The Large Hadron-Electron Collider at the HL-LHC
Authors:
P. Agostini,
H. Aksakal,
S. Alekhin,
P. P. Allport,
N. Andari,
K. D. J. Andre,
D. Angal-Kalinin,
S. Antusch,
L. Aperio Bella,
L. Apolinario,
R. Apsimon,
A. Apyan,
G. Arduini,
V. Ari,
A. Armbruster,
N. Armesto,
B. Auchmann,
K. Aulenbacher,
G. Azuelos,
S. Backovic,
I. Bailey,
S. Bailey,
F. Balli,
S. Behera,
O. Behnke
, et al. (312 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Large Hadron electron Collider (LHeC) is designed to move the field of deep inelastic scattering (DIS) to the energy and intensity frontier of particle physics. Exploiting energy recovery technology, it collides a novel, intense electron beam with a proton or ion beam from the High Luminosity--Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC). The accelerator and interaction region are designed for concurrent el…
▽ More
The Large Hadron electron Collider (LHeC) is designed to move the field of deep inelastic scattering (DIS) to the energy and intensity frontier of particle physics. Exploiting energy recovery technology, it collides a novel, intense electron beam with a proton or ion beam from the High Luminosity--Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC). The accelerator and interaction region are designed for concurrent electron-proton and proton-proton operation. This report represents an update of the Conceptual Design Report (CDR) of the LHeC, published in 2012. It comprises new results on parton structure of the proton and heavier nuclei, QCD dynamics, electroweak and top-quark physics. It is shown how the LHeC will open a new chapter of nuclear particle physics in extending the accessible kinematic range in lepton-nucleus scattering by several orders of magnitude. Due to enhanced luminosity, large energy and the cleanliness of the hadronic final states, the LHeC has a strong Higgs physics programme and its own discovery potential for new physics. Building on the 2012 CDR, the report represents a detailed updated design of the energy recovery electron linac (ERL) including new lattice, magnet, superconducting radio frequency technology and further components. Challenges of energy recovery are described and the lower energy, high current, 3-turn ERL facility, PERLE at Orsay, is presented which uses the LHeC characteristics serving as a development facility for the design and operation of the LHeC. An updated detector design is presented corresponding to the acceptance, resolution and calibration goals which arise from the Higgs and parton density function physics programmes. The paper also presents novel results on the Future Circular Collider in electron-hadron mode, FCC-eh, which utilises the same ERL technology to further extend the reach of DIS to even higher centre-of-mass energies.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2021; v1 submitted 28 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
Experience of Using Multimonitor Workstations Under XFree86 4.x in VEPP-5 Control Room
Authors:
D. Yu. Bolkhovityanov,
R. G. Gromov,
I. L. Pivovarov,
A. A. Starostenko
Abstract:
Modern PC workstations often provide more CPU power than required for most control applications. On the other hand, the screen space is always in short supply. One possible solution is to use more PCs, but in fact we need only more screens, not more keyboards, mice etc. PC architecture allows using more than one videocard, and X Window protocol is also aware that there can be more than one scree…
▽ More
Modern PC workstations often provide more CPU power than required for most control applications. On the other hand, the screen space is always in short supply. One possible solution is to use more PCs, but in fact we need only more screens, not more keyboards, mice etc. PC architecture allows using more than one videocard, and X Window protocol is also aware that there can be more than one screen. But until release of XFree86 version 4 there was no freely available server capable of driving multiple ``heads''. We have been using multiheaded workstations under XFree86 in the VEPP-5 control room since early 2000 (currently 4 4-headed PCs plus several dual-headed). The ``Xinerama'' mode (one-large-screen) is better suited for accelerator control system than ``several separate screens''. When moving to this configuration we've encountered a number of, mainly human-related, problems, some of which required modifications to X server Additionaly, the ``style'' of performing control has slightly changed.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2001;
originally announced November 2001.
