California Test System (CATS): A Geographically Accurate Test System based on the California Grid
Authors:
Sofia Taylor,
Aditya Rangarajan,
Noah Rhodes,
Jonathan Snodgrass,
Bernie Lesieutre,
Line A. Roald
Abstract:
This paper presents the California Test System (CATS), a synthetic transmission grid in California that can be used by the public for power systems policy research without revealing any critical energy information. The proposed synthetic grid combines publicly available geographic data of California's electric infrastructure, such as the actual locations of transmission corridors, with invented to…
▽ More
This paper presents the California Test System (CATS), a synthetic transmission grid in California that can be used by the public for power systems policy research without revealing any critical energy information. The proposed synthetic grid combines publicly available geographic data of California's electric infrastructure, such as the actual locations of transmission corridors, with invented topology and transmission line parameters that are ``realistic but not real". The result is a power grid test system that is suitable for power flow and policy analyses with geo-referenced applications, including studies related to weather, topography, and socio-economic considerations. The methods used to develop and evaluate the CATS grid are documented in detail in this report.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2023; v1 submitted 9 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
The Effects of Correctly Modeling Generator Step-Up Transformer Status in Geomagnetic Disturbance Studies
Authors:
Jessica L. Wert,
Pooria Dehghanian,
Jonathan Snodgrass,
Thomas J. Overbye
Abstract:
In order to correctly model the impacts of geomagnetically induced current (GIC) flows, the generator step-up (GSU) transformer status must be properly modeled. In power flow studies, generators are typically removed from service without disconnecting their GSU transformers since the GSU transformer status has little to no impact on the power flow result. In reality, removing a generator from serv…
▽ More
In order to correctly model the impacts of geomagnetically induced current (GIC) flows, the generator step-up (GSU) transformer status must be properly modeled. In power flow studies, generators are typically removed from service without disconnecting their GSU transformers since the GSU transformer status has little to no impact on the power flow result. In reality, removing a generator from service involves also removing its GSU transformer from service. This difference presents a discrepancy between simulated behavior and system observations during geomagnetic disturbance (GMD) events. This paper presents GMD case studies on 2000-bus and 24,000-bus systems in which reactive power losses and geomagnetically induced currents are compared across scenarios in which the GSU transformers for the disconnected generators are either in-service or out-of-service. The results demonstrate a 3.2 to 15.5 percent error in reactive power losses when the GSU status is modeled incorrectly. Discrepancies of up to 95 A per phase for branch GIC flows and 450 A for transformer neutral GIC flows are also observed and visualized.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
