-
Reconsidering evaluation practices in modular systems: On the propagation of errors in MRI prostate cancer detection
Authors:
Erlend Sortland Rolfsnes,
Philip Thangngat,
Trygve Eftestøl,
Tobias Nordström,
Fredrik Jäderling,
Martin Eklund,
Alvaro Fernandez-Quilez
Abstract:
Magnetic resonance imaging has evolved as a key component for prostate cancer (PCa) detection, substantially increasing the radiologist workload. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems can support radiological assessment by segmenting and classifying lesions in clinically significant (csPCa) and non-clinically significant (ncsPCa). Commonly, AI systems for PCa detection involve an automatic prostate…
▽ More
Magnetic resonance imaging has evolved as a key component for prostate cancer (PCa) detection, substantially increasing the radiologist workload. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems can support radiological assessment by segmenting and classifying lesions in clinically significant (csPCa) and non-clinically significant (ncsPCa). Commonly, AI systems for PCa detection involve an automatic prostate segmentation followed by the lesion detection using the extracted prostate. However, evaluation reports are typically presented in terms of detection under the assumption of the availability of a highly accurate segmentation and an idealistic scenario, omitting the propagation of errors between modules. For that purpose, we evaluate the effect of two different segmentation networks (s1 and s2) with heterogeneous performances in the detection stage and compare it with an idealistic setting (s1:89.90+-2.23 vs 88.97+-3.06 ncsPCa, P<.001, 89.30+-4.07 and 88.12+-2.71 csPCa, P<.001). Our results depict the relevance of a holistic evaluation, accounting for all the sub-modules involved in the system.
△ Less
Submitted 15 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Leveraging multi-view data without annotations for prostate MRI segmentation: A contrastive approach
Authors:
Tim Nikolass Lindeijer,
Tord Martin Ytredal,
Trygve Eftestøl,
Tobias Nordström,
Fredrik Jäderling,
Martin Eklund,
Alvaro Fernandez-Quilez
Abstract:
An accurate prostate delineation and volume characterization can support the clinical assessment of prostate cancer. A large amount of automatic prostate segmentation tools consider exclusively the axial MRI direction in spite of the availability as per acquisition protocols of multi-view data. Further, when multi-view data is exploited, manual annotations and availability at test time for all the…
▽ More
An accurate prostate delineation and volume characterization can support the clinical assessment of prostate cancer. A large amount of automatic prostate segmentation tools consider exclusively the axial MRI direction in spite of the availability as per acquisition protocols of multi-view data. Further, when multi-view data is exploited, manual annotations and availability at test time for all the views is commonly assumed. In this work, we explore a contrastive approach at training time to leverage multi-view data without annotations and provide flexibility at deployment time in the event of missing views. We propose a triplet encoder and single decoder network based on U-Net, tU-Net (triplet U-Net). Our proposed architecture is able to exploit non-annotated sagittal and coronal views via contrastive learning to improve the segmentation from a volumetric perspective. For that purpose, we introduce the concept of inter-view similarity in the latent space. To guide the training, we combine a dice score loss calculated with respect to the axial view and its manual annotations together with a multi-view contrastive loss. tU-Net shows statistical improvement in dice score coefficient (DSC) with respect to only axial view (91.25+-0.52% compared to 86.40+-1.50%,P<.001). Sensitivity analysis reveals the volumetric positive impact of the contrastive loss when paired with tU-Net (2.85+-1.34% compared to 3.81+-1.88%,P<.001). Further, our approach shows good external volumetric generalization in an in-house dataset when tested with multi-view data (2.76+-1.89% compared to 3.92+-3.31%,P=.002), showing the feasibility of exploiting non-annotated multi-view data through contrastive learning whilst providing flexibility at deployment in the event of missing views.
△ Less
Submitted 15 September, 2023; v1 submitted 12 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Recurrent Neural Networks: An Embedded Computing Perspective
Authors:
Nesma M. Rezk,
Madhura Purnaprajna,
Tomas Nordström,
Zain Ul-Abdin
Abstract:
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are a class of machine learning algorithms used for applications with time-series and sequential data. Recently, there has been a strong interest in executing RNNs on embedded devices. However, difficulties have arisen because RNN requires high computational capability and a large memory space. In this paper, we review existing implementations of RNN models on embe…
▽ More
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are a class of machine learning algorithms used for applications with time-series and sequential data. Recently, there has been a strong interest in executing RNNs on embedded devices. However, difficulties have arisen because RNN requires high computational capability and a large memory space. In this paper, we review existing implementations of RNN models on embedded platforms and discuss the methods adopted to overcome the limitations of embedded systems.
We will define the objectives of map** RNN algorithms on embedded platforms and the challenges facing their realization. Then, we explain the components of RNN models from an implementation perspective. We also discuss the optimizations applied to RNNs to run efficiently on embedded platforms. Finally, we compare the defined objectives with the implementations and highlight some open research questions and aspects currently not addressed for embedded RNNs.
Overall, applying algorithmic optimizations to RNN models and decreasing the memory access overhead is vital to obtain high efficiency. To further increase the implementation efficiency, we point up the more promising optimizations that could be applied in future research. Additionally, this article observes that high performance has been targeted by many implementations, while flexibility has, as yet, been attempted less often. Thus, the article provides some guidelines for RNN hardware designers to support flexibility in a better manner.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2020; v1 submitted 23 July, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
