MammoFL: Mammographic Breast Density Estimation using Federated Learning
Authors:
Ramya Muthukrishnan,
Angelina Heyler,
Keshava Katti,
Sarthak Pati,
Walter Mankowski,
Aprupa Alahari,
Michael Sanborn,
Emily F. Conant,
Christopher Scott,
Stacey Winham,
Celine Vachon,
Pratik Chaudhari,
Despina Kontos,
Spyridon Bakas
Abstract:
In this study, we automate quantitative mammographic breast density estimation with neural networks and show that this tool is a strong use case for federated learning on multi-institutional datasets. Our dataset included bilateral CC-view and MLO-view mammographic images from two separate institutions. Two U-Nets were separately trained on algorithm-generated labels to perform segmentation of the…
▽ More
In this study, we automate quantitative mammographic breast density estimation with neural networks and show that this tool is a strong use case for federated learning on multi-institutional datasets. Our dataset included bilateral CC-view and MLO-view mammographic images from two separate institutions. Two U-Nets were separately trained on algorithm-generated labels to perform segmentation of the breast and dense tissue from these images and subsequently calculate breast percent density (PD). The networks were trained with federated learning and compared to three non-federated baselines, one trained on each single-institution dataset and one trained on the aggregated multi-institution dataset. We demonstrate that training on multi-institution datasets is critical to algorithm generalizability. We further show that federated learning on multi-institutional datasets improves model generalization to unseen data at nearly the same level as centralized training on multi-institutional datasets, indicating that federated learning can be applied to our method to improve algorithm generalizability while maintaining patient privacy.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2023; v1 submitted 11 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
Deep-LIBRA: Artificial intelligence method for robust quantification of breast density with independent validation in breast cancer risk assessment
Authors:
Omid Haji Maghsoudi,
Aimilia Gastounioti,
Christopher Scott,
Lauren Pantalone,
Fang-Fang Wu,
Eric A. Cohen,
Stacey Winham,
Emily F. Conant,
Celine Vachon,
Despina Kontos
Abstract:
Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer that also affects the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. Current federal legislation mandates reporting of breast density for all women undergoing breast screening. Clinically, breast density is assessed visually using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) scale. Here, we…
▽ More
Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer that also affects the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. Current federal legislation mandates reporting of breast density for all women undergoing breast screening. Clinically, breast density is assessed visually using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) scale. Here, we introduce an artificial intelligence (AI) method to estimate breast percentage density (PD) from digital mammograms. Our method leverages deep learning (DL) using two convolutional neural network architectures to accurately segment the breast area. A machine-learning algorithm combining superpixel generation, texture feature analysis, and support vector machine is then applied to differentiate dense from non-dense tissue regions, from which PD is estimated. Our method has been trained and validated on a multi-ethnic, multi-institutional dataset of 15,661 images (4,437 women), and then tested on an independent dataset of 6,368 digital mammograms (1,702 women; cases=414) for both PD estimation and discrimination of breast cancer. On the independent dataset, PD estimates from Deep-LIBRA and an expert reader were strongly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.90). Moreover, Deep-LIBRA yielded a higher breast cancer discrimination performance (area under the ROC curve, AUC = 0.611 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.583, 0.639]) compared to four other widely-used research and commercial PD assessment methods (AUCs = 0.528 to 0.588). Our results suggest a strong agreement of PD estimates between Deep-LIBRA and gold-standard assessment by an expert reader, as well as improved performance in breast cancer risk assessment over state-of-the-art open-source and commercial methods.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2021; v1 submitted 13 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
