-
Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector
Authors:
D. de Florian,
C. Grojean,
F. Maltoni,
C. Mariotti,
A. Nikitenko,
M. Pieri,
P. Savard,
M. Schumacher,
R. Tanaka,
R. Aggleton,
M. Ahmad,
B. Allanach,
C. Anastasiou,
W. Astill,
S. Badger,
M. Badziak,
J. Baglio,
E. Bagnaschi,
A. Ballestrero,
A. Banfi,
D. Barducci,
M. Beckingham,
C. Becot,
G. Bélanger,
J. Bellm
, et al. (351 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This Report summarizes the results of the activities of the LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group in the period 2014-2016. The main goal of the working group was to present the state-of-the-art of Higgs physics at the LHC, integrating all new results that have appeared in the last few years. The first part compiles the most up-to-date predictions of Higgs boson production cross sections and decay…
▽ More
This Report summarizes the results of the activities of the LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group in the period 2014-2016. The main goal of the working group was to present the state-of-the-art of Higgs physics at the LHC, integrating all new results that have appeared in the last few years. The first part compiles the most up-to-date predictions of Higgs boson production cross sections and decay branching ratios, parton distribution functions, and off-shell Higgs boson production and interference effects. The second part discusses the recent progress in Higgs effective field theory predictions, followed by the third part on pseudo-observables, simplified template cross section and fiducial cross section measurements, which give the baseline framework for Higgs boson property measurements. The fourth part deals with the beyond the Standard Model predictions of various benchmark scenarios of Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, extended scalar sector, Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and exotic Higgs boson decays. This report follows three previous working-group reports: Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables (CERN-2011-002), Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 2. Differential Distributions (CERN-2012-002), and Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs properties (CERN-2013-004). The current report serves as the baseline reference for Higgs physics in LHC Run 2 and beyond.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2017; v1 submitted 25 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
Statistics of predictions with missing higher order corrections
Authors:
Laure Berthier,
Jeppe Trøst Nielsen
Abstract:
Effective operators have been used extensively to understand small deviations from the Standard Model in the search for new physics. So far there has been no general method to fit for small parameters when higher order corrections in these parameters are present but unknown. We present a new technique that solves this problem, allowing for an exact p-value calculation under the assumption that hig…
▽ More
Effective operators have been used extensively to understand small deviations from the Standard Model in the search for new physics. So far there has been no general method to fit for small parameters when higher order corrections in these parameters are present but unknown. We present a new technique that solves this problem, allowing for an exact p-value calculation under the assumption that higher order theoretical contributions can be treated as gaussian distributed random variables. The method we propose is general, and may be used in the analysis of any perturbative theoretical prediction, ie.~truncated power series. We illustrate this new method by performing a fit of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory parameters, which include eg.~anomalous gauge and four-fermion couplings.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2017; v1 submitted 6 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
Supernovae as cosmological probes
Authors:
Jeppe Trost Nielsen
Abstract:
The cosmological standard model at present is widely accepted as containing mainly things we do not understand. In particular the appearance of a Cosmological Constant, or dark energy, is puzzling. This was first inferred from the Hubble diagram of a low number of Type Ia supernovae, and later corroborated by complementary cosmological probes. Today, a much larger collection of supernovae is avail…
▽ More
The cosmological standard model at present is widely accepted as containing mainly things we do not understand. In particular the appearance of a Cosmological Constant, or dark energy, is puzzling. This was first inferred from the Hubble diagram of a low number of Type Ia supernovae, and later corroborated by complementary cosmological probes. Today, a much larger collection of supernovae is available, and here I perform a rigorous statistical analysis of this dataset. Taking into account how the supernovae are calibrated to be standard candles, we run into some subtleties in the analysis. To our surprise, this new dataset - about an order of bigger than the size of the original dataset - shows, under standard assumptions, only mild evidence of an accelerated universe.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
Marginal evidence for cosmic acceleration from Type Ia supernovae
Authors:
Jeppe Trøst Nielsen,
Alberto Guffanti,
Subir Sarkar
Abstract:
The "standard" model of cosmology is founded on the basis that the expansion rate of the universe is accelerating at present --- as was inferred originally from the Hubble diagram of Type Ia supernovae. There exists now a much bigger database of supernovae so we can perform rigorous statistical tests to check whether these "standardisable candles" indeed indicate cosmic acceleration. Taking accoun…
▽ More
The "standard" model of cosmology is founded on the basis that the expansion rate of the universe is accelerating at present --- as was inferred originally from the Hubble diagram of Type Ia supernovae. There exists now a much bigger database of supernovae so we can perform rigorous statistical tests to check whether these "standardisable candles" indeed indicate cosmic acceleration. Taking account of the empirical procedure by which corrections are made to their absolute magnitudes to allow for the varying shape of the light curve and extinction by dust, we find, rather surprisingly, that the data are still quite consistent with a constant rate of expansion.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2016; v1 submitted 3 June, 2015;
originally announced June 2015.
-
Benefits to the U.S. from Physicists Working at Accelerators Overseas
Authors:
Jacob Anderson,
Raymond Brock,
Yuri Gershtein,
Nicholas Hadley,
Michael Harrison,
Meenakshi Narain,
Jason Nielsen,
Fred Olness,
Bjoern Penning,
Michael Peskin,
Eric Prebys,
Marc Ross,
Salvatore Rappoccio,
Abraham Seiden,
Ryszard Stroynowski
Abstract:
We illustrate benefits to the U.S. economy and technological infrastructure of U.S. participation in accelerators overseas. We discuss contributions to experimental hardware and analysis and to accelerator technology and components, and benefits stemming from the involvement of U.S. students and postdoctoral fellows in global scientific collaborations. Contributed to the proceedings of the Snowmas…
▽ More
We illustrate benefits to the U.S. economy and technological infrastructure of U.S. participation in accelerators overseas. We discuss contributions to experimental hardware and analysis and to accelerator technology and components, and benefits stemming from the involvement of U.S. students and postdoctoral fellows in global scientific collaborations. Contributed to the proceedings of the Snowmass 2013 Community Summer Study.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
Higgs Working Group Report of the Snowmass 2013 Community Planning Study
Authors:
S. Dawson,
A. Gritsan,
H. Logan,
J. Qian,
C. Tully,
R. Van Kooten,
A. Ajaib,
A. Anastassov,
I. Anderson,
D. Asner,
O. Bake,
V. Barger,
T. Barklow,
B. Batell,
M. Battaglia,
S. Berge,
A. Blondel,
S. Bolognesi,
J. Brau,
E. Brownson,
M. Cahill-Rowley,
C. Calancha-Paredes,
C. -Y. Chen,
W. Chou,
R. Clare
, et al. (109 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This report summarizes the work of the Energy Frontier Higgs Boson working group of the 2013 Community Summer Study (Snowmass). We identify the key elements of a precision Higgs physics program and document the physics potential of future experimental facilities as elucidated during the Snowmass study. We study Higgs couplings to gauge boson and fermion pairs, double Higgs production for the Higgs…
▽ More
This report summarizes the work of the Energy Frontier Higgs Boson working group of the 2013 Community Summer Study (Snowmass). We identify the key elements of a precision Higgs physics program and document the physics potential of future experimental facilities as elucidated during the Snowmass study. We study Higgs couplings to gauge boson and fermion pairs, double Higgs production for the Higgs self-coupling, its quantum numbers and $CP$-mixing in Higgs couplings, the Higgs mass and total width, and prospects for direct searches for additional Higgs bosons in extensions of the Standard Model. Our report includes projections of measurement capabilities from detailed studies of the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC), a Gamma-Gamma Collider, the International Linear Collider (ILC), the Large Hadron Collider High-Luminosity Upgrade (HL-LHC), Very Large Hadron Colliders up to 100 TeV (VLHC), a Muon Collider, and a Triple-Large Electron Positron Collider (TLEP).
△ Less
Submitted 8 January, 2014; v1 submitted 30 October, 2013;
originally announced October 2013.
-
Fundamentals of LHC Experiments
Authors:
Jason Nielsen
Abstract:
Experiments on the Large Hadron Collider at CERN represent our furthest excursion yet along the energy frontier of particle physics. The goal of probing physical processes at the TeV energy scale puts strict requirements on the performance of accelerator and experiment, dictating the awe-inspiring dimensions of both. These notes, based on a set of five lectures given at the 2010 Theoretical Advanc…
▽ More
Experiments on the Large Hadron Collider at CERN represent our furthest excursion yet along the energy frontier of particle physics. The goal of probing physical processes at the TeV energy scale puts strict requirements on the performance of accelerator and experiment, dictating the awe-inspiring dimensions of both. These notes, based on a set of five lectures given at the 2010 Theoretical Advanced Studies Institute in Boulder, Colorado, not only review the physics considered as part of the accelerator and experiment design, but also introduce algorithms and tools used to interpret experimental results in terms of theoretical models. The search for new physics beyond the Standard Model presents many new challenges, a few of which are addressed in specific examples.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2011;
originally announced June 2011.
-
Search for neutral Higgs bosons decaying into four taus at LEP2
Authors:
ALEPH Collaboration,
S. Schael,
R. Barate,
R. Brunelière,
I. De Bonis,
D. Decamp,
C. Goy,
S. Jézéquel,
J. -P. Lees,
F. Martin,
E. Merle,
M. -N. Minard,
B. Pietrzyk,
B. Trocmé S. Bravo,
M. P. Casado,
M. Chmeissani,
J. M. Crespo,
E. Fernandez,
M. Fernandez-Bosman,
Ll. Garrido,
M. Martinez,
A. Pacheco,
H. Ruiz,
A. Colaleo,
D. Creanza
, et al. (236 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A search for the production and non-standard decay of a Higgs boson, h, into four taus through intermediate pseudoscalars, a, is conducted on 683 pb-1 of data collected by the ALEPH experiment at centre-of-mass energies from 183 to 209 GeV. No excess of events above background is observed, and exclusion limits are placed on the combined production cross section times branching ratio, ξ^2 = σ(e+e…
▽ More
A search for the production and non-standard decay of a Higgs boson, h, into four taus through intermediate pseudoscalars, a, is conducted on 683 pb-1 of data collected by the ALEPH experiment at centre-of-mass energies from 183 to 209 GeV. No excess of events above background is observed, and exclusion limits are placed on the combined production cross section times branching ratio, ξ^2 = σ(e+e- --> Zh)/σ_{SM}(e+e- --> Zh) x B(h --> aa)x B(a --> τ^+τ^-)^2. For mh < 107 GeV/c2 and 4 < ma < 10 GeV/c2, ξ^2 > 1 is excluded at the 95% confidence level.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2010; v1 submitted 2 March, 2010;
originally announced March 2010.
