Direct mineral content prediction from drill core images via transfer learning
Authors:
Romana Boiger,
Sergey V. Churakov,
Ignacio Ballester Llagaria,
Georg Kosakowski,
Raphael Wüst,
Nikolaos I. Prasianakis
Abstract:
Deep subsurface exploration is important for mining, oil and gas industries, as well as in the assessment of geological units for the disposal of chemical or nuclear waste, or the viability of geothermal energy systems. Typically, detailed examinations of subsurface formations or units are performed on cuttings or core materials extracted during drilling campaigns, as well as on geophysical boreho…
▽ More
Deep subsurface exploration is important for mining, oil and gas industries, as well as in the assessment of geological units for the disposal of chemical or nuclear waste, or the viability of geothermal energy systems. Typically, detailed examinations of subsurface formations or units are performed on cuttings or core materials extracted during drilling campaigns, as well as on geophysical borehole data, which provide detailed information about the petrophysical properties of the rocks. Depending on the volume of rock samples and the analytical program, the laboratory analysis and diagnostics can be very time-consuming. This study investigates the potential of utilizing machine learning, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNN), to assess the lithology and mineral content solely from analysis of drill core images, aiming to support and expedite the subsurface geological exploration. The paper outlines a comprehensive methodology, encompassing data preprocessing, machine learning methods, and transfer learning techniques. The outcome reveals a remarkable 96.7% accuracy in the classification of drill core segments into distinct formation classes. Furthermore, a CNN model was trained for the evaluation of mineral content using a learning data set from multidimensional log analysis data (silicate, total clay, carbonate). When benchmarked against laboratory XRD measurements on samples from the cores, both the advanced multidimensional log analysis model and the neural network approach developed here provide equally good performance. This work demonstrates that deep learning and particularly transfer learning can support extracting petrophysical properties, including mineral content and formation classification, from drill core images, thus offering a road map for enhancing model performance and data set quality in image-based analysis of drill cores.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
In-layer Thermal Control of a Multi-layer Selective Laser Melting Process
Authors:
Dominic Liao-McPherson,
Efe C. Balta,
Ryan Wüest,
Alisa Rupenyan,
John Lygeros
Abstract:
Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is an additive manufacturing technology that builds three dimensional parts by melting layers of metal powder together with a laser that traces out a desired geometry. SLM is popular in industry, however the inherent melting and re-solidification of the metal during the process can, if left uncontrolled, cause excessive residual stress, porosity, and other defects in…
▽ More
Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is an additive manufacturing technology that builds three dimensional parts by melting layers of metal powder together with a laser that traces out a desired geometry. SLM is popular in industry, however the inherent melting and re-solidification of the metal during the process can, if left uncontrolled, cause excessive residual stress, porosity, and other defects in the final printed parts. This paper presents a control-oriented thermal model of a multi-layer SLM process and proposes a structured model reduction methodology with an associated reduced order model based in-layer controller to track temperature references. Simulation studies demonstrate that the controller is able to prevent layer-to-layer heat buildup and that good closed-loop performance is possible using relatively low-order models.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2022; v1 submitted 1 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.