-
The full Low-carbon Expansion Generation Optimization (LEGO) model
Authors:
Sonja Wogrin,
Diego A. Tejada-Arango,
Udo Bachhiesl,
Benjamin F. Hobbs
Abstract:
This paper introduces the full Low-carbon Expansion Generation Optimization (LEGO) model available on Github (https://github.com/wogrin/LEGO). LEGO is a mixed-integer quadratically constrained optimization problem and has been designed to be a multi-purpose tool, like a Swiss army knife, that can be employed to study many different aspects of the energy sector. Ranging from short-term unit commitm…
▽ More
This paper introduces the full Low-carbon Expansion Generation Optimization (LEGO) model available on Github (https://github.com/wogrin/LEGO). LEGO is a mixed-integer quadratically constrained optimization problem and has been designed to be a multi-purpose tool, like a Swiss army knife, that can be employed to study many different aspects of the energy sector. Ranging from short-term unit commitment to long-term generation and transmission expansion planning. The underlying modeling philosophies are: modularity and flexibility. Its unique temporal structure allows LEGO to function with either chronological hourly data, or all kinds of representative periods. LEGO is also composed of thematic modules that can be added or removed from the model easily via data options depending on the scope of the study. Those modules include: unit commitment constraints; DC- or AC-OPF formulations; battery degradation; rate of change of frequency inertia constraints; demand-side management; or the hydrogen sector. LEGO also provides a plethora of model outputs (both primal and dual), which is the basis for both technical but also economic analyses. To our knowledge, there is no model that combines all of these capabilities, which we hereby make freely available to the scientific community.
△ Less
Submitted 19 January, 2022; v1 submitted 3 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Stochastic Optimal Operation of the VSC-MTDC System with FACTS Devices to Integrate Wind Power
Authors:
Zhao Yuan,
Mohammad Reza Hesamzadeh,
Sonja Wogrin,
Mohamadreza Baradar
Abstract:
This paper proposes to use stochastic conic programming to address the challenge of large-scale wind power integration to the power system. Multiple wind farms are connected through the voltage source converter (VSC) based multi-terminal DC (VSC-MTDC) system to the power network supported by the Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS). The optimal operation of the power network incorporating the V…
▽ More
This paper proposes to use stochastic conic programming to address the challenge of large-scale wind power integration to the power system. Multiple wind farms are connected through the voltage source converter (VSC) based multi-terminal DC (VSC-MTDC) system to the power network supported by the Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS). The optimal operation of the power network incorporating the VSC-MTDC system and FACTS devices is formulated in a stochastic conic programming framework accounting the uncertainties of the wind power generation. A methodology to generate representative scenarios of power generations from the wind farms is proposed using wind speed measurements and wind turbine models. The nonconvex transmission network constraints including the VSC-MTDC system and FACTS devices are convexified through the proposed second-order cone AC optimal power flow model (SOC-ACOPF) that can be solved to the global optimality using interior point method. In order to tackle the computational challenge due to the large number of wind power scenarios, a modified Benders decomposition algorithm (M-BDA) accelerated by parallel computation is proposed. The energy dispatch of conventional power generators is formulated as the master problem of M-BDA. Numerical results for up to 50000 wind power scenarios show that the proposed M-BDA approach to solve stochastic SOC-ACOPF outperforms the traditional single-stage (without decomposition) solution approach in both convergence capability and computational efficiency. The feasibility performance of the proposed stochastic SOC-ACOPF model is also demonstrated.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Assessing the impact of inertia and reactive power constraints in generation expansion planning
Authors:
Sonja Wogrin,
Diego Tejada-Arango,
Stefanos Delikaraoglou,
Audun Botterud
Abstract:
On the path towards power systems with high renewable penetrations and ultimately carbon-neutral, more and more synchronous generation is being displaced by variable renewable generation that does not currently provide system inertia nor reactive power support. This could create serious issues of power system stability in the near future, and countries with high renewable penetrations such as Irel…
▽ More
On the path towards power systems with high renewable penetrations and ultimately carbon-neutral, more and more synchronous generation is being displaced by variable renewable generation that does not currently provide system inertia nor reactive power support. This could create serious issues of power system stability in the near future, and countries with high renewable penetrations such as Ireland are already facing these challenges. Therefore, this paper aims at answering the questions of whether and how explicitly including inertia and reactive power constraints in generation expansion planning would affect the optimal capacity mix of the power system of the future. Towards this end, we propose the novel Low-carbon Expansion Generation Optimization (LEGO) model, which explicitly accounts for: unit commitment constraints, Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF) inertia requirements and virtual inertia provision, and, a second-order cone programming (SOCP) approximation of the AC power flow, accounting for reactive power constraints. An illustrative case study underlines that disregarding inertia and reactive power constraints in generation expansion planning can result in additional system cost, system infeasibilities, a distortion of optimal resource allocation and inability to reach established policy goals.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
