-
Interactive spatial speech recognition maps based on simulated speech recognition experiments
Authors:
Marc René Schädler
Abstract:
In their everyday life, the speech recognition performance of human listeners is influenced by diverse factors, such as the acoustic environment, the talker and listener positions, possibly impaired hearing, and optional hearing devices. Prediction models come closer to considering all required factors simultaneously to predict the individual speech recognition performance in complex acoustic envi…
▽ More
In their everyday life, the speech recognition performance of human listeners is influenced by diverse factors, such as the acoustic environment, the talker and listener positions, possibly impaired hearing, and optional hearing devices. Prediction models come closer to considering all required factors simultaneously to predict the individual speech recognition performance in complex acoustic environments. While such predictions may still not be sufficiently accurate for serious applications, they can already be performed and demand an accessible representation. In this contribution, an interactive representation of speech recognition performance is proposed, which focuses on the listeners head orientation and the spatial dimensions of an acoustic scene. A exemplary modeling toolchain, including an acoustic rendering model, a hearing device model, and a listener model, was used to generate a data set for demonstration purposes. Using the spatial speech recognition maps to explore this data set demonstrated the suitability of the approach to observe possibly relevant behavior. The proposed representation provides a suitable target to compare and validate different modeling approaches in ecologically relevant contexts. Eventually, it may serve as a tool to use validated prediction models in the design of spaces and devices which take speech communication into account.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Thoughts on the potential to compensate a hearing loss in noise
Authors:
Marc René Schädler
Abstract:
The effect of hearing impairment on speech perception was described by Plomp (1978) as a sum of a loss of class A, due to signal attenuation, and a loss of class D, due to signal distortion. While a loss of class A can be compensated by linear amplification, a loss of class D, which severely limits the benefit of hearing aids in noisy listening conditions, cannot. Not few users of hearing aids kee…
▽ More
The effect of hearing impairment on speech perception was described by Plomp (1978) as a sum of a loss of class A, due to signal attenuation, and a loss of class D, due to signal distortion. While a loss of class A can be compensated by linear amplification, a loss of class D, which severely limits the benefit of hearing aids in noisy listening conditions, cannot. Not few users of hearing aids keep complaining about the limited benefit of their devices in noisy environments. Recently, in an approach to model human speech recognition by means of a re-purposed automatic speech recognition system, the loss of class D was explained by introducing a level uncertainty which reduces the individual accuracy of spectro-temporal signal levels. Based on this finding, an implementation of a patented dynamic range manipulation scheme (PLATT) is proposed, which aims to mitigate the effect of increased level uncertainty on speech recognition in noise by expanding spectral modulation patterns in the range of 2 to 4 ERB. An objective evaluation of the benefit in speech recognition thresholds in noise using an ASR-based speech recognition model suggests that more than half of the class D loss due to an increased level uncertainty might be compensable.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
DARF: A data-reduced FADE version for simulations of speech recognition thresholds with real hearing aids
Authors:
David Hülsmeier,
Marc René Schädler,
Birger Kollmeier
Abstract:
Develo** and selecting hearing aids is a time consuming process which is simplified by using objective models. Previously, the framework for auditory discrimination experiments (FADE) accurately simulated benefits of hearing aid algorithms with root mean squared prediction errors below 3 dB. One FADE simulation requires several hours of (un)processed signals, which is obstructive when the signal…
▽ More
Develo** and selecting hearing aids is a time consuming process which is simplified by using objective models. Previously, the framework for auditory discrimination experiments (FADE) accurately simulated benefits of hearing aid algorithms with root mean squared prediction errors below 3 dB. One FADE simulation requires several hours of (un)processed signals, which is obstructive when the signals have to be recorded. We propose and evaluate a data-reduced FADE version (DARF) which facilitates simulations with signals that cannot be processed digitally, but that can only be recorded in real-time. DARF simulates one speech recognition threshold (SRT) with about 30 minutes of recorded and processed signals of the (German) matrix sentence test. Benchmark experiments were carried out to compare DARF and standard FADE exhibiting small differences for stationary maskers (1 dB), but larger differences with strongly fluctuating maskers (5 dB). Hearing impairment and hearing aid algorithms seemed to reduce the differences. Hearing aid benefits were simulated in terms of speech recognition with three pairs of real hearing aids in silence ($\geq$8 dB), in stationary and fluctuating maskers in co-located (stat. 2 dB; fluct. 6 dB), and spatially separated speech and noise signals (stat. $\geq$8 dB; fluct. 8 dB). The simulations were plausible in comparison to data from literature, but a comparison with empirical data is still open. DARF facilitates objective SRT simulations with real devices with unknown signal processing in real environments. Yet, a validation of DARF for devices with unknown signal processing is still pending since it was only tested with three similar devices. Nonetheless, DARF could be used for improving as well as for develo** or model-based fitting of hearing aids.
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2021; v1 submitted 10 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
