Medical Imaging and Computational Image Analysis in COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Review
Authors:
Shahabedin Nabavi,
Azar Ejmalian,
Mohsen Ebrahimi Moghaddam,
Ahmad Ali Abin,
Alejandro F. Frangi,
Mohammad Mohammadi,
Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Abstract:
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus. The disease presents with symptoms such as shortness of breath, fever, dry cough, and chronic fatigue, amongst others. Sometimes the symptoms of the disease increase so much they lead to the death of the patients. The disease may be asymptomatic in some patients in the early stages, which can lead to…
▽ More
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus. The disease presents with symptoms such as shortness of breath, fever, dry cough, and chronic fatigue, amongst others. Sometimes the symptoms of the disease increase so much they lead to the death of the patients. The disease may be asymptomatic in some patients in the early stages, which can lead to increased transmission of the disease to others. Many studies have tried to use medical imaging for early diagnosis of COVID-19. This study attempts to review papers on automatic methods for medical image analysis and diagnosis of COVID-19. For this purpose, PubMed, Google Scholar, arXiv and medRxiv were searched to find related studies by the end of April 2020, and the essential points of the collected studies were summarised. The contribution of this study is four-fold: 1) to use as a tutorial of the field for both clinicians and technologists, 2) to comprehensively review the characteristics of COVID-19 as presented in medical images, 3) to examine automated artificial intelligence-based approaches for COVID-19 diagnosis based on the accuracy and the method used, 4) to express the research limitations in this field and the methods used to overcome them. COVID-19 reveals signs in medical images can be used for early diagnosis of the disease even in asymptomatic patients. Using automated machine learning-based methods can diagnose the disease with high accuracy from medical images and reduce time, cost and error of diagnostic procedure. It is recommended to collect bulk imaging data from patients in the shortest possible time to improve the performance of COVID-19 automated diagnostic methods.
△ Less
Submitted 1 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
Quantifying Cortical Bone Free Water Using short echo time (STE-MRI) at 1.5T
Authors:
Shahrokh Abbasi-Rad,
Atena Akbari,
Malakeh Malekzadeh,
Mohammad Shahgholi,
Hossein Arabalibeik,
Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Abstract:
Purpose: The purpose of our study was to use Dual-TR STE-MR protocol as a clinical tool for cortical bone free water quantification at 1.5T and validate it by comparing the obtained results (MR-derived results) with dehydration results. Methods: Human studies were compliant with HIPPA and were approved by the institutional review board. Short Echo Time (STE) MR imaging with different Repetition Ti…
▽ More
Purpose: The purpose of our study was to use Dual-TR STE-MR protocol as a clinical tool for cortical bone free water quantification at 1.5T and validate it by comparing the obtained results (MR-derived results) with dehydration results. Methods: Human studies were compliant with HIPPA and were approved by the institutional review board. Short Echo Time (STE) MR imaging with different Repetition Times (TRs) was used for quantification of cortical bone free water T1 (T1free) and concentration (\r{ho}free). The proposed strategy was compared with the dehydration technique in seven bovine cortical bone samples. The agreement between the two methods was quantified by using Bland and Altman analysis. Then we applied the technique on a cross-sectional population of thirty healthy volunteers (18F/12M) and examined the association of the biomarkers with age. Results: The mean values of \r{ho}free for bovine cortical bone specimens were quantified as 4.37% and 5.34% by using STE-MR and dehydration techniques, respectively. The Bland and Altman analysis showed good agreement between the two methods along with the suggestion of 0.99% bias between them. Strong correlations were also reported between \r{ho}free (r2 = 0.62) and T1free and age (r2 = 0.8). The reproducibility of the method, evaluated in eight subjects, yielded an intra-class correlation of 0.95. Conclusion: STE-MR imaging with dual-TR strategy is a clinical solution for quantifying cortical bone \r{ho}free and T1free.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
