-
Second Analysis Ecosystem Workshop Report
Authors:
Mohamed Aly,
Jackson Burzynski,
Bryan Cardwell,
Daniel C. Craik,
Tal van Daalen,
Tomas Dado,
Ayanabha Das,
Antonio Delgado Peris,
Caterina Doglioni,
Peter Elmer,
Engin Eren,
Martin B. Eriksen,
Jonas Eschle,
Giulio Eulisse,
Conor Fitzpatrick,
José Flix Molina,
Alessandra Forti,
Ben Galewsky,
Sean Gasiorowski,
Aman Goel,
Loukas Gouskos,
Enrico Guiraud,
Kanhaiya Gupta,
Stephan Hageboeck,
Allison Reinsvold Hall
, et al. (44 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The second workshop on the HEP Analysis Ecosystem took place 23-25 May 2022 at IJCLab in Orsay, to look at progress and continuing challenges in scaling up HEP analysis to meet the needs of HL-LHC and DUNE, as well as the very pressing needs of LHC Run 3 analysis.
The workshop was themed around six particular topics, which were felt to capture key questions, opportunities and challenges. Each to…
▽ More
The second workshop on the HEP Analysis Ecosystem took place 23-25 May 2022 at IJCLab in Orsay, to look at progress and continuing challenges in scaling up HEP analysis to meet the needs of HL-LHC and DUNE, as well as the very pressing needs of LHC Run 3 analysis.
The workshop was themed around six particular topics, which were felt to capture key questions, opportunities and challenges. Each topic arranged a plenary session introduction, often with speakers summarising the state-of-the art and the next steps for analysis. This was then followed by parallel sessions, which were much more discussion focused, and where attendees could grapple with the challenges and propose solutions that could be tried. Where there was significant overlap between topics, a joint discussion between them was arranged.
In the weeks following the workshop the session conveners wrote this document, which is a summary of the main discussions, the key points raised and the conclusions and outcomes. The document was circulated amongst the participants for comments before being finalised here.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Learning from the Pandemic: the Future of Meetings in HEP and Beyond
Authors:
Mark S. Neubauer,
Todd Adams,
Jennifer Adelman-McCarthy,
Gabriele Benelli,
Tulika Bose,
David Britton,
Pat Burchat,
Joel Butler,
Timothy A. Cartwright,
Tomáš Davídek,
Jacques Dumarchez,
Peter Elmer,
Matthew Feickert,
Ben Galewsky,
Mandeep Gill,
Maciej Gladki,
Aman Goel,
Jonathan E. Guyer,
Bo Jayatilaka,
Brendan Kiburg,
Benjamin Krikler,
David Lange,
Claire Lee,
Nick Manganelli,
Giovanni Marchiori
, et al. (14 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic has by-and-large prevented in-person meetings since March 2020. While the increasing deployment of effective vaccines around the world is a very positive development, the timeline and pathway to "normality" is uncertain and the "new normal" we will settle into is anyone's guess. Particle physics, like many other scientific fields, has more than a year of experience in holding…
▽ More
The COVID-19 pandemic has by-and-large prevented in-person meetings since March 2020. While the increasing deployment of effective vaccines around the world is a very positive development, the timeline and pathway to "normality" is uncertain and the "new normal" we will settle into is anyone's guess. Particle physics, like many other scientific fields, has more than a year of experience in holding virtual meetings, workshops, and conferences. A great deal of experimentation and innovation to explore how to execute these meetings effectively has occurred. Therefore, it is an appropriate time to take stock of what we as a community learned from running virtual meetings and discuss possible strategies for the future. Continuing to develop effective strategies for meetings with a virtual component is likely to be important for reducing the carbon footprint of our research activities, while also enabling greater diversity and inclusion for participation. This report summarizes a virtual two-day workshop on Virtual Meetings held May 5-6, 2021 which brought together experts from both inside and outside of high-energy physics to share their experiences and practices with organizing and executing virtual workshops, and to develop possible strategies for future meetings as we begin to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic. This report outlines some of the practices and tools that have worked well which we hope will serve as a valuable resource for future virtual meeting organizers in all scientific fields.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Passive low-energy nuclear recoil detection with color centers
Authors:
Bernadette K. Cogswell,
Apurva Goel,
Patrick Huber
Abstract:
Crystal damage events such as tracks and point defects have been used to record and detect radiation for a long time and recently they have been proposed as a means for dark matter detection. Color centers can be read out optically and we propose a scheme based on selective plane illumination microscopy for sub-micron imaging of large volumes corresponding to kilogram mass detectors. This class of…
▽ More
Crystal damage events such as tracks and point defects have been used to record and detect radiation for a long time and recently they have been proposed as a means for dark matter detection. Color centers can be read out optically and we propose a scheme based on selective plane illumination microscopy for sub-micron imaging of large volumes corresponding to kilogram mass detectors. This class of detectors would be passive and would operate at room temperature. We apply these concepts to the detection of reactor neutrinos using coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering (CEvNS). Crystal damage formation energies are intrinsically on the order of 25eV, resulting in similarly low nuclear recoil thresholds. This would enable the first observation of reactor neutrino CEvNS with detectors as small as 10g. Additionally, a competitive search for spin-dependent dark matter scattering down to a dark matter mass of 0.3GeV could be possible. Passive crystal detectors might also be attractive for nuclear non-proliferation safeguards if used to monitor reactor power and to put limits on plutonium production. The passive nature and small footprint of the proposed detectors implies that these might fit well within accepted reactor safeguards operations.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2021; v1 submitted 28 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
