-
Permutation-based multiple testing when fitting many generalized linear models
Authors:
Riccardo De Santis,
Jelle J. Goeman,
Samuel Davenport,
Jesse Hemerik,
Livio Finos
Abstract:
The multiple testing problem appears when fitting multivariate generalized linear models for high dimensional data. We show that the sign-flip test can be combined with permutation-based procedures for assessing the multiple testing problem
The multiple testing problem appears when fitting multivariate generalized linear models for high dimensional data. We show that the sign-flip test can be combined with permutation-based procedures for assessing the multiple testing problem
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Inference in generalized linear models with robustness to misspecified variances
Authors:
Riccardo De Santis,
Jelle J. Goeman,
Jesse Hemerik,
Livio Finos
Abstract:
Generalized linear models usually assume a common dispersion parameter. This assumption is seldom true in practice, and may cause appreciable loss of type I error control if standard parametric methods are used. We present an alternative semi-parametric group invariance method based on sign flip** of score contributions. Our method requires only the correct specification of the mean model, but i…
▽ More
Generalized linear models usually assume a common dispersion parameter. This assumption is seldom true in practice, and may cause appreciable loss of type I error control if standard parametric methods are used. We present an alternative semi-parametric group invariance method based on sign flip** of score contributions. Our method requires only the correct specification of the mean model, but is robust against any misspecification of the variance. The method is available in the R library flipscores.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2022; v1 submitted 28 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
The sequential rejection principle of familywise error control
Authors:
Jelle J. Goeman,
Aldo Solari
Abstract:
Closed testing and partitioning are recognized as fundamental principles of familywise error control. In this paper, we argue that sequential rejection can be considered equally fundamental as a general principle of multiple testing. We present a general sequentially rejective multiple testing procedure and show that many well-known familywise error controlling methods can be constructed as specia…
▽ More
Closed testing and partitioning are recognized as fundamental principles of familywise error control. In this paper, we argue that sequential rejection can be considered equally fundamental as a general principle of multiple testing. We present a general sequentially rejective multiple testing procedure and show that many well-known familywise error controlling methods can be constructed as special cases of this procedure, among which are the procedures of Holm, Shaffer and Hochberg, parallel and serial gatekee** procedures, modern procedures for multiple testing in graphs, resampling-based multiple testing procedures and even the closed testing and partitioning procedures themselves. We also give a general proof that sequentially rejective multiple testing procedures strongly control the familywise error if they fulfill simple criteria of monotonicity of the critical values and a limited form of weak familywise error control in each single step. The sequential rejection principle gives a novel theoretical perspective on many well-known multiple testing procedures, emphasizing the sequential aspect. Its main practical usefulness is for the development of multiple testing procedures for null hypotheses, possibly logically related, that are structured in a graph. We illustrate this by presenting a uniform improvement of a recently published procedure.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2012;
originally announced November 2012.
