-
Single Element Error Correction/ in a Euclidean Distance Matrix
Authors:
Abdo Alfakih,
Woosuk L. Jung,
Henry Wolkowicz,
Tina Xu
Abstract:
We consider the \emph{exact} error correction of a noisy Euclidean distance matrix, EDM, where the elements are the squared distances between $n$ points in $R^d$. For our problem we are given two facts: (i) the embedding dimension, $d$, (ii) \emph{exactly one} distance in the data is corrupted by \emph{nonzero noise}. But we do \underline{not} know the magnitude nor position of the noise. Thus the…
▽ More
We consider the \emph{exact} error correction of a noisy Euclidean distance matrix, EDM, where the elements are the squared distances between $n$ points in $R^d$. For our problem we are given two facts: (i) the embedding dimension, $d$, (ii) \emph{exactly one} distance in the data is corrupted by \emph{nonzero noise}. But we do \underline{not} know the magnitude nor position of the noise. Thus there is a combinatorial element to the problem. We present three solution techniques. These use three divide and conquer strategies in combination with three versions of facial reduction that use: exposing vectors, facial vectors, and Gale transforms. This sheds light on the connections between the various forms of facial reduction related to Gale transforms. Our highly successful empirics confirm the success of these approaches as we can solve huge problems of the order of $100,000$ nodes in approximately one minute to machine precision. \\Our algorithm depends on identifying whether a principal submatrix of the \EDM contains the corrupted element. We provide a theorem for doing this that is related to the existing results for identifying \emph{yielding} elements, i.e.,~we provide a characterization for guaranteeing the perturbed EDM remains an EDM with embedding dimension $d$. The characterization is particularly simple in the $d=2$ case. \\In addition, we characterize when the intuitive approach of the nearest EDM problem, solves our problem. In fact, we show that this happens if, and only if, the original distance element is $0$, degenerate, and the perturbation is negative.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Exact Solutions for the NP-hard Wasserstein Barycenter Problem using a Doubly Nonnegative Relaxation and a Splitting Method
Authors:
Abdo Alfakih,
Jeffery Cheng,
Woosuk L. Jung,
Walaa M. Moursi,
Henry Wolkowicz
Abstract:
The simplified Wasserstein barycenter problem consists in selecting one point from $k$ given sets, each set consisting of $n$ points, with the aim of minimizing the sum of distances to the barycenter of the $k$ points chosen. This problem is known to be NP-hard. We compute the Wasserstein barycenter by exploiting the Euclidean distance matrix structure to obtain a facially reduced doubly nonnegati…
▽ More
The simplified Wasserstein barycenter problem consists in selecting one point from $k$ given sets, each set consisting of $n$ points, with the aim of minimizing the sum of distances to the barycenter of the $k$ points chosen. This problem is known to be NP-hard. We compute the Wasserstein barycenter by exploiting the Euclidean distance matrix structure to obtain a facially reduced doubly nonnegative relaxation (DNN). The facial reduction provides a natural splitting for applying the symmetric alternating directions method of multipliers (sADMM) to the DNN relaxation. The sADMM method exploits structure in the subproblems to find strong upper and lower bounds.
The purpose of this paper is twofold. First we want to illustrate the strength of this DNN relaxation with a splitting approach. Our numerical tests then illustrate the surprising success on random problems, as we generally, efficiently, find the provable exact solution of this NP-hard problem. Comparisons with current commercial software illustrate this surprising efficiency. However, we demonstrate and prove that there is a duality gap for problems with enough multiple optimal solutions, and that this arises from problems with highly symmetrized structure.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
The $ω$-Condition Number for Optimal Preconditioning and Low Rank Generalized Jacobian Updating
Authors:
Woosuk L. Jung,
David Torregrosa-Belén,
Henry Wolkowicz
Abstract:
Preconditioning is essential in iterative methods for solving linear systems. It is also the implicit objective in updating approximations of Jacobians in optimization methods, e.g., in quasi-Newton methods. Motivated by the latter, we study a nonclassic matrix condition number, the $ω$-condition number. We do this in the context of optimal conditioning for: (i) our application to low rank updatin…
▽ More
Preconditioning is essential in iterative methods for solving linear systems. It is also the implicit objective in updating approximations of Jacobians in optimization methods, e.g., in quasi-Newton methods. Motivated by the latter, we study a nonclassic matrix condition number, the $ω$-condition number. We do this in the context of optimal conditioning for: (i) our application to low rank updating of generalized Jacobians; (ii) iterative methods for linear systems: (iia) clustering of eigenvalues and (iib) convergence rates.
For a positive definite matrix, the $ω$-condition measure is the ratio of the arithmetic and geometric means of the eigenvalues. In particular, our applications concentrate on linear systems with low rank updates of ill-conditioned positive definite matrices. These systems arise in the context of nonsmooth Newton methods using generalized Jacobians. We are able to use optimality conditions and derive explicit formulae for $ω$-optimal preconditioners and preconditioned updates. Connections to partial Cholesky sparse preconditioners are made.
Evaluating or estimating the classical condition number $κ$ can be expensive. We show that the $ω$-condition number can be evaluated explicitly following a Cholesky or LU factorization. Moreover, the simplicity of $ω$ allows for the derivation of formulae for optimal preconditioning in various scenarios, i.e., this avoids the need for expensive algorithmic calculations. Our empirics show that $ω$ estimates the actual condition of a linear system significantly better. Moreover, our empirical results show a significant decrease in the number of iterations required for a requested accuracy in the residual during an iterative method, i.e., these results confirm the efficacy of using the $ω$-condition number compared to the classical condition number.
△ Less
Submitted 23 June, 2024; v1 submitted 25 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
