △ Less

Submitted 6 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

MSC Class: Primary 93C20 Secondary 49M99

Adaptive Horizon Model Predictive Control and Al'brekht's Method

Authors: Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: A standard way of finding a feedback law that stabilizes a control system to an operating point is to recast the problem as an infinite horizon optimal control problem. If the optimal cost and the optmal feedback can be found on a large domain around the operating point then a Lyapunov argument can be used to verify the asymptotic stability of the closed loop dynamics. The problem with this approa… ▽ More A standard way of finding a feedback law that stabilizes a control system to an operating point is to recast the problem as an infinite horizon optimal control problem. If the optimal cost and the optmal feedback can be found on a large domain around the operating point then a Lyapunov argument can be used to verify the asymptotic stability of the closed loop dynamics. The problem with this approach is that is usually very difficult to find the optimal cost and the optmal feedback on a large domain for nonlinear problems with or without constraints. Hence the increasing interest in Model Predictive Control (MPC). In standard MPC a finite horizon optimal control problem is solved in real time but just at the current state, the first control action is implimented, the system evolves one time step and the process is repeated. A terminal cost and terminal feedback found by Al'brekht's methoddefined in a neighborhood of the operating point is used to shorten the horizon and thereby make the nonlinear programs easier to solve because they have less decision variables. Adaptive Horizon Model Predictive Control (AHMPC) is a scheme for varying the horizon length of Model Predictive Control (MPC) as needed. Its goal is to achieve stabilization with horizons as small as possible so that MPC methods can be used on faster and/or more complicated dynamic processes. △ Less

Submitted 29 March, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1602.08619

MSC Class: 49L20

Series Solution of Discrete Time Stochastic Optimal Control Problems

Authors: Arthur J Krener

Abstract: In this paper we consider discrete time stochastic optimal control problems over infinite and finite time horizons. We show that for a large class of such problems the Taylor polynomials of the solutions to the associated Dynamic Programming Equations can be computed degree by degree. In this paper we consider discrete time stochastic optimal control problems over infinite and finite time horizons. We show that for a large class of such problems the Taylor polynomials of the solutions to the associated Dynamic Programming Equations can be computed degree by degree. △ Less

Submitted 21 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1806.04120

Stochastic HJB Equations and Regular Singular Points

Authors: Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: IIn this paper we show that some HJB equations arising from both finite and infinite horizon stochastic optimal control problems have a regular singular point at the origin. This makes them amenable to solution by power series techniques. This extends the work of Al'brecht who showed that the HJB equations of an infinite horizon deterministic optimal control problem can have a regular singular poi… ▽ More IIn this paper we show that some HJB equations arising from both finite and infinite horizon stochastic optimal control problems have a regular singular point at the origin. This makes them amenable to solution by power series techniques. This extends the work of Al'brecht who showed that the HJB equations of an infinite horizon deterministic optimal control problem can have a regular singular point at the origin, Al'brekht solved the HJB equations by power series, degree by degree. In particular, we show that the infinite horizon stochastic optimal control problem with linear dynamics, quadratic cost and bilinear noise leads to a new type of algebraic Riccati equation which we call the Stochastic Algebraic Riccati Equation (SARE). If SARE can be solved then one has a complete solution to this infinite horizon stochastic optimal control problem. We also show that a finite horizon stochastic optimal control problem with linear dynamics, quadratic cost and bilinear noise leads to a Stochastic Differential Riccati Equation (SDRE) that is well known. If these problems are the linear-quadratic-bilinear part of a nonlinear finite horizon stochastic optimal control problem then we show how the higher degree terms of the solutions can be computed degree by degree. To our knowledge this computation is new. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2018; v1 submitted 11 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

Adaptive Horizon Model Predictive Control

Authors: Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: Adaptive Horizon Model Predictive Control (AHMPC) is a scheme for varying as needed the horizon length of Model Predictive Control (MPC). Its goal is to achieve stabilization with horizons as small as possible so that MPC can be used on faster or more complicated dynamic processes. Beside the standard requirements of MPC including a terminal cost that is a control Lyapunov function, AHMPC requires… ▽ More Adaptive Horizon Model Predictive Control (AHMPC) is a scheme for varying as needed the horizon length of Model Predictive Control (MPC). Its goal is to achieve stabilization with horizons as small as possible so that MPC can be used on faster or more complicated dynamic processes. Beside the standard requirements of MPC including a terminal cost that is a control Lyapunov function, AHMPC requires a terminal feedback that turns the control Lyapunov function into a standard Lyapunov function in some domain around the operating point. But this domain need not be known explicitly. MPC does not compute off-line the optimal cost and the optimal feedback over a large domain instead it computes these quantities on-line when and where they are needed. AHMPC does not compute off-line the domain on which the terminal cost is a control Lyapunov function instead it computes on-line when a state is in this domain. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2016; originally announced February 2016.

Model Predictive Regulation

Authors: Cesar O. Aguilar, Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: We show how optimal nonlinear regulation can be achieved in a model predictive control fashion. We show how optimal nonlinear regulation can be achieved in a model predictive control fashion. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2013; originally announced October 2013.

The patchy Method for the Infinite Horizon Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation and its Accuracy

Authors: Thomas Hunt, Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: We introduce a modification to the patchy method of Navasca and Krener for solving the stationary Hamilton Jacobi Bellman equation. The numerical solution that we generate is a set of polynomials that approximate the optimal cost and optimal control on a partition of the state space. We derive an error bound for our numerical method under the assumption that the optimal cost is a smooth strict Lyu… ▽ More We introduce a modification to the patchy method of Navasca and Krener for solving the stationary Hamilton Jacobi Bellman equation. The numerical solution that we generate is a set of polynomials that approximate the optimal cost and optimal control on a partition of the state space. We derive an error bound for our numerical method under the assumption that the optimal cost is a smooth strict Lyupanov function. The error bound is valid when the number of subsets in the partition is not too large. △ Less

Submitted 17 July, 2012; originally announced July 2012.

Comments: 50 pages, 5 figures

MSC Class: 49-04; 49J15; 49J20; 49L99; 49M37

Simplicial Nonlinear Principal Component Analysis

Authors: Thomas Hunt, Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: We present a new manifold learning algorithm that takes a set of data points lying on or near a lower dimensional manifold as input, possibly with noise, and outputs a simplicial complex that fits the data and the manifold. We have implemented the algorithm in the case where the input data can be triangulated. We provide triangulations of data sets that fall on the surface of a torus, sphere, swis… ▽ More We present a new manifold learning algorithm that takes a set of data points lying on or near a lower dimensional manifold as input, possibly with noise, and outputs a simplicial complex that fits the data and the manifold. We have implemented the algorithm in the case where the input data can be triangulated. We provide triangulations of data sets that fall on the surface of a torus, sphere, swiss roll, and creased sheet embedded in a fifty dimensional space. We also discuss the theoretical justification of our algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2012; v1 submitted 13 July, 2012; originally announced July 2012.

Comments: 21 pages, 6 figures

MSC Class: 62-04

Patchy Solution of a Francis-Byrnes-Isidori Partial Differential Equation

Authors: Cesar O. Aguilar, Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: The solution to the nonlinear output regulation problem requires one to solve a first order PDE, known as the Francis-Byrnes-Isidori (FBI) equations. In this paper we propose a method to compute approximate solutions to the FBI equations when the zero dynamics of the plant are hyperbolic and the exosystem is two-dimensional. With our method we are able to produce approximations that converge unifo… ▽ More The solution to the nonlinear output regulation problem requires one to solve a first order PDE, known as the Francis-Byrnes-Isidori (FBI) equations. In this paper we propose a method to compute approximate solutions to the FBI equations when the zero dynamics of the plant are hyperbolic and the exosystem is two-dimensional. With our method we are able to produce approximations that converge uniformly to the true solution. Our method relies on the periodic nature of two-dimensional analytic center manifolds. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2011; originally announced June 2011.

Comments: 21 pages, 12 figures

MSC Class: 93C10; 34C45

Journal ref: International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, Vol. 23, No. 9, pp. 1046-1061, 2013

The Convergence of the Extended Kalman Filter

Authors: Arthur J. Krener

Abstract: We demonstrate that the extended Kalman filter converges locally for a broad class of nonlinear systems. If the initial estimation error of the filter is not too large then the error goes to zero exponentially as time goes to infinity. To demonstrate this, we require that the system be $C^2$ and uniformly observable with bounded second partial derivatives. We demonstrate that the extended Kalman filter converges locally for a broad class of nonlinear systems. If the initial estimation error of the filter is not too large then the error goes to zero exponentially as time goes to infinity. To demonstrate this, we require that the system be $C^2$ and uniformly observable with bounded second partial derivatives. △ Less

Submitted 18 December, 2002; originally announced December 2002.

Journal ref: in Directions in Mathematical Systems Theory and Optimization, A. Rantzer and C. I. Byrnes, eds, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp.173-182, 2002