-
Background results for robust minmax control of linear dynamical systems
Authors:
James B. Rawlings,
Davide Mannini,
Steven J. Kuntz
Abstract:
The purpose of this note is to summarize the arguments required to derive the results appearing in robust minmax control of linear dynamical systems using a quadratic stage cost. The main results required in robust minmax control are Corollary 19 and Proposition 20. Moreover, the solution to the trust-region problem given in Proposition 15 and Lemma 16 may be of more general interest.
The purpose of this note is to summarize the arguments required to derive the results appearing in robust minmax control of linear dynamical systems using a quadratic stage cost. The main results required in robust minmax control are Corollary 19 and Proposition 20. Moreover, the solution to the trust-region problem given in Proposition 15 and Lemma 16 may be of more general interest.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Maximum Likelihood Identification of Uncontrollable Linear Time-Invariant Models for Offset-Free Control
Authors:
Steven J. Kuntz,
James B. Rawlings
Abstract:
Maximum likelihood identification of linear time-invariant models is a difficult problem because it is, in general, a nonlinear semidefinite program, with semidefinite covariance matrix arguments and semidefinite filter stability constraints. To enforce filter stability, we establish a general theory of closed constraints on the system eigenvalues using LMI regions. To solve the identification pro…
▽ More
Maximum likelihood identification of linear time-invariant models is a difficult problem because it is, in general, a nonlinear semidefinite program, with semidefinite covariance matrix arguments and semidefinite filter stability constraints. To enforce filter stability, we establish a general theory of closed constraints on the system eigenvalues using LMI regions. To solve the identification problem, we employ a Cholesky factorization method that reduces the semidefinite program to a standard nonlinear program. Finally, we apply the identification algorithm to a class of linear plant and disturbance models commonly used in offset-free model predictive control applications. Specifically, we consider models that are structured with uncontrollable, integrating disturbance states. We solve this disturbance modeling problem, and validate the resulting controller and estimator performance, in two real-world case studies: first, a low-cost benchmark temperature control laboratory, and second, an industrial-scale chemical reactor at Eastman Chemical's Kingsport plant.
△ Less
Submitted 6 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Moving-Horizon Estimators for Hyperbolic and Parabolic PDEs in 1-D
Authors:
Luke Bhan,
Yuanyuan Shi,
Iasson Karafyllis,
Miroslav Krstic,
James B. Rawlings
Abstract:
Observers for PDEs are themselves PDEs. Therefore, producing real time estimates with such observers is computationally burdensome. For both finite-dimensional and ODE systems, moving-horizon estimators (MHE) are operators whose output is the state estimate, while their inputs are the initial state estimate at the beginning of the horizon as well as the measured output and input signals over the m…
▽ More
Observers for PDEs are themselves PDEs. Therefore, producing real time estimates with such observers is computationally burdensome. For both finite-dimensional and ODE systems, moving-horizon estimators (MHE) are operators whose output is the state estimate, while their inputs are the initial state estimate at the beginning of the horizon as well as the measured output and input signals over the moving time horizon. In this paper we introduce MHEs for PDEs which remove the need for a numerical solution of an observer PDE in real time. We accomplish this using the PDE backstep** method which, for certain classes of both hyperbolic and parabolic PDEs, produces moving-horizon state estimates explicitly. Precisely, to explicitly produce the state estimates, we employ a backstep** transformation of a hard-to-solve observer PDE into a target observer PDE, which is explicitly solvable. The MHEs we propose are not new observer designs but simply the explicit MHE realizations, over a moving horizon of arbitrary length, of the existing backstep** observers. Our PDE MHEs lack the optimality of the MHEs that arose as duals of MPC, but they are given explicitly, even for PDEs. In the paper we provide explicit formulae for MHEs for both hyperbolic and parabolic PDEs, as well as simulation results that illustrate theoretically guaranteed convergence of the MHEs.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
