-
ACE Science Workshop Report
Authors:
Stefania Gori,
Nhan Tran,
Karri DiPetrillo,
Bertrand Echenard,
Jeffrey Eldred,
Roni Harnik,
Pedro Machado,
Matthew Toups,
Robert Bernstein,
Innes Bigaran,
Cari Cesarotti,
Bhaskar Dutta,
Christian Herwig,
Sergo **dariani,
Ryan Plestid,
Vladimir Shiltsev,
Matthew Solt,
Alexandre Sousa,
Diktys Stratakis,
Zahra Tabrizi,
Anil Thapa,
Jacob Zettlemoyer,
Jure Zupan
Abstract:
We summarize the Fermilab Accelerator Complex Evolution (ACE) Science Workshop, held on June 14-15, 2023. The workshop presented the strategy for the ACE program in two phases: ACE Main Injector Ramp and Target (MIRT) upgrade and ACE Booster Replacement (BR) upgrade. Four plenary sessions covered the primary experimental physics thrusts: Muon Collider, Neutrinos, Charged Lepton Flavor Violation, a…
▽ More
We summarize the Fermilab Accelerator Complex Evolution (ACE) Science Workshop, held on June 14-15, 2023. The workshop presented the strategy for the ACE program in two phases: ACE Main Injector Ramp and Target (MIRT) upgrade and ACE Booster Replacement (BR) upgrade. Four plenary sessions covered the primary experimental physics thrusts: Muon Collider, Neutrinos, Charged Lepton Flavor Violation, and Dark Sectors. Additional physics and technology ideas were presented from the community that could expand or augment the ACE science program. Given the physics framing, a parallel session at the workshop was dedicated to discussing priorities for accelerator R\&D. Finally, physics discussion sessions concluded the workshop where experts from the different experimental physics thrusts were brought together to begin understanding the synergies between the different physics drivers and technologies.
In December of 2023, the P5 report was released setting the physics priorities for the field in the next decade and beyond, and identified ACE as an important component of the future US accelerator-based program. Given the presentations and discussions at the ACE Science Workshop and the findings of the P5 report, we lay out the topics for study to determine the physics priorities and design goals of the Fermilab ACE project in the near-term.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2024; v1 submitted 4 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Detailed Report on the Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm
Authors:
D. P. Aguillard,
T. Albahri,
D. Allspach,
A. Anisenkov,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
L. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
S. Braun,
M. Bressler,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey
, et al. (168 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present details on a new measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ= (g_μ-2)/2$. The result is based on positive muon data taken at Fermilab's Muon Campus during the 2019 and 2020 accelerator runs. The measurement uses $3.1$ GeV$/c$ polarized muons stored in a $7.1$-m-radius storage ring with a $1.45$ T uniform magnetic field. The value of $ a_μ$ is determined from the measured difference b…
▽ More
We present details on a new measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ= (g_μ-2)/2$. The result is based on positive muon data taken at Fermilab's Muon Campus during the 2019 and 2020 accelerator runs. The measurement uses $3.1$ GeV$/c$ polarized muons stored in a $7.1$-m-radius storage ring with a $1.45$ T uniform magnetic field. The value of $ a_μ$ is determined from the measured difference between the muon spin precession frequency and its cyclotron frequency. This difference is normalized to the strength of the magnetic field, measured using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). The ratio is then corrected for small contributions from beam motion, beam dispersion, and transient magnetic fields. We measure $a_μ= 116 592 057 (25) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.21 ppm). This is the world's most precise measurement of this quantity and represents a factor of $2.2$ improvement over our previous result based on the 2018 dataset. In combination, the two datasets yield $a_μ(\text{FNAL}) = 116 592 055 (24) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.20 ppm). Combining this with the measurements from Brookhaven National Laboratory for both positive and negative muons, the new world average is $a_μ$(exp) $ = 116 592 059 (22) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.19 ppm).
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2024; v1 submitted 23 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm
Authors:
D. P. Aguillard,
T. Albahri,
D. Allspach,
A. Anisenkov,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
L. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
S. Braun,
M. Bressler,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey
, et al. (166 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a new measurement of the positive muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ\equiv (g_μ- 2)/2$, from the Fermilab Muon $g\!-\!2$ Experiment using data collected in 2019 and 2020. We have analyzed more than 4 times the number of positrons from muon decay than in our previous result from 2018 data. The systematic error is reduced by more than a factor of 2 due to better running conditions, a more stable…
▽ More
We present a new measurement of the positive muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ\equiv (g_μ- 2)/2$, from the Fermilab Muon $g\!-\!2$ Experiment using data collected in 2019 and 2020. We have analyzed more than 4 times the number of positrons from muon decay than in our previous result from 2018 data. The systematic error is reduced by more than a factor of 2 due to better running conditions, a more stable beam, and improved knowledge of the magnetic field weighted by the muon distribution, $\tildeω'^{}_p$, and of the anomalous precession frequency corrected for beam dynamics effects, $ω_a$. From the ratio $ω_a / \tildeω'^{}_p$, together with precisely determined external parameters, we determine $a_μ= 116\,592\,057(25) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.21 ppm). Combining this result with our previous result from the 2018 data, we obtain $a_μ\text{(FNAL)} = 116\,592\,055(24) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.20 ppm). The new experimental world average is $a_μ(\text{Exp}) = 116\,592\,059(22)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.19 ppm), which represents a factor of 2 improvement in precision.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2023; v1 submitted 11 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Towards a Muon Collider
Authors:
Carlotta Accettura,
Dean Adams,
Rohit Agarwal,
Claudia Ahdida,
Chiara Aimè,
Nicola Amapane,
David Amorim,
Paolo Andreetto,
Fabio Anulli,
Robert Appleby,
Artur Apresyan,
Aram Apyan,
Sergey Arsenyev,
Pouya Asadi,
Mohammed Attia Mahmoud,
Aleksandr Azatov,
John Back,
Lorenzo Balconi,
Laura Bandiera,
Roger Barlow,
Nazar Bartosik,
Emanuela Barzi,
Fabian Batsch,
Matteo Bauce,
J. Scott Berg
, et al. (272 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A muon collider would enable the big jump ahead in energy reach that is needed for a fruitful exploration of fundamental interactions. The challenges of producing muon collisions at high luminosity and 10 TeV centre of mass energy are being investigated by the recently-formed International Muon Collider Collaboration. This Review summarises the status and the recent advances on muon colliders desi…
▽ More
A muon collider would enable the big jump ahead in energy reach that is needed for a fruitful exploration of fundamental interactions. The challenges of producing muon collisions at high luminosity and 10 TeV centre of mass energy are being investigated by the recently-formed International Muon Collider Collaboration. This Review summarises the status and the recent advances on muon colliders design, physics and detector studies. The aim is to provide a global perspective of the field and to outline directions for future work.
△ Less
Submitted 27 November, 2023; v1 submitted 15 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Snowmass'21 Accelerator Frontier Report
Authors:
S. Gourlay,
T. Raubenheimer,
V. Shiltsev,
G. Arduini,
R. Assmann,
C. Barbier,
M. Bai,
S. Belomestnykh,
S. Bermudez,
P. Bhat,
A. Faus-Golfe,
J. Galambos,
C. Geddes,
G. Hoffstaetter,
M. Hogan,
Z. Huang,
M. Lamont,
D. Li,
S. Lund,
R. Milner,
P. Musumeci,
E. Nanni,
M. Palmer,
N. Pastrone,
F. Pellemoine
, et al. (13 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In 2020-2022, extensive discussions and deliberations have taken place in corresponding topical working groups of the Snowmass Accelerator Frontier (AF) and in numerous joint meetings with other Frontiers, Snowmass-wide meetings, a series of Colloquium-style Agoras, cross-Frontier Forums on muon and electron-positron colliders and the collider Implementation Task Force (ITF). The outcomes of these…
▽ More
In 2020-2022, extensive discussions and deliberations have taken place in corresponding topical working groups of the Snowmass Accelerator Frontier (AF) and in numerous joint meetings with other Frontiers, Snowmass-wide meetings, a series of Colloquium-style Agoras, cross-Frontier Forums on muon and electron-positron colliders and the collider Implementation Task Force (ITF). The outcomes of these activities are summarized in this Accelerator Frontier report.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2022; v1 submitted 28 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Muon Collider Forum Report
Authors:
K. M. Black,
S. **dariani,
D. Li,
F. Maltoni,
P. Meade,
D. Stratakis,
D. Acosta,
R. Agarwal,
K. Agashe,
C. Aime,
D. Ally,
A. Apresyan,
A. Apyan,
P. Asadi,
D. Athanasakos,
Y. Bao,
E. Barzi,
N. Bartosik,
L. A. T. Bauerdick,
J. Beacham,
S. Belomestnykh,
J. S. Berg,
J. Berryhill,
A. Bertolin,
P. C. Bhat
, et al. (160 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A multi-TeV muon collider offers a spectacular opportunity in the direct exploration of the energy frontier. Offering a combination of unprecedented energy collisions in a comparatively clean leptonic environment, a high energy muon collider has the unique potential to provide both precision measurements and the highest energy reach in one machine that cannot be paralleled by any currently availab…
▽ More
A multi-TeV muon collider offers a spectacular opportunity in the direct exploration of the energy frontier. Offering a combination of unprecedented energy collisions in a comparatively clean leptonic environment, a high energy muon collider has the unique potential to provide both precision measurements and the highest energy reach in one machine that cannot be paralleled by any currently available technology. The topic generated a lot of excitement in Snowmass meetings and continues to attract a large number of supporters, including many from the early career community. In light of this very strong interest within the US particle physics community, Snowmass Energy, Theory and Accelerator Frontiers created a cross-frontier Muon Collider Forum in November of 2020. The Forum has been meeting on a monthly basis and organized several topical workshops dedicated to physics, accelerator technology, and detector R&D. Findings of the Forum are summarized in this report.
△ Less
Submitted 8 August, 2023; v1 submitted 2 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
A New Charged Lepton Flavor Violation Program at Fermilab
Authors:
M. Aoki,
R. B. Appleby,
M. Aslaninejad,
R. Barlow,
R. H. Bernstein,
C. Bloise,
L. Calibbi,
F. Cervelli,
R. Culbertson,
Andre Luiz de Gouvea,
S. Di Falco,
E. Diociaiuti,
S. Donati,
R. Donghia,
B. Echenard,
A. Gaponenko,
S. Giovannella,
C. Group,
F. Happacher,
M. T. Hedges,
D. G. Hitlin,
E. Hungerford,
C. Johnstone,
D. M. Kaplan,
M. Kargiantoulakis
, et al. (43 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The muon has played a central role in establishing the Standard Model of particle physics, and continues to provide valuable information about the nature of new physics. A new complex at Fermilab, the Advanced Muon Facility, would provide the world's most intense positive and negative muon beams by exploiting the full potential of PIP-II and the Booster upgrade. This facility would enable a broad…
▽ More
The muon has played a central role in establishing the Standard Model of particle physics, and continues to provide valuable information about the nature of new physics. A new complex at Fermilab, the Advanced Muon Facility, would provide the world's most intense positive and negative muon beams by exploiting the full potential of PIP-II and the Booster upgrade. This facility would enable a broad muon physics program, including studies of charged lepton flavor violation, muonium-antimuonium transitions, a storage ring muon EDM experiment, and muon spin rotation experiments. This document describes a staged realization of this complex, together with a series of next-generation experiments to search for charged lepton flavor violation.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Future Collider Options for the US
Authors:
P. C. Bhat,
S. **dariani,
G. Ambrosio,
G. Apollinari,
S. Belomestnykh,
A. Bross,
J. Butler,
A. Canepa,
D. Elvira,
P. Fox,
Z. Gecse,
E. Gianfelice-Wendt,
P. Merkel,
S. Nagaitsev,
D. Neuffer,
H. Piekarz,
S. Posen,
T. Sen,
V. Shiltsev,
N. Solyak,
D. Stratakis,
M. Syphers,
G. Velev,
V. Yakovlev,
K. Yonehara
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The United States has a rich history in high energy particle accelerators and colliders -- both lepton and hadron machines, which have enabled several major discoveries in elementary particle physics. To ensure continued progress in the field, U.S. leadership as a key partner in building next generation collider facilities abroad is essential; also critically important is the exploring of options…
▽ More
The United States has a rich history in high energy particle accelerators and colliders -- both lepton and hadron machines, which have enabled several major discoveries in elementary particle physics. To ensure continued progress in the field, U.S. leadership as a key partner in building next generation collider facilities abroad is essential; also critically important is the exploring of options to host a future collider in the U.S. The "Snowmass" study and the subsequent Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel (P5) process provide the timely opportunity to develop strategies for both. What we do now will shape the future of our field and whether the U.S. will remain a world leader in these areas. In this white paper, we briefly discuss the US engagement in proposed collider projects abroad and describe future collider options for the U.S. We also call for initiating an integrated R\&D program for future colliders.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
European Strategy for Particle Physics -- Accelerator R&D Roadmap
Authors:
C. Adolphsen,
D. Angal-Kalinin,
T. Arndt,
M. Arnold,
R. Assmann,
B. Auchmann,
K. Aulenbacher,
A. Ballarino,
B. Baudouy,
P. Baudrenghien,
M. Benedikt,
S. Bentvelsen,
A. Blondel,
A. Bogacz,
F. Bossi,
L. Bottura,
S. Bousson,
O. Brüning,
R. Brinkmann,
M. Bruker,
O. Brunner,
P. N. Burrows,
G. Burt,
S. Calatroni,
K. Cassou
, et al. (111 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The 2020 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics emphasised the importance of an intensified and well-coordinated programme of accelerator R&D, supporting the design and delivery of future particle accelerators in a timely, affordable and sustainable way. This report sets out a roadmap for European accelerator R&D for the next five to ten years, covering five topical areas identified…
▽ More
The 2020 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics emphasised the importance of an intensified and well-coordinated programme of accelerator R&D, supporting the design and delivery of future particle accelerators in a timely, affordable and sustainable way. This report sets out a roadmap for European accelerator R&D for the next five to ten years, covering five topical areas identified in the Strategy update. The R&D objectives include: improvement of the performance and cost-performance of magnet and radio-frequency acceleration systems; investigations of the potential of laser / plasma acceleration and energy-recovery linac techniques; and development of new concepts for muon beams and muon colliders. The goal of the roadmap is to document the collective view of the field on the next steps for the R&D programme, and to provide the evidence base to support subsequent decisions on prioritisation, resourcing and implementation.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2022; v1 submitted 19 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm
Authors:
B. Abi,
T. Albahri,
S. Al-Kilani,
D. Allspach,
L. P. Alonzi,
A. Anastasi,
A. Anisenkov,
F. Azfar,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
A. Basti,
F. Bedeschi,
A. Behnke,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
R. Bjorkquist,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico
, et al. (212 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the first results of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_μ\equiv (g_μ-2)/2$. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency $ω_a$ between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in…
▽ More
We present the first results of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_μ\equiv (g_μ-2)/2$. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency $ω_a$ between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in a magnetic storage ring. The storage ring magnetic field is measured using nuclear magnetic resonance probes calibrated in terms of the equivalent proton spin precession frequency ${\tildeω'^{}_p}$ in a spherical water sample at 34.7$^{\circ}$C. The ratio $ω_a / {\tildeω'^{}_p}$, together with known fundamental constants, determines $a_μ({\rm FNAL}) = 116\,592\,040(54)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.46\,ppm). The result is 3.3 standard deviations greater than the standard model prediction and is in excellent agreement with the previous Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) E821 measurement. After combination with previous measurements of both $μ^+$ and $μ^-$, the new experimental average of $a_μ({\rm Exp}) = 116\,592\,061(41)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.35\,ppm) increases the tension between experiment and theory to 4.2 standard deviations
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Measurement of the anomalous precession frequency of the muon in the Fermilab Muon g-2 experiment
Authors:
T. Albahri,
A. Anastasi,
A. Anisenkov,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
A. Basti,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey,
D. Cauz,
R. Chakraborty,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain
, et al. (153 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) has measured the muon anomalous precession frequency $ω_a$ to an uncertainty of 434 parts per billion (ppb), statistical, and 56 ppb, systematic, with data collected in four storage ring configurations during its first physics run in 2018. When combined with a precision measurement of the magnetic field of the experiment's muo…
▽ More
The Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) has measured the muon anomalous precession frequency $ω_a$ to an uncertainty of 434 parts per billion (ppb), statistical, and 56 ppb, systematic, with data collected in four storage ring configurations during its first physics run in 2018. When combined with a precision measurement of the magnetic field of the experiment's muon storage ring, the precession frequency measurement determines a muon magnetic anomaly of $a_μ({\rm FNAL}) = 116\,592\,040(54) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.46 ppm). This article describes the multiple techniques employed in the reconstruction, analysis and fitting of the data to measure the precession frequency. It also presents the averaging of the results from the eleven separate determinations of ω_a, and the systematic uncertainties on the result.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Beam dynamics corrections to the Run-1 measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment at Fermilab
Authors:
T. Albahri,
A. Anastasi,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey,
D. Cauz,
R. Chakraborty,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett
, et al. (152 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper presents the beam dynamics systematic corrections and their uncertainties for the Run-1 data set of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment. Two corrections to the measured muon precession frequency $ω_a^m$ are associated with well-known effects owing to the use of electrostatic quadrupole (ESQ) vertical focusing in the storage ring. An average vertically oriented motional magnetic field is fe…
▽ More
This paper presents the beam dynamics systematic corrections and their uncertainties for the Run-1 data set of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment. Two corrections to the measured muon precession frequency $ω_a^m$ are associated with well-known effects owing to the use of electrostatic quadrupole (ESQ) vertical focusing in the storage ring. An average vertically oriented motional magnetic field is felt by relativistic muons passing transversely through the radial electric field components created by the ESQ system. The correction depends on the stored momentum distribution and the tunes of the ring, which has relatively weak vertical focusing. Vertical betatron motions imply that the muons do not orbit the ring in a plane exactly orthogonal to the vertical magnetic field direction. A correction is necessary to account for an average pitch angle associated with their trajectories. A third small correction is necessary because muons that escape the ring during the storage time are slightly biased in initial spin phase compared to the parent distribution. Finally, because two high-voltage resistors in the ESQ network had longer than designed RC time constants, the vertical and horizontal centroids and envelopes of the stored muon beam drifted slightly, but coherently, during each storage ring fill. This led to the discovery of an important phase-acceptance relationship that requires a correction. The sum of the corrections to $ω_a^m$ is 0.50 $\pm$ 0.09 ppm; the uncertainty is small compared to the 0.43 ppm statistical precision of $ω_a^m$.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2021; v1 submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Magnetic Field Measurement and Analysis for the Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermilab
Authors:
T. Albahri,
A. Anastasi,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey,
D. Cauz,
R. Chakraborty,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett
, et al. (148 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory has measured the anomalous precession frequency $a^{}_μ= (g^{}_μ-2)/2$ of the muon to a combined precision of 0.46 parts per million with data collected during its first physics run in 2018. This paper documents the measurement of the magnetic field in the muon storage ring. The magnetic field is monitored by nuclear magnetic resonance systems and calibrat…
▽ More
The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory has measured the anomalous precession frequency $a^{}_μ= (g^{}_μ-2)/2$ of the muon to a combined precision of 0.46 parts per million with data collected during its first physics run in 2018. This paper documents the measurement of the magnetic field in the muon storage ring. The magnetic field is monitored by nuclear magnetic resonance systems and calibrated in terms of the equivalent proton spin precession frequency in a spherical water sample at 34.7$^\circ$C. The measured field is weighted by the muon distribution resulting in $\tildeω'^{}_p$, the denominator in the ratio $ω^{}_a$/$\tildeω'^{}_p$ that together with known fundamental constants yields $a^{}_μ$. The reported uncertainty on $\tildeω'^{}_p$ for the Run-1 data set is 114 ppb consisting of uncertainty contributions from frequency extraction, calibration, map**, tracking, and averaging of 56 ppb, and contributions from fast transient fields of 99 ppb.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2022; v1 submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Unconventional Ideas for Ionization Cooling of Muons
Authors:
T. L. Hart,
J. G. Acosta,
L. M. Cremaldi,
D. V. Neuffer,
S. J. Oliveros,
D. Stratakis,
D. J. Summers,
K. Yonehara
Abstract:
Small muon beams increase the luminosity of a muon collider. Reducing the momentum and position spreads of muons reduces emittance and leads to small, cool beams. Ionization cooling has been observed at the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment. 6D emittance reduction by a factor of 100, 000 has been achieved in simulation. Another factor of 5 in cooling would meet the basic requirements of a high lu…
▽ More
Small muon beams increase the luminosity of a muon collider. Reducing the momentum and position spreads of muons reduces emittance and leads to small, cool beams. Ionization cooling has been observed at the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment. 6D emittance reduction by a factor of 100, 000 has been achieved in simulation. Another factor of 5 in cooling would meet the basic requirements of a high luminosity muon collider. In this paper we compare, for the first time, the amount of RF needed in a cooling channel to previous linacs. We also outline three methods aimed to help achieve a final factor of 5 in 6D cooling.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2020; v1 submitted 1 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Expression of Interest for Evolution of the Mu2e Experiment
Authors:
F. Abusalma,
D. Ambrose,
A. Artikov,
R. Bernstein,
G. C. Blazey,
C. Bloise,
S. Boi,
T. Bolton,
J. Bono,
R. Bonventre,
D. Bowring,
D. Brown,
D. Brown,
K. Byrum,
M. Campbell,
J. -F. Caron,
F. Cervelli,
D. Chokheli,
K. Ciampa,
R. Ciolini,
R. Coleman,
D. Cronin-Hennessy,
R. Culbertson,
M. A. Cummings,
A. Daniel
, et al. (103 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We propose an evolution of the Mu2e experiment, called Mu2e-II, that would leverage advances in detector technology and utilize the increased proton intensity provided by the Fermilab PIP-II upgrade to improve the sensitivity for neutrinoless muon-to-electron conversion by one order of magnitude beyond the Mu2e experiment, providing the deepest probe of charged lepton flavor violation in the fores…
▽ More
We propose an evolution of the Mu2e experiment, called Mu2e-II, that would leverage advances in detector technology and utilize the increased proton intensity provided by the Fermilab PIP-II upgrade to improve the sensitivity for neutrinoless muon-to-electron conversion by one order of magnitude beyond the Mu2e experiment, providing the deepest probe of charged lepton flavor violation in the foreseeable future. Mu2e-II will use as much of the Mu2e infrastructure as possible, providing, where required, improvements to the Mu2e apparatus to accommodate the increased beam intensity and cope with the accompanying increase in backgrounds.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Concept for a Future Super Proton-Proton Collider
Authors:
**gyu Tang,
J. Scott Berg,
Wei** Chai,
Fusan Chen,
Nian Chen,
Weiren Chou,
Haiyi Dong,
Jie Gao,
Tao Han,
Yongbin Leng,
Guangrui Li,
Ramesh Gupta,
Peng Li,
Zhihui Li,
Baiqi Liu,
Yudong Liu,
Xinchou Lou,
Qing Luo,
Ernie Malamud,
Lijun Mao,
Robert B. Palmer,
Quanling Peng,
Yuemei Peng,
Manqi Ruan,
GianLuca Sabbi
, et al. (26 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Following the discovery of the Higgs boson at LHC, new large colliders are being studied by the international high-energy community to explore Higgs physics in detail and new physics beyond the Standard Model. In China, a two-stage circular collider project CEPC-SPPC is proposed, with the first stage CEPC (Circular Electron Positron Collier, a so-called Higgs factory) focused on Higgs physics, and…
▽ More
Following the discovery of the Higgs boson at LHC, new large colliders are being studied by the international high-energy community to explore Higgs physics in detail and new physics beyond the Standard Model. In China, a two-stage circular collider project CEPC-SPPC is proposed, with the first stage CEPC (Circular Electron Positron Collier, a so-called Higgs factory) focused on Higgs physics, and the second stage SPPC (Super Proton-Proton Collider) focused on new physics beyond the Standard Model. This paper discusses this second stage.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2015; v1 submitted 12 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.
-
The EUROnu Project
Authors:
T. R. Edgecock,
O. Caretta,
T. Davenne,
C. Densham,
M. Fitton,
D. Kelliher,
P. Loveridge,
S. Machida,
C. Prior,
C. Rogers,
M. Rooney,
J. Thomason,
D. Wilcox,
E. Wildner,
I. Efthymiopoulos,
R. Garoby,
S. Gilardoni,
C. Hansen,
E. Benedetto,
E. Jensen,
A. Kosmicki,
M. Martini,
J. Osborne,
G. Prior,
T. Stora
, et al. (146 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The EUROnu project has studied three possible options for future, high intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe. The first is a Super Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of pions created by bombarding targets with a 4 MW proton beam from the CERN High Power Superconducting Proton Linac. The far detector for this facility is the 500 kt MEMPHYS water Cherenkov, located in the…
▽ More
The EUROnu project has studied three possible options for future, high intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe. The first is a Super Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of pions created by bombarding targets with a 4 MW proton beam from the CERN High Power Superconducting Proton Linac. The far detector for this facility is the 500 kt MEMPHYS water Cherenkov, located in the Fréjus tunnel. The second facility is the Neutrino Factory, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of μ+ and μ- beams in a storage ring. The far detector in this case is a 100 kt Magnetised Iron Neutrino Detector at a baseline of 2000 km. The third option is a Beta Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of beta emitting isotopes, in particular 6He and 18Ne, also stored in a ring. The far detector is also the MEMPHYS detector in the Fréjus tunnel. EUROnu has undertaken conceptual designs of these facilities and studied the performance of the detectors. Based on this, it has determined the physics reach of each facility, in particular for the measurement of CP violation in the lepton sector, and estimated the cost of construction. These have demonstrated that the best facility to build is the Neutrino Factory. However, if a powerful proton driver is constructed for another purpose or if the MEMPHYS detector is built for astroparticle physics, the Super Beam also becomes very attractive.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
-
Interim Design Report
Authors:
R. J. Abrams,
S. K. Agarwalla,
A. Alekou,
C. Andreopoulos,
C. M. Ankenbrandt,
S. Antusch,
M. Apollonio,
M. Aslaninejad,
J. Back,
P. Ballett,
G. Barker,
K. B. Beard,
E. Benedetto,
J. R. J. Bennett,
J. S. Berg,
S. Bhattacharya,
V. Blackmore,
M. Blennow,
A. Blondel,
A. Bogacz,
M. Bonesini,
C. Bontoiu,
C. Booth,
C. Bromberg,
S. Brooks
, et al. (111 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory (the IDS-NF) was established by the community at the ninth "International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, super-beams, and beta- beams" which was held in Okayama in August 2007. The IDS-NF mandate is to deliver the Reference Design Report (RDR) for the facility on the timescale of 2012/13. In addition, the mandate for the study [3] requires a…
▽ More
The International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory (the IDS-NF) was established by the community at the ninth "International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, super-beams, and beta- beams" which was held in Okayama in August 2007. The IDS-NF mandate is to deliver the Reference Design Report (RDR) for the facility on the timescale of 2012/13. In addition, the mandate for the study [3] requires an Interim Design Report to be delivered midway through the project as a step on the way to the RDR. This document, the IDR, has two functions: it marks the point in the IDS-NF at which the emphasis turns to the engineering studies required to deliver the RDR and it documents baseline concepts for the accelerator complex, the neutrino detectors, and the instrumentation systems. The IDS-NF is, in essence, a site-independent study. Example sites, CERN, FNAL, and RAL, have been identified to allow site-specific issues to be addressed in the cost analysis that will be presented in the RDR. The choice of example sites should not be interpreted as implying a preferred choice of site for the facility.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2011;
originally announced December 2011.
