Learning to detect an animal sound from five examples
Authors:
Inês Nolasco,
Shubhr Singh,
Veronica Morfi,
Vincent Lostanlen,
Ariana Strandburg-Peshkin,
Ester Vidaña-Vila,
Lisa Gill,
Hanna Pamuła,
Helen Whitehead,
Ivan Kiskin,
Frants H. Jensen,
Joe Morford,
Michael G. Emmerson,
Elisabetta Versace,
Emily Grout,
Haohe Liu,
Dan Stowell
Abstract:
Automatic detection and classification of animal sounds has many applications in biodiversity monitoring and animal behaviour. In the past twenty years, the volume of digitised wildlife sound available has massively increased, and automatic classification through deep learning now shows strong results. However, bioacoustics is not a single task but a vast range of small-scale tasks (such as indivi…
▽ More
Automatic detection and classification of animal sounds has many applications in biodiversity monitoring and animal behaviour. In the past twenty years, the volume of digitised wildlife sound available has massively increased, and automatic classification through deep learning now shows strong results. However, bioacoustics is not a single task but a vast range of small-scale tasks (such as individual ID, call type, emotional indication) with wide variety in data characteristics, and most bioacoustic tasks do not come with strongly-labelled training data. The standard paradigm of supervised learning, focussed on a single large-scale dataset and/or a generic pre-trained algorithm, is insufficient. In this work we recast bioacoustic sound event detection within the AI framework of few-shot learning. We adapt this framework to sound event detection, such that a system can be given the annotated start/end times of as few as 5 events, and can then detect events in long-duration audio -- even when the sound category was not known at the time of algorithm training. We introduce a collection of open datasets designed to strongly test a system's ability to perform few-shot sound event detections, and we present the results of a public contest to address the task. We show that prototypical networks are a strong-performing method, when enhanced with adaptations for general characteristics of animal sounds. We demonstrate that widely-varying sound event durations are an important factor in performance, as well as non-stationarity, i.e. gradual changes in conditions throughout the duration of a recording. For fine-grained bioacoustic recognition tasks without massive annotated training data, our results demonstrate that few-shot sound event detection is a powerful new method, strongly outperforming traditional signal-processing detection methods in the fully automated scenario.
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
Joint Scattering for Automatic Chick Call Recognition
Authors:
Changhong Wang,
Emmanouil Benetos,
Shuge Wang,
Elisabetta Versace
Abstract:
Animal vocalisations contain important information about health, emotional state, and behaviour, thus can be potentially used for animal welfare monitoring. Motivated by the spectro-temporal patterns of chick calls in the time$-$frequency domain, in this paper we propose an automatic system for chick call recognition using the joint time$-$frequency scattering transform (JTFS). Taking full-length…
▽ More
Animal vocalisations contain important information about health, emotional state, and behaviour, thus can be potentially used for animal welfare monitoring. Motivated by the spectro-temporal patterns of chick calls in the time$-$frequency domain, in this paper we propose an automatic system for chick call recognition using the joint time$-$frequency scattering transform (JTFS). Taking full-length recordings as input, the system first extracts chick call candidates by an onset detector and silence removal. After computing their JTFS features, a support vector machine classifier groups each candidate into different chick call types. Evaluating on a dataset comprising 3013 chick calls collected in laboratory conditions, the proposed recognition system using the JTFS features improves the frame- and event-based macro F-measures by 9.5% and 11.7%, respectively, than that of a mel-frequency cepstral coefficients baseline.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
