-
Accelerators for Electroweak Physics and Higgs Boson Studies
Authors:
A. Faus-Golfe,
G. H. Hoffstaetter,
Q. Qin,
F. Zimmermann,
T. Barklow,
E. Barzi,
S. Belomestnykh,
M. Biagini,
M. Chamizo Llatas,
J. Gao,
E. Gianfelice,
B. List,
V. Litvinenko,
E. Nanni,
T. Raubenheimer,
T. Roser,
T. Satogata,
V. Shiltsev,
S. Stapnes,
V. Telnov
Abstract:
We discuss the goals, the designs, the state of technical readiness, and the critical R&D needs of the accelerators that are currently under discussion as Higgs and electroweak factories. We also address the respective staging options enabling future energy-frontier colliders. The accelerators covered are based on many different techniques and approaches. They include several circular colliders, v…
▽ More
We discuss the goals, the designs, the state of technical readiness, and the critical R&D needs of the accelerators that are currently under discussion as Higgs and electroweak factories. We also address the respective staging options enabling future energy-frontier colliders. The accelerators covered are based on many different techniques and approaches. They include several circular colliders, various linear colliders, colliders based on energy recovery linacs (ERLs), ERL-ring combinations, as well as gamma-gamma colliders. The linear colliders proposed consist of options for the International Linear Collider (ILC), for the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC), for the Cold Copper Collider (C^3), and for the more recent Higgs-Energy Lepton Collider (HELEN). ERLs are key components of the Recycling Linear e+e- Collider (ReLiC), of the Energy Recovery Linear Collider (ERLC), and of the Circular Energy Recovery Collider (CERC). Among the more conventional ring colliders, the following proposals are featured: the Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee), the Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC), the Electron Positron Circular Collider at Fermilab (EPCCF), and the Large Electron Positron collider $\#$3 (LEP-3). In addition, we consider the X-ray FEL based gamma-gamma Collider Higgs Factory (XCC) and the High-Energy High-Luminosity gamma-gamma collider (HE&HL gamma-gamma). Finally, a Higgs factory based on a circular muon collider is mentioned for completeness.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2022; v1 submitted 13 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
The storage ring proton EDM experiment
Authors:
Jim Alexander,
Vassilis Anastassopoulos,
Rick Baartman,
Stefan Baeßler,
Franco Bedeschi,
Martin Berz,
Michael Blaskiewicz,
Themis Bowcock,
Kevin Brown,
Dmitry Budker,
Sergey Burdin,
Brendan C. Casey,
Gianluigi Casse,
Giovanni Cantatore,
Timothy Chupp,
Hooman Davoudiasl,
Dmitri Denisov,
Milind V. Diwan,
George Fanourakis,
Antonios Gardikiotis,
Claudio Gatti,
James Gooding,
Renee Fatemi,
Wolfram Fischer,
Peter Graham
, et al. (52 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe a proposal to search for an intrinsic electric dipole moment (EDM) of the proton with a sensitivity of \targetsens, based on the vertical rotation of the polarization of a stored proton beam. The New Physics reach is of order $10^~3$TeV mass scale. Observation of the proton EDM provides the best probe of CP-violation in the Higgs sector, at a level of sensitivity that may be inaccessib…
▽ More
We describe a proposal to search for an intrinsic electric dipole moment (EDM) of the proton with a sensitivity of \targetsens, based on the vertical rotation of the polarization of a stored proton beam. The New Physics reach is of order $10^~3$TeV mass scale. Observation of the proton EDM provides the best probe of CP-violation in the Higgs sector, at a level of sensitivity that may be inaccessible to electron-EDM experiments. The improvement in the sensitivity to $θ_{QCD}$, a parameter crucial in axion and axion dark matter physics, is about three orders of magnitude.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Electric dipole moments and the search for new physics
Authors:
Ricardo Alarcon,
Jim Alexander,
Vassilis Anastassopoulos,
Takatoshi Aoki,
Rick Baartman,
Stefan Baeßler,
Larry Bartoszek,
Douglas H. Beck,
Franco Bedeschi,
Robert Berger,
Martin Berz,
Hendrick L. Bethlem,
Tanmoy Bhattacharya,
Michael Blaskiewicz,
Thomas Blum,
Themis Bowcock,
Anastasia Borschevsky,
Kevin Brown,
Dmitry Budker,
Sergey Burdin,
Brendan C. Casey,
Gianluigi Casse,
Giovanni Cantatore,
Lan Cheng,
Timothy Chupp
, et al. (118 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Static electric dipole moments of nondegenerate systems probe mass scales for physics beyond the Standard Model well beyond those reached directly at high energy colliders. Discrimination between different physics models, however, requires complementary searches in atomic-molecular-and-optical, nuclear and particle physics. In this report, we discuss the current status and prospects in the near fu…
▽ More
Static electric dipole moments of nondegenerate systems probe mass scales for physics beyond the Standard Model well beyond those reached directly at high energy colliders. Discrimination between different physics models, however, requires complementary searches in atomic-molecular-and-optical, nuclear and particle physics. In this report, we discuss the current status and prospects in the near future for a compelling suite of such experiments, along with developments needed in the encompassing theoretical framework.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2022; v1 submitted 15 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
The Large Hadron-Electron Collider at the HL-LHC
Authors:
P. Agostini,
H. Aksakal,
S. Alekhin,
P. P. Allport,
N. Andari,
K. D. J. Andre,
D. Angal-Kalinin,
S. Antusch,
L. Aperio Bella,
L. Apolinario,
R. Apsimon,
A. Apyan,
G. Arduini,
V. Ari,
A. Armbruster,
N. Armesto,
B. Auchmann,
K. Aulenbacher,
G. Azuelos,
S. Backovic,
I. Bailey,
S. Bailey,
F. Balli,
S. Behera,
O. Behnke
, et al. (312 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Large Hadron electron Collider (LHeC) is designed to move the field of deep inelastic scattering (DIS) to the energy and intensity frontier of particle physics. Exploiting energy recovery technology, it collides a novel, intense electron beam with a proton or ion beam from the High Luminosity--Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC). The accelerator and interaction region are designed for concurrent el…
▽ More
The Large Hadron electron Collider (LHeC) is designed to move the field of deep inelastic scattering (DIS) to the energy and intensity frontier of particle physics. Exploiting energy recovery technology, it collides a novel, intense electron beam with a proton or ion beam from the High Luminosity--Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC). The accelerator and interaction region are designed for concurrent electron-proton and proton-proton operation. This report represents an update of the Conceptual Design Report (CDR) of the LHeC, published in 2012. It comprises new results on parton structure of the proton and heavier nuclei, QCD dynamics, electroweak and top-quark physics. It is shown how the LHeC will open a new chapter of nuclear particle physics in extending the accessible kinematic range in lepton-nucleus scattering by several orders of magnitude. Due to enhanced luminosity, large energy and the cleanliness of the hadronic final states, the LHeC has a strong Higgs physics programme and its own discovery potential for new physics. Building on the 2012 CDR, the report represents a detailed updated design of the energy recovery electron linac (ERL) including new lattice, magnet, superconducting radio frequency technology and further components. Challenges of energy recovery are described and the lower energy, high current, 3-turn ERL facility, PERLE at Orsay, is presented which uses the LHeC characteristics serving as a development facility for the design and operation of the LHeC. An updated detector design is presented corresponding to the acceptance, resolution and calibration goals which arise from the Higgs and parton density function physics programmes. The paper also presents novel results on the Future Circular Collider in electron-hadron mode, FCC-eh, which utilises the same ERL technology to further extend the reach of DIS to even higher centre-of-mass energies.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2021; v1 submitted 28 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Beam Based Alignment of Interaction Region Magnets
Authors:
G. H. Hoffstaetter,
F. Willeke
Abstract:
In conventional beam based alignment (BBA) procedures, the relative alignment of a quadrupole to a nearby beam position monitor is determined by finding a beam position in the quadrupole at which the closed orbit does not change when the quadrupole field is varied. The final focus magnets of the interaction regions (IR) of circular colliders often have some specialized properties that make it di…
▽ More
In conventional beam based alignment (BBA) procedures, the relative alignment of a quadrupole to a nearby beam position monitor is determined by finding a beam position in the quadrupole at which the closed orbit does not change when the quadrupole field is varied. The final focus magnets of the interaction regions (IR) of circular colliders often have some specialized properties that make it difficult to perform conventional beam based alignment procedures. At the HERA interaction points, for example, these properties are: (a) The quadrupoles are quite strong and long. Therefore a thin lens approximation is quite imprecise. (b) The effects of angular magnet offsets become significant. (c) The possibilities to steer the beam are limited as long as the alignment is not within specifications. (d) The beam orbit has design offsets and design angles with respect to the axis of the low-beta quadrupoles. (e) Often quadrupoles do not have a beam position monitor in their vicinity. Here we present a beam based alignment procedure that determines the relative offset of the closed orbit from a quadrupole center without requiring large orbit changes or monitors next to the quadrupole. Taking into account the alignment angle allows us to reduce the sensitivity to optical errors by one to two orders of magnitude. We also show how the BBA measurements of all IR quadrupoles can be used to determine the global position of the magnets. The sensitivity to errors of this method is evaluated and its applicability to HERA is shown.
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2002;
originally announced May 2002.
